Abele, Robert P., The Anatomy of a Deception: A Reconstruction and Analysis of the Decision to Invade Iraq (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2010)Google Scholar

Abels, Denis, Prisoners of the International Community (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Alexander, John B., Future War: Non-lethal Weapons in Modern Warfare (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 1999)Google Scholar

Allhoff, Fritz, Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge (Berlin: Springer Science and Business, 2008)Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas M. and Gonza, Alejandra, The American Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Arai, Yutaka, The Law of Occupation (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Roberta and Knoops, Geert-Jan G. J. , Practice and Policies of Modern Peace Support Operations under International Law (New York: Transnational Publishers, 2006)Google Scholar

Altmann, Jürgen, Millimetre Waves, Lasers, Acoustics for Non-lethal Weapons? Physics Analyses and Inferences (Osnabrück: Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung, 2008)Google Scholar

Altmann, Jürgen, Bernhardt, Ute, Nixdorff, Kathryn, Ruhmann, Ingo and Wöhrle, Dieter, Naturwissenschaft, Rüstung, Frieden (2nd ed., Wiesbaden: Springer, 2017)Google Scholar

Askar, Yusuf, Implementing International Humanitarian Law: From the Ad Hoc Tribunals to a Permanent International Criminal Court (New York: Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar

Bantekas, Ilias and Oette, Lutz, International Human Rights Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Bayley, David H. and Perito, Robert, The Police in War: Fighting Insurgency, Terrorism, and Violent Crime (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar

Bonn, Keith E. and Baker, Anthony E. , Military Operations other than War: Tactics, Techniques & Procedures for Stability & Support Operations (Mechanicsburg: Stackpole Books, 2000)Google Scholar

Boothby, William H., Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Boothby, William H., The Law of Targeting (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael and Kondoch, Boris, Yearbook of International Peacekeeping (The Hague: Kluwer International, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef and Solf, Waldembar A., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (2nd ed., Leiden: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2013)Google Scholar

Bouchet-Saulnier, Françoise, The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Bourke, Joanna, Wounding the World: How Military Violence and War-Play Invade Our Lives (London: Virago, 2014)Google Scholar

Button, Kenneth J. and Wiltse, James C., Infrared and Millimeter Waves (New York: Academic Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Byron, Christine, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Cameron, Schyrlet and Craig, Carolyn, Science Vocabulary Building (New York: Mark Twain Media, 2009)Google Scholar

Carey, Henry F. and Mitchell, Stacey M., Understanding International Law through Moot Courts (Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2014)Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart and Connolly, Sean, Police Use of Force under International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Chauhan, Sharad S., Biological Weapons (New Delhi: Nisha Enterprises, 2004)Google Scholar

Cordesman, Anthony H., Arab-Israeli Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric Wars (Westport: Praeger Security International, 2006)Google Scholar

Corn, Geoffrey S., VanLandingham, Rachel E. and Reeves, Shane R., US Military Operations: Law, Policy, Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Crawshaw, Stuart Cullen and Williamson, Tom, Human Rights and Policing (2nd ed., Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Crawshaw, Ralph and Holmström, Leif, Essential Texts on Human Rights for the Police: A Compilation of International Interests (2nd ed., Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008)Google Scholar

Crowley, Michael, Chemical Control: Regulation of Incapacitating Chemical Agent Weapons, Riot Control Agents and their Means of Delivery (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2016)Google Scholar

Dando, Malcolm, A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-lethal Weapons (London: Brassey’s, 1997)Google Scholar

Dando, Malcolm, Neuroscience and the Future of Chemical-Biological Weapons (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015)Google Scholar

Daugthry, J. Martin, Listening to War, Sound, Music, Trauma, and Survival in Wartime Iraq (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Davison, Neil, Non-lethal Weapons (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009)Google Scholar

Dettmeyer, Reinhard B., Verhoff, Marcel A. and Schütz, Harald F., Forensic Medicine: Fundamentals and Perspectives (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaio, Vincent J. M. and Dana, Suzanna E., Handbook of Forensic Pathology (3rd ed., Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, 2007)Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2014)Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, The Law of Belligerent Occupation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Durham, Helen and McCormack, Timothy L. H. , The Changing Face of Conflict and the Efficacy of International Humanitarian Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999)Google Scholar

Ehlers, Dirk, European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007)Google Scholar

Ellison, D. Hank, Handbook of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents (2nd ed., Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Erickson, Andrew and Goldstein, Lyle J., Chinese Aerospace Power (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Garche, Jürgen, Dyer, Chris K., Moseley, Patrick T., Ogumi, Zempachi, Rand, David A. J. and Scrosati, Bruno, Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009)Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Giri, D. V., High Power Electromagnetic Radiators: Non-lethal Weapons and other Applications (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Goodman, John, Sonication: Sound, Effect and the Ecology of Fear (London: MIT Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (München: C. H. Beck, 2008)Google Scholar

