Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–85.Google Scholar

Abrahamson, E. and Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708–40.Google Scholar

Aggeri, F. (2005). Les régimes de gouvernementalité dans le domaine de l’environnement. In Hatchuel, A., Pezet, E., Starkey, K. and Lenay, O., eds., Gouvernement, organisation et gestion. L’héritage de Michel Foucault. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université de Laval, 431–67.Google Scholar

Aggeri, F. and Labatut, J. (2010). La gestion au prisme de ses instruments: Une analyse généalogique des approches théoriques fondées sur les instruments de gestion. Finance, Contrôle, Stratégie, 13(3), 5–37.Google Scholar

Ahnre, G., Brunsson, N. and Garsten, C. (2000). Standardizing through organization. In Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B., eds., A World of Standards. Oxford University Press, 50–70.Google Scholar

Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C. (2002). The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: Day-to-day contests of accountability in a U.K. restaurant chain. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (2006). Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs. Paris: Presse École des Mines de Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, R. R. and Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amado, G. and Enriquez, E. (2006). Editorial. Nouvelle Revue de Psychosociologie, 1.Google Scholar

Amblard, M. (2003a). Vers une théorie de la dynamique des conventions. In Amblard, M., ed., Conventions et management. Bruxelles: Éditions De Boeck Université, 139–58.Google Scholar

Amblard, M., ed. (2003b). Conventions et management. Bruxelles: Éditions De Boeck Université.Google Scholar

Amblard, M. (2004). Conventions et comptabilité: Vers une approche sociologique du modèle. Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, 10(3), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ardichvili, A. (2003). Constructing socially situated learning experiences in human resource development: An activity theory perspective. Human Resource Development International, 6(1), 5–20.Google Scholar

Ardoino, J. (1990). L’analyse multiréférentielle des situations sociales. Psychologie clinique, 3, 33–49.Google Scholar

Arnold, P. and Hammond, T. (1994). The role of accounting in ideological conflict: Lessons from the South African Divestment Movement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(2), 111–26.Google Scholar

Aubert, N. and Gaulejac, V. de (1991). Le coût de l’excellence. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1975). How To Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Balfet, H. (1991). Observer l’action technique. Des chaînes opératoires pour quoi faire? Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Balle, C. and Peaucelle, J. L. (1972). Le pouvoir informatique dans l’entreprise. Paris: Les Éditions d’organisation.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the University Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.Google Scholar

Barley, S. and Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363–99.Google Scholar

Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

Barraud de Lagerie, P. (2009). Objectiver la qualité sociale. In Vatin, F., ed., Evaluer et valoriser. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 229–45.Google Scholar

Barrett, M., Grant, D., and Wailes, N. (2006). ICT and organizational change: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1): 6–22.Google Scholar

Barrett, M., Oborn, E. and Orlikowski, W. (2016). Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 704–23.Google Scholar

Barrett, M. and Walsham, G. (1999). Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Information Systems Research, 10(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Barrey, S. (2007). Struggling to be displayed at the point of purchase: The emergence of merchandising in French supermarkets. In Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F., eds., Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 92–108.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar

Barus-Michel, J., Enriquez, E. and Lévy, A., eds. (2003). Vocabulaire de la psychosociologie. Références et positions. Ramonville: Erès.Google Scholar

Baud, C. and Chiapello, E. (2015). How the financialization of firms occurs: The role of regulation and management tools – the case of bank credit. Revue française de sociologie, 56(3), 439–68. [English translation of the French article online] www.cairn-int.info/article-E_RFS_563_0439--how-the-financialization-of-firms-occurs.htmGoogle Scholar

Baudrillard, J. (1996). The System of Objects. London and New York: Verso [Original work published in 1968].Google Scholar

Baumard, P. (1997). Une école française de l’intervention, commentaire de l’ouvrage. In Moisdon, J. C., ed., Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion. Paris: Seli Arslan [Revue française de gestion, 114], 136–8.Google Scholar

Bayart, D. (1995). Des objets qui solidifient une théorie: L’histoire du contrôle statistique de fabrication. In Charue-Duboc, F., ed., Des savoirs en action. Contributions de la recherche en gestion. Paris: L’Harmattan, 139–73.Google Scholar

Beauvois, J. L. (1994). Traité de la servitude libérale. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Beauvois, J. L. (1997). Cognitive dissonance theory: A radical view. European Review of Social Psychology, 8(1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Beauvois, J. L. (2005). Les illusions libérales, individualisme et pouvoir social. Petit traité des grandes illusions. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1963). The Outsiders. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Beckert, J. and Aspers, P., eds. (2011). The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Béguin, P. and Rabardel, P. (1999). Concevoir pour les activités instrumentées. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 14, 35–54.Google Scholar

Béguin, P. and Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173–90.Google Scholar

Benedetto-Meyer, M., Maugeri, S., and Metzger, J. L. (2011). L’emprise de la gestion. La société au risque des violences gestionnaires, Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Beniger, J. (1986). The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Benzerafa, M. (2007). L’introduction de la Balanced Scorecard dans les administrations de l’État en France: Premières conclusions d’une recherche empirique. Politiques et management public, 25(4), 81–97.Google Scholar

Bergström, O., Hasselbladh, H. and Karreman, D. (2009). Organizing disciplinary power in a knowledge organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 178–90.Google Scholar

Berland, N., Alcouffe, S. and Levant, Y. (2008). The role of actor-networks in the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study of budgetary control, GP method and activity-based costing in France. Management Accounting Research, 19(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Berland, N. and Chiapello, E. (2009). Criticisms of capitalism, budgeting and the double enrolment: Budgetary control rhetoric and social reform in France in the 1930s and 1950s. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 28–57.Google Scholar

Bernard, B. (2008). Itinéraire d’un indicateur forestier: De l’émergence et de l’enrôlement. Revue française de gestion, 181, 97–110.Google Scholar

