Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- 13 Cracking the Code: Wedgies and Lexical Respectability
- 14 Language Regard and Cultural Practice: Variation, Evaluation, and Change in the German Regional Languages
- 15 Tabula Rasa New-Dialect Formation: On the Occasional Irrelevance of Language Regard
- 16 Sharedness and Variability in Language Regard among Young Danes: Focus on Gender
- Index
- References
14 - Language Regard and Cultural Practice: Variation, Evaluation, and Change in the German Regional Languages
from Part III - Language Regard and Language Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- 13 Cracking the Code: Wedgies and Lexical Respectability
- 14 Language Regard and Cultural Practice: Variation, Evaluation, and Change in the German Regional Languages
- 15 Tabula Rasa New-Dialect Formation: On the Occasional Irrelevance of Language Regard
- 16 Sharedness and Variability in Language Regard among Young Danes: Focus on Gender
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language RegardMethods, Variation and Change, pp. 249 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Allport, Gordon. 1935. Attitudes. In Murchison, Carl (ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology, 789–844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Anders, Christina. 2010. Wahrnehmungsdialektologie. Das Obersächsische im Alltagsverständnis von Laien. Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 36. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Delbecque, Nicole, Auwera, Johan van der, & Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.), Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, 8–42. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 163. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2013. State borders and language change. The (non-)effects of political border permeability on language. In Gilles, Peter, Koff, Harlan, Maganda, Carmen, & Schulz, Christian (eds.), Theorizing Borders through Analyses of Power Relationships, 225–247. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.). 2010. Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1. Theories and Methods. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, Martha, Walker, Iain, & Donaghue, Ngaire (eds.). 2014. Social Cognition. 3rd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Barbour, Stephen & Stevenson, Patrick. 1990. Variation in German: A Critical Approach to German Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bassili, John & Brown, Rick. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair, & Zanna, Mark (eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes, 543–573. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blume, Thomas. 2003. Ideologie. In Rehfus, Wulff (ed.), Handwörterbuch Philosophie. Stuttgart: UTB, 401.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice & Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Fishbein, Martin & Ajzen, Icek. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Frings, Theodor. 1956. Sprache und Geschichte. Vol. 1–3. Mitteldeutsche Studien 16–18. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Dirk. 1996. Kulturalistische Handlungstheorie. In Hartmann, Dirk & Janich, Peter (eds.), Methodischer Kulturalismus – zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, 70–114. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Herrgen, Joachim. 2010. The Linguistic Atlas of the Middle Rhine (MRhSA): A study on the emergence and spread of regional dialects. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 668–686.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Auer, Peter, & Kerswill, Paul. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect Change: The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Europe, 1–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In Hobsbawm, Eric & Ranger, Terence (eds.), The Invention of Tradition, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970 [1936]. The Crisis of the European Sciences. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Carl. 1971 [1921]. Psychological Types. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 6. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kasper, Simon. 2015. Instruction Grammar. From Perception via Grammar to Action. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 293. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kehrein, Roland. 2012. Regionalsprachliche Spektren im Raum – zur linguistischen Struktur der Vertikale. ZDL Beihefte 152. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. 2003. From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics 31. 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lameli, Alfred. 2013. Strukturen im Sprachraum: Analysen zur arealtypologischen Komplexität der Dialekte in Deutschland. Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra. 2010. Emergence of varieties through restructuring and reevaluation. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 295–315.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus. 1996. Varietätenkonvergenz. Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Mattheier, Klaus (eds.), Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Europe. Sociolinguistica, special issue 10. 31–52.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1). 233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Varatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Does Language Regard Vary? In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 1–36.Google Scholar
Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2008. Regionalsprachlichkeit im Hörerurteil. In Christen, Helen & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Sprechen, Schreiben, Hören – zur Produktion und Perzeption von Dialekt und Standardsprache zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts, 183–202. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2011a. Regionalsprache und Hörerurteil. Grundzüge einer perzeptiven Variationslinguistik. ZDL Beihefte 149. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2011b. Regional linguistic knowledge and perception – On the conceptualization of Hessian. In Nerbonne, John, Grondelaers, Stefan, Speelman, Dirk, & Perea, Maria-Pilar (eds.), Production, Perception and Attitude. Dialectologia, Special Issue II. 91–118.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014a. “I remember it like it was interesting.” Zur Theorie von Salienz und Pertinenz. In Christen, Helen & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Die Vermessung der Salienz(forschung). Linguistik Online 66. 31–50.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014b. REACT – Einstellungen als evaluative Routinen in sozialen Praxen. In Cuonz, Christina & Studler, Rebekka (eds.), Sprechen über Sprache: Perspektiven und neue Methoden der linguistischen Einstellungsforschung, 123–142. Stauffenberg Linguistik 81. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014c. Wort und Totschlag – Zur sozio-symbolischen Bedeutung sprachlicher Divergenz. In Krefeld, Thomas & Pustka, Elissa (eds.), Perzeptive Linguistik. Phonetik – Semantik – Varietäten, 51–64. ZDL Beihefte 157. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2015a. REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 37–54.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2015b. Das Holz, die Axt, der Hieb: Über den Zusammenhang von Einstellung und Handeln am Beispiel des Handlungsschemas ‘Holz hacken’. In Langhanke, Robert (ed.), Sprache, Literatur, Raum: Festgabe für Willy Diercks, 145–162. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. in preparation. Praxis und Struktur. Eine Philosophie der Selbstbehauptung. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Rocholl, Josephine. 2015. Ostmitteldeutsch – eine moderne Regionalsprache? Eine Untersuchung zu Konstanz und Wandel im thüringisch-obersächsischen Sprachraum. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 118. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Russ, Charles (ed.). 1990. The Dialects of Modern German. A Linguistic Survey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Trans. Wolfgang Fleischer. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für deutsche Sprache und Literatur 25. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich. 1986. Die mittelfränkischen Tonakzente: (Rheinische Akzentuierung). Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2010. Language and Space: The Linguistic Dynamics Approach. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 201–225.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich & Herrgen, Joachim. 2011. Sprachdynamik: Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. Zaner, Richard (ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1903. Soziologie des Raumes. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 27(1). 27–71.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2012. Current issues in the social psychological study of ‘language attitudes’: constructionism, context, and the attitude-behavior link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4). 212–224.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2015. Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 55–84.Google Scholar
Vorberger, Lars. in press. Sprachvariation in Büdingen. In Ganswindt, Brigitte & Purschke, Christoph (eds.), Variation und Wandel im Blickpunkt. Beiträge aus dem Forum Sprachvariation. Germanistische Linguistik 237/238, 395–431. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1980. Die Stellung der Dialekte Hessens im Mitteldeutschen. In Friebertshäuser, Hans & Hildebrandt, Reiner (eds.), Sprache und Brauchtum: Bernhard Martin zum 90. Geburtstag, 68–148. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 100. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1983. Die Einteilung der deutschen Dialekte. In Besch, Werner, Knoop, Ulrich, Putschke, Wolfgang, & Wiegand, Herbert Ernst (eds.), Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung, Vol. 2, 807–900. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by