Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:19:14.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Vietnam and the “science” of war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Stephanie Carvin
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michael John Williams
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

All wars and military development should have taught us that … a war, small or large, does not follow a prescribed “scenario” laid out in advance. If we could predict the sequence of events more accurately, we could probably have avoided war in the first place.

Vice Admiral Rickover, 1966, cited in Gibson, The Perfect War

When the Nixon Administration took over in 1969 all data on North Vietnam and the United States was fed into a Pentagon computer – populations, gross national product, manufacturing capability, number of tanks, ships, and aircraft, size of the armed forces, and the like. The computer was then asked, “When will we win?” It took only moments to give the answer: “You won in 1964!”

Colonel Harry Summers, “Lessons: A Soldier’s View”

America’s war in Vietnam was almost without historical precedent. Aside from the insurgency in the Philippines, the United States had not ever fought a war without any fronts. Although the American military had engaged in several “small wars” over the course of American history, nothing matched the challenge and scope of what was then known as the Vietnam “conflict.” Unlike Britain, the United States had little experience in colonial policing, as these irregular wars were often known. Coming on the heels of Korea, the United States was reluctant to get fully involved in a traditional ground war in Asia. The atomic bomb was briefly considered as a possibility to stop communist expansion in Vietnam, but the Eisenhower Administration ruled out this option since it thought that it would ultimately be counterproductive. This left the United States with limited options. Yet, the Americans felt that something had to be done as the “domino theory,” which held great sway in Washington, argued that the expansion of communism could not be left unchecked.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
The Quest for Humanity in Conflict
, pp. 88 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, P. D., Doomsday Men: The Real Dr. Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon (London: Allen Lane, 2007), pp. 356–358.Google Scholar
Bernard, and Brodie, Fawn M., From Crossbow to H-Bomb: The Evolution of the Weapons and Tactics of Warfare (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973), pp. 282–283.Google Scholar
United States Objectives and Programs for National Security (April 14, 1950), A Report to the President Pursuant to the President’s Directive of January 31, 1950. Available at: (accessed June 30, 2014)
Gray, Chris Hables, Postmodern War: The New Politics of Conflict (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 138.Google Scholar
Herken, Gregg, Counsels of War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 51Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, “War in the Atomic Age,” in Brodie, (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1946), p. 76Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell, The Uncertain Trumpet (New York: Harper, 1980)Google Scholar
The Transformation of War (New York: The Free Press, 1991), p. 9
Bousquet, Antoine, The Scientific Way of Warfare (London: Hurst, 2009), p. 96Google Scholar
van Creveld, Martin, Technology and War (New York: Touchstone, 1991), p. 239Google Scholar
Thomas, Clayton J. and Sheldon, Robert S., “Air Force Operations Analysis,” in Harris, Carl and Gass, Saul (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Operations Research and Management Science (Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000), p. 8.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984), p. 87Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “Implementing Flexible Response: Vietnam as a Test Case,” in Art, Robert J. and Waltz, Kenneth N. (eds.), The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), p. 222Google Scholar
Buley, Benjamin, The New American Way of War: Military Culture and the Political Utility of Force (London: Routledge, 2008), p. 56Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice, Reading Clausewitz (London: Pimlico, 2002), p. 159Google Scholar
Gibson, James, The Perfect War (New York: Atlantic Monthly, 2000), p. ixGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul, The Closed World: Systems Discourse (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), p. 155Google Scholar
George, and Friedmans, Meredith, The Future of War (New York: Griffin, 1977), pp. 52–59Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, Strategies of Containment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 255Google Scholar
Leckie, Robert, The Wars of America (New York: Harper & Row, 1981), p. 945Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell, The American Way of War (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1973), p. 457Google Scholar
Public Papers of the President of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1962 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1963), p. 454
Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win: Airpower and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), p. 174Google Scholar
Tin, Bui, From Enemy to Friend: A North Vietnamese Perspective on the War (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Clifford, Clark and Holbrook, Richard, Counsel to the President: A Memoir (New York: Random House, 1991);Google Scholar
Duiker, William J., Sacred War: Nationalism and Revolution in a Divided Vietnam (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995);Google Scholar
Ehrhart, W. D., Passing Time: Memoir of a Vietnam Veteran Against the War, second edition (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995);Google Scholar
Herring, George C., America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001);Google Scholar
Hunt, David, Vietnam’s Southern Revolution: From Peasant Insurrection to Total War (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Lawrence, Mark Atwood, The Vietnam War: A Concise International History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008);Google Scholar
Summers, Jr. Harry G., On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1982);Google Scholar
Westmoreland, William, A Soldier Reports (New York: Doubleday, 1976);Google Scholar
Young, Marilyn B., Fitzgerald, John J. and Grunfeld, A. Tom, The Vietnam War: A History in Documents (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002);Google Scholar
Zaffiri, Samuel, Westmoreland (New York: William Morrow, 1994)Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (Westport, CT: Greenview Press, 1977), pp. 2–3Google Scholar
Leckie, Robert, The Wars of America (New York: Harper & Row, 1981), p. 980Google Scholar
Boot, Max, The Savage Wars of Peace (New York: Basic Books, 2002), p. 301Google Scholar
Tucker, Spencer, The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History (Oxford: ABC-CLIO, 2011), p. 1070Google Scholar
Osborne, Milton E., Strategic Hamlets in South Viet-Nam: A Survey and Comparison (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Elliot, David W. P., The Vietnamese War: Revolution and Social Change in the Mekong Delta, 1930–1975 (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 2003), p. 232Google Scholar
Zasloff, J. J., “Rural Resettlements in South Vietnam: The Agroville Program,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Winter 1962–1963), 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Neil, Smith, Hedrick, Kenworthy, E. W. and Butterfield, Fox, The Pentagon Papers (New York: Bantam, 1971);Google Scholar
Van Tra, Tran, “Tet: The 1968 General Offensive and General Uprising,” in Werner, Jayne S. and Huynh, Luu Doan (eds.), The Vietnam War: Vietnamese and American Perspectives (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1994);Google Scholar
Willbanks, James H., The Tet Offensive: A Concise History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008);Google Scholar
Wirtz, James J., The Tet Offensive: Intelligence Failure in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Solis, Gary, Marine Lawyers and Military Law in Vietnam (Quantico, VA: US Marine Corps Press, 1989), p. 34Google Scholar
Krulak, Charles C. and Hoar, Joseph P., “Fear Was No Excuse to Condone Torture,” Miami Herald, September 11, 2009Google Scholar
Borch, Frederic L., Judge Advocates in Combat: Army Lawyers in Military Operations from Vietnam to Haiti (Washington, D.C.: Office of the Judge Advocate General and Center for Military History United States Army, 2001), p. 22Google Scholar
Prugh, Gary, Law at War, 1964–1973 (Washington D.C.: Department of the Army, 1975), p. 107Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, “Crimes and Hostilities,” Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 60, No. 9 (September 1976), 38–39, p. 38Google Scholar
Lewey, Guenter, America in Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 330Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, “The United States Military: Inculcating an Ethos,” Social Research, Vol. 69, No. 4 (Winter 2002), 981–1015, p. 984Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey, Law and War since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 364Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T., War without End: American Planning for the Next Vietnam (New York: Knopf, 1972)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×