Bernoux, P. (2004a). Le changement dans les organisations: Entre structures et interactions. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 57(1), 77–99.Google Scholar

Bernoux, P. (2004b). Sociologie du changement dans les entreprises et les organisations. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Berry, M., ed. (1983). Une technologie invisible? L’impact des instruments de gestion sur l’évolution des systèmes humains. CRG-École polytechnique, Rapport pour le Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie.Google Scholar

Bessire, D. and Onnée, S. (2010). Assessing corporate social performance: Strategies of legitimation and conflicting ideologies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 445–67.Google Scholar

Beunza, D. and Garud, R. (2007). Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts. Sociological Review, 55(2), 13–39.Google Scholar

Bezes, P. (2004). Rationalisation salariale dans l’administration française: Un instrument discret. In Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P., eds., Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 108–9.Google Scholar

Bidet, A. (2005). Quatre mesures du téléphone: L’invention d’une gestion téléphonique. Économie et Sociétés, série Socio-Économie du travail, 25(4), 601–23.Google Scholar

Bidet, A. (2010). Dessiner le marché, démultiplier le calcul: Les rationalisations matérielle et formelle dans la téléphonie au tournant des années 1980. Revue française de socio-économie, 1, 165–85.Google Scholar

Biencourt, O., Chasserant, C. and Rébérioux, A. (2001). L’économie des conventions: L’affirmation d’un programme de recherche. In Batifoulier, P., ed., Théorie des conventions. Paris: Economica, 193–218.Google Scholar

Bijan, A. (2017) Exploring materialization of institutional logics: A case of changing tax regimes and procedures. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 11765.Google Scholar

Bijker, W. and Law, J. (1992). Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Blandin, B. (2002). La construction du social par les objets. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1955). Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 106–26.Google Scholar

Boje, D. M. and Winsor, R. D. (1993). The resurrection of Taylorism: Total quality management’s hidden agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 6(4), 57–70.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. (1970). Taxinomies populaires, taxinomies savantes: Les objets de consommation et leur classement. Revue française de sociologie. 11(1), 34–44.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. (1987). The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. (2012). Love and Justice as Competences. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Borzeix, A. and Fraenkel, B., eds. (2001). Langage et travail. Paris: Presses du CNRS.Google Scholar

Bouilloud, J. P. and Lécuyer, B. P. (1994). L’Invention de la gestion. Histoire et pratiques. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Bourguignon, A. (2005). Management accounting and value creation: The profit and loss of reification. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(4), 353–89.Google Scholar

Bourguignon, A. and Chiapello, E. (2005). The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(6), 665–700.Google Scholar

Boussard, V. (2001). Quand les règles s’incarnent: L’exemple des indicateurs prégnants. Sociologie du travail, 43(4), 533–51.Google Scholar

Boussard, V. (2008). Sociologie de la gestion. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

Boussard, V. and Maugeri, S., eds. (2003). Du politique dans les organisations. Sociologie des dispositifs de gestion. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (2007). Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(4), 273–80.Google Scholar

Brabet, J. (1999). Peut-on enseigner autre chose que le modèle instrumental en gestion des ressources humaines ? Gérer et comprendre, 58, 72–85.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Breton, P. (1987). Histoire de l’informatique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Briers, M. and Chua, W. F. (2001). The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: A field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3), 237–69.Google Scholar

Brivot, M. (2008). Une auto-rationalisation douce du travail par le knowledge management dans les firmes de services professionnels: Le cas d’un cabinet d’avocats français. Ph.D. thesis, HEC Paris.Google Scholar

Brown, M. H. (1990). Defining stories in organizations: Characteristics and functions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 13(1), 162–90.Google Scholar

Brunel, V. (2004). Les managers de l’âme. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Bruno, I. (2008). A vos marques, prêts … cherchez ! La stratégie européenne de Lisbonne, vers un marché de la recherche. Bellecombes en Bauges: Éditions du croquant.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. (2002). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Action in Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B., eds. (2000). A World of Standards. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buchli, V., ed. (2002). The Material Culture Reader. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar

Buisson-Fenet, H. and Draelants, H. (2013). School-linking processes: Describing and explaining their role in the social closure of French elite education. Higher Education, 66(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Burawoy, M. (1983). Between the labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 587–605.Google Scholar

Burns, J., Englund, H. and Gerdin, J. (2010). Twenty-five years of Giddens’ structuration theory in management accounting research: Achievements, limitations and the future. Working paper. HEC Paris.Google Scholar

Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. (1961). Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Caglio, A. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems and accountants: Towards hybridization? European Accounting Review, 12(1), 123–53.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1981). Pour une sociologie des controverses technologiques. Fundamenta Scientae, 2(3–4), 381–99.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociological Review, 32(1 suppl.), 196–233.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2006). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L., eds., Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan; or how actors macrostructure reality, and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr, K. D. and Cicourel, A., eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 277–303.Google Scholar

Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F., eds. (2007). Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Capron, M., ed. (2005). Les normes comptables internationales, instruments du capitalisme financier. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Carmona, S., Ezzamel, M. and Gutierrez, F. (2002). The relationship between accounting and spatial practices in the factory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), 239–74.Google Scholar

Carpenter, V. L. and Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organization and Society, 26(7), 565–96.Google Scholar