Green, James A., The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Gresham, Austin, Colour Atlas of Wounds and Wounding (Hingham: MTP Press Unlimited, 1986)Google Scholar

Gross, Michael L., Moral Dilemmas of Modern War, Torture Assassination and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Grover, Leena, Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Haque, Adil Ahmad, Law and Morality at War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Hemsley, John, The Soviet Biochemical Threat to NATO (Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 1987)Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary Humanitarian Law, vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, Jan Arno, Human Rights and Personal Self-Defense in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Hunsicker, A., Behind the Shield: Anti-Riot Operations Guide (Boca Raton: Universal Publishers, 2011)Google Scholar

Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka, The Concept of Military Objectives in International Law and Targeting Practice (London: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar

Anette, Jacobsen Faye, Human Rights Monitoring: A Field Mission Manual (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar

Karmakar, Rabindra Nath, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (Kolkata: Academic Publishers Kolkata, 2013)Google Scholar

Kennaway, James, Bad Vibrations: The History of the Idea of Music as a Cause of Disease (London: Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar

Khan, JaVed, Kennedy, Thomas J. and Jr. Christian, Donnell R., Basic Principles of Forensic Chemistry (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert and Hyde, Richard, An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts (Oxford and Portland: Bloomsbury, 2008)Google Scholar

Koplow, David A., Non-lethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Technologies for the Military and Law Enforcement (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Langford, Everett R., Introduction to Weapons of Mass Destruction (Hoboken: Wiley Interscience, 2004)Google Scholar

Lasbury, Mark E., The Realization of Star Trek Technologies: The Science, Not Fiction, Behind Brain Implants, Plasma Shields, Quantum Computing and More (New York: Springer, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lederberg, Joshua, Biological Weapons: Limiting the Threat (4th ed., Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Lerner, K. Lee and Lerner, Brenda Wilmoth, World of Forensic Science (New York: Thompson and Gale, 2006)Google Scholar

Lewer, Nick and Schofield, Steven, Non-lethal Weapons, A Fatal Attraction?: Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st Century Conflict (London: Zed Books, 1997)Google Scholar

Luban, David, Torture, Power and Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Lubell, Noam, Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Medina Qurioga, Cecilia, The American Convention on Human Rights (2nd ed., Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016)Google Scholar

Mehring, Sigrid, First Do No Harm: Medical Ethics in Humanitarian Law (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2015)Google Scholar

Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Metzger, Norman, Integration of Hard-kill and Soft-kill Systems for More Effective Fleet Air Defense, Naval Studies Board, National Research Council (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Moir, Lindsay, The Law of Internal Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Murray, Daragh, Practitioner’s Guide to Human Rights in Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Oberleitner, Gerd, Human Rights in Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Ohlin, Jens David, The Assault on International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Ohlin, Jens David and May, Larry, Necessity in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmiotto, Michael J., Policing: Concepts, Strategies and Current Issues in American Police Forces (3rd ed., Scots Valley: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2013)Google Scholar

Parmar, Leena, Military Sociology: Global Perspectives (London: Rawat, 1999)Google Scholar

Pictet, Jean, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985)Google Scholar

Piehler, Kurt G., Encyclopedia of Military Science (Houston: SAGE Publishers, 2013)Google Scholar

Quiroga, Cecilia Medina, The American Convention on Human Rights (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Ramcharan, Bertrand G., The Right to Life in International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985)Google Scholar

Rappert, Brian, Non-lethal Weapons as Legitimizing Forces? (Oregon: Frank Cass, 2005)Google Scholar

Rea, Desmond and Masefield, Robin, Policing in Northern Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Rejali, Darius, Torture and Democracy (Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Rietiker, Daniel, Humanization of Arms Control: Paving the Way for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons (New York: Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Rodley, Nigel and Pollard, Matt, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Romano, James A., Lukey, Brian J. and Salem, Harry, Chemical Warfare Agents: Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics (2nd ed., Boca Raton: CRC Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Roth, Mitchel, Historical Dictionary of Law Enforcement (Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001)Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law, vol. I, ICRC (3rd. ed., Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2011)Google Scholar

Saukko, Pekka and Knight, Bernard, Knight’s Forensic Pathology (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Schindler, Dietrich and Toman, Jiri, The Laws of Armed Conflicts (Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2004)Google Scholar

Singh, Jasjit, Airpower in Modern Warfare (New Delhi: Lancer International, 1988)Google Scholar

Silvast, William T., Laser Fundamentals (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Sokolnikov, Andre U., The Identification for Defense and Security Purposes: Identifying Materials, Substances and Items (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solis, Gary D., The Law of Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Summers, David A., Waterjetting Technology (London: CRC Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Verwey, Wil D., Riot Control Agents and Herbicides in War (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff Publishers, 1977)Google Scholar

Volcler, Juliette, Extremely Loud: Sound as a Weapon (New York: The New Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977)Google Scholar

