Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 7
    • Show more authors
    • Open Access
      You have digital access to this book
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      03 March 2025
      03 April 2025
      ISBN:
      9781009325912
      9781009325905
      Creative Commons:
      Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC Creative Common License - ND
      This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
      https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.086kg, 44 Pages
    • Series:
      Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare
    Open Access
    You have digital access to this book
    Selected: Digital
    View content
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Series:
    Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare

    Book description

    Despite enormous efforts at healthcare improvement, major challenges remain in achieving optimal outcomes, safety, cost, and value. This Element introduces the concept of learning health systems, which have been proposed as a possible solution. Though many different variants of the concept exist, they share a learning cycle of capturing data from practice, turning it into knowledge, and putting knowledge back into practice. How learning systems are implemented is highly variable. This Element emphasises that they are sociotechnical systems and offers a structured framework to consider their design and operation. It offers a critique of the learning health system approach, recognising that more has been said about the aspiration than perhaps has been delivered. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.

    References

    1.Garwin, DA. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review 1993; 71(4): 7391.
    2.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.
    3.Institute of Medicine. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
    4.National Academy of Medicine. The Learning Health System Series. 2007. https://nam.edu/programs/value-science-driven-health-care/learning-health-system-series/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    5.Foley, TH, Zahran, R. Realising the Potential of Learning Health Systems. 2021. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/realising-the-potential-of-learning-health-systems/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    6.McGinnis, JM, Stuckhardt, L, Saunders, R, Smith, M. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
    7.Zurynski, Y, Smith, CL, Vedovi, A, et al. Mapping the Learning Health system: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence. 2020. www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1083809/Mapping-the-Learning-Health-System-A-white-paper-web.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    8.Psek, WA, Stametz, RA, Bailey-Davis, LD, et al. Operationalizing the learning health care system in an integrated delivery system. EGEMS 2015; 3(1): 1122. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1122.
    9.Davis, FD, Williams, MS, Stametz, RA. Geisinger’s effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(2): e10221. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10221.
    10.Foley, T, Fairmichael, F. Geisinger Health System Site Visit. www.learninghealthcareproject.org/section/evidence/34/63/site-visit-to-geisinger-health-system (accessed 27 July 2024).
    11.University of Michigan. Our Approach to Learning Health Sciences. https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/lhs/explore-learning-health-sciences/our-approach (accessed 27 July 2024).
    12.McLachlan, S, Potts, HWW, Dube, K, et al. The Heimdall framework for supporting characterisation of learning health systems. J Innov Health Inform 2018; 25(2): 7787. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v25i2.996.
    13.Menear, M, Blanchette, MA, Demers-Payette, O, Roy, D. A framework for value-creating learning health systems. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17(1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0477-3.
    14.Monash Partners. Initiatives: Learning Health System. https://monashpartners.org.au/initiatives/learning-health-system/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    15.Allen, C, Coleman, K, Mettert, K, et al. A roadmap to operationalize and evaluate impact in a learning health system. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(4): e10258. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10258.
    16.Greenhalgh, T, Wherton, J, Papoutsi, C, et al. Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19(11): e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775.
    17.Flynn, AJ, Friedman, CP, Boisvert, P, Landis-Lewis, Z, Lagoze, C. The Knowledge Object Reference Ontology (KORO): A formalism to support management and sharing of computable biomedical knowledge for learning health systems. Learn Health Syst 2018; 2(2): e10054. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10054.
    18.Foley, T, Fairmichael, F. Dr Paul Wallace Interview. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/dr-paul-wallace-interview/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    19.Fink, MA, Bischoff, A, Fink, CA, et al. Potential of ChatGPT and GPT-4 for data mining of free-text CT reports on lung cancer. Radiology 2023; 308(3): e231362. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231362.
    20.Hsueh, JY, Nethala, D, Singh, S, et al. Exploring the feasibility of GPT-4 as a data extraction tool for renal surgery operative notes. Urol Pract 2024; 11(5): 782789. https://doi.org/10.1097/upj.0000000000000599.