Carruthers, B. G. (1995). Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20(4), 313–28.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. (2005). Les normes comptables comme institution du capitalisme. Une analyse du passage aux IFRS en Europe à partir de 2005. Sociologie du travail, 47(3), 362–82.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. (2007). Accounting and the birth of the notion of capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 263–96.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. (2015). Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38(1), 13–35.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. (2017). Critical accounting research and neoliberalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Special Anniversary Issue, 43, 47–64.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. (2018). The work of financialisation. In Chambost, I., Lenglet, M. and Tadjeddine, Y., eds., The Making of Finance. London: Routledge, 192–200.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Baker, C. R. (2011). The introduction of French theory into English language accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 140–60.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Desrosières, A. (2006). La quantification de l’économie et la recherche en sciences sociales: Paradoxes, contradictions et omissions. Le cas exemplaire de la Positive accounting theory. In Eymard-Duvernay, F., ed., L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, Tome 1: Débats. Paris: La Découverte, 297–310.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Gilbert, P. (2009). La gestion comme technologie économique. In Steiner, P. and Vatin, F., eds., Traité de sociologie économique. Paris: PUF, 325–65.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Gilbert, P. (2012). Les outils de gestion, producteurs ou régulateurs de la violence au travail? Le travail humain, 75(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Gilbert, P. (2013). Sociologie des outils de gestion. Introduction à l’analyse sociale de l’instrumentation de gestion. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Gilbert, P. (2016). L’agence des outils de gestion. In De Vaujany, F. X., Hussenot, A. and Chanlat, J. F., eds., Théories des organisations. Nouveaux tournants. Paris: Economica, 177–226.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Godefroy, G. (2017). The dual function of judgment devices: Why does the plurality of market classifications matter? In Krenn, K., ed., Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, Special Issue of Market Classification, 42(1), 152–88.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Godelier, E. (2015a). Management multiculturel. Tome 1: Pratiques de management comparées. Paris: Presses de l’école polytechnique.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Godelier, E. (2015b). Management multiculturel. Tome 2: Explorations indiennes. Paris: Presses de l’école polytechnique.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Medjad, K. (2009). An unprecedented privatization of mandatory standard-setting: The case of European accounting policy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(4), 448–68.Google Scholar

Chiapello, E. and Ramirez, C. (2004). La sociologie de la comptabilité: Une introduction. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 10(3), 3–5.Google Scholar

Cho, S., Mathiassen, L. and Nilsson, A. (2008). Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: An event-based actor-network approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 614–30.Google Scholar

Christiansen, E. (1996). Tamed by a rose: Computers as tools in human activity. In Nardi, B. A., ed., Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 174–98.Google Scholar

Christiansen, J. K. and Skaerbaek, P. (1997). Implementing budgetary control in the performing arts: Games in the organizational theatre. Management Accounting Research, 8(4), 405–38.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. (1981). Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In Cicourel, A. and Knorr-Cetina, K., eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 51–80.Google Scholar

Clark, T. (2004). The fashion of management fashion: A surge too far? Organization, 11(2), 297–306.Google Scholar

Clot, Y. (1995). Le travail sans l’homme. Pour une psychologie des milieux de travail et de vie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Cochoy, F. (1999). Une histoire du marketing. Discipliner l’économie de marché. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Cochoy, F. (2007). A sociology of market‐things: On tending the garden of choices in mass retailing. Sociological Review, 55(Suppl. 2), 109–29.Google Scholar

Cochoy, F., Garel, J. P. and Terssac, G. de (1998). Comment l’écrit travaille l’organisation: Le cas des normes ISO 9000. Revue française de sociologie, 39(4), 673–99.Google Scholar

Colette, C. and Richard, J. (2000). Comptabilité générale. Les systèmes français et anglo-saxons. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Conein, B., Dodier, N. and Thevenot, L., eds. (1993). Les objets dans l’action. De la maison au laboratoire (Raisons Pratiques 4). Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar

Covaleski, M. A. and Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and fall of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 562–87.Google Scholar

Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B. and Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 293–327.Google Scholar

Cresswell, R. (1983). Transfert de techniques et chaînes opératoires. Techniques et culture, 2, 143–63.Google Scholar

Crozier, M. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1977].Google Scholar

Currie, G. and Spyridonidis, D. (2016). Interpretation of multiple institutional logics on the ground: Actors’ position, their agency and situational constraints in professionalized contexts. Organization Studies, 37(1), 77– 97.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. and March, J. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Czarniawska, B. (2002). A Tale of Three Cities, or the Glocalization of City Management. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Czarniawska-Joerges, B. and Joerges, B. (1988). How to control things with words: Organizational talk and control. Management Communication Quarterly, 2(2), 170–93.Google Scholar

Czarniawska, B. and Sevon, G. (1996). Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Czarniawska, B. and Sevon, G., eds. (2005). Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar

Dagognet, F. (1989). Eloge de l’objet. Pour une philosophie de la marchandise. París: Vrin.Google Scholar

Dagognet, F. (1996). Les dieux sont dans la cuisine. Philosophie des objets et objets de la philosophie. Paris: Synthélabo Groupe.Google Scholar

Dambrin, C. and Lambert, C. (2017). Beauty or not beauty: Making up the producer of popular culture. Management Accounting Research, 35, 35–46.Google Scholar

Daumas, M. (1963). Le mythe de la révolution technique. Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 16(4), 291–302.Google Scholar

David, A. (1996). L’aide à la décision entre outils et organisation. Entreprises et Histoire, 13, 9–26.Google Scholar

David, A. (1998). Outils de gestion et dynamique du changement. Revue française de gestion, 120, 44–59.Google Scholar

David, A. (2006). Sensemaking, outils de gestion et activités de conception: Quatre rapprochements. In Autissier, D. and Bensebaa, F., eds., Les défis du sensemaking en entreprise. Karl Weick et les sciences de gestion. Paris: Economica, 249–72.Google Scholar

Davidson, E. J. (1999). What’s in a name? Exploring the metaphorical implications of data warehousing in concept and practice. Journal of End User Computing, 11(4), 22–32.Google Scholar

Davie, S. S. K. (2000). Accounting for imperialism: A case of British-imposed indigenous collaboration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(3), 330–59.Google Scholar

Davison, J. (2011). Barthesian perspectives on accounting communication and visual images of professional accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 250–83.Google Scholar

Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Dechow, N. and Mouritsen, J. (2005). Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(7–8), 691–733.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. (1990). Nouveau regard sur la souffrance humaine dans les organisations. In Chanlat, A., ed., L’individu dans l’organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval & les Éditions Eska, 687–708.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. (1995). Le facteur humain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. (2003). L’évaluation du travail à l’épreuve du réel. Critique des fondements de l’évaluation. Versailles: INRA Éditions.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. (2006). Subjectivity, work and action. Critical Horizons, 7(1), 45–62.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. (2007). Conjurer la violence. Travail, violence, santé. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. and Deranty, J. P. (2010). The centrality of work. Critical Horizons, 11(2), 167–80.Google Scholar

Delcambre, P. (2009). L’activité d’évaluation et les systèmes d’information. L’évaluation est aussi un travail: langagier, assisté, organisé. Études de communication, 33, 79–100.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar

Denis, J. (2006). Les nouveaux visages de la performativité. Études de communication, 29, 8–24.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 15(2), 121–47.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. (1977). Éléments pour l’histoire des nomenclatures socio-professionnelle. Pour une Histoire de la Statistique, Economica, 1, 155–231.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. (2004). Pour une politique des outils du savoir: le cas de la statistique. Presented at the conference ‘Politics and knowledge: Democratizing knowledge in times of the expert‘. University of Bergen, 21–22 June.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. (2008). Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. L’argument statistique I. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. and Thévenot, L. (1988). Les catégories socioprofessionnelles. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Detchessahar, M. and Journé, B. (2007). Une approche narrative des outils de gestion. Revue française de gestion, 177, 77–92.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of Valuation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Diaz-Bone, R. and Didier, E., eds. (2016). Special Issue: Conventions and Quantification – Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Statistics and Classifications. Historical Social Research, 41(2).Google Scholar

Diaz-Bone, R. and Salais, R., eds. (2011). Special Issue: Conventions and Institutions from a Historical Perspective. Historical Social Research, 36(4).Google Scholar

Didier, E. (2009). En quoi consiste l’Amérique? Le statistiques, le new deal et la démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The iron-cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–60.Google Scholar

Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B. and Covaleski, M. A. (1997). Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of controls in the big six. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Djelic, M. L. and Quack, S. (2008). Institutions and transnationalization. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R.., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 299–324.Google Scholar

Djelic, M. L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K., eds. (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Doganova, L. and Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–70.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W. and Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (1999). Le prestataire, le client et le consommateur: Sociologie d’une relation marchande. Revue française de sociologie, 40(4), 671–88.Google Scholar

Dupuy, F. (2004). Sociologie du changement. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M. (1963). Primitive Classification. University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1903].Google Scholar

Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Ellul, J. (1980). The Technological System. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Ellul, J. (1990). The Technological Bluff. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Emery, F. E., Thorsrud, E. and Trist, E. L. (1969). Form and Content in Industrial Democracy: Some Experiences from Norway and Other European Countries. London: Tavistock Institute.Google Scholar

Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In Churchman, C. W. and Verhulst, M., eds., Management Sciences: Models and Techniques, vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 83–97.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126–32.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–56.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. and Middleton, D. (1998). Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Englund, H., Gerdin, J. and Burns, J. (2011). 25 years of Giddens in accounting research: Achievements, limitations and the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(8), 494–513.Google Scholar

Enriquez, E. (1982). Structures d’organisation et contrôle social. Connexions, 41, 97–124.Google Scholar

Enriquez, E. (1989). L’individu pris au piège de la structure stratégique. Connexions, 54, 145–65.Google Scholar

Enriquez, E. (1997a). Les jeux du pouvoir et du désir dans l’entreprise. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Enriquez, E. (1997b). The clinical approach: Genesis and development in Western Europe. International Sociology, 12(2), 151–64.Google Scholar

Erlingsdottir, G. (1999). Förförande idéer – kvalitetssäkring i hälso – och sjurkvarden. Lund: KFS AB.Google Scholar

Erlingsdottir, G. and Lindberg, K. (2005). Isomorphism, isopraxism, and isonymism: Complementary or competing processes? In Czarniawska, B. and Sevon, G., eds., Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmö: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, 47–70.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. and Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measure recreates social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. and Stevens, M. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–43.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. and Stevens, M. (2008). A sociology of quantification. Archives Européennes de Sociologie/European Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 401–36.Google Scholar

Eymard-Duvernay, F. (1989). Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination. Revue Economique, 40 (2), 329–59.Google Scholar

Eymard-Duvernay, F., ed. (2006a). L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, Tome 1: Débats. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Eymard-Duvernay, F., ed. (2006b). L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats. Tome 2: Développements. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Eymard-Duvernay, F. and Marchal, E. (1997). Façons de recruter. Le jugement des compétences sur le marché du travail. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar

Eyraud, C. (2004). Comptabilité (publique et d’entreprise) et sociologie, ou l’analyse sociologique des catégorisations sociales. Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, 10(3), 29–45.Google Scholar

Eyraud, C. (2011). Une comptabilité d’entreprise pour les Etats? Un dispositif de quantification économique soumis à l’analyse sociologique. Le cas français. Sociologie et Sociétés, 43(2), 91–116.Google Scholar

Ezzamel, M., Xio, J. Z. and Pan, A. (2007). Political ideology and accounting regulation in China. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7/8), 669–700.Google Scholar

Fauré, B. and Gramaccia, G. (2006). La pragmatique des chiffres dans les organisations: De l’acte de langage à l’acte de calcul. Études de communication, 29, 25–37.Google Scholar

Favereau, O. (1989). Marché interne/marché externe. Revue économique, 2, 273–328.Google Scholar

Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman [Original work published in 1916].Google Scholar