Whitehead, John W., The Government of Wolves (New York: Select Books Inc., 2013)Google Scholar

Williams, Howard E., Taser Electronic Control Devices and Sudden In-Custody Death: Separating Evidence from Conjecture (Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 2007)Google Scholar

Wyatt, Jonathan P., Squires, Tim, Norfolk, Guy and Payne-James, Jason, Oxford Handbook of Forensic Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Aas, Pål, “The Threat of Mid-Spectrum Chemical Warfare Agents” (2003) 18 (4) Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 306–12Google Scholar

Accardo, Julia and Chaudhry, M. Ahmad, “Radiation Exposure and Privacy Concerns Surrounding Full-Body Scanners in Airports” (2014) 7 (2) Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 198–200Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo, “Clearing the Fog of War?, The ICRC’s Interpretative Guidance on Direct Participation in Hostilities” (2010) 59 (1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 180–92Google Scholar

Alamuddin, Amal and Webb, Philippa, “Expanding Jurisdiction over War Crimes under Article 8 of the ICC-Statute” (2010) 8 (5) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1219–43Google Scholar

Alexander, John, “An Overview of the Future of Non-lethal Weapons” in Lewer, Nick (ed.), The Future of Non-lethal Weapons: Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass, 2002), pp. 12–25Google Scholar

Altmann, Jürgen, “Acoustic Weapons – A Prospective Assessment?” (2001) 9 Journal for Science & Global Security 165–234Google Scholar

Banaszewska, Dorota Marianna, “Hors de Combat” in Lachenmann, Frauke and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), The Law of Armed Conflict and the Use of Force, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 443–52Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard Reeve and Burgenthal, Thomas, “Legal Aspects of the Geneva Protocol of 1925” (1970) 64 (5) The American Journal of International Law 853–79Google Scholar

Bell, Christine and Pfeiffer, Julia, “Indiscriminate Attacks” in Lachenmann, Frauke and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), The Law of Armed Conflict and the Use of Force, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Thematic Series Vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 497–502Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, “Occupation, Belligerent” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Thematic Series Vol. II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 920–29Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Sovereignty” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 366–90Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Ryan, “Electrocution and Lightning” in Madea, Burkhard (ed.), Handbook of Forensic Medicine (London : Wiley, 2014), pp. 477–94Google Scholar

Boyle, Kevin and Shah, Sangeeta, “Thought, Expression, Association and Assembly” in Moeckli, David, Shah, Sangeeta and Sivakumaran, Sandesh (eds.), International Human Rights Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 217–37Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart, “Crowd Management, Crowd Control and Riot Control” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 32–53Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart, Corney, Neil and Dymond-Bass, Abi, “The Review of Weapons under International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 411–47Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart, “Existing and Future Weapons and Weapons Systems” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 593–606Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart and Weill, Sharon, “The Use of Weapons in Armed Conflict” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 240–81Google Scholar

Chainoglou, Kalliopi, “Psychological Warfare” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. VIII (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 559–65Google Scholar

Chesney, Robert M., “Prisoners of War” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. VIII (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 436–51Google Scholar

Chesney, Robert M., “Who may be Killed? Anwar Al-Awlaki as a Case Study in the International Legal Regulation of Lethal Force” in Schmitt, Michael N., Arimatsu, Louise and McCormack, Tim (eds.), Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2011), pp. 3–60Google Scholar

Chevrier, Marie Isabelle and Leonard, James F. , “Incapacitating Biochemicals and the Biological Weapons Convention” in Pearson, Alan M., Chevrier, Marie Isabelle and Wheelis, Mark (eds.), Incapacitating Biochemical Weapons (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007), pp. 209–23Google Scholar

Cleary, Stephen F., “Microwave Radiation Effects on Humans” (1983) 33 (4) Journal of BioScience 269–73Google Scholar

Crowley, Michael, “Exploring the Role of Life Scientists in Combating the Misuse of Incapacitating Chemical and Toxin Agents” in Rappert, Brian and Selgelid, Michael J. (eds.), On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics: Principles, Practices, and Prospects (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 2013), pp. 293–330Google Scholar

Crowley, Michael, “The Use of Riot Control Agents in Law Enforcement” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 334–56Google Scholar

Crowley, Michael, “The Use of Incapacitants in Law Enforcement” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 357–81Google Scholar

Davison, Neil, “New Weapons: Legal and Policy Issues” in Saxon, Dan (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and the Changing Technology of War (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013), pp. 281–314Google Scholar

D’Cunha, Samit, “The Notion of External NIAC: Reconsidering the Intensity Threshold in Light of Contemporary Armed Conflict” in Gill, Terry D., McCormack, Tim, Geiß, Robin, Krieger, Heike and Paulusson, Christophe (eds.), Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2017 (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2019), pp. 75–112Google Scholar

Dimitroglou, Yiannis, Rachiotis, George and Hadjichristodoulou, Christos, “Exposure to the Riot Control Agent CS and Potential Health Effects: A Systematic Review of the Evidence” (2005) 12 (2) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 1397–411Google Scholar