    21.Obermeyer, Z, Powers, B, Vogeli, C, Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366(6464): 447453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.
    22.NHS Digital. Data quality – Current Data Quality Maturity Index (DQMI). https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/data-quality#current-data-quality-maturity-index-dqmi- (accessed 27 July 2024).
    23.ONC. Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A 10-Year Vision to Achieve an Interoperable Health IT Infrastructure. 2014. www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ONC10yearInteroperabilityConceptPaper.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    24.SNOMED International. What Is SNOMED CT? www.snomed.org/what-is-snomed-ct (accessed 27 July 2024).
    25.World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases (accessed 27 July 2024).
    26.LOINC: The International Standard for Identifying Health Measurements, Observations and Documents. https://loinc.org/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    27.HL7. Standards-Based Product Grid. www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_matrix.cfm (accessed 27 July 2024).
    28.OHDSI. OMOP Common Data Model. www.ohdsi.org/data-standardization/the-common-data-model/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    29.HL7. FHIR Overview. www.hl7.org/fhir/overview.html (accessed 27 July 2024).
    30.DICOM. DICOM Standard. www.dicomstandard.org (accessed 27 July 2024).
    31.CIO. Introduction to HTTPS. https://https.cio.gov/faq/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    32.UK Gov. Data Protection Act. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29 (accessed 27 July 2024).
    34.Health and Human Services (HHS). Health Information Privacy. www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html (accessed 27 July 2024).
    35.Horwitz, LI, Kuznetsova, M, Jones, SA. Creating a learning health system through rapid-cycle, randomized testing. N Engl J Med 2019; 381(12): 11751179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1900856.
    36.Ellenberg, SS. The stepped-wedge clinical trial: Evaluation by rolling deployment. JAMA 2018; 319(6): 607608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21993.
    37.Penfold, RB, Zhang, F. Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. Review. Acad Pediatr 2013; 13(6 Suppl): S38S44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002.
    38.Devkaran, S, O’Farrell, PN. The impact of hospital accreditation on quality measures: An interrupted time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15(1): 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0784-5.
    39.Maciejewski, ML and Basu, AA . Regression discontinuity design. JAMA 2020; 324(4): 381382. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3822.
    40.Desai, S, McWilliams, JM. Consequences of the 340B Drug Pricing Program. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(6): 539548. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1706475.
    41.Rosenbaum, PR. Modern algorithms for matching in observational studies. Annu Rev Stat Appl 2020; 7: 143176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041058.
    42.Iacus, SM, King, G, Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis 2017; 20(1): 124. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013.
    43.Neuburger, J, Walker, K, Sherlaw-Johnson, C, van der Meulen, J, Cromwell, DA. Comparison of control charts for monitoring clinical performance using binary data. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26(11): 919928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005526.
    44.Mohammed, MA. Statistical process control. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009326834.
    45.Bejnordi, BE, Veta, M, Diest, PJV, et al. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 2017; 318(22): 21992210. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14585
    46.Seymour, CW, Kennedy, JN, Wang, S, et al. Derivation, validation, and potential treatment implications of novel clinical phenotypes for sepsis. JAMA 2019; 321(20): 20032017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5791.
    47.Pavlou, M, Ambler, G, Guttmann, O, et al. How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events. BMJ 2015; 351): p.h3868.
    48.Miotto, R, Li, L, Kidd, BA, Dudley, JT. Deep patient: An unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 26094. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26094.
    49.Liang, G, Fan, W, Luo, H, Zhu, X. The emerging roles of artificial intelligence in cancer drug development and precision therapy. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 128: 110255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110255.
    50.Woldaregay, AZ, Arsand, E, Walderhaug, S, et al. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes. Artif Intell Med; 98(98): 109134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007.