Fincham, R. (2002). Narratives or success and failure in systems development. British Journal of Management, 13(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Fisher, S. L. and Howell, A. W. (2004). Beyond user acceptance: An examination of employee reactions to information technology systems. Resource Management, 43(2–3), 243–58.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: The Archaeology of Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications [Original work published in 1966].Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1971). The order of discourse: Inaugural lecture delivered at the Collège de France. Social Science Information, 10(2), 7–30.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge & the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books [The Archaeology of Knowledge originally published in 1969].Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, C., Marshall, L., Meplam, J. and Soper, K.. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1988). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage Books [Original work published in 1961].Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2001 [1976]). Les mailles du pouvoir. In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 1001–20 [Originally presented at a conference at Bahia University of Philosophy, 1976; first published in 1981].Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2001 [1977]). Le jeu de Michel Foucault. In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 298–329 [Original interview published in Ornica, Bulletin Périodique du champ freudien, 10, July 1977].Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008a). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, trans. Burchell, G.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008b). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fourcade, M. (2011). Cents and sensibility: Economic valuation and the nature of nature. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1721–77.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, B. (1995). La traçabilité: Une fonction caractéristique des écrits de travail. Connexions, 65, 63–75.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, B. (2007). Actes d’écriture: Quand écrire c’est faire. Langage et société, 121–22, 101–12.Google Scholar

Friedland, R. (2009). Institution, practice and ontology: Towards a religious sociology. In Meyer, R. E., Sahlin, K. and Ventresca, M. J., eds., Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 27. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 45–83.Google Scholar

Friedland, R. (2011). The institutional logic of religious nationalism: Sex, violence and the ends of history. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar

Friedland, R. (2013). God, love, and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics. In Lounsbury, M. and Boxenbaum, E., eds., Institutional Logics in Action, Part A. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 25–50.Google Scholar

Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell, W. W. and Di Maggio, P. J., eds., The New Institutionalism in New Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, 232–66.Google Scholar

Friedmann, G. (1964). The Anatomy of Work: Labor, Leisure and the Implications of Automation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fritz, J. M., ed. (2007). International Clinical Sociology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Furusten, S. (2000). The knowledge base of standards. In Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B., eds., A World of Standards. Oxford University Press, 71–84.Google Scholar

Gadrey, J. (2006). Les conventions de richesse au cœur de la comptabilité nationale: Anciennes et nouvelles controverses. In Eymard-Duvernay, F., ed., L’économie des conventions, méthodes et résultats. Tome 1: Débats. Paris: La Découverte, 311–24.Google Scholar

Gallhofer, S. and Haslam, J. (2003). Accounting and Emancipation: Some Critical Interventions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gates, W. H. (1999). Business @ the Speed of Thought. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar

Gaulejac, V. de (2005). La société malade de la gestion. Idéologie gestionnaire, pouvoir managérial et harcèlement social. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Gaulejac, V. de (2008). On the origins of clinical sociology in France: Some milestones. In Fritz, J. M., ed., International Clinical Sociology. New York: Springer, 54–71.Google Scholar

Gendron, Y. and Baker, C. R. (2005). On interdisciplinary movements: The development of a network of support around Foucaultian perspectives in accounting research. European Accounting Review, 14( 3), 525–69.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. and Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, P. (1998a). L’instrumentation de gestion. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Gilbert, P. (1998b). Fonctions implicites et explicites des instruments de gestion des ressources humaine. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 1, 118–30.Google Scholar

Gilbert, P. and Gonzalez, D. (2000). Les progiciels intégrés et la GRH: Quand l’ambiguïté des enjeux est fonctionnelle. Gérer et Comprendre, Annales des Mines, 59, 26–33.Google Scholar

Gilbert, P. and Leclair, P. (2004). Les systèmes de gestion intégrés: Une modernité en trompe-l’œil? Sciences de la société, 61, 17–30.Google Scholar

Gilbert, P., Raulet-Croset, N., and Teglborg, A. C. (2018). How the materialization of a managerial model contributes to its take up: The case of ‘liberating management’ in France. In Mitev, N., Morgan-Thomas, A., Lorino, P., de Vaujany, F.-X. and Nama, Y., eds., Materiality and Managerial Techniques. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 281–305.Google Scholar

Gille, B., ed. (1986). The History of Techniques, Vol. 1. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Girin, J. (1983). Les machines de gestion. In Berry, M., ed., Le rôle des outils de gestion dans l’évolution des systèmes sociaux complexes, CRG-École polytechnique, Report for the ministry of Research and Technology.Google Scholar

Girin, J. (1990). Problèmes du langage dans les organisations. In Chanlat, F., ed., L’individu dans l’organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval/Éditions Eska, 37–78.Google Scholar

Giroux, N. and Marroquin, L. (2005). L’approche narrative des organisations. Revue française de gestion, 159, 15–42.Google Scholar

Glendinning, C. (1990). Notes toward a neo-Luddite manifesto. Utne Reader, 38(1), 50–3.Google Scholar

Goffi, J. Y. (1988). La philosophie de la technique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Gomez, P. Y. (1994). Qualité et théorie des conventions. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Gomez, P. Y. (1997). Information et convention: Le cadre du modèle général. Revue française de gestion, 112, 64–77.Google Scholar

Gordon, C., ed. (1980). Foucault. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–54.Google Scholar

Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 1–46.Google Scholar

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R. and Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–71.Google Scholar

Guibert, B., Laganier, J. and Volle, M. (1971). Essai sur les nomenclatures industrielles. Économie et Statistiques, 20(1), 23–36.Google Scholar

Guibert, G. (2011). Détourner le contrôle? Le cas de la Fédération des lieux de musiques actuelles. Sociologies Pratiques, 22, 79–92.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Halpern, C., Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P., eds. (2014). L’instrumentation de l’action publique. Controverse, résistances, effets. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Halpern, C. and Le Galès, P. (2011). Pas d’action publique sans instruments propres. Revue française de sciences politiques, 61(1), 51–78.Google Scholar

Halström, K. T. (2000). Organizing the process of standardization. In Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B., eds., A World of Standards. Oxford University Press, 85–99.Google Scholar

