Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:17:36.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Back to the future?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Stephanie Carvin
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michael John Williams
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Reportedly fed up with complicated and protracted operations overseas, top Pentagon officials acknowledged this week they were desperate to be given just one straightforward, no-nonsense military engagement they could really knock out of the park.

“Given all these messy, ambiguous conflicts we’ve been fighting against enemies you can’t even put your finger on, what we could really use right now is a plain old war against a clear-cut bad guy employing conventional tactics and weaponry,” said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “No roadside bombs or plainclothes militants hiding out among innocent civilians – just a fair fight where two sides shoot at each other and someone wins. That’s it.”

Citing the country’s long history of winning wars against sovereign nations with actual standing armies, the Pentagon’s top brass repeatedly assured reporters they would “completely wipe the floor” with such an opponent if given the chance, and promised they would make America “very, very proud.”

The Onion, March 28, 2012

The story of the United States at war is a tale of a country greatly influenced by its liberal political culture, geographic position and history. The United States uniquely adapted a specific Western way of war, starting in the early days of the republic, to wage war in a manner compatible with its liberal norms. Isolated geographically, and with a history of military engagements conceptualized as “all or nothing struggles,” the American people, American politicians and the American military developed a view of war as an aberration – a necessary struggle to be won quickly, but to also be won in a more or less humane way. A liberal nation, enthralled with science and technology, it has sought to apply its technological prowess to achieve this goal. This has worked in some cases, principally where the opponent fights by the same normative standards, but it has failed spectacularly in others, mainly those that are inter-cultural in nature. Today’s challenges, and those of the medium term, are no different.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
The Quest for Humanity in Conflict
, pp. 201 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, KennethPredators over Pakistan,” The Weekly Standard (March 8, 2010), 26–34Google Scholar
David, Steven R., “Fatal Choices: Israel’s Policy of Targeted Killing,” Mideast Security and Policy Studies, No. 51 (2002)Google Scholar
“Israel’s Policy of Targeted Killing,” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2003), 111–126CrossRef
If Not Combatants, Certainly Not Civilians,” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2003), 138–140CrossRef
Dershowitz, Alan, “Targeted Killing Vindicated,” Huffington Post (May 2, 2011). Available at: Google Scholar
Gross, Michael L., “Fighting by Other Means in the Mideast: A Critical Analysis of Israel’s Assassination Policy,” Political Studies, Vol. 51 (2003), 350–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assassination and Targeted Killing: Law Enforcement, Execution or Self-Defence?”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2006), 323–335CrossRef
Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N.Drone Attacks under the Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello: Clearing the ‘Fog of Law,’Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 13 (2011), 311–326Google Scholar
Stein, Yael, “By Any Name Illegal and Immoral,” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2003), 127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel, “Do Targeted Killings Work?”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2 (2006), 95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Do Targeted Killings Work?”, Foreign Policy (July 2009)
Hafez, Mohammed M. and Hatfield, Joseph M., “Do Targeted Assassinations Work? A Multivariate Analysis of Israeli Counter-Terrorism Effectiveness during Al-Aqsa Uprising,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 29, No. 4 (2006), 359–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Patrick B.International Security, Vol. 36, No. 4 (2012), 47–79CrossRef
Jordan, Jenna, “‘When Heads Roll’ Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation,” Security Studies, Vol. 18 (2006), 719–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, Lisa, Sarapu, Alexander J. and Wells, Matthew, “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers,” Journal of Public and International Affairs, Vol. 15 (Spring 2004), 59–78Google Scholar
Mannes, Aaron A. (2008), “Testing the Snake Head Strategy: Does Killing or Capturing its Leaders Reduce a Terrorist Group’s Activity?”, Journal of International Policy Solutions, Vol. 9 (Spring 2008), 40–49Google Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie, “The Trouble with Targeted Killing,” Security Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3 (2012), 529–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeal, Greg, “Army Publishes New ‘Manual’ on Preventing Harm to Civilians,” Forbes (July 19, 2012)Google Scholar
Williams, Michael, “The Fatally Flawed Logic of a No-Fly Zone,” Guardian: Comment is Free (March 17, 2011)Google Scholar
Cook, Martin, “Teaching Military Ethics in the United States Air Force: Challenges Posed by Service Culture,” in Carrick, Don, Connelly, James and Robinson, Paul (eds.), Ethics Education for Irregular Warfare (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), pp. 107–111, p. 110Google Scholar
Tavernise, Sabrina, “As Fewer Americans Serve, Gap is Growing between Civilians and Military,” New York Times, March 24, 2011Google Scholar
Williams, M. J., “The Coming Revolution in Foreign Affairs: Rethinking American National Security,” International Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 6 (2008), 1112–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, Christopher, Waging War without Warriors (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002), p. 59Google Scholar
van Creveld, Martin, “War,” in Cowley, Robert and Parker, Geoffrey (eds.), The Osprey Companion to Military History (London: Osprey, 1996), pp. 497–498Google Scholar
Alvin, and Toffler, Heidi, War and Anti-War (New York: Grand Central Publishing, 1995), p. 134Google Scholar
Coker, Christopher, Humane Warfare (London: Routledge, 2001), p. 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Robert M., “The Quiet Fury of Robert Gates,” The Wall Street Journal (January 7, 2014)Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984), p. 336Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin, “Risk Transfer Militarism, Small Massacres and the Historical Legitimacy of War,” International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 3 (December 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles, How Enemies Become Friends: The Source of Stable Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles, Adler, Emmanuel, Coicaud, Jean-Marc and Khong, Yuen Foong, Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×