    51.Longhurst, CA, Harrington, RA, Shah, NH. A ‘green button’ for using aggregate patient data at the point of care. Health Aff 2014; 33(7): 12291235. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0099.
    52.Radnor, Z, Williams, S. Lean and associated techniques for process improvement. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press; Forthcoming.
    53.Toulany, A, Shojania, K. Measurement for improvement. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press; Forthcoming. www.cambridge.org/core/publications/elements/elements-of-improving-quality-and-safety-in-healthcare/listing?aggs[productTypes][filters]=ELEMENT&sort=canonical.date:desc.
    54.Martin, G, Dixon-Woods, M. Collaboration-based approaches. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009236867.
    55.Horwitz, LI, Krelle, HA. Using rapid randomized trials to improve health care systems. Annu Rev Public Health 2023; 44: 445457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-025758.
    56.Austrian, J, Mendoza, F, Szerencsy, A, et al. Applying A/B testing to clinical decision support: Rapid randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23(4): e16651. https://doi.org/10.2196/16651.
    57.Swan, J, Clarke, A, Nicolini, D, et al. Evidence in Management Decisions (EMD): Advancing Knowledge Utilization in Healthcare Management. Final report. 2012. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/research/ikon/research/emd/final_report_fr-08-1808-244.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    58.Milligan, C, Berta, W. Reimagining community relationships for organizational learning: A scoping review with implications for a learning health system. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21(1): 603. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06640-9.
    59.OpenClinical. OpenClinical. www.openclinical.net (accessed 27 July 2024).
    60.MCBK. Mobilizing Computable Biomedical Knowledge. https://mobilizecbk.med.umich.edu/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    61.Ohno-Machado, L, Gennari, JH, Murphy, SN, et al. The guideline interchange format: A model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(4): 357372. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050357.
    62.HL7 & Boston Children’s Hospital. Home Page – CDS Hooks. https://cds-hooks.org/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    63.Walsh, K, Wroe, C. Mobilising computable biomedical knowledge: Challenges for clinical decision support from a medical knowledge provider. BMJ Health Care Inform 2020; 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100121.
    64.Wong, D, Peek, N. Does not compute: Challenges and solutions in managing computable biomedical knowledge. BMJ Health Care Inform 2020; 27(2): e100121. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100123.
    66.Health and Social Care Act 2012. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted (accessed 27 July 2024).
    67.Gov UK. Guidance: Approved Bodies for Medical Devices. www.gov.uk/government/publications/notified-bodies-for-medical-devices/notified-bodies-for-medical-devices (accessed 27 July 2024).
    68.Bernstein, JA, Friedman, C, Jacobson, P, Rubin, JC. Ensuring public health’s future in a national-scale learning health system. Am J Prev Med 2015; 48(4): 480487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.013.
    69.Friedman, C, Rubin, J, Brown, J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: A research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22(1): 4350. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977.
    70.Nonadoption, Foley T., Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability in LHS Workshop. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/NASSS-Workshop-Writeup-201020.pdf (accessed 12 January 2021).
    71.Braithwaite, J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. BMJ 2018; 361: k2014. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2014.
    72.Snowden, DJ, Boone, ME. A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 2007; 85(11): 6876.
    73.Papoutsi, C, Greenhalgh, T, Marjanovic, S. Approaches to spread, scale-up, and sustainability. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009326049.
    74.Greenhalgh, T, Maylor, H, Shaw, S, et al. The NASSS-CAT tools for understanding, guiding, monitoring, and researching technology implementation projects in health and social care: Protocol for an evaluation study in real-world settings. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9(5): e16861. https://doi.org/10.2196/16861.
    75.Carayon, P, Hoonakker, P. Human factors and usability for health information technology: Old and new challenges. Year Med Inform 2019; 28(1): 7177. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677907.
