Alland, D. and Teitgen-Colly, C., Traité du droit d'asile (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2002).Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E., International Organizations as Law-makers (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D., ‘Introduction: Finding a Common Language for Open Legal Systems’, in Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law before the Courts (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004).Google Scholar

Anker, D., ‘Law, Gender, and the Human Rights Paradigm’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15 (2002), 133–54.Google Scholar

,Anon, ‘Conflicts between Treaties and Subsequently Enacted Statutes in Belgium: Etat Belge v. S.A. «Fromagerie Franco-Suisse Le Ski»’, Michigan Law Review, 72 (1973–1974), 118–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldassarre, A., ‘La Corte costituzionale italiana e il metodo comparativo’, Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo, 2 (2006), 983–91.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (eds.), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Belfiore, A., ‘L'interpretazione della legge. L'analogia’, Studium Iuris, 4 (2008), 421–33.Google Scholar

Bell, J., French Legal Cultures (London: Butterworths, 2001).Google Scholar

Bell, J., Judiciaries within Europe – A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Belorgey, J.-M., ‘Le contentieux du droit d'asile et l'intime conviction du juge’, Revue Administrative No. 336, (November 2003), 619–22.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E., ‘Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts’, American Journal of International Law 102 (2008), 241–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenuti, M., Il diritto di asilo nell'ordinamento costituzionale italiano. Un'introduzione (Padua: CEDAM, 2007).Google Scholar

Betts, A. and Durieux, J.-F., ‘Convention Plus as a Norm-Setting Exercise’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 20 (2007), 509–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, Sir T., ‘ “There is a World Elsewhere”: The Changing Perspectives of English Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 41 (1992), 513–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjarup, J., ‘The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism’, Ratio Juris, 18 (2005), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, N. and Husain, R., Immigration, Asylum and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Blanquer, D., Asilo político en España. Garantías del extranjero y garantías del interés general (Madrid: Ministerio del Interior, 1997).Google Scholar

Bodart, S., La protection internationale des réfugiés en Belgique (Brussels: Bruylant, 2008).Google Scholar

Bonetti, P., ‘Il diritto d'asilo – Profili generali e costituzionali del diritto d'asilo nell'ordinamento italiano’, in Nascimbene, B. (ed.), Diritto degli stranieri (Padua: CEDAM, 2004), 1136–88.Google Scholar

Bonnotte, C., ‘La contestation des décisions de maintien en rétention administrative et en zone d'attente devant le juge judiciaire et le juge administratif’, L'Actualité juridique – Droit administrative, 2004, 694–703.Google Scholar

Booth, C., Remarks at a one-day conference at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law: ‘European Influences on Public Law: 5 years of the HRA 1998 in English Law and Recent Developments in France’, October 2005.

Boyle, A. and Chinkin, C., The Making of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Breton-Le Goff, G., ‘Mondialisation et démocratie: Evaluation de la participation normative des OING à la gouvernance’, Université de Québec à Montréal sur les fondements philosophiques de la justice et de la société démocratique, October 2001.

Bring, O. and Mahmoudi, S., Sverige och folkrätten, 3rd edn (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2007).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Basic Documents in International Law, 6th edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 7th edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Byrne, R. and Shacknove, A., ‘The Safe Country Notion in European Asylum Law’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 9 (1996), 185–228.Google Scholar

Byrne, R., Noll, G. and Vedsted-Hansen, J., New Asylum Countries? Migration Control and Refugee Protection in an Enlarged European Union (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Byrne, R., Noll, G. and Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Understanding Refugee Law in an Enlarged European Union’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 355–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canivet, G., ‘The Use of Comparative Law Before the French Private Law Courts’ in Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004), 181–93.Google Scholar

Canivet, G.Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004).

Caritas, (ed.), Immigrazione Dossier Statistico '97 (Rome: Anterem, 1997).Google Scholar

Carlier, J.-Y.Droit d'asile et des réfugiés. De la protection aux droits, Recueil des cours, Académie de droit international de La Haye, volume 332 (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 9–354.Google Scholar

Carlier, J.-Y., and Sarolea, S. (ed.), Droit des étrangers et nationalité (Brussels: De Boeck et Larcier, 2005).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘Commento all'art. 10’, in Branca, G. (ed.), Commentario alla Costituzione, vol. I – Principi fondamentali: Art. 1–12 (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1975), 485–564.Google Scholar

