Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T21:52:33.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2010

Austin Sarat
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts
Matthew Anderson
Affiliation:
University of New England, Maine
Cathrine O. Frank
Affiliation:
University of New England, Maine
Get access

Summary

From the “Trial of the Century” to the Century of the Trial

On January 31, 2005, the “trial of the century” began in Santa Barbara, California, as pop star Michael Jackson was accused of conspiracy to abduct a child, as well as various other lewd acts against children. At the same time, on the other side of the world, another “trial of the century” was already in progress, that of Slobodan Milosevic, the former president of Serbia, before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for crimes against humanity and genocide. This trial followed on the heels of yet another “trial of the century” – the trial of two Libyan men in Camp Zeist, the Netherlands, accused of murdering the passengers of Pan Am flight 103 by exploding a bomb over Lockerbie, Scotland. This trial took place only a few years after the trial of O. J. Simpson for murder in 1995, a trial that was in its time widely claimed to be the trial of the century – albeit a different century. Indeed, it is possible to find the claim being made about large numbers of trials going back to the early years of the twentieth century – although in these earlier cases the claim is more often made by later commentators than contemporary observers. Thus other candidates for the “trial of the century” include variously the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (1951), the Nuremberg trials (1945), the Scopes “Monkey” trial (1925), the trial of Leopold and Loeb (1924), and back to the trial of Harry Thaw (1906) – and large numbers of trials in between.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and the Humanities
An Introduction
, pp. 455 - 477
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, Natalie Zemon, The Return of Martin Guerre (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha, A Princely Impostor? The Strange and Universal History of the Kumar of Bhawal (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Deutsch, Linda, “Trials of the Century,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 33:2 (2000) 743Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, The Juridical Unconscious: Trials and Trauma in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002) 3–7Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence, The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin, 1977) Part IGoogle Scholar
Gatrell, A. C., The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People 1776–1868 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Beattie, John, Crime and the Courts 1660–1800 (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Cairns, David J. A., Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998) ch. 3Google Scholar
Taylor, Katharine F., In the Theater of Criminal Justice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
McGowen, Randall, “The Image of Justice and Reform of the Criminal Law in Early Nineteenth-Century England,” Buffalo Law Review 32 (1983) 89–125Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas, “Property, Authority, and the Criminal Law” in Hay, D. et al., Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England (London: Allen Lane, 1975)Google Scholar
Jackson, R. M., “The Incidence of Jury Trial during the Past Century,” Modern Law Review 1 (1937), 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, George, Plea Bargaining's Triumph (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
McConville, Michael and Mirsky, Chester, Jury Trials and Plea Bargaining: A True History (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
May, Allison N., The Bar and the Old Bailey 1750–1850 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Langbein, John H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Duff, Antony, Farmer, Lindsay, Marshall, Sandra, and Tadros, Victor, The Trial on Trial III: Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007) ch. 2Google Scholar
Dubber, M. D. and Farmer, L., Modern Histories of Crime and Punishment (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia, “‘Rejouer Les Crimes.’ Theater vs. Video,” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 13 (Spring 2001) 119 at 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen, Conviction! Law, the State, and the Construction of Justice (London: Macmillan, 1981)Google Scholar
Garland, David, Punishment and Modern Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 70 ff.