    76.Waights, V. Technologies for Care – the Imperative for Upskilling Carers. 2018. The Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series. www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalassets/documents/raise/knowledge_exchange/briefing_papers/series7/waights140318.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    77.Wilson, L, Lowe, T. The Learning Communities Handbook: Collective Improvement in Complex Environments. 2019. www.humanlearning.systems/uploads/The-Learning-Communities-Handbook.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    78.Ferguson, L, Dibble, M, Williams, M, Ferraro, J. Operationalizing a learning community for a learning health system: A practical guide. 2020. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/163515 (accessed 27 July 2024).
    79.NHS Digital. Engagement with the Data-Enabled Research Community. https://digital.nhs.uk/services/research-advisory-group (accessed 27 July 2024).
    80.Seid, M, Dellal, G, Peterson, LE, et al. Co-designing a collaborative chronic care network (C3N) for inflammatory bowel disease: Development of methods. JMIR Hum Factors 2018; 5(1): e8. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.8083.
    81.Hartley, DM, Keck, C, Havens, M, Margolis, PA, Seid, M. Measuring engagement in a collaborative learning health system: The case of ImproveCareNow. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(2): e10225. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10225.
    82.Batalden, M, Batalden, P, Margolis, P, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25(7): 509517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315.
    83.NHS Digital. NHS Federated Data Platform (FDP). www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/nhs-federated-data-platform/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    84.NHS Digital. Secure Data Environment. https://digital.nhs.uk/services/secure-data-environment-service (accessed 27 July 2024).
    85.Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic Platform_Connect. www.mayoclinicplatform.org/mayo-clinic-platform-connect/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    86.Epic. Epic Cosmos. https://cosmos.epic.com/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    87.Tarabichi, Y, Frees, A, Honeywell, S, et al. The cosmos collaborative: A vendor-facilitated electronic health record data aggregation platform. ACI Open 2021; 5(1): e36e46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731004.
    88.Freedman, L. Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    89.Lafley, AG, Martin, RL. Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2013.
    90.Porter, ME. What is strategy? Harvard Bus Rev 1996; 74(6): 6178.
    91.Rumelt, RP. Good strategy/bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. Strateg Dir. 2012; 28(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2012.05628haa.002.
    92.Target Operating Model (TOM) at a Glance. www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/strategy/lu-target-operating-model-glance-122014.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    93.How to Design a Target Operating Model (TOM) [Updated 2019]. https://strategiccoffee.chriscfox.com/2012/12/how-to-design-target-operating-model-tom.html (accessed 27 July 2024).
    94.Britto, MT, Fuller, SC, Kaplan, HC, et al. Using a network organisational architecture to support the development of Learning Healthcare Systems. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 27(11): 937946. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007219.
    95.Scobie, S, Castle-Clarke, S. What Can the NHS Learn from Learning Health Systems? www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2019–05/learning-health-systems-v3.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    96.Mannion, R, Davies, H. Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement. BMJ 2018; 363: k4907. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4907.
    97.Vinson, AH. Culture as infrastructure in learning health systems. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(3): e10267. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10267.
    98.The King’s Fund. Improving NHS Culture. www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/culture (accessed 27 July 2024).
    99.Dave Snowden, Shirai B. – How Leaders Change Culture though Small Actions. https://medium.com/@brixen/dave-snowden-how-leaders-change-culture-though-small-actions-766cd2bf5128 (accessed 27 July 2024).
    100.Jung, T, Scott, T, Davies, HTO, et al. Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Adm Rev 2009; 69(6): 10871096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02066.x.
    101.Mannion, R. Making culture change happen. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009236935.
    102.Wachter, RM, Adler-Milstein, J, Brailer, D, et al. Making IT Work: Harnessing the Power of Health Information Technology to Improve Care in England: Report of the National Advisory Group on Health Information Technology in England. Vol. 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/550866/Wachter_Review_Accessible.pdf.