Hatchuel, A. (2000). Quels horizons pour les sciences de gestion? Vers une théorie de l’action collective. In David, A., Hatchuel, A. and Laufer, R., eds., Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion. Eléments d’épistémologie de la recherche en management. Paris: Vuibert, 7–44.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, A. G. (1955). Biogéographie des araires et des charrues. Compte rendu sommaire des séances de la Société de biogéographie, 280, 77–83.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, A. G. (1964). La technologie, science humaine. La Pensée, 115, 28–35.Google Scholar

Havard, C. and Krohmer, C. (2008). Création et articulation des règles dans le cadre d’un management des compétences. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 70, 1–14.Google Scholar

Henning, R. (2000). Selling standards. In Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B., eds., A World of Standards. Oxford University Press, 114–24.Google Scholar

Henry, O. (1992). Entre savoir et pouvoir: Les professionnels de l’expertise et du conseil. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 95, 37–54.Google Scholar

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. New York: World Publishing.Google Scholar

Hilbert, R. A. (1990). Ethnomethodology and the micro-macro order. American Sociological Review, 55, 794–808.Google Scholar

Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–71.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Hopper, T. and Armstrong, P. (1991). Cost accounting, controlling labour and the rise of conglomerates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(5/6), 405–38.Google Scholar

Hopper, T. and Macintosh, N. (1993). Management accounting as disciplinary practice: The case of ITT under Harold Geneen. Management Accounting Research, 4(3), 181–216.Google Scholar

Hoskin, K. W. and Macve, R. (1988). The genesis of accountability: The West Point connections. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(1), 37–73.Google Scholar

Isaac, H. (1998). Les normes de qualité dans les services professionnels: Une lecture des pratiques à travers la théorie des conventions. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 1(2), 89–112.Google Scholar

Jack, L. (2005). Stocks of knowledge, simplification and unintended consequences: The persistence of post-war accounting practices in UK agriculture. Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 59–79.Google Scholar

Jones, T. C. and Dugdale, D. (2002). The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(1–2), 121–63.Google Scholar

Joule, R. V. and Beauvois, J. L. (2002). Petit traité de manipulation à l’usage des honnêtes gens. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar

Justin, J. (2004). Proposition d’un cadre conceptuel d’analyse des jeux d’acteurs cristallisés dans et par les outils de contrôle. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 10(3), 213–36.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1, 71–9.Google Scholar

Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. T. and Fiss, P. C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 52(5), 897–918.Google Scholar

Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The Psychology of Commitment. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kipping, M., Furusten, S. and Gammelsaeter, H. (2003). Converging towards American dominance? Developments and structures of consultancy fields in Europe. Entreprises et Histoire, 33, 25–40.Google Scholar

Kletz, F., Moisdon, J. C. and Pallez, F. (1997). Zoom sur l’organisation. Les grilles de classification: Un dispositif photographique problématique. In Moisdon, J. C., ed., Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion. Les instruments de gestion à l’épreuve de l’organisation. Paris: Seli Arslan, 91–112.Google Scholar

Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., Madsen, A. K. and Mouritsen, J., eds. (2015). Making Things Valuable. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar

La Boétie, E. (1975). The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. Montréal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. and Pezet, E. (2011). The making of the management accountant: Becoming the producer of truthful knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 10–30.Google Scholar

Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(21), 201–21.Google Scholar

Lascoumes, P. (2004). La gouvernementalité: De la critique de l’État aux technologies du pouvoir. Le portique [en ligne], Revue de philosophie et de sciences humaines (http://le portique.revues.org).Google Scholar

Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P., eds. (2004a). Gouverner par les instruments, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2004b). Introduction: L’action publique saisie par ses instruments. In Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P., eds., Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 11–44.Google Scholar

Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J., ed., A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 103–31.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2000). The Berlin key or how to do words with things. In Graves-Brown, P. M., ed., Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London: Routledge, 10–21.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Law, J. (2003). Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. http://comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-Notes-on-ANT.pdfGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In Turner, B. S., ed., The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 141–58.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Lejeune, A. and Harvey, P. L. (2007). L’analyse des systèmes d’activité, l’apprentissage extensif et le codesign en communauté: Une approche alternative à la réingénierie du système de santé au Québec. Gestion 2000, 24(5), 143–59.Google Scholar

Lemieux, C. (2007). À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses? Mil neuf cent. Revue d’Histoire Intellectuelle, 25, 191–212.Google Scholar

Lemonnier, P. (1976). La description des chaînes opératoires: Contribution à l’analyse des systèmes techniques. Techniques et culture, 1, 100–51.Google Scholar

Lemonnier, P. (1986). The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(2), 147–86.Google Scholar

Lemonnier, P. (1991). Technique (système). In Bonte, P. and Izard, M., eds., Dictionnaire de l’ethnologie et de l’anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 697–8.Google Scholar

Lemonnier, P. (2012). Mundane Objects: Materiality and Non-Verbal Communication. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Lenay, O. (2005). L’ergonomie de la gouvernementalité: Le cas du système hospitalier français. In Hatchuel, A., Pezet, E., Starkey, K. and Lenay, O., eds., Gouvernement, organisation et gestion. L’héritage de Michel Foucault. Les Presses de l’Université de Laval, 395–428.Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–67.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1943). Évolution et techniques. L’homme et la matière. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1945). Milieu et techniques. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Original work published in 1964].Google Scholar

Lévy, A. (1997). Sciences humaines cliniques et organisations sociales. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Lévy, P. (1994). L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 271–99.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q. and Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. Management of Information Systems Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.Google Scholar

Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Linhardt, R. (1983). Le taylorisme entre les deux guerres: Quelques problèmes. Travail et Emploi, 18, 9–15.Google Scholar

Loft, A. (1986). Towards a critical understanding of accounting: The case of cost accounting in the UK, 1914–1925. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 11(2), 137–69.Google Scholar