Garfinkel, Harold, “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies,” American Journal of Sociology (1956) 420–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodensky, Lisa, The Crime in Mind: Criminal Responsibility and the Victorian Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Bender, John, Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Bennet, Lance and Feldman, Martha, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Umphrey, Martha Merrill, “The Dialogics of Legal Meaning: Spectacular Trials, the Unwritten Law, and Narratives of Criminal Responsibility,” Law and Society Review 33 (1999) 393–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Martin, “Judges v. Jurors: Courtroom Tensions in Murder Trials and the Law of Criminal Responsibility in Nineteenth-Century England,” Law and History Review 17 (1999) 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Clare, Ordering Law: The Architectural and Social History of the English Law Court to 1914 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003)Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul (ed.), Essential Works of Foucault 1954–84. Vol. 3 Power (ed. Faubion, James D.) (New York: New Press, 2000) 1–89
Francois, Faubion J., “Aveu, Verite, Justice et Subjectivite. Autour d'un enseignement de Michel Foucault,” Juridiques 7 (1981) 163–82Google Scholar
Bentley, David, English Criminal Justice in the Nineteenth Century (London: Hambledon, 1998) 63–4, 275–7Google Scholar
Jones, Carol, Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine, and the Practice of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974–1975 (London: Verso, 2003) 8Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara, “The Beyond Reasonable Doubt Doctrine: ‘Moral Comfort’ or Standard of Proof,” Law and Humanities 2:2 (2008) 149–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q., “Response to Shapiro,” Law and Humanities 2:2 (2008) 175–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara, “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” and “Probable Cause.” Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Welsh, Alexander, Strong Representations: Narrative and Circumstantial Evidence in England (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Shramm, Jan-Melissa, Testimony and Advocacy in Victorian Law, Literature, and Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949)Google Scholar
Summerscale, Kate, The Suspicions of Mr Whicher: A Shocking Murder and the Undoing of a Great Victorian Detective (New York: Walker & Co., 2008)Google Scholar
Eigen, J. P., Unconscious Crime: Mental Absence and Criminal Responsibility in Victorian London (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003) 158–60Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin, Reconstructing the Criminal: Culture, Law, and Policy in England 1830–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Oldham, James, “Truth-Telling in the Eighteenth-Century English Courtroom,” Law and History Review 12 (1994) 95 at 100–1Google Scholar
Schneider, Wendie, “Perjurious Albion: Perjury Prosecutions and the Victorian Trial,” Law and History, Lewis, Andrew and Lobban, Michael, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Reik, Theodor, The Compulsion to Confess: On the Psychoanalysis of Crime and Punishment (New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Cudahy, 1959)Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter, Troubling Confessions: Speaking Guilt in Law and Literature (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Freud, S., “Psycho-Analysis and the Establishment of Facts in Legal Proceedings,” Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 9 (London: Hogarth Press, 1959)Google Scholar
Gross, Hans, Criminal Psychology: A Manual for Judges, Practitioners, and Students (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1911)Google Scholar
Münsterberg, Hugo, On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime (New York: Doubleday, Page & Co., 1909)Google Scholar
Valier, Clare, “True Crime Stories: Scientific Methods of Criminal Investigation, Criminology, and HistoriographyBritish Journal of Criminology 38 (1998) 97–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Dr. William, the notorious poisoner; see “The Demeanour of Murderers,” Household Words (1856) 504–7Google Scholar
Matsuda, Matt, The Memory of the Modern (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996) ch. 5Google Scholar
Strowick, Elisabeth, “Comparative Epistemology of Suspicion: Psychoanalysis, Literature, and the Human Sciences,” Science in Context 18 (2005) 649–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, Lindsay, “Arthur and Oscar (and Sherlock): The Reconstructive Trial and the ‘Hermeneutics of Suspicion,’International Commentary on Evidence (2007) (Article 4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Robert A., The Trial in American Life (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007) 28Google Scholar
MacNamara, Martha J., From Tavern to Courthouse: Architecture and Ritual in American Law 1658–1860 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames, A History of the Criminal Law of England (London: Macmillan, 1883) I, 516Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., “On Stage: Some Historical Notes About Criminal Justice,” Social Science, Social Policy, and the Law, Ewick, Patricia, Kagan, Robert A., and Sarat, Austin, eds. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999) 77Google Scholar
Ball, Milner S., “The Play's the Thing: An Unscientific Reflection on Courts Under the Rubric of Theater,” Stanford Law Review 28:1 (1975) 81–115 at 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter, “Screening Law,” Law and Literature 21:1 (2009) 1–23 at 7–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone, “Legal Performance: Good and Bad,” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 4 (2008) 179 at 180–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supiot, Alain, Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of Law (London: Verso, 2007) pt IGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, Linda, “Architects of Justice: The Politics of Courtroom Design,” Social and Legal Studies 16 (2007) 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, Judith and Curtis, Denis, “Representing Justice: From Renaissance Iconography to Twenty-First-Century Courthouses,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 151 (2007) 139Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006) I, 293–5Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P., A Theory of the Trial (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969) 145Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto, Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin, 1994) 233Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence, “Perpetrator Proceedings and Didactic Trials” in Duff, R. A. et al., The Trial on Trial II: Judgment and Calling to Account (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006) 203Google Scholar
Lahav, Pnina, “Theater in the Courtroom: The Chicago Conspiracy Trial,” Law and Literature 16 (2005) 381–474 at 394–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, Emilios, “The Objection that Cannot be Heard: Communication and Legitimacy in the Courtroom” in Duff, R. A. et al., The Trial on Trial I: Truth and Due Process (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard, When Law Goes Pop. The Vanishing Line Between Law and Culture (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter, “Europe in America: Grammatology, Legal Studies, and the Politics of Transmission,” Columbia Law Review 101:8 (2001) 2033–84 at 2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garapon, Antoine, “Justice Out of Court: The Dangers of Trial by Media,” Law as Communication, Nelken, David, ed. (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996)Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia and Ogger, Sara, “Tele-Tribunals: Anatomy of a Medium,” Grey Room 10 (Winter 2003) 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, Linda, “The Unbearable Lightness of Being? Shifts Towards the Virtual Trial,” Journal of Law and Society 35 (2008) 464–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirtz, Peter, “Victims and Voyeurs: Two Narrative Problems at the Criminal Trial,” Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law, Brooks, Peter and Gewirtz, Peter, eds. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Pizzi, William, Trials Without Truth (New York: New York University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Frankel, Marvin E., “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 23 (1975) 1031 at 1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan, “Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure,” University Pennsylvania Law Review 21 (1973) 506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, Richard, Liturgies and Trials: The Secularization of Religious Language (London: Blackwell, 1982) 51Google Scholar
Dennis, Ian, The Law of Evidence, 3rd ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007) 12Google Scholar
Smith, John C., “Evidence in Criminal Cases,” The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process, McConville, Michael and Wilson, Geoffrey, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 184Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard, Law, Fact, and Narrative Coherence (Liverpool: Deborah Charles, 1988)Google Scholar
Umphrey, Martha M., “Fragile Performances: The Dialogics of Judgment in ‘A Theory of the Trial,’Law and Social Inquiry 28 (2003) 527–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone, “Literature, the Rights of Man, and Narratives of Atrocity: Historical Backgrounds to the Culture of Testimony,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 17 (2005) 253–83Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, Emilios and Veitch, Scott, eds., Lethe's Law: Justice, Law, and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)
Berman, Paul Schiff, “Rats, Pigs, and Statues on Trial: The Creation of Cultural Narratives in the Prosecution of Animals and Inanimate Objects,” New York University Law Review 69 (1994) 288 at 292Google Scholar
Hoffer, Peter Charles, “Invisible Worlds and Criminal Trials: The Cases of John Proctor and O. J. Simpson,” American Journal of Legal History 41 (1997) 287 at 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Lindsay, “‘With all the Impressiveness and Substantial Value of Truth’: Notable Trials and Criminal Justice, 1750–1930,” Law and Humanities 1:1 (2007) 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco, Signs Taken for Wonders: On the Sociology of Literary Forms (London: Verso, 1983) ch. 5Google Scholar
Grossman, Jonathan H., The Art of Alibi: English Law Courts and the Novel (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2002)Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law (New York: Transaction, 1997)Google Scholar
The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973) 91

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×