    103.Foley, T, Woollard, J. The Digital Future of Mental Healthcare and Its Workforce. 2019. https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HEE-Topol-Review-Mental-health-paper.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    104.Foley, T, Fairmichael, F. Workforce and Training Focus Group. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/workforce-and-training-focus-group/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    105.Foley, T, Fairmichael, F. Professor Charles Friedman Interview. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/professor-charles-friedman-interview/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    106.Foley, T, Fairmichael F. Dr Jeff Brown Interview. www.learninghealthcareproject.org/publication/5/60/dr-jeff-brown-interview (accessed 27 July 2024).
    107.The Chartered Institute for IT. Core Competency Framework for Clinical Informaticians. www.bcs.org/membership-and-registrations/become-a-member/skills-framework/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    108.Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. www.iso.org/standard/77520.html (accessed 27 July 2024).
    109.Design Principles. https://service-manual.nhs.uk/assets/nhs-design-principles.pdf (accessed 27 July 2024).
    110.Reponen, S. Co-design Framework. http://results.learning-layers.eu/methods/co-design/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    111.Sanders, EB-N, Eva Brandt, TB. A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2010: 195198. https://10.1145/1900441.1900476.
    112.EBCD: Experience-Based Co-design Toolkit. www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    113.Digital Health. Co-design in Health. https://digital-health-lab.org/codesign-in-health (accessed 27 July 2024).
    114.Design Kit. Design Kit. www.designkit.org/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    115.Service Design Tools. Service Design Tools. https://servicedesigntools.org/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    116.The Right Question. The Right Question. https://rightquestion.org/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    117.Vandekerckhove, P, de Mul, M, Bramer, WM, de Bont, AA. Generative participatory design methodology to develop electronic health interventions: Systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(4): e13780. https://doi.org/10.2196/13780.
    118.Robert, G, Locock, L, Williams, O, et al. Co-producing and co-designing. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009237024.
    119.Bauer, MS, Damschroder, L, Hagedorn, H, Smith, J, Kilbourne, AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol 2015; 3(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9.
    120.Wilson, P, Kislov, R. Implementation science. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements in Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009237055.
    121.Michie, S, van Stralen, MM, West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    122.Seid, M, Hartley, DM, Margolis, PA. A science of collaborative learning health systems. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(3): e10278. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10278.
    123.Ivers, N, Foy, R. Audit, feedback, and behaviour change. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S, et al., editors. Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press; Forthcoming.
    124.Foley, T. Evaluation in LHS Workshop. https://learninghealthcareproject.org/evaluation-in-lhs-workshop/ (accessed 27 July 2024).
    125.Leviss, J. HIT or Miss, 3rd Edition Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Projects. Oxford: Taylor & Francis; 2019.
    126.Lannon, C, Schuler, CL, Seid, M, et al. A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5(2): e10232. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10232.
    127.Steiner, JF, Paolino, AR, Thompson, EE, Larson, EB. Sustaining research networks: The twenty-year experience of the HMO research network. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2014; 2(2): 1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1067.
    128.Huang, SS, Septimus, E, Kleinman, K, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(24): 22552265. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1207290.
    129.Bindman, AB. Learning healthcare systems: A perspective from the US. Public Health Res Pract 2019; 29(3): 2931920. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2931920.
    130.Hardie, T, Horton, T, Thornton, N, Home, J, Pereira, P. Developing Learning Health Systems in the UK: Priorities for Action. 2022. www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/developing-learning-health-systems-in-the-uk-priorities-for-action (accessed 27 July 2024).
    131.University of Michigan. Department of Learning Health Sciences. https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/learning-health-sciences (accessed 27 July 2024).
    132.MCBK. 2024 MCBK Global Meeting. https://mobilizecbk.med.umich.edu/news-events/mcbk-meetings/2024-meeting (accessed 27 July 2024).
    133.Friedman, C. Learning Health Systems. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23796146 (accessed 27 July 2024).
    134.INACT-LHS. Learning Health System Toolkit. https://lhstoolkit.learninghealthcareproject.co.uk/ (accessed 27 July 2024).

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.