BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alan Paterson

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511998362.008

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Alan Paterson

Show author details

Alan Paterson: Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Lawyers and the Public Good
Democracy in Action?
, pp. 198 - 211

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998362.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, R.English Lawyers between Market and StateOxford University Press 2003Google Scholar

Abel, R.The Decline of ProfessionalismModern Law Review, 49 1986 1CrossRef Google Scholar

American Bar Association 1986

Arthurs, H. W.The Dead Parrot: Does Professional Self-regulation Exhibit Vital Signs?Alberta Law Review, 33 1995 800Google Scholar

Australian Governmentwww.ag.gov.au/a2jwww.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf

Baker, L.Brandeis and Frankfurter, A Dual BiographyNew YorkHarper & Row 1984Google Scholar

Baksi, C. 2010

Barak, A.The Judge in a DemocracyPrinceton University Press 2006Google Scholar

Beaton, G.Why Professionalism is still Relevant 2010 au.linkedin.com/in/georgerbeatonGoogle Scholar

Bellingham, H.

Bindman, G.

Bindman, G.Robins, J.Pro Bono: Good Enough?Solicitors Journal 2010 www.solicitorsjournal.com/pictures/web/s/h/d/SJ%20Pro%20Bono.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bingham, Lord T.The Rule of LawLondonAllen Lane 2010Google Scholar

Bingham, Lord T.The Rule of LawCambridge Law Journal 66 2007 67CrossRef Google Scholar

Blom-Cooper, L.Drewry, G.Final AppealOxfordClarendon Press 1972Google Scholar

Boffey, E.Raising the Bar: The Impact of Solicitor Advocates in ScotlandHonours Dissertation 2010Google Scholar

Bogdanor, V.The New British ConstitutionOxfordHart Publishing 2009Google Scholar

Boon, A.Postmodern Professions?Journal of Law and Society 32 2005 473CrossRef Google Scholar

Boon, A.Levin, J.The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and WalesOxfordHart Publishing 2008Google Scholar

Burke, E.Reason in Common SenseDover 1980Google Scholar

Canivet, G.Independence, Accountability and the JudiciaryLondonBIICL 2006Google Scholar

Cape, E.Moorhead, R. 2005

Cappelletti, M.Garth, B.Access to JusticeAmsterdamSitjoff & Noordhoff 1978

Carter, Lord D.Legal Aid, A Market-based Approach to ReformLondonDepartment for Constitutional Affairs 2006Google Scholar

Cashman, P.Third Party Funding: A Changing LandscapeCivil Justice Quarterly 27 2008 312Google Scholar

Caulkin, S. 2006

Ciolino, D.Redefining Professionalism as Seeking’,Loyola Law Review 49 2003 229Google Scholar

Clark, M.Introducing a Parliamentary Confirmation Process for New Supreme Court JusticesPublic Law 2010 464Google Scholar

Clementi, D.Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services in England and WalesLondonMinistry of Justice 2004

Coulehan, J.Wear, D.Professionalism in MedicineNew YorkSpringer 2006Google Scholar

Cownie, F.Cocks, R.A Great and Noble OccupationOxfordHart Publishing 2009Google Scholar

Dare, T.The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s RoleAldershotAshgate 2009Google Scholar

Decker, C.Yarrow, G.Understanding the Economic Rationale for Legal Services RegulationLondonRegulatory Policy Institute 2010Google Scholar

Dickson, B.The Processing of Appeals in the House of LordsLaw Quarterly Review 123 2007 571Google Scholar

Director General of Fair TradingCompetition in the ProfessionsLondonOffice of Fair Trading 2001Google Scholar

Edwards, H. T.The Effects of Collegiality on Judicial Decision-MakingUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 2003 1639CrossRef Google Scholar

European Commission for the Efficiency of JusticeFourth Evaluation Report on European Judicial SystemsStrasbourgCouncil of Europe 2010Google Scholar

Foundation for Law, Justice and Society 2011 www.fljs.org/section.aspx?id=2946

Galanter, M.Access to Justice in a World of Expanding Social CapabilityFordham Urban Law Journal 37 2010 115Google Scholar

Galanter, M.Lowering the Bar, Lawyer Jokes and Legal CultureUniversity of Wisconsin Press 2005Google Scholar

Galanter, M.Why the “Haves” come out AheadLaw and Society Law Review, 9 1974 95CrossRef Google Scholar

Garth, B.Rethinking the Legal Profession’s Approach to Collective Self-Improvement: Competence and the Consumer PerspectiveWisconsin Law Review 1983 639Google Scholar

