Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T23:43:17.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Market Microstructure and Securities Values Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange*

Journal of Financial Economics 45, 1997

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Yakov Amihud
Affiliation:
Stern School of Business, New York University
Haim Mendelson
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
Lasse Heje Pedersen
Affiliation:
Stern School of Business, New York University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Securities markets around the world are making major investments to improve their trading technology. The London Stock Exchange is phasing in an automated, order-driven trading system to improve liquidity and reduce trading costs (see, London Stock Exchange, 1996). The current plan is to implement the system for the FTSE-100 stocks while preserving the traditional quote-driven system for large block trades. Other European stock exchanges (e.g., the French, Italian, Spanish, and Swedish markets) have converted their trading systems from the traditional call market to computer-based continuous trading alternatives. The stock exchanges of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Alberta have recently changed their trading systems to support decimal pricing ‘in a bid to increase liquidity’ (Reuters, 1996). In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission has introduced new rules requiring market-makers to incorporate in their public quotes both customer limit orders and orders they quote on electronic communication networks such as Instinet and Selectnet. These rules are intended to improve liquidity through increased market transparency and enhanced quality of execution (see, Securities and Exchange Commission, 1996). These reforms were partly triggered by the studies of Christie and Schultz (1994) and Christie et al. (1994), who presented evidence that market makers implicitly colluded to maintain high bid--ask spreads, and Huang and Stoll (1996), who showed that Nasdaq spreads exceeded NYSE benchmarks. Further, emerging markets are evaluating and implementing new trading systems, and are making considerable investments in improving their microstructure.

A question of interest for both financial economists and practitioners is whether investments in improving the market microstructure have positive value. The answer relates to the raison d’être of market microstructure research, and it can quantify the benefits of improving trading mechanisms. This paper examines the value of an improvement in the market microstructure for selected stocks on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE).

Type
Chapter
Information
Market Liquidity
Asset Pricing, Risk, and Crises
, pp. 72 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admati, A.Pfleiderer, P. 1988 A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price variabilityReview of Financial Studies 1 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1980 Dealership market: market making with inventoryJournal of Financial Economics311Google Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1985 An integrated computerized trading systemMarket Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities IndustryLexington BooksLexington, MA217Google Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1986 Asset pricing and the bid–ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics 17 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1988 Liquidity and asset prices: financial management implicationsFinancial Management 17 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1988 Liquidity, volatility and exchange automationJournal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 3 369Google Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1989 The effects of beta, bid–ask spread, residual risk and size on slock returnsJournal of Finance 44 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1989 Market microstructure and price discovery on the Tokyo Stock ExchangeJapan and the World Economy 1 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1990
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1991 Liquidity, maturity and the yields on U.S. government securitiesJournal of Finance 46 1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1991 Volatility, efficiency and trading: evidence from the Japanese stock marketJournal of Finance 46 1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H. 1991 How (not) to integrate the European capital marketsGiovannini, A.Mayer, C.European Financial IntegrationCambridge University PressCambridge, MA73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H.Murgia, M. 1990 Journal of Banking and Finance423CrossRef
Amihud, Y.Mendelson, H.Wood, R. 1990 Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring65CrossRef
Asquith, P. 1983 Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholders returnJournal of Financial Economics 11 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.Subrahmanyam, A. 1996 Market microstructure and asset pricing: on the compensation for illiquidity in stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics 41 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.J.Warner, J.B. 1980 Measuring security price performanceJournal of Financial Economics 8 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S.J.Goetzmann, W.N.Ross, S.A. 1995 SurvivalJournal of Finance 50 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.G.Harris, J.H.Schultz, P.H. 1994 Why did NASDAQ market makers stop avoiding odd-eighth quotes?The Journal of Finance 49 1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.G.Huang, RD. 1990 Equity return dispersion: their behavior and relation to business conditionsWorking paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt UniversityTNGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.G.Huang, R.D. 1994 Market structures and liquidity: a transactions data study of exchange listingsJournal of Financial Intermediation 3 300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.G.Huang, R.D. 1995 31
Christie, W.G.Schuttz, P.H. 1994 Why do NASDAQ market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes?The Journal of Finance 49 1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K.J.Maier, S.F.Schwartz, R.A.Whitcomb, D.K. 1986 The Microstructure of Securities MarketsPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
Cooper, S.K.Groth, J.C.Avera, W.E. 1985 Liquidity, exchange listing and common stock performanceJournal of Economics and Business 37 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, T.E.Mayers, D. 1982 The value line enigmaJournal of Financial Economics 10 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datar, V.Naik, N.Radcliffe, R. 1996 The role of trading activity in the cross-section of stock returnsLondon Business SchoolLondon, EnglandGoogle Scholar
Dhillon, U.Johnson, H. 1991 Changes in the standard and poor's 500 listJournal of Business 64 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmeister, R.O.Pirie, W.L. 1995 Trading cost expectations: evidence from S&P 500 index replacement stock announcementUniversity of MississippiMSGoogle Scholar
Eleswarapu, V.R. 1995 Cost of transacting and expected returns in the NASDAQ marketUniversity of AucklandNew ZealandGoogle Scholar
Grammatikos, T.Papaionnou, G.J. 1986 Market reaction to NYSE listings: tests of the marketability gains hypothesisJournal of Financial Research 9 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L.Gurel, E. 1986 Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: new-evidence for the existence of price pressuresJournal of Finance 41 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, R.A.Baker, N.L. 1996 Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics 41 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T.S.Stoll, H.R. 1981 Optimal dealer pricing under transactions and return uncertaintyJournal of Financial Economics 9 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, R.D.Stoll, H.R. 1996 Dealer versus auction markets: a paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSEJournal of Financial Economics 41 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.Lehn, K.Mulherin, J.H. 1991 Institutional ownership of equity: effects on stock market liquidity and corporate long-term investmentSametz, A.W.Institutional Investing. Business One IrwinHomewood, IL115Google Scholar
Kadlec, G.B.McConnell, J.J. 1994 The effect of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset prices: evidence from exchange listingsJournal of Finance 49 611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamara, A. 1994 Liquidity, taxes, and short-term treasury yieldsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karafiath, I. 1988 Using dummy variables in the event study methodologyFinancial Review 23 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, V.A.Baker, H.K. 1993 Unlisted trading privileges, liquidity and stock returnsJournal of Financial Research 16 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterbach, B.Ungar, M. 1992
London Stock Exchange 1996
Lynch, A.W.Mendenhall, R.R. 1996 New evidence on stock price effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 indexJournal of BusinessGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, P.H. 1986 Measuring abnormal performance: the event parameter approach using joint generalized least squaresJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, H. 1982 Market behavior in a clearing houseEconometrica 50 1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, H. 1985 Random competitive exchange: price distributions and gains from tradeJournal of Economic Theory 37 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters 1996
Securities and Exchange Commission 1996
Shleifer, A. 1986 Do demand curves for stocks slope downward?Journal of Finance 41 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, W. L. 1991 60
Tamari, R.Resnik, I. 1990 12
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 1987
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 1988
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 1994 133
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 1995
Thompson, R. 1985 Conditioning the return-generating process on firm-specific events: a discussion of event study methodsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. 1980 Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticityEconometrica 48 817CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×