Dörr, Oliver, “Article 31” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, A Commentary (2nd ed., Berlin: Springer, 2018), pp. 559–614Google Scholar

Dymond-Bass, Abi and Corney, Neil, “The Use of ‘Less-lethal’ Weapons in Law Enforcement” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 411–47Google Scholar

Elliott, Michael, “Where Precision is the Aim: Locating the Targeted Killing Policies of the United States and Israel Within International Humanitarian Law” (2010) 47 Canadian Yearbook of International 99–160Google Scholar

Ferraro, Tristan, “The Law of Occupation and Human Rights Law: Some Selected Issues” in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013), pp. 273–93Google Scholar

Fidler, David P., “‘Non-lethal’ Weapons and International Law: Three Perspectives on the Future” in Lewer, Nick (ed.), The Future of Non-lethal Weapons (London: Frank Cass, 2002), pp. 26–38Google Scholar

Fidler, David P., “‘Non-lethal’ Weapons and International Law: Three Perspectives on the Future” (2001) 17 Journal of Medicine, Conflict and Survival 194–206Google Scholar

Fidler, David P., “The International Legal Implications of ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons” (1999) 21 Michigan Journal of International Law 52–100Google Scholar

Fidler, David P., “The Meaning of Moscow: ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons and International Law in the Early 21st Century” (2005) 87 (859) International Review of the Red Cross 525–52Google Scholar

Fry, James D., “Gas Smells Awful: U.N. Forces, Riot Control Agents and the Chemical Weapons Convention” (2010) 31 (3) Michigan Journal of International Law 475–559Google Scholar

Ganesan, Kumaran, Raza, Kamran Syed and Vijayaraghavan, Rajagopalan, “Chemical Warfare Agents” (2010) 2 (3) Journal of Pharmacy and Bio Allied Sciences 166–78Google Scholar

Giacca, Gilles, “Object and Purpose” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart, Clapham, Andrew, Giacca, Gilles and Parker, Sarah, The Arms Trade Treaty, Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 41–57Google Scholar

Gill, Terry D., “Some Thoughts on the Relationship Between International Humanitarian and International Human Rights Law: A Plea for Mutual Respect and a Common-Sense Approach” (2013) 16 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 251–66Google Scholar

Goodman, Ryan, “The Power to Kill or to Capture Enemy Combatants” (2013) 81 (4) European Journal of International Law 819–53Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, “Proportionality and Collateral Damage” in Lachenmann, Frauke and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), The Law of Armed Conflict and the Use of Force, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 1055–9Google Scholar

Henderson, Ian and Cavanagh, Brian, “Military Members Claiming Self-Defence During Armed Conflict: Often Misguided and Helpful” in Petrovic, Jadranka (ed.), Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 73–94Google Scholar

Hilmas, Corey J., “Riot Control Agents” in Gupta, Ramesh C. (ed.), Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents (London: Academic Press, 2015) pp. 131–50Google Scholar

Hoffberger, Elisabeth, “Non-Lethal Weapons: The Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict and the Right to Health in Law Enforcement” (2017) 38 (2) Zb. Prav. Fak. Sveuč. Rij. 831–53Google Scholar

Jabarin, Shawan, “The Occupied Palestinian Territory and International Humanitarian Law” (2013) 95 (890) International Review of the Red Cross 415–28Google Scholar

Jarrett, Robert E., “Non-lethal Weapons: The Environmental Issues” (2000) 2 (1) Environmental Practice 30–31Google Scholar

Jauchem, James R., Ryan, Kathy L., Lovelace, Jessica and Frei, Melvin R., “Effects of Esmolol on 35 GHz Microwave-Induced Lethal Heat Stress” (1997)17 Journal of Autonomic Pharmacology 165–73Google Scholar

Jeler, Grigore Eduard and Roman, Daniel, “The Graphite Bomb: An Overview of its Basic Military Applications” (2016) 31 (1) Review of the Air Force Academy 13–18Google Scholar

Kastan, Benjamin, “The Chemical Weapons Convention and Riot Control Agents” (2012) 22 Duke Journal of International and Comparative Law 267–90Google Scholar

Kleffner, Jann K., “Protection of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked” in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 321–58Google Scholar

Koplow, David A., “Tangled up in Khaki and Blue: Lethal and Non-lethal Weapons in Recent Confrontations” (2005) 36 Georgetown University Law Center 703–808Google Scholar

Kremnitzer, Mordechai, Menashe, Doron and Ghanyaim, Khalid, “The Use of Lethal Force by the Police” (2007) 53 (4) Criminal Law Quarterly 67–97Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike, “A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship Between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights in the ICRC Study on Customary Law” (2006) 11 (2) Journal of Conflict and Security Law 265–91Google Scholar