Gearty, C.Can Human Rights Survive?Cambridge University Press 2006CrossRef Google Scholar

Genn, H.Judging Civil JusticeCambridge University Press 2008Google Scholar

Genn, H.Paths to Justice ScotlandOxfordHart Publishing 2001Google Scholar

Genn, H.Paths to JusticeOxfordHart Publishing 1999Google Scholar

Gibb, F. 2010

Gibb, F. 2009

Gill, B.Scottish Civil Courts Review 2009 www.scotcourts.gov.uk/civilcourtsreview/theReport/Vol1Chap1_9.pdfGoogle Scholar

Glasser, C.The Legal Profession in the 1990sLegal Studies, 10 1990 1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goriely, T. 2003

Goriely, T.

Griffith, J.The Brave New World of Sir John LawsModern Law Review 63 2000 159CrossRef Google Scholar

Griffiths, J.The Distribution of Legal Services in the NetherlandsBritish Journal of Law and Society 4 1977 282CrossRef Google Scholar

Hafferty, F.Stern, D.Measuring Medical ProfessionalismOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar

Hale, Lady B.Andenas, M.Fairgrieve, D.Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the LawOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Hale, Lady B.Equality and the Judiciary: Why Should we Want More Women Judges?Public Law 2001 489Google Scholar

Hammond, G.Judicial RecusalHart Publishing 2009Google Scholar

Hand, J.The Compensation CultureJournal of Law and Society 37 2010 569CrossRef Google Scholar

Hanlon, G.Lawyers, the State and the MarketLondonMacmillan 1990Google Scholar

Harvey, T.Munro, C.Thalidomide: The Legal AftermathFarnboroughSaxon House 1976Google Scholar

Hough, B. 2009 www.ilagnet.org/papers.php

Hunt, P.Legal Services Regulation ReviewLondonLaw Society 2009Google Scholar

Hurlburt, W. H.The Self-Regulation of the Legal Profession in Canada and in England and WalesEdmontonAlberta, Law Society of Alberta and Alberta Law Reform Institute 2000Google Scholar

Hynes, S. 2010

Hynes, S.Robins, J.The Justice GapLondonLegal Action Group 2009Google Scholar

Irvine, LordModernising JusticeLondonLord Chancellor’s Department 1998Google Scholar

Jackson, Lord R.Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final ReportMinistry of Justice 2010 www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/jackson-final-report-140110.pdfGoogle Scholar

Janes, L.

Kafka, F.The TrialLondonPenguin Books 1994Google Scholar

Kenny, C.The Paradoxes of Regulatory ReformOxford/Harvard Legal Symposium 2009 www.legalservicesboard.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Kilian, M. 2010

Kinsella, N.

Kritzer, H.The Professions are Dead, Long live the Professions: Legal Practice in a Post Professional WorldLaw and Society Review, 33 1999 713CrossRef Google Scholar

Kronman, A.The Lost LawyerCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1993Google Scholar

Law Society of England and Wales 2011 www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/legal-aid-reform-151110.htm

Law Society of England and WalesAccess to Justice ReviewLondonLaw Society 2010Google Scholar

Lee, J.A Defence of Concurring SpeechesPublic Law 2009 305Google Scholar

Legal Action Group 2011

Legal Services BoardUnderstanding the Economic Rationale for Legal Services Regulation – A Collection Of EssaysLondonLegal Services Board 2011Google Scholar

Legal Services Board 2010 www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/what_we_do/pdf/20100929_referral_fees.pdf

Legal Services Commission 2010 www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/cds_main/QAADiscussionPaper_Feb2010.pdf

Legal Services Consumer PanelQuality in Legal ServicesLondonLegal Services Consumer Panel 2010Google Scholar

Legal Services InstituteThe Regulation of Legal ServicesLondonCollege of Law 2011Google Scholar

Legal Services OmbudsmanAnnual Report, 2001–2002LondonStationery Office 2002

Legg, T.Judges for the New CenturyPublic Law 2001 62Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A.Developing Mechanisms for Judicial Accountability in the UKLegal Studies, 24 2004 73CrossRef Google Scholar

Liptak, A.Justices are Long on Words but Short on GuidanceNew York Times 2010Google Scholar

Loughrey, J.Corporate Lawyers and Corporate Governance: International Corporate Law and Financial Market RegulationCambridge University Press 2011CrossRef Google Scholar

Lukes, S.Power: A Radical ViewPalgrave Macmillan 2005CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackay, Lord J. 1995

Macqueen, H. 2010 http://womeninlaw.law.ed.ac.uk/documents/WilsonLecture.pdf

Magee, I.Review of Legal Aid Delivery and GovernanceLondonMinistry of Justice 2010 www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/legal-aid-delivery.pdfGoogle Scholar

Malleson, K. 2010

Malleson, K.Rethinking the Merit Principle in Judicial SelectionJournal of Law and Society 33 2006 126CrossRef Google Scholar

Malleson, K.Le Sueur, A.Building the UK’s New Supreme CourtOxford University Press 2004Google Scholar

Mansfield, M.