Castagnos-Sen, A., Les conditions d'exercice du droit d'asile en France (Paris: La Documentation française, 2006).Google Scholar

Cavasino, E., ‘Un passo indietro nell'interpretazione dei rapporti fra diritto d'asilo e status di rifugiato nell'ordinamento italiano’, Giurisprudenza italiana, 159 (2007), 318–24.Google Scholar

Chaltiel, F., ‘Le juge administratif, juge de l'immigration’, Revue de Droit Public, 1 (2000), 153–93.Google Scholar

Chenevière, C., ‘L'article 68 CE – Rapide survol d'un renvoi préjudiciel mal compris’, Cahiers de droit européen, 40 (2004), 567–90.Google Scholar

Chieffi, L., ‘La tutela costituzionale del diritto di asilo e di rifugio a fini umanitari’, Diritto, immigrazione e cittadinanza, 2 (2004), 25–48.Google Scholar

Clayton, G., Immigration and Asylum Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Comporti, M., ‘La codificazione ed i principali codici europei’, in Bessone, M. (ed.), Istituzioni di diritto privato, 14th edn (Turin: Giappichelli, 2008), 28–38.Google Scholar

Consoli, D. and Schiavone, G., ‘Analisi della procedura semplificata, della procedura ordinaria e delle collegate misure di trattenimento dei richiedenti asilo’, Diritto, immigrazione e cittadinanza, 2 (2005), 13–27.Google Scholar

Cassazione, Corte Suprema, ‘Relazione sull'amministrazione della giustizia nell'anno 2008 del Primo Presidente della Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Vincenzo Carbone’, 30 January 2009, available at www.cortedicassazione.it/Documenti/Relazione%20anno%20giudiziario%202008.pdf

Cremer, H.-J., ‘Zur Einwirkung der EMRK auf das deutsche Ausländerrecht’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 26 (2006), 341–54.Google Scholar

D ' Alconzo, G.et al. (eds.), Ricerca giuridica sugli orientamenti giurisprudenziali in materia di asilo (Rome: Jesuit Refugee Service – Italia, 2003), also available at www.centroastalli.it/dl/QUAD_4.zip.Google Scholar

,Danish Institute for International Studies, De danske forbehold over for den Europæiske Union [Report on the Danish opt outs from the European Union] (Copenhagen: DIIS, 2008).Google Scholar

Deau, R., ‘Les liens unissant l'erreur manifeste d'appréciation et les contrôles “entiers” en matière de droit des étrangers’, Revue française de droit administratif, (November–December 2005), 1188–96.Google Scholar

Delouvin, P., ‘The Evolution of Asylum in France’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 13 (2000), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosa, O. and Verrastro, D. (eds.), Appunti di viaggio: l'emigrazione italiana tra attualità e memoria (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2007).Google Scholar

Diesen, C., Veloz Roca, A. Lagerqvist, Lindholm-Billing, K., Seidlitz, M. and Wahren, A., Prövning av asylärenden. Bevis 8 (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2007).Google Scholar

Domingo, L., ‘Les conditions de la rétention administrative peuvent être constatées par le juge judiciaire’, L'Actualité juridique – Droit administratif (2004), 1011–13.Google Scholar

Dörig, H., ‘Flüchtlingsschutz in Großbritannien’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 26 (2006), 272–77.Google Scholar

Doyen, I., ‘La nouvelle réglementation sur la protection subsidiaire’, Revue du droit des étrangers, 139 (2006), 459–66.Google Scholar

Dutheillet de Lamothe, O., ‘Constitutional court judges’ roundtable', International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3 (2005), 550–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eklund, H., ‘Rättsbildningen i en ny miljö – hur har domstolarnas roll och betydelse förändrats?’, Svensk Juristtidning, 3 (2004), 205–28.Google Scholar

Errera, R., ‘The Use of Comparative Law Before the French Administrative Law Courts’ in Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004), 153–63.Google Scholar

Esposito, C., ‘Asilo (diritto di) – Diritto Costituzionale’, in Santoro Passarelli, F. and others (eds.), Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. III (Milan: Giuffré, 1958).Google Scholar

Feller, E., Türk, V., and Nicholson, F. (eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernhout, R., ‘Erkenning en toelating als vluchteling in Nederland’, PhD Thesis, Amsterdam 1990.

