Accioly, A., and Paszko, R. 2004. Photon mass and gravitational deflection. Phys. Rev. D, 69, 107501.Google Scholar

Agarwal, B., Jain, P., Mitra, S., Nayak, A. C., and Verma, R. K. 2015. Elko fermions as dark matter candidates. Phys. Rev., D92, 075027. arXiv: 1407.0797[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Aharonov, Y., and Susskind, L. 1967. Observability of the sign change of spinors under 2πrotations. Phys. Rev., 158, 1237–1238.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 1994. Quantum measurement, gravitation, and locality. Phys. Lett., B339, 301–303. arXiv: gr-qc/9308007.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 1995. A new type of massive spin one boson: And its relation with Maxwell equations. In: The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light. Proceedings, Symposium in Honour of Jean-Pierre Vigier, Toronto, Canada, August 27-30, 1995.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 1996. Theory of neutral particles: McLennan-Case construct for neutrino, its generalization, and a fundamentally new wave equation. Int. J. Mod. Phys., A11, 1855–1874. arXiv: hep-th/9409134[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 1998. Book review of Quantum Field Theory by Lewis, H. Ryder, . Found. of Phys., 28, 527–529.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2000. Wave particle duality at the Planck scale: Freezing of neutrino oscillations. Phys. Lett., A275, 31–35. arXiv: gr-qc/0002005.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2003. Extended set of Majorana spinors, a new dispersion relation, and a preferred frame. arXiv: hep-ph/0305336 (unpublished).Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2004. Charge conjugation and Lense-Thirring effect: A new asymmetry. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D13, 2361–2367. arXiv: gr-qc/0405112[gr-qc]. [Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 2581 (2004)].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2017a. Evading Weinberg’s no-go theorem to construct mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness. EPL, 118(6), 60001. arXiv: 1605.04224[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2017b. Reflections of the observer and the observed in quantum gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D26(12), 1743001. arXiv: 1706.05927[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V. 2017c. The theory of local mass dimension one fermions of spin one half. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras, 27(3), 2247–2285. arXiv: 1601.03188[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Ernst, D. J. 1992. Paradoxical kinematic acausality in Weinberg’s equations for massless particles of arbitrary spin. Mod. Phys. Lett., A7, 1967–1974.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Grumiller, D. 2005a. Dark matter: A spin one half fermion field with mass dimension one? Phys. Rev., D72, 067701. arXiv: hep-th/0410192 [hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Grumiller, D. 2005b. Spin half fermions with mass dimension one: Theory, phenomenology, and dark matter. JCAP, 0507, 012. arXiv: hep-th/0412080[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Horvath, S. P. 2010. Very special relativity as relativity of dark matter: The Elko connection. JHEP, 11, 078. arXiv: 1008.0436[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Nayak, A. C. 2015. Elko and mass dimension one field of spin one half: Causality and fermi statistics. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D23, 1430026. arXiv: 1502.01940[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Sarmah, S. 2019. Elko under spatial rotations. EPL 125, 300005. arXiv: 1810.04985[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., and Sawicki, M. 1993. Front form spinors in the Weinberg-Soper formalism and generalized Melosh transformations for any spin. Phys. Rev., D47, 5161–5168. arXiv: nucl-th/9603019.Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., Lee, C.-Y., and Schritt, D. 2010. Elko as self-interacting fermionic dark matter with axis of locality. Phys. Lett., B687, 248–252. arXiv: 0804.1854[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., Horvath, S. P., and Schritt, D. 2011a. Amplitudes for space-like separations and causality. arXiv: 1110.1162[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Ahluwalia, D. V., Lee, C.-Y., and Schritt, D. 2011b. Self-interacting Elko dark matter with an axis of locality. Phys. Rev., D83, 065017. arXiv: 0911.2947[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Aitchison, I. J. R., and Hey, A. J. G. 2004. Gauge Theories in Particle Physics: A Practical Introduction. Vol. 2: Non-Abelian Gauge Theories: QCD and the Electroweak Theory. Bristol, UK: IOP 454 p. The citations in the monograph refer to this edition.Google Scholar

Alves, A., Dias, M., and de Campos, F. 2014. Perspectives for an Elko Phenomenology using monojets at the 14 TeV LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D23, 1444005. arXiv: 1410.3766[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Alves, A., de Campos, Fernando, Dias, M., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2015. Searching for Elko dark matter spinors at the CERN LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys., A30, 1550006. arXiv: 1401.1127[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Alves, A., Dias, M., de Campos, F., Duarte, L., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2018. Constraining Elko dark matter at the LHC with monophoton events. EPL, 121(3), 31001. arXiv: 1712.05180[hep-ph].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Referee, Anonymous. 2006. Referee report for Marsden application 07-UOC-055 (Royal Society of New Zealand) “Dark Matter and its Darkness”.Google Scholar