Krutzsch, Walter and Trapp, Ralph, “Art II, Definition and Criteria” in Krutzsch, Walter, Myjer, Erich and Trapp, Ralph (eds.), The Chemical Weapons Convention, A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 73–104Google Scholar

Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, Cooper, Camilla G. Guldahl and Nystuen, Gro, “Is There a Principle of Humanity in International Humanitarian Law?” in Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, Cooper, Camilla Guldahl and Nystuen, Gro (eds.), Searching for a ‘Principle of Humanity’ in International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 1–20Google Scholar

Lazarus, Liora, “The Right to Security: Securing Rights or Securitising Rights?” in Dickinson, Rob, Katselli, Elena, Murray, Colin and Pedersen, Ole W. (eds.), Examining Critical Perspectives on Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 87–106Google Scholar

LeVine, Susan D., “US Military Use of Non-lethal Weapons” (2015) 47 (1) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 239–62Google Scholar

Maresca, Louis, “A New Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War: The History and Negotiation of Protocol V to the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapon” (2004) 86 (856) International Review of the Red Cross 815–35Google Scholar

Massingham, Eve, “Conflict Without Casualties … a Note of Caution: Non-lethal Weapons and International Humanitarian Law” (2012) 94 (886) International Review of the Red Cross 673–85Google Scholar

Mayer, Chris, “Non-lethal Weapons and Noncombatant Immunity: Is it Permissible to Target Non-combatants?” (2007) 6 (3) Journal of Military Ethics 221–31Google Scholar

Mathews, Robert J. and McCormack, Timothy, “The Influence of Humanitarian Principles in the Negotiation of Arms Control Treaties” (1999) 81 (384) International Review of the Red Cross 331–52Google Scholar

McCormack, Timothy and Durham, Helen, “Aerial Bombardment of Civilians: The Current International Legal Framework” in Tanaka, Yuki and Young, Marilyn B. (eds.), Bombing Civilians: A Twentieth-Century History (New York: The New Press, 2009), pp. 215–39Google Scholar

Melzer, Nils, “Targeted Killing or Least Harmful Means? – Israel’s High Court Judgment on Targeted Killing and the Restrictive Function of Military Necessity” 2006 (9) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 87–113Google Scholar

Melzer, Nils, “Conceptual Distinction and Overlaps Between Law Enforcement and the Conduct of Hostilities” in Gill, Terry D. and Fleck, Dieter (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 33–50Google Scholar

Meyrowitz, Henri, “Le Droit de La Guerre et les Droits de l’Homme” (1972) 88 Revue De Droit Pénal Militaire et de Droit de la Guerre 1059–105Google Scholar

Norfolk, Guy and Stark, Margaret M., “Care of Detainees” in Stark, Margaret M. (ed.), Clinical Forensic Medicine: A Physician’s Guide (2nd ed., Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press, 2005), pp. 205–34Google Scholar

Nowak, Manfred, “Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment” in Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 387–409Google Scholar

Oeter, Stefan, “Methods and Means of Combat” in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 115–230Google Scholar

Olajos, Eugene J. and Stopford, Woodhall, “Riot Control Agents and Acute Sensory Irritation” in Olajos, Eugene J. and Stopford, Woodhall (eds.), Riot Control Agents: Issues in Toxicology, Safety and Health (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004), pp. 65–78Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernhard H., “Jurisdiction of States” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. XII (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 546–52Google Scholar

Panescu, Dorin and Stratbucker, Robert A., “Current Flow in the Human Body” in Kroll, Mark W. and Ho, Jeffrey D. (eds.), Taser® Conducted Electrical Weapons: Physiology, Pathology and Law (New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 63–84Google Scholar

Parks, Hays, “Part IX of the ICRC ‘Direct Participation in Hostilities’ Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect” (2010) 42 Journal of International Law and Politics 769–830Google Scholar

Parks, Hays, “Conventional Weapons and Weapons Reviews” (2005) 8 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 55–142Google Scholar

Pearson, Alan, “Incapacitating Biochemical Agents: Science, Technology, and Policy for the 21st Century” (2006) 13 (2) The Nonproliferation Review 155–88Google Scholar

Quénivet, Noëlle, “The Moscow Hostage Crisis in the Light of the Armed Conflict in Chechnya” (2001) 4 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 348–72Google Scholar

Ramachandran, Gowri, “Against the Right to Bodily Integrity: Of Cyborgs and Human Rights” (2009) 87 Denver University Law Review 1–57Google Scholar

Rappert, Brian, “Towards an Understanding of Non-lethality” in Lewer, Nick (ed.), The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons (London: Frank Cass, 2002), pp. 53–73Google Scholar

Roberts, Adam, ‘What Is a Military Occupation?’ (1984) 55 (1) British Yearbook of International Law 49–305Google Scholar

Robinson, Isabel and Nohle, Ellen, “Proportionality and Precautions in Attack: The Reverberating Effects of Using Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas” (2016) 98 (1) International Review of the Red Cross 107–45Google Scholar