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Intrepretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’, British Yearbook of International Law 28 (1951), 1–28.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’, British Yearbook of International Law 33 (1957), 203–93.Google Scholar

Foblets, M. and Vanheule, D., ‘Het federale vreemdelingenbeleid in België: enkele recente wetswijzigingen’, Tijdschrift voor Bestuurswetenschappen en Publiekrecht, 7 (2007), 387–408.Google Scholar

Foblets, M., Vanheule, D. and Bouckaert, S., ‘De nieuwe asielwetgeving: het Belgische asielrecht kleurt Europeser’, Rechtskundig Weekblad, 23 (2006–7), 942–57.Google Scholar

Franck, T. and Fox, G., ‘Transnational Judicial Synergy’, in Franck, T. and Fox, G. (eds.) International Law Decisions in National Courts (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1996).Google Scholar

Gabaccia, D. R., Italy's Many Diasporas (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000).Google Scholar

García Vázquez, S., El estatuto jurídico-constitucional del extranjero en España (Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch, 2007).Google Scholar

George, A. L., ‘Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’, in Lauren, P. G. (ed.) Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Glenn, H. P., ‘La tradition juridique nationale’, Revue internationale de droit comparé, 2 (2003), 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, G. S. and McAdam, J., The Refugee in International Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Gortázar Rotaeche, C., ‘The Implementation Rules of the New Spanish Asylum Law’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 7 (1995), 506–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granestrand, L., I Sveriges väntrum (Stockholm: Norstedts, 2008).Google Scholar

Gross, L., ‘Some Observations on the International Court of Justice’, American Journal of International Law, 56 (1962), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, L., States as Organs of International Law and the Problem of Autointepretation', in Lipsky, G. A. (ed.), Law and Politics in the World Community: Essays on Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory and Related Problems in International Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Grossi, P., L'ordine giuridico medievale, 4th edn (Rome: Laterza, 2008).Google Scholar

Grossi, P., Scienza giuridica italiana: un profilo storico, 1860–1950 (Milan: Giuffré, 2000).Google Scholar

Guiraudon, V., ‘European Court and Foreigners’ Rights: A Comparative Study of Norms Diffusion', International Migration Review, 34 (2000), 1088–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gyulai, G., ‘Country Information in Asylum Procedures – Quality as a Legal Requirement in the EU’, Hungarian Helsinki Committee, 2007.

Hailbronner, K., Ausländerrecht, 2nd edn (Müller, Heidelberg 1989).Google Scholar

Hansenclever, A., Mayer, P. and Rittberger, V., Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, C., ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), 214–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, J. C., ‘A Forum for the Transnational Development of Refugee Law: The IARLJ's Advanced Refugee Law Workshop’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 15 (2003), 418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, J. C., The Law of Refugee Status (Toronto: Butterworths, 1991).Google Scholar

Hathaway, J. C., The Rights of Refugees under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haughey, N., ‘Legal Query on Asylum-Seekers Voucher System’, Irish Times, 3 December 1999.Google Scholar

Hering, E., ‘Zur Lage der ausländischen Flüchtlinge in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 32 (1979), 149–54.Google Scholar

,ICS – Consorzio Italiano di Solidarietà and Olivieri, M. S., La protezione negata: primo rapporto sul diritto di asilo in Italia (Milan: Feltrinelli, 2005).Google Scholar

L'utopia dell'asilo: il diritto di asilo in Italia nel 2005 (Turin: Edizioni Gruppo Abele, 2006).

Incisa Di Camerana, L., Il grande esodo: storia delle migrazioni italiane nel mondo (Milan: Corbaccio, 2003).Google Scholar

,Irish Human Rights Commission, Observations on the Immigration and Residence Bill 2008 (Dublin, 2008).Google Scholar

Council, Irish Refugee, The Right to Protection: Submission to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights on the protection aspects of the Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill 2008 (Dublin 2008).Google Scholar

Jeannin, L., Meneghini, M., Pauti, C., and Poupet, R., Le Droit d'Asile en Europe – Étude compare (Paris: Legislation'Harmattan, 1999).Google Scholar

Jennings, R. Y. and Watts (eds.), A., Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edn (London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

Jessup, P. C., Transnational Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Julien-Laferrière, F., Droit des étrangers (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2000).Google Scholar

Kjær, K. U., ‘Åbenbart grundløs-proceduren’ in Christensen, L. B.et al., Udlændingeret, 3rd edn (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2006), 505–28.Google Scholar