Atiyah, M. 2013. What Is a Spinor? www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBdW978Ii E.Google Scholar

Bahamonde, S., Boehmer, C. G., Carloni, S., Copeland, E. J., Fang, W., and Tamanini, N. 2018. Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity. Phys. Rept., 775–777, 1–122. arXiv: 1712.03107[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Barkana, R. 2018. Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars. Nature, 555(7694), 71–74. arXiv: 1803.06698[astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Barkana, R., Outmezguine, N. J., Redigolo, D., and Volansky, T. 2018. Strong constraints on light dark matter interpretation of EDGES signal. Phys. Rev., D98, 103005. arXiv: 1803.03091[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Basak, A., and Bhatt, J. R. 2011. Lorentz invariant dark-spinor and inflation. JCAP, 1106, 011. arXiv: 1104.4574[astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Basak, A., and Shankaranarayanan, S. 2015. Super-inflation and generation of first order vector perturbations in Elko. JCAP, 1505, 034. arXiv: 1410.5768[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Basak, A., Bhatt, , Jitesh, R., Shankaranarayanan, S., and Prasantha Varma, K. V. 2013. Attractor behaviour in Elko cosmology. JCAP, 1304, 025. arXiv: 1212.3445[astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Bernardini, A. E., and da Rocha, R. 2012. Dynamical dispersion relation for Elko dark spinor fields. Phys. Lett., B717, 238–241. arXiv: 1203.1049[hep-th].Google Scholar

Bertone, G., and Hooper, D. 2018. A history of dark matter. Rev. Mod. Phys., 90(4), 045002. arXiv: 1605.04909[astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G. 2007a. The Einstein-Cartan-Elko system. Annalen Phys., 16, 38–44. arXiv: gr-qc/0607088[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G. 2007b. The Einstein-Elko system: Can dark matter drive inflation? Annalen Phys., 16, 325–341. arXiv: gr-qc/0701087[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G. 2008. Dark spinor inflation: Theory primer and dynamics. Phys. Rev., D77, 123535. arXiv: 0804.0616[astro-ph].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G., and Burnett, J. 2008. Dark spinors with torsion in cosmology. Phys. Rev., D78, 104001. arXiv: 0809.0469[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G., and Burnett, J. 2010. Dark energy with dark spinors. Mod. Phys. Lett., A25, 101–110. arXiv: 0906.1351[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G., and Mota, D. F. 2008. CMB anisotropies and inflation from nonstandard Spinors. Phys. Lett., B663, 168–171. arXiv: 0710.2003[astro-ph].Google Scholar

Böhmer, C. G., Burnett, J., Mota, D. F., and Shaw, D. J. 2010. Dark spinor models in gravitation and cosmology. JHEP, 07, 053. arXiv: 1003.3858[hep-th].Google Scholar

Bonetti, L., Ellis, J., Mavromatos, N. E., Sakharov, A. S., Sarkisyan-Grinbaum, , Edward, K. G., and Spallicci, Alessandro D. A. M. 2016. Photon mass limits from fast radio bursts. Phys. Lett., B757, 548–552. arXiv: 1602.09135[astro-ph.HE].Google Scholar

Bonora, L., and da Rocha, R. 2016. New spinor fields on Lorentzian 7-manifolds. JHEP, 01, 133. arXiv: 1508.01357[hep-th].Google Scholar

Brown, H. R. 2005. Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bueno Rogerio, R. J., Hoff da Silva, J. M., Pereira, S. H., and da Rocha, R. 2016. A framework to a mass dimension one fermionic sigma model. Europhys. Lett., 113(6), 60001. arXiv: 1603.09183[hep-th].Google Scholar

Bueno Rogerio, R. J., Hoff da Silva, J. M., Dias, M., and Pereira, S. H. 2018. Effective lagrangian for a mass dimension one fermionic field in curved spacetime. JHEP, 02, 145. arXiv: 1709.08707[hep-th].Google Scholar

Burgard, C. 1992. Private communication.Google Scholar

Cavalcanti, R. T., Hoff da Silva, J. M., and da Rocha, R. 2014. VSR symmetries in the DKP algebra: The interplay between Dirac and Elko spinor fields. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 129, 246. arXiv: 1401.7527[hep-th].Google Scholar

Chang, Y.-C., Bouhmadi-Lopez, M., and Chen, P. 2017. Phantom dark ghost in Einstein-Cartan Gravity. Eur. Phys. J., C77 (5), 278. arXiv: 1507.07571[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Chaves, M., and Singleton, D. 2008. A unified model of phantom energy and dark Matter. SIGMA, 4, 009. arXiv: 0801.4728[hep-th].Google Scholar