Markovits, D.A Modern Legal EthicsPrinceton University Press 2010CrossRef Google Scholar

Marks, S.Views from an Australian RegulatorJournal of the Professional Lawyer 2009 45Google Scholar

McBride, J.Access to Justice and Human Rights TreatiesCivil Justice Quarterly, 17 1998 235Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice 2010

Ministry of JusticeProposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and WalesLondonHMSO 2010

Ministry of JusticeStudy of Legal Advice and the Local LevelLondonMinistry of Justice 1999Google Scholar

Ministry of JusticeTransforming the Legal Aid SystemWellingtonMinistry of Justice 2009Google Scholar

Moorhead, R. 2010

Moorhead, R.Community Legal Advice Centres and Networks: A Process EvaluationLondonLegal Services Research Centre 2010Google Scholar

Moorhead, R.Lawyer Specialisation – Managing the Professional ParadoxLaw and Policy, 32 2010 226CrossRef Google Scholar

Moorhead, R. 2010 http://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2010/12/16

Moorhead, R.Pioneers in Practice: The Community Legal Service Pioneer Partnership Research ProjectLondonLord Chancellor’s Department 2000Google Scholar

Murray, L.The PleaderMainstream Publishing 2002Google Scholar

National Audit OfficeReport of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament on the Community Legal Service Fund and the Criminal Defence Service accounts for the year ended 31 March 2010LondonThe Stationery Office 2010

National Audit OfficeThe Procurement of Criminal Legal Aid in England and Wales by the Legal Services Commission, 27 November 2009LondonThe Stationery Office 2009

National Consumer CouncilThree Steps to Credible Self RegulationLondonNational Consumer Council 2003Google Scholar

Nelson, R.Lawyers’ Ideals/Lawyers’ Practices: Transformations in the American Legal ProfessionNew YorkCornell University Press 1992Google Scholar

Neuberger, Lord D. 2011

Nicolson, D.Webb, J.Professional Legal EthicsOxford University Press 1999Google Scholar

Ogus, A.Regulation: Legal Form and Economic TheoryOxfordHart Publishing 2004

Oliver, D.Justice, Legality and the Rule of LawOxford University Press 2009CrossRef

Panel on Fair Access to the ProfessionsUnleashing AspirationLondonInstitute of Career Guidance, Cabinet Office 2009 www.icg-uk.org/article607.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pannick, Lord D. 2011

Pannick, Lord D. 2010

Parker, C.Just LawyersOxford University Press 1999Google Scholar

Parker, C.Law Deregulation via Business DeregulationInternational Journal of the Legal Profession, 6 1999 175CrossRef Google Scholar

Parker, C.Competing Images of the Legal Profession: Competing Regulatory StrategiesInternational Journal of the Sociology of Law 25 (1997),

Passmore, C.

Paterson, A.Lee, J.From House of Lords to Supreme Court(OxfordHart Publishing 2011Google Scholar

Paterson, A.Russell, P.Malleson, K.Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial PowerUniversity of Toronto Press 2006Google Scholar

Paterson, A.Hayton, D.Law’s FutureOxfordHart Publishing 2000Google Scholar

Paterson, A.Professionalism and the Legal Services MarketInternational Journal of Legal Studies 3 1996 137Google Scholar

Paterson, A.Scottish Lords of Appeal 1876–1988The Juridical Review 1988 235Google Scholar

Paterson, A.The Law LordsLondonMacmillan 1982CrossRef Google Scholar

Paterson, A.Goriely, T.Resourcing Civil JusticeOxford University Press 1996

Paterson, A.Ritchie, B.Law, Practice and Conduct for SolicitorsEdinburghW. Green 2006Google Scholar

Pearce, R.How Law Firms can do Good while Doing Well (and the Answer is Not Pro Bono)Fordham Urban Law Journal, Symposium on Professional Challenges in Large-Firm Practice 33 2005 221Google Scholar

Pearce, R.The Professionalism Paradigm ShiftNew York University Law Review, 70 1995 1229Google Scholar

Peresie, J.Female Judges MatterYale Law Journal 114 2005 1759Google Scholar

Philippsohn, S.Mascarenhas, T.A Class ApartEuropean Law, 87 2009 14Google Scholar