Kjær, K. U., ‘En grov tilsidesættelse af grundlovens klare ord …’, Juristen (1998), 45–55.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. K., ‘International Legal Histories: The Declining Importance of Travaux Préparatoires in Treaty Interpretation?’, Netherlands International Law Review, 50 (2003), 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klos, Ch., ‘Deutschlands Verhältnis zur Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention und zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 20 (2000), 202–10.Google Scholar

Koch, I. E. and Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Judicialised Protection of International Human Rights and the Issue of Power Balance’, in Scheinin, M. (ed.), Welfare State and Constitutionalism – Nordic Perspectives, (Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2001), 175–217.Google Scholar

Koopmans, T., ‘Comparative Law and the Courts’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45 (1996), 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacey, W., ‘Judicial Discretion and Human Rights: Expanding the Role of International Law in the Domestic Sphere’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 5 (2004), 108–32.Google Scholar

Lambert, H., ‘Asylum, Exceptional Leave to Remain and the Right of Appeal’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 3 (2003), 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, H., ‘The EU Qualification Directive, Its Impact on the Jurisprudence of the United Kingdom and International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (2006), 161–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, H., ‘International Refugee Law: Dominant and Emerging Approaches’, in Armstrong, D. (ed.) Handbook of International Law (London: Routledge, 2008), 344–54.Google Scholar

Lambert, H., Seeking Asylum – Comparative Law and Practice in Selected European Countries (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995).Google Scholar

Lambert, H., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58, no. 3, (2009), 519–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, H., Messineo, F. and Tiedemann, P., ‘Comparative Perspectives of Constitutional Asylum in France, Italy and Germany : Requiescat in Pace?’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27 (2008), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasswell, H. D. and McDougal, M. S., ‘Legal Education and Public Policy: Professional Training in the Public Interest’, Yale Law Journal, 52 (1943), 203–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens, 1958).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar

Lee, J., ‘Portrait of a Young Italy: Asylum Practice and Public Opinion’, Contemporary Topics in Forced Migration (Working Paper no. 4), 2005, available at www.ccis-ucsd.org/fml/wrkg4_fml.pdf.

Legrand, P., ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45 (1996), 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemmens, M. and Roggen, J., ‘De hervorming van de asielprocedure anno 2006: een verbetering van de rechtspositie?’, Tijdschrift voor Vreemdelingenrecht, 1 (2007), 6–22.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K., ‘Interlocking Legal Orders in the European Union and Comparative Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52 (2003), 873–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenaerts, K., ‘The Unity of European Law and the Overload of the ECJ – The System of Preliminary Rulings Revisited’, in Pernice, I., Kokott, J. and Saunders, C. (eds.), The Future of the European Judicial System in a Comparative Perspective, European Constitutional Law Network-Series Vol. 6 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2006), 211–39.Google Scholar

Letsas, G., A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichère, , Fr., Potvin-Solis, L. and Raynouard, A. (eds.), Le dialogue entre les juges européens et nationaux: incantation ou réalité? (Brussels: Bruylant, 2004).Google Scholar

Lindblom, P. H., ‘Domstolarnas växande samhällsroll och processens förändrade funktioner – floskler eller fakta?’, Svensk Juristtidning, 3 (2004), 229–62.Google Scholar

Lochak, D., ‘Le Conseil d’État en politique', Pouvoirs – Revue Française d'études constitutionnelles et politiques, No.123, November 2007, 19–32.Google Scholar

Lundh, P., ‘Domarrollen och kraven på domare – en yngre, relativt nyutnämnd, domares reflektioner’, Svensk Juristtidning, 3 (2004), 320–3.Google Scholar

Manciaux, H., ‘La réforme de la reconduite à la frontière par la loi du 26 novembre 2003: l'imbroglio juridique demeure’, L'Actualité juridique – Droit administratif (2004), 1904–10.Google Scholar

Mariño Menéndez, F. M., ‘Algunas observaciones sobre la futura ley de asilo española’, Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 2 (1981), 955–65.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. S., ‘Judge, Jurist and the Study and Use of Foreign Law’, Law Quarterly Review, 99 (1993), 622–35.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. S., ‘A Matter of Style’, Law Quarterly Review, 110 (1994), 607–28.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. S. and Fedtke, J., ‘The Judge as Comparatist’, Tulane Law Review, 80 (2005), 11–167.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. S. and Fedtke, J., Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law. A New Source of Inspiration? (University of Texas at Austin and University College London Press, 2006).Google Scholar