Chee, G. 2010. Stability of de Sitter solutions sourced by dark spinors. arXiv: 1007.0554[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Chryssomalakos, C., and Okon, E. 2004. Generalized quantum relativistic kinematics: A stability point of view. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D13, 2003–2034. arXiv: hep-th/0410212[hep-th].Google Scholar

Cohen, A. G., and Glashow, Sheldon L. 2006. Very special relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 021601. arXiv: hep-ph/0601236[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., and Laloe, F. 1977. Quantum Mechanics, Vol. I and Vol. II. Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. R., and Mandula, J. 1967. All possible symmetries of the S Matrix. Phys. Rev., 159, 1251–1256.Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Cavalcanti, R. T. 2017. Flag-dipole and flagpole spinors fluid flows in Kerr spacetimes. Phys. Atom. Nucl., 80(2), 329–333. arXiv: 1602.02441[hep-th].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2010. Elko, flagpole and flag-dipole spinor fields, and the instanton Hopf fibration. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras, 20, 847–870. arXiv: 0811.2717[math-ph].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2014. Hawking radiation from Elko Particles tunnelling across black strings horizon. Europhys. Lett. (EPL), 107, 50001. arXiv: 1408.2402[hep-th].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2007. From Dirac spinor fields to Elko. J. Math. Phys., 48, 123517. arXiv: 0711.1103[math-ph].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Pereira, J. G. 2007. The quadratic spinor Lagrangian, axial torsion current, and generalizations. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D16, 1653–1667. arXiv: gr-qc/0703076[GR-QC].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., and Rodrigues, W. A. Jr. 2006. Where are Elko spinor fields in Lounesto spinor field classification? Mod. Phys. Lett., A21, 65–74. arXiv: math-ph/0506075[math-ph].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., Hoff da Silva, J. M., and Bernardini, A. E. 2011a. Elko spinor fields as a tool for probing exotic topological spacetime features. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser., 3, 133–142.Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., Bernardini, Alex E., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2011b. Exotic dark spinor fields. JHEP, 04, 110. arXiv: 1103.4759[hep-th].Google Scholar

da Rocha, R., Fabbri, L., Hoff da Silva, J. M., Cavalcanti, R. T., and Silva-Neto, J. A. 2013. Flag-Dipole spinor fields in ESK Gravities. J. Math. Phys., 54, 102505. arXiv: 1302.2262[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Darwin, C. G. 1927. The electron as a vector wave. Nature, 119, 282–284.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, A. 2016. Private communication.Google Scholar

de Souza, G. 2015. The Representations of HOM(2) and SIM(2) in the Context of Very Special Relativity. M.Phil. thesis, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), São Paulo, Brasil.Google Scholar

Dias, M., de Campos, F., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2012. Exploring Elko typical signature. Phys. Lett., B706, 352–359. arXiv: 1012.4642[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1928. The quantum theory of the electron. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A117, 610–624.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1930. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Doplicher, S., Fredenhagen, K., and Roberts, J. E. 1994. Space-time quantization induced by classical gravity. Phys. Lett., B331, 39–44.Google Scholar

dos Santos Souza, A. P., Pereira, S. H., and Jesus, J. F. 2015. A new approach on the stability analysis in Elko cosmology. Eur. Phys. J., C75, 36. arXiv: 1407. 3401[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Dowker, J. S. 1969. Is the sign change of spinors under 2π rotations observable? J. Phys. A, 2, 267–273.Google Scholar

Dvoeglazov, V. V. 1995a. Lagrangian for the Majorana-Ahluwalia construct. Nuovo Cim., A108, 1467–1476. arXiv: hep-th/9506083[hep-th].Google Scholar

Dvoeglazov, V. V. 1995b. Neutral particles in light of the Majorana-Ahluwalia ideas. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 34, 2467–2490. arXiv: hep-th/9504158[hep-th].Google Scholar

Dyson, F. J. 1949. The S matrix in quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev., 75, 1736–1755.Google Scholar