Rodley, Nigel, “Integrity of the Person” in Moeckli, Daniel, Shah, Sangeeta and Sivakumaran, Sandesh (eds.), International Human Rights Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 174–94Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco and Olson, Laura M., “The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts” (2008) 90 (871) International Review of the Red Cross 599–627Google Scholar

Schabas, William, “The Crime of Torture and the International Criminal Tribunals” (2006) 37 (2) Case Western Reserve Journal 349–64Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N., “Targeting in Operational Law” in Gill, Terry D. and Fleck, Dieter (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 269–306Google Scholar

Schrantz, Joe, “The Long Range Acoustic Device: Don’t Call it a Weapon – Them’s Fightin’ Words” (2010) The Army Lawyer 53–61Google Scholar

Shah, Sangeeta, “Detention and Trial” in Moeckli, Daniel, Shah, Sangeeta and Sivakumaran, Sandesh (eds.), International Human Rights Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 259–85Google Scholar

Spoerri, Philip, “The Law of Occupation” in Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 182–205Google Scholar

Strong, James M., “Blinding Laser Weapons and Protocol IV: Obscuring the Humanitarian Vision” (1996) 15 Penn State International Law Review 237–64Google Scholar

Suteu, Silvia, “The Use of Weapons in Custodial Centers” in Casey-Maslen, Stuart (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 80–121Google Scholar

Treleaven, Philip C. and Wells, Jonathan, “3D Body Scanning and Healthcare Applications” (2007) 40 (7) Computer Science, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 28–34Google Scholar

Van der Vyer, Johan D., “The International Criminal Court and the Concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law” (2004) 7 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 57–149Google Scholar

Wagner, Adolf von, “Toxic Chemicals for Law Enforcement Including Domestic Riot Control Purposes under the Chemical Weapons Convention” in Pearson, Alan, Chevrier, Marie Isabelle and Wheelis, Mark (eds.), Incapacitating Biochemical Weapons (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007), pp. 195–207Google Scholar

Wallace, Dave and Reeves, Shanre R., “Modern Weapons” in Corn, Geoffrey S., VanLandingham, Rachel E., and Reeves, Shane R. (eds.), U.S. Military Operations: Law, Policy, and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 41–66Google Scholar

Watkin, Kenneth, “Use of Force During Occupation: Law Enforcement and Conduct of Hostilities” (2012) 94 (885) International Review of the Red Cross 267–315Google Scholar

Wright, Steve, “The Role of Sub-lethal Weapons in Human Rights Abuse” (2001) 17 Journal for Medicine, Conflict and Survival 221–23Google Scholar

Wright, Steve, “The Role of Sub-lethal Weapons in Human Rights Abuse” in Lewer, Nick (ed.), The Future of Non-lethal Weapons (London: Frank Cass, 2002), pp. 75–86Google Scholar

Wright, Susan and Falk, Richard, “Rethinking Biological Disarmament” in Wright, Susan (ed.), Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002), pp. 415–46Google Scholar

Yeom, Seokwon, Lee, Dong-Su, Jang, Yushin and Lee, Mun-Kyo, “Real-time Concealed Object Detection and Recognition with Passive Millimeter Wave Imaging” (2012) 20 (9) Optical Society of America 9371–81Google Scholar

AfCommHR, Guidelines for the Policing of Assemblies by Law Enforcement Officials in Africa (March 4, 2017), accessible at www.achpr.org/instruments/policing-assemblies-in-africa/ (last accessed February 25, 2020).Google Scholar

Amnesty International, “Amnesty International’s Concerns about Taser Use: Statement to the US Justice Department Inquiry into Deaths in Custody,” AI Index: AMR 51/151/2007, accessible at www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR511512007ENGLISH.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Amnesty International, “Arming the Torturers: Electro-Shock Torture and the Spread of Stun Technology” (March 4, 1997), accessible at www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ACT40/001/1997/en/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Amnesty International, “The Human Rights Impact of Less-lethal Weapons and other Law Enforcement Equipment,” ACT 30/1305/2015 (2015), accessible at www.amnestyusa.org/files/human_rights_impact_less_lethal_weapons_doha_paper.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo, “Can the ICC Prosecute for Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria?” (August 23, 2013), accessible at www.ejiltalk.org/can-the-icc-prosecute-for-use-of-chemical-weapons-in-syria/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Alexander, John B., Combating Terrorism with Non-lethal Weapons, accessible at www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=Europe&sa.x=0&sa.y=0 (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Alley, Roderic, Firing Blanks? The Arms Trade Treaty, Centre for Strategic Studies, New Zealand, Victoria University of Wellington, Discussion Paper No. 16/14 (2014), accessible at www.victoria.ac.nz/hppi/centres/strategic-studies/documents/Firing-Blanks-The-Arms-Trade-Treaty,-by-Roderick-Alley.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Amnesty International, “‘Less-Than-Lethal’, The Use of Stun Weapons in US Law Enforcement,” AMR 51/010/2008 (2008), accessible at www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/52000/amr510102008en.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Canadian Ministry of Community, Safety and Correctional Services, Review of the Long Range Acoustic Device (2011), accessible at www.acoustical-consultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/LRAD-Report.pdf. (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart, “Non-Kinetic-Energy Weapons Termed ‘Non-lethal’,” Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Working Paper (2010), accessible at www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Non-Kinetic-Energy%20Weapons.pdf/(last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, “Urgent Need to Prevent Human Rights Violations During Peaceful Protests” (May 10, 2016) Doc. 14060, accessible at http://website-pace.net/documents/19838/2192213/20160307-ProtestViolationsHR-EN.pdf/9681e75d-725b-440f-b3a8-faf2a36884e4 (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Council of Europe, “Factsheet Detention Conditions and Treatment of Prisoners” (September 2018), accessible at www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Detention_conditions_ENG.pdf. (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Council of Europe, “Health Related Issues in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights” (2015), accessible at www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_health.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Defensetech, “GI’s in Iraq Get Tasers, other ‘Non-lethals’” (November 12, 2003), accessible at www.defensetech.org/2003/12/11/g-i-s-in-iraq-get-tasers-other-non-lethals/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Less than Lethal Weapons: UN Peacekeeping PDT Standards for Formed Police Units (2015), accessible at http://repository.un.org/bistream/handle/11176/387390/Less%20Than%20Lethal%20Weapons.pdf?sequence=24&isAllowed=y (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

El Nuevo Diario, Denuncian Doce Detenciones Arbitrarias (September 24, 2018), accessible at www.elnuevodiario.com.ni/nacionales/475419-denuncian-detenciones-arbitrarias-nicaragua/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Geneva Academy, Use of Force in Law Enforcement and the Right to Life: The Role of the Human Rights Council, Academy In-Brief No. 6 (2016), accessible at www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/in-brief6-WEB.pdf. (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

The Guardian, Abu Ghraib Torture Suit Against Contractor Revived by Federal Court (June 30, 2014), accessible at www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jun/30/iraq-lawsuit-defense-contractor-torture-abu-graib (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Hoppe, Jeffrey J., “Operational Planning Considerations for the Use of Riot Control Agents in Military Operations other than War,” Paper submitted to the Faculty of the Naval War College, Naval War College (February 14, 2005), accessible at www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a464221.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, “Global Security: Non-Proliferation, Fourth Report of Session 2008–09” (June 2009), accessible at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmfaff/222/222.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, “Acoustic Weapons, Memorandum for Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Delegates” (1999), accessible at www.angelfire.com/nj4/hightechharassment/memo.htm (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, “Blinding Laser Weapons: The Need to Ban a Cruel and Inhuman Weapon” (1995), accessible at www.hrw.org/reports/1995/General1.htm#P393_82416 (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, “Russia: Bill Would Expand Use of Force on Inmates” (October 26, 2015), accessible at www.hrw.org/news/2015/10/26/russia-bill-would-expand-use-force-inmates (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, “Small Group Isolation Prisons in Turkey” (2000), accessible at www.hrw.org/reports/2000/turkey/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Metropolitan Police of the United Kingdom, accessible at http://content.met.police.uk/Home (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

National Center for Biotechnology Information, Open Chemistry Database, “Compound Summary for CID 8082: Piperidine,” accessible at https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/piperidine#section=Top (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Neill, Donald, “Riot Control and Incapacitating Chemical Agents under the Chemical Weapons Convention,” Center for Operational Research and Analysis, Technical Memorandum DRDC CORA TM 2007 (2007), accessible at cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc63/p528121.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, “NATO Policy on Non-lethal Weapons,” Press Statement (October 13, 1999), accessible at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27417.htm?selectedLocale=en (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Omega Research Foundation, “Will They Be Covered by an Arms Trade Treaty?” (London 2011), accessible at https://omegaresearchfoundation.org/publications/arms-internal-security-will-they-be-covered-arms-trade-treaty-june-2011 (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, “What is a Chemical Weapon?,” accessible at www.opcw.org/about-chemical-weapons/what-is-a-chemical-weapon/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “Attack,” accessible at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/attack (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “Enforce,” accessible at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/enforce (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “Light,” accessible at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/light (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “Riot Control,” accessible at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/riot_control (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “Sound,” accessible at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sound (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary, “To Incapacitate,” accessible athttps://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/incapacitate (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Panel on Anticholinesterase Chemicals, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards, Commission on Life Sciences and Division on Earth and Life Studies, “Possible Long-Term Health Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Chemical Agents” (Washington: National Academy Press, 1984), accessible at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217774/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Pearson, Alan, “Relevant Scientific and Technological Developments for the First CWC Review Conference: The BTWC Review Conference Experience,” CWC Review Conference Paper No. 1, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (2002), accessible at https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:A4Okv00PMKMJ:https://brads-cholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/879+&cd=1&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=at&client=firefox-b-ab (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