McCoubrey, H. and White, N. D., Textbook on Jurisprudence, 3rd edn (London: Blackstone, 1999).Google Scholar

McCrudden, C., ‘A Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (2000), 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougal, M. S., ‘Some Basic Concepts about International Law: A Policy Orientated Approach’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4 (1960), 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougal, M. S. and Lasswell, H. D., ‘The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order’, American Journal of International Law, 53 (1959), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGoldrick, D., ‘The United Kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998 in Theory and Practice’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50 (2001), 901–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNair, A. D., The Law of Treaties (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Frontiere, Medici Senza (ed.), Oltre la frontiera: le barriere al riconoscimento del diritto d'asilo in Italia (Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2006).Google Scholar

,Migration Courts of Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Malmö, , Joint Report, Kartläggning och analys av bifallsfrekvenserna i migrationsdomstolarna, 31 May 2007. Available at: www.domstol.se/upload/Verksamheten/Pressrum/Kartlaggning_migrationsdomstolarna.pdf.

Montero Elena, C. M., ‘Garantías procesales del derecho de asilo’ in Mariño Menéndez, F. M. (ed.), Derecho de extranjería, asilo y refugio, 2nd edn, (Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales, 2003).Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Ch. L. de Secondat baron de la Brède et, De l'Esprit des lois, I (Paris, 1748).Google Scholar

Nascimbene, B., ‘National Reports: Italy’ in Higgins, I. and Hailbronner, K. (eds.), Migration and Asylum Law and Policy in the European Union: FIDE 2004 National Reports (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 205–20.Google Scholar

Neri, L., ‘Il diritto d'asilo – Profili sostanziali: lo status di rifugiato’ in Nascimbene, B. (ed.), Diritto degli stranieri (Padua: CEDAM, 2004), 1189–244.Google Scholar

Nguyen Quoc Dinh, P. Daillet and Pellet, A., Droit international public, 7th edn. (Paris, 2002).Google Scholar

Nilsson, E., Barn i rättens gränsland (Uppsala: Iustus, 2007).Google Scholar

Noll, G. (ed.), Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Law (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

North, A. M. and Chia, J., ‘Towards Convergence in the Interpretation of the Refugee Convention: A Proposal for the Establishment of an International Judicial Commission for Refugees’, in McAdam, J. (ed.), Forced Migration, Human Rights and Security (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), 225–61.Google Scholar

,Observatorio Permanente de la Inmigración, Extranjeros con certificado de registro o tarjeta de residencia en vigor y Extranjeros con autorización de estancia por estudios en vigor a 31 de diciembre de 2008 (Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración, February 2009).Google Scholar

,Observatorio Permanente de la Inmigración, Extranjeros con certificado de registro o tarjeta de residencia en vigor a 31 de diciembre de 2007 (Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración, 17 January 2008).Google Scholar

O'Mahony, P., ‘Direct Provision – A Recipe for Social Exclusion’, Poverty Today, 47 (July/August 2000).Google Scholar

Ouareff, A., ‘La France doit cesser le transfert de demandeurs d'asile sous Dublin vers la Grèce’, expert note, n. 6/2008, April 2008. Available at: www.­forumrefugies.org/FR06-dublin%20transfert_da_vers_grece.pdf.

Passaglia, P., ‘Eutanasia di un diritto (la triste parabola dell'asilo) (Osservaz. a Cass. 25 novembre 2001, n. 25028)’, Foro Italiano, (2006-I), 2851–53.Google Scholar

Peczenik, A., ‘Lagstiftningen, domstolarna, rättsmedvetandet och rättsvetenskapen’, in SOU (Swedish Government Official Report), Löser juridiken demokratins problem?, 58 (1999), 7–55.Google Scholar

Peczenik, A., On Law and Reason (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez Sola, N., La regulación del derecho de asilo y refugio en España (Granada: Adhara, 1997).Google Scholar

Pescatore, V. P., ‘Le recours dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes à des normes déduites de la comparaison des droits des États membres’, Revue trimestrielle de droit communautaire 1980, 337–52.Google Scholar

Piperno, F., ‘From Albania to Italy: Formation and Basic Features of a Binational Migration System’, Centro Studi di Politica Internazionale – Background paper for the CEME-CeSPI research mission in Italy and Albania (5–9 June 2002), 2002, available at www.cespi.it/PASTORE/Italy-Albania.PDF.