Lomba, C. (2004). Distinguer un ouvrier d’un employé dans l’industrie: Naturalisation et négociations des classifications. Sociétés Contemporaines, 2(54), 35–53.Google Scholar

Lordon, F. (2000). La création de valeur comme rhétorique et comme pratique. Généalogie et sociologie de la valeur actionnariale. L’année de la régulation, 4, 117–65.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2002). Vers une théorie pragmatique et sémiotique des outils appliquée aux instruments de gestion. Working paper. ESSEC, DR-02015.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2013). Management systems as organizational ‘architextures’. In de Vaujany, F.-X. and Mitev, N., eds., Materiality and Space: Technology, Work and Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 62–95.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation on the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307.Google Scholar

Lukács, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Original work published in 1923].Google Scholar

Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403.Google Scholar

Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. and Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 107–45.Google Scholar

Maister, D. H. (1993). Managing the Professional Service Firm. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

March, J., Schulz, M. and Zhou, X. (2000). The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

March, J. and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Martin, L., Gutman, H. and Hutton, P., eds. (1988). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–96.Google Scholar

Maugeri, S., ed. (2001). Délit de gestion. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1923). Essai sur le don. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1948). Les techniques et la technologie. Journal de psychologie, 41, 71–8.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (2007). The Manual of Ethnography. New York: Berghahn Books [Original work published in 1926].Google Scholar

Mayo, E. (1933). The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McGrath, K. (2002). The golden circle: A way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 251–66.Google Scholar

McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

McKenna, C. (1995). The origins of modern management consulting. Business and Economic History, 24(1), 51–8.Google Scholar

McKinlay, A. and Starkey, K., eds. (1998). Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of the Self. London: Sage.Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. and Fiore, Q. (1967). The Medium is the Message: An Inventory of Effects. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Mercier, E. (2003). Pour une lecture conventionnaliste du changement organisationnel: Le cas d’une entreprise publique de service. In Amblard, M., ed., Conventions et management. Bruxelles: Éditions De Boeck Université, 179–202.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Theory et Social Structure. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.Google Scholar

Miller, P. (1991). Accounting innovation beyond the enterprise: Problematizing investment decisions and programming economic growth in the U.K. in the 1960s. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(8), 733–62.Google Scholar

Miller, P. and O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–66.Google Scholar

Miller, P. and O’Leary, T. (1994). Accounting economic citizenship and the spatial reordering of manufacture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 15–43.Google Scholar

Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Mitev, N. and Vaujany, F. X. de, eds. (2013). Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14, 333–59.Google Scholar

Moisdon, J. C., ed. (1997). Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion. Paris: Seli Arsan.Google Scholar

Montmollin, M. de (1995). Préface, Vocabulaire de l’ergonomie. Toulouse: Octares.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. and Markova, I. (2006). The Making of Modern Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Muniesa, F. (2005). Contenir le marché: La transition de la criée à la cotation électronique à la Bourse de Paris. Sociologie du Travail, 47(4), 485–501.Google Scholar

Muniesa, F. (2007). Market technologies and the pragmatics of prices. Economy and Society, 36(3), 377–95.Google Scholar

Muniesa, F. (2011). A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. Sociological Review, 59(s2): 24–38.Google Scholar

Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Muniesa, F. and Callon, M. (2009). La performativité des sciences économiques. In Steiner, P. and Vatin, F., eds., Traité de sociologie économique. Paris: PUF, 281–316.Google Scholar

Murray, F. (2010). The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 341–88.Google Scholar

Oakes, L. S., Townley, B. and Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257–92.Google Scholar

Oldroyd, D., Fleischman, R. K. and Tyson, T. N. (2008). The culpability of accounting practice in promoting slavery in the British Empire and antebellum United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(5), 764–84.Google Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–28.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. (2005). Material works: Exploring the situated entanglement of technological performativity and human agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 183–6.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. and Barley, S. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–65.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. and Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143–69.Google Scholar

Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Pache, A. C. and Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–76.Google Scholar

Pagès, M., Bonetti, M., Gaulejac, V. de and Descendre, D. (1998). L’emprise de l’organisation. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Palpacuer, F., Seignour, A. and Vercher, C. (2007). Sorties de cadre(s). Le licenciement pour motif personnel, instrument de gestion de la firme mondialisée. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Pavé, F. (1989). L’illusion informaticienne. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Pavé, F. (1993). Les nouvelles technologies de l’information et de la communication et l’organisation du travail. In Freeman, C. and Mendras, H., eds., Le paradigme informatique. Technologie et informatique sociales. Paris: Descartes, 77–121.Google Scholar

Peaucelle, J. L. (2003). L’outillage administratif de Fayol. In Peaucelle, J. L., ed., Henri Fayol, inventeur des outils de gestion. Paris: Economica, 207–35.Google Scholar

Pereira, R. E. (2002). An adopter-centered approach to understanding adoption of innovations, European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1), 40–9.Google Scholar

Perrin, J. (1988). Comment naissent les techniques. La production sociale des techniques. Paris: Publisud.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1985). Review essay: Overboard with myth and symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 151–5.Google Scholar

Peters, T. and Waterman, R. (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Pharabod, A. S., Nicolski, V. and Granjon, F. (2013). La mise en chiffres de soi: Une approche compréhensive des mesures personnelles. Réseau, 1(177), 97–129.Google Scholar

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. and Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–52.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Pichault, F. (1990). Le conflit informatique. Gérer les ressources humaines dans le changement technologique. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.Google Scholar

Pichault, F. and Nizet, J. (2000). Les pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines. Approches contingente et politique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Poole, M. and DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5–49.Google Scholar

Poole, M. and DeSanctis, G. (2004). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In Whitman, M. and Woszczynski, A., eds., The Handbook of Information Systems Research. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing, 206–49.Google Scholar

Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. (1985). The institutionalization of rational organization. Contemporary Sociology, 14(5), 564–6.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market, nor hierarchy: Network form of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pozzebon, M. and Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: Learning from IT research. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1353–76.Google Scholar

Preston, A. M. (2006). Enabling, enacting and maintaining action at a distance: An historical case study of the role of accounts in the reduction of the Navajo herds. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 559–78.Google Scholar

Preston, A. M., Cooper, D. J. and Coombs, R. W. (1992). Fabricating budgets: A study of the production of management budgeting in the National Health Service. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 561–93.Google Scholar

Rabardel, P. (2001). Instrument mediated activity in situations. In Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J. and Gray, P., eds., People and Computers XV: Interaction without Frontiers. London: Springer, 17–30.Google Scholar

Rabardel, P. (2002). People and Technology: A Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Instruments. Saint Denis: Université Paris 8. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01020705Google Scholar

Rabardel, P. (2003). From artifact to instrument. Interacting with Computers, 15, 641–5.Google Scholar

Rabardel, P. and Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15, 665–91.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and Function. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar

Revel, J. (2002). Le vocabulaire de Foucault. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar

Reynaud, J. D. (1979). Conflict and social regulation: A sketch of theory of joint regulation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(3), 314–21.Google Scholar

Reynaud, J. D. (1988). Les régulations dans les organisations: Régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome. Revue française de sociologie, 29(1), 5–18.Google Scholar

Reynaud, J. D. (1997). Les règles du jeu. L’action collective et la régulation sociale. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Reynaud, J. D. (2001). Le management par les compétences: Un essai d’analyse. Sociologie du travail, 43(1), 7–31.Google Scholar

Rivaud-Danset, D. and Salais, R. (1992). Les conventions de financement des entreprises: Premières approches théorique et empirique. Revue française d’économie, 7(4), 81–120.Google Scholar

Roberts, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R. and Hendry, J. (2006). In the mirror of the market: The disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 277–94.Google Scholar

Robson, K. (1991). On the arenas of accounting change: The process of translation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(5–6), 547–70.Google Scholar

Robson, K. (1992). Accounting numbers as inscription: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(7), 685–708.Google Scholar

Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.Google Scholar

Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 218–42.Google Scholar

Sainsaulieu, R. (1977). L’identité au travail. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar

Salais, R. (1989). L’analyse économique des conventions du travail. Revue économique, 40(2), 199–240.Google Scholar

Sale, K. (1996). Rebels against the Future: The Luddites and Their War on the Industrial Revolution – Lessons for the Computer Age. New York: Perseus Press.Google Scholar

Sarker, S., Sarker, S. and Sidorova, A. (2006). Understanding business process change failure: An actor-network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 51–86.Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Schmitz, K., Teng, J. and Webb, K. (2016). Capturing the complexity of malleable IT use: Adaptive structuration theory for individuals. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 663–86.Google Scholar

Scott, R. W. (1981). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Scott, S. V. and Barrett, M. L. (2005). Strategic risk positioning as sensemaking in crisis: The adoption of electronic trading at the London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(1), 45–68.Google Scholar

Scott, S. V. and Orlikowski, W. (2014). Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 873–95.Google Scholar

Segrestin, D. (1997). L’entreprise à l’épreuve des normes de marché: Les paradoxes des nouveaux standards de gestion dans l’industrie. Revue de sociologie française, 38(3), 553–85.Google Scholar

Segrestin, D. (2004). Les chantiers du manager. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Seligman, L. (2006). Sensemaking throughout adoption and innovation decision process. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 108–20.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 397–428.Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1960). The New Science of Management Decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Simondon, G. (1980). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. London, ON: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar

Siti-Nabiha, A. K. and Scapens, R. (2005). Stability and change: An institutionalist study of management accounting change. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(1), 44–73.Google Scholar

Sorokin, P. (1956). Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences. Chicago, IL: H. Regnery Co.Google Scholar

Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar

Starr, P. (1992). Social categories and claims in the liberal state. Social Research, 59(2), 263–95.Google Scholar

Steiner, P. (2001). The sociology of economic knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 443–58.Google Scholar

Steiner, P. (2005). Le marché selon la sociologie économique. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 43(2), 31–64.Google Scholar

Storper, M. and Salais, R. (1997). Worlds of Production: The Action Frameworks of the Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Supiot, A. (2002). Travail, droit et technique. Droit social, 1, 13–25.Google Scholar

Suzuki, T. (2007). Accountics: Impacts of internationally standardized accounting on the Japanese socio-economy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 263–301.Google Scholar

Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S. M., Robertson, M. and Dopson, S. (2010). When policy meets practice: Colliding logics and the challenges of Mode 2 initiatives in the translation of academic knowledge. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1311–40.Google Scholar

Tarde, G. (1969). On Communication and Social Influence: Selected Papers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Teglborg, A. C., Gilbert, P. and Raulet-Croset, N. (2015). The management device in the blind spot to resistance to change. Revue de gestion des ressources humaines, 98(4), 18–29.Google Scholar

Teulier, R. and Lorino, P., eds. (2005). Entre connaissance et organisation: L’activité collective. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Thévenot, L. (1979). Une jeunesse difficile: Les fonctions sociales du flou et de la rigueur dans les classements. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 26–27, 3–18.Google Scholar

Thévenot, L. (1984). Rules and implement: Investment in forms. Social Science Information, 23(1), 1–45.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Thornton, P. and Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–43.Google Scholar

Thornton, P. and Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 99–129.Google Scholar

Thornton, P., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.Google Scholar

Townley, B. (1993). Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(2), 221–39.Google Scholar

Townley, B. (1995). Know thyself: Self-awareness, self-formation and managing. Organization, 2, 271–89.Google Scholar

Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2), 261–85.Google Scholar

Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163–79.Google Scholar

Trist, E. L. and Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall Method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations, 46(1), 3–39.Google Scholar