Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:03:23.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Customary law, courts and code after 1927

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Martin Chanock
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

This chapter has two parts: the first is a reprise of the major themes in the state's relationship with African law, while the second illustrates briefly the doctrinal directions taken by the native courts after the passing of the Native Administration Act in 1927. In creating a separate court system for Africans, the 1927 Act adopted the Transkei formula which gave to magistrates in the native courts discretion as to whether to apply African law. Section 11(1) of the Act provided that

it shall be in the discretion of the Courts of Native Commissioners in all suits or proceedings between Natives involving questions of customs followed by Natives, to decide such questions according to the Native law applying to such custom … Provided that such Native law shall not be opposed to the principles of public policy or natural justice: Provided further that it shall not be lawful for any court to declare that the custom of lobola or bogadi or any other similar custom is repugnant to such principles.

But the Act did not make clear how this discretion was to be exercised. Did it mean that the Roman-Dutch common law was to be considered to be the law that usually applied to African civil cases, except in matters peculiar to tribal life and custom, for which there was no common-law provision? Or was it to be taken to mean that African law would usually apply to civil cases between Africans, the only exceptions being those circumstances in which it was impossible to apply the concepts of African law? Unsurprisingly the different divisions of the new native courts initially took different views.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Making of South African Legal Culture 1902–1936
Fear, Favour and Prejudice
, pp. 328 - 358
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×