Phillips, Lord N.Andenas, M.Fairgrieve, D.Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the LawOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Pleasence, P.Causes of ActionLondonThe Stationery Office 2006Google Scholar

Reshaping Medical Workforce Project BoardConsultation on Speciality Training Numbers from 2011 to 2015EdinburghScottish Executive 2010Google Scholar

Rhode, D.ProfessionalismSouth Carolina Law Review, 52 2001 459Google Scholar

Rhode, D.The Professionalism ProblemWilliam & Mary Law Review 39 1998 283Google Scholar

Rhode, D.Policing the Professional MonopolyStanford Law Review 34 1981 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Robins, J.Closing the Justice GapSolicitors Journal 2010 www.solicitorsjournal.com/Pictures/Web/k/l/p/Closing%20the%20Justice%20Gap.pdfGoogle Scholar

Rosen, R.Dewar, S. 2004

Ross, Y.The Jokes on LawyersSydneyFederation Press 1996Google Scholar

Rothwell, R. 2010

Rothwell, R.Royal Commission on Legal Services in ScotlandEdinburghHMSO 1980Google Scholar

Sandefur, R.The Fulcrum point of Equal Access to JusticeLoyola of Los Angeles Law Review 42 2009 949Google Scholar

Scottish ExecutiveReport by the Research Working Group on Competition in the Legal Services Market in ScotlandEdinburghScottish Executive 2006

Scottish ExecutiveReview of Legal Information and Advice ProvisionEdinburghScottish Executive 2001Google Scholar

Scottish Legal News 2010

Sedley, S.Andenas, M.Fairgrieve, D.Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the LawOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Seneviratne, M.The Legal Profession: Regulation and the ConsumerLondonSweet & Maxwell 1999

Sellar, W. C.Yeatman, R. J.1066 and All ThatLondonMethuen 1930Google Scholar

Sherr, A.Paterson, A.Professional Competence, Peer Review and Quality Assurance in England and Wales and in ScotlandAlberta Law Review 45 2008 151Google Scholar

Sherr, A.Lawyers the Quality AgendaLondonHMSO 1994Google Scholar

Simms, A.Ghost Town Britain, the Threat from Economic Globalisation to Livelihoods, Liberty and Local Economic ReformLondonThe New Economics Foundation 2002

Smith, R. 2010

Smith, R.The Justice Gap: Whatever Happened to Legal Aid?’New Law Journal 159 2009 866Google Scholar

Smith, R.

Solicitors Regulatory Agency 2010

Sommerlad, H.Managerialism and the Legal ProfessionInternational Journal of the Legal Profession, 2 1995 159CrossRef Google Scholar

SPADABritish Professions Today: the State of the SectorLondonSPADA 2009Google Scholar

Stephen, F.Legal Aid Expenditure in ScotlandLaw Society 1999Google Scholar

Stevens, R. B.Reform in Haste and Repent at LeisureLegal Studies 24 2004 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevens, R. B.The English JudgesOxfordHart Publishing 2002Google Scholar

Stevens, R. B.Unpacking the JudgesCurrent Legal Problems 1 1993 2.Google Scholar

Stevens, R. B.The Role of a Final Appeal Court in a DemocracyModern Law Review 28 1965 509CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevenson, R. L.Edinburgh: Picturesque NotesEdinburgh 1897Google Scholar

Steyn, J. 2003

Sturgess, G.Chubb, P.Judging the WorldSydneyButterworths 1988Google Scholar

Susskind, R.The End of Lawyers?Oxford University Press 2008Google Scholar

The Scottish OfficeAccess to Justice: Beyond the Year 2000EdinburghThe Scottish Office 1998

2011 www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/03/15112328/0

Todd, P.

Tomkins, A.National Security and the Role of the Court: A Changed Landscape?Law Quarterly Review 126 2010 543Google Scholar

Trigg, J.

Wear, D.Aultman, J.Professionalism in Medicine: Critical PerspectivesNew YorkSpringer 2006CrossRef

Wright, T.The Common Law of Contracts: Are Broad Principles Better than Detailed Rules? An Empirical InvestigationTexas Wesleyan Law Review 11 2005 399Google Scholar

Young, Lord D.Common Sense, Common SafetyLondonCabinet Office 2010Google Scholar

Zander, M.The State of JusticeLondonSweet & Maxwell 1999Google Scholar

Zander, M.Legal Services for the CommunityLondonTemple Smith 1978Google Scholar

Zander, M.Lawyers and the Public InterestLondonWeidenfeld and Nicolson 1968Google Scholar

Book contents

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive