Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:31:36.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The independence of the international judiciary: some introductory thoughts

from PART IV - New challenges in international adjudication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Philippe Sands
Affiliation:
Professor of Law and Director of the Centre for International Courts and Tribunals University College London
Steve Charnovitz
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Debra P. Steger
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Peter Van den Bossche
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Florentino Feliciano has contributed greatly to the development of international law as scholar, practitioner, judge, and arbitrator. He has a deserved reputation for excellence, independence, and integrity. Amongst his many contributions, I feel especially privileged to have benefited from his counsel and advice as a founding member of the Steering Committee of the Project on International Courts and Tribunals. He was amongst those who actively encouraged the Project to focus on the independence of the international judiciary. This is a subject that has attracted greater attention as international courts and tribunals increase in number and in influence.

The first efforts to establish a standing international court occurred in the 1890s; they foundered for the simple reason that the states involved in the diplomatic negotiation of the Hague Peace Conference of 1899 could not agree on the method of appointing the judges, in particular how to balance the competing interests of, on the one hand, the desire of every participating state to have a judge on the court with, on the other hand, the need for a tribunal of manageable proportions (imagine a national Supreme or Constitutional Court of fifty or more judges …).

The first international court – the Central American Court of Justice – was established in 1907, between a small enough number of states to dispose of the obstacle on which the Hague discussions foundered. At this court each participating state had a judge on the bench.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law in the Service of Human Dignity
Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano
, pp. 313 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×