Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- for Judge Thomas H. Crofts, Sr aka Pop
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Text at Hand
- 2 Caxton's Preface: Historia and Argumentum
- 3 Malory's Moral Scribes: ‘Balyn’ in the Winchester Manuscript
- 4 Usurpation, Right and Redress in Malory's Roman War
- 5 No Hint of the Future
- Epilogue: Two Gestures of Closure
- Bibliography
- Index
- Arthurian Studies
4 - Usurpation, Right and Redress in Malory's Roman War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- for Judge Thomas H. Crofts, Sr aka Pop
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Text at Hand
- 2 Caxton's Preface: Historia and Argumentum
- 3 Malory's Moral Scribes: ‘Balyn’ in the Winchester Manuscript
- 4 Usurpation, Right and Redress in Malory's Roman War
- 5 No Hint of the Future
- Epilogue: Two Gestures of Closure
- Bibliography
- Index
- Arthurian Studies
Summary
History becomes ‘effective’ to the degree that it introduces discontinuity into our very being – as it divides our emotions, dramatizes our instincts, multiplies our body and sets it against itself. “Effective” history deprives the self of the reassuring stability of life and nature, and it will not allow itself to be transmitted by a voiceless obstinacy toward a millennial ending. It will uproot its traditional foundations and relentlessly disrupt its pretended continuity. This is because knowledge is not made for understanding; it is made for cutting.
(Michel Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’)Introduction: The History of the Roman War
The production history of the Brut, as Professor Radulescu has shown, gave the late medieval gentry a point of focus for self-fashioning and political debate: it gave them books to own and annotate, leaves on which to inscribe their names and arms. Within just this context of book-ownership and book-use, the chronicle tradition of Arthur's Roman War gave both Malory and Caxton a particular place to express anxieties about England's political continuity, the civil costs of war (and peace), and the logic of monarchical succession – anxieties, in short, about England's constitution. It is important to remember, however, that the times of Malory's and Caxton's respective encounters with this narrative were at opposite ends of the Morte's production continuum. At the earlier end lies Malory's adaptation of the fourteenth-century alliterative Morte Arthure. Whether or not Malory's version of Arthur's war with Emperor Lucius was, as Vinaver argues, the first written of the Morte's sections, it is among the very earliest.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Malory's Contemporary AudienceThe Social Reading of Romance in Late Medieval England, pp. 94 - 120Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2006