Pollern, H.-I., ‘Die Entwicklung der Asylbewerberzahlen seit 1979’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 1 (1981), 33–36.Google Scholar

Pollern, H.-I., ‘Die Entwicklung der Asylbewerberzahlen 1992’, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 13 (1993), 26–33.Google Scholar

Polo Guardo, R. K. and Carmona Muñoz, V. (eds.), Guía sobre el derecho de asilo (Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 2005).Google Scholar

Refugee Appeals Board, Annual Reports issued by the Executive Committee.

11. Report 2002 (Copenhagen 2003).

12. Report 2003 (Copenhagen 2004).

13. Report 2004 (Copenhagen 2005).

14. Report 2005 (Copenhagen 2006).

15. Report 2006 (Copenhagen 2007).

Rabatel, B., ‘Liaison Magistrates: Their Role in Comparative Law and International Judicial Cooperation’ in Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004), 49–54.Google Scholar

Reed, R., ‘Foreign Precedents and Judicial Reasoning: The American Debate and British Practice’, Law Quarterly Review 124 (2008), 253–73.Google Scholar

Rehaag, S., ‘Troubling Patterns in Canadian Refugee Adjudication’, Ottawa Law Review 39 (2008), 1–31.Google Scholar

Reinfeldt, F., (Swedish Prime Minister), Speech to the European Parliament, 19 February 2008. Available at: www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/10296/a/98630.

Rosenfeld, M., ‘Constitutional adjudication in Europe and the United States: paradoxes and contrasts’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2004), 633–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozakis, Ch. L., ‘The European Judge as Comparatist’, Tulane Law Review 80 (2005), 257–80.Google Scholar

Rumpf, O., ‘Ein Jahr danach – Ergebnisse und Umfrageaktion des BDVR über die Erfahrungen mit dem neuen Asylverfahrensrecht’, BDVR-Rundschreiben 4 (1994), 3–11.Google Scholar

Santolaya Machetti, P., El derecho de asilo en la Constitución española (Valladolid: Lex Nova, 2001).Google Scholar

Sarolea, S., Kaiser, M., Doyen, I. and Jacques, J., La réforme du droit des étrangers. Les lois du 15 septembre 2006 modifiant la loi du 15 décembre 1980 sur l'accès au territoire, au séjour, à l'établissement et à l'éloignement des étrangers en réformant le Conseil d'État et créant un Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers (Waterloo: Kluwer, 2007).Google Scholar

Scarman, Lord ‘English Law – The New Dimension’, The Hamlyn Lectures – Series 2 (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1974).Google Scholar

Schnell, R., Hill, P. B. and Esser, E., Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 5th edn (R. Oldenbourg, 1995).

Sedley, S. ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’, Public Law (1995), 386–401.Google Scholar

Sefton-Green, R., ‘Compare and Contrast: Monstre à Deux Têtes’, Revue internationale de droit compare, 1 (2002), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester UniversityPress, 1984).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal, 44 (2003), 191–219.Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Judicial Globalization’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 40 (2000), 1103–24.Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M., A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Typology of Transjudicial Communication’, University of Richmond Law Review, 29 (1994), 99–137.Google Scholar

Stein, A., ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’, in Krasner, S. D. (ed.) International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), 115–40.Google Scholar

Snidal, D., ‘Coordination Versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes', American Political Science Review 79 (1985), 923–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ställvik, O., Domarrollen – rättsregler, yrkeskultur och ideal (Uppsala University, 2009).Google Scholar

Stanley, J., ‘The Refugee Appeals Tribunal and the Publication of Previous Decisions’, The Researcher, The Refugee Documentation Centre Newsletter, Issue 3, September 2006.Google Scholar

Stein, E.,‘Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’, American Journal of International Law, 75 (1981), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stella, G. A., L'orda: quando gli albanesi eravamo noi (Milan: BUR – Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli, 2006).Google Scholar

Stern, R., Ny utlänningslag under lupp (Stockholm: Svenska Röda Korset, 2008).Google Scholar

Stevens, D., UK Asylum Law and Policy – Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Stirn, B., Comments/speech at a one-day conference at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law: ‘European Influences on Public Law: 5 years of the HRA 1998 in English Law and Recent Developments in France’ (October 2005).