PSNI Manual of Policy Procedure and Guidance on Conflict Management, “Batons,” PB 4/13, accessible at www.psni.police.uk/advice_information/our-publications/corporate-policy/conflict-management-manual/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

PSNI Manual of Policy Procedure and Guidance on Conflict Management, “CS Incapacitant Spray,” accessible at www.psni.police.uk/advice_information/our-publications/corporate-policy/conflict-management-manual/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Qinetiq, Vehicle Arrest Systems, accessible at www.qinetiq.com/blogs/2019/05/au-x-net-product (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Reidy, Aisling, “The Prohibition of Torture, A Guide to the Implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights,” accessible at https://rm.coe.int/168007ff4c (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Reuters, “US Military Sees More Use of Laser, Microwave Weapons” (July 28, 2015), accessible at www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-arms/u-s-military-sees-more-use-of-laser-microwave-weapons-idUSKCN0Q22HH20150728 (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Security Devices International, “Current Use of Less Lethal Force in Prison Riot Control,” accessible at https://securitydii.com/riot-control-corrections-prisons/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Shading, Mothepa, “Tools of Torture? – Use of Electric Shock Equipment Among African Police,” Institute for Security Studies Policy Brief (2016), accessible at https://issafrica.org/research/policy-brief/tools-of-torture-use-of-electric-shock-equipment-among-african-police (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Siniscalchi, Joseph, “Non-lethal Technologies: Implications for Military Strategy, Center for Strategy and Technology,” Air War College, Maxwell Airforce Base Alabama, Occasional Paper No. 3 (1998), accessible at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/csat3.pdf. (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Sutherland, Ronald, “Chemical and Biological Non-lethal Weapons: Political and Technical Aspects,” SIPRI Policy Paper 23 (2008)Google Scholar

Telemetro, “Policía Reprime con Violencia Protesta Contra Ortega en Nicaragua” (October 14, 2018), accessible at www.telemetro.com/internacionales/Policia-violencia-protesta-Ortega-Nicaragua_0_1181582209.html (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

The Journal, “New Evidence Proves the UK Tortured Interned Men During the Troubles, Says Ireland” (December 2, 2014), accessible at www.thejournal.ie/hooded-men-legal-review-1811429-Dec2014/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Tumbarska, Adelina and Petkov, Petko, “Non-lethal Weapons in the Context of the Restrictions Required by International Law” (Conference Paper, October 2017), accessible at www.researchgate.net/profile/Adelina_Tumbarska/publication/321882578_Non-lethal_Weapons_in_the_Context_of_the_Restrictions_Required_by_International_law/links/5a61e8420f7e9b6b8fd416ea/Non-lethal-Weapons-in-the-Context-of-the-Restrictions-Required-by-International-law.pdf?origin=publication_detail (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Human Rights Bodies – Complaint Procedures,” accessible at www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/TBPetitions/Pages/HRTBPetitions.aspx#interstate (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

UN News, UN Outlaws Use of Rubber Bullets in Kosovo and Consults on Possible Wider Ban (July 3, 2007), accessible at https://news.un.org/en/story/2007/07/224512-un-outlaws-use-rubber-bullets-kosovo-and-consults-possible-wider-ban (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, “Resource Book on the Use of Force and Firearms in Law Enforcement,” HR/PUB/17/6 (2017), accessible at www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/UseOfForceAndFirearms.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, UN Register on Conventional Arms, accessible at www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/register/ (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

UN Special Rapporteur on the Use of a Lethal Water Cannon in South Korea, accessible at www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=20603&LangID=E (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

US National Center for Biotechnology Information, “Open Chemistry Database on Methyl Diethanolamine,” accessible at https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/methyldiethanolamine#section=Top (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

US DoD, Directive No. 3000.03E (April 13, 2013), accessible at www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300003p.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

US DoD, Escalation of Force Options, Annual Report (2009), accessible at http://jnlwp.defense.gov/Portals/50/Documents/Press%5FRoom/Annual%5FReviews%5FReports/2009/AR2009%5FPosted%5Fto%5Fwebsite.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

US DoJ, “Police Use of Force, Tasers and other Less-lethal Weapons,” Research Brief (2011), accessible at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/232215.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Venice Commission, “Guidelines on Freedom of Assembly,” Study No. 581/2010, CDL- AD. (June 4, 2010), accessible at www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2010)020-e. (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

WHO, “What are Electromagnetic Fields? – Summary of Health Effects,” accessible at www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/index1.html (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar

Williams, John Michael, “Biological Effects of Microwaves: Thermal and Nonthermal Mechanisms,” accessible at https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0102/0102007.pdf (last accessed February 25, 2020)Google Scholar