Storey, H., ‘The Advanced Refugee Law Workshop Experience: An IARLJ Perspective’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 15 (2003), 422–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storey, H., ‘EU Refugee Qualification Directive: A Brave New World?’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 20 (2008), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strömgren, S., ‘Domarrollen och kraven på domare – några blickar framåt’, Svensk Juristtidning, 3 (2004), 309–14.Google Scholar

Strömholm, S., Rätt, rättskällor och rättstillämpning, 5th edn (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 1996).Google Scholar

Symes, M., Caselaw on the Refugee Convention (London: Refugee Legal Centre, 2001).Google Scholar

Symes, M. and Jorro, P., Asylum Law and Practice (London: Lexis-Nexis, 2003).Google Scholar

Teitgen-Colly, C. and Julien-Laferrière, F., ‘La réforme du droit d'asile’, Doctrine, L'Actualité juridique-Droit Administratif, 20 (December 1998), 1002–4.Google Scholar

Tiberghien, F., ‘La jurisprudence du Conseil d’État sur la Convention de Genève du 28 juillet 1951 relative au statut des réfugiés' in Chetail, V. (ed.), La Convention de Genève du 28 juillet 1951 relative au statut des réfugiés 50 ans après: Bilan et perspectives (Bruylant: Brussels, 2001), 289–323.Google Scholar

Tiedemann, P., Internet für Juristen (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1999).Google Scholar

Türk, V., ‘The Role of UNHCR in the Development of International Refugee Law’, in Nicholson, F. and Twomey, P., Refugee Rights and Realities, (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Asylum in the European Union: A Study of the Implementation of the Qualification Directive (November 2007).

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, ‘Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries, First Half 2008. Statistical Overview of Asylum Applications Lodged in 38 European and 6 Non-European Countries’, (Geneva: UNHCR, 17 October 2008).

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, ‘Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries (2008): Statistical Overview of Asylum Applications Lodged in Europe and selected Non-European Countries’, 24 March 2009, available at www.unhcr.org/statistics/STATISTICS/49c796572.pdf.

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Comments on the Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill2008 (Dublin: UNHCR, 2008).Google Scholar

,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (Geneva: UNHCR, 1979).Google Scholar

States Parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol (Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 1 November 2007).

Valluy, J., ‘La fiction juridique de l'asile’, Plein Droit, 63 (December 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanheule, D., ‘The Qualification Directive: A Milestone in Belgian Asylum Law’, in Zwaan, K. (ed.), The Qualification Directive: Central Themes, Problem Issues and Implementation in Selected Member States (Nijmegen: Wolf, 2007), 71–7.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘The Borderline Between Questions of Fact and Questions of Law’, in Noll, G. (ed.), Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), 57–65.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Denmark’, in Higgins, I. (ed.), Migration and Asylum Law and Policy in the European Union. FIDE 2004 National Reports (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 65–87.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Grundbegreber og hovedsondringer i udlændingeretten’ in Christensen, L. B.et al., Udlændingeret, 3rd edn (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2006), 3–17.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Klageproceduren i asylsager’, in Christensen, L. B.et al., Udlændingeret, 3rd edn (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2006), 457–504.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Konkret og individuelt’, in Møller-Sørensen, A. and Storgaard, A., Jurist uden omsvøb. Festskrift til Gorm Toftegaard Nielsen (Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers' Forlag, 2007), 599–616.Google Scholar

Vitale, G., ‘La nuova procedura di riconoscimento dello status di rifugiato: dall'audizione avanti la Commissione territoriale all'impugnativa giurisdizionale’, Diritto, immigrazione e cittadinanza, 4 (2005) 47–65.Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘Foreign Law and the ModernIus Gentium’, Harvard Law Review 119 (2005), 129–47.Google Scholar

Ward, E., ‘Ireland's Refugee Policies: A Critical Historical Review’, in Driscoll, D. (ed.) Irish Human Rights Review 2000, (Dublin: Roundhall Ltd, 2000), 157–75.Google Scholar

Watson, J. S. ‘Autointerpretation, Competence and the Continuing Validity of Article 2(7) of the UN Charter’, American Journal of International Law 71 (1977), 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wikrén, G. and Sandesjö, H., Utlänningslagen med kommentarer, 8th edn (Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2006).Google Scholar

Young, E. A., ‘Foreign Law and the Denominator Problem’, Harvard Law Review, 119 (2005), 148–67.Google Scholar

Ziotti, P., Il diritto d'asilo nell'ordinamento italiano (Padua: CEDAM, 1988).Google Scholar

Zoller, E., La bonne foi en droit international public (Paris: Editions Pedone, 1977).Google Scholar