Fabbri, L. 2010. Causal propagation for Elko fields. Mod. Phys. Lett., A25, 151–157. arXiv: 0911.2622[gr-qc]. [Erratum: Mod. Phys. Lett.A25,1295(2010)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabbri, L. 2011a. The most general cosmological dynamics for Elko matter Fields. Phys. Lett., B704, 255–259. arXiv: 1011.1637[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Fabbri, L. 2011b. Zero energy of plane-waves for Elkos. Gen. Rel. Grav., 43, 1607–1613. arXiv: 1008.0334[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Fabbri, L. 2012. Conformal gravity with the most general Elko matter. Phys. Rev., D85, 047502. arXiv: 1101.2566[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Fabbri, L., and Vignolo, S. 2012a. A modified theory of gravity with torsion and its applications to cosmology and particle physics. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 51, 3186–3207. arXiv: 1201.5498[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Fabbri, L., and Vignolo, S. 2012b. The most general Elko matter in torsional f(R)-theories. Annalen Phys., 524, 77–84. arXiv: 1012.4282[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Fabbri, L., and Vignolo, S. 2014. Elko and Dirac spinors seen from torsion. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D23, 1444001. arXiv: 1407.8237[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Faddeev, L. D. 1989. Mathematician’s view on the development of physics (in Frontiers in physics, high technology and mathematics edited by H. A. Cerdeira and S. Lundqvist). 238–246. Also see: L. D. Faddeev, 1988 Asia-Pacific News, Vol. 3, page 21 .Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. 1949. The theory of positrons. Phys. Rev., 76(Sep), 749–759.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P., and Weinberg, S. 1999. Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics: The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures. Cambridge University Press. (See Feynman in).Google Scholar

Flato, M. 1982. Deformation view of physical theories. Czech. J. Phys., B32, 472–475. Note: While the general physical ideas of this important paper remain valid, some of the pessimistic remarks have been proved by experiments to be unfounded.Google Scholar

Folland, G. B. 2008. Quantum Field Theory: A Tourist Guide for Mathematicians.Google Scholar

Gaioli, F. H., and Garcia Alvarez, E. T. 1995 . Some remarks about intrinsic parity in Ryder’s derivation of the Dirac equation. Am. J. Phys., 63, 177–178. arXiv: hep-th/9807211[hep-th].Google Scholar

Gredat, D., and Shankaranarayanan, S. 2010. Modified scalar and tensor spectra in spinor driven inflation. JCAP, 1001, 008. arXiv: 0807.3336[astro-ph].Google Scholar

Haag, R., Lopuszanski, Jan T., and Sohnius, M. 1975. All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S Matrix. Nucl. Phys., B88, 257.Google Scholar

Hackermueller, L., Uttenthaler, S., Hornberger, K., Reiger, E., Brezger, B., Zeilinger, A., and Arndt, M. 2003. Wave nature of biomolecules and fluorofullerenes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(Aug), 090408.Google Scholar

Hardy, E., Lasenby, R., March-Russell, J., and West, S. M. 2015. Big bang synthesis of nuclear dark matter. JHEP, 06, 011. arXiv: 1411.3739[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Hladik, J. 1999. Spinors in Physics. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., and Cavalcanti, R. T. 2017. Revealing how different spinors can be: the Lounesto spinor classification. Mod. Phys. Lett., A32(35), 1730032. arXiv: 1708.06222[physics.gen-ph].Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., and da Rocha, R. 2013. Unfolding Physics from the algebraic classification of spinor fields. Phys. Lett., B718, 1519–1523. arXiv: 1212.2406 [hep-th].Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., and da Rocha, R. 2009. From Dirac action to Elko action. Int. J. Mod. Phys., A24, 3227–3242. arXiv: 0903.2815[math-ph].Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., and Pereira, S. H. 2014. Exact solutions to Elko spinors in spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes. JCAP, 1403, 009. arXiv: 1401.3252[hep-th].Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., Coronado Villalobos, C. H., and da Rocha, R. 2016a. Black holes and exotic spinors. Universe, 2(2), 8.Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., Coronado Villalobos, C. H., Bueno Rogerio, R. J., and Scatena, E. 2016b. On the bilinear covariants associated to mass dimension one spinors. Eur. Phys. J., C76(10), 563. arXiv: 1608.05365[hep-th].Google Scholar

Hoff da Silva, J. M., Coronado Villalobos, C. H., Bueno Rogerio, R. J. Bueno, and da Rocha, R. 2017. On the spinor Representation. arXiv: 1702.05034[math-ph].Google Scholar

Hogerheijde, M. R., et al. 2011. Detection of the water reservoir in a forming planetary system. Science, 334, 338–340. arXiv: 1110.4600[astro-ph.SR].Google Scholar

Horvathy, P. A. 1985. The observability of 2π rotations around an Aharonov-Bohm solenoid. Phys. Rev., A31, 1151–1153.Google Scholar

Ilderton, A. 2016. Very special relativity as a background field theory. Phys. Rev., D94(4), 045019. arXiv: 1605.04967[hep-th].Google Scholar

Jardim, I. C., Alencar, G., Landim, R. R., and Costa Filho, R. N. 2015. Solutions to the problem of Elko spinor localization in brane models. Phys. Rev., D91, 085008. arXiv: 1411.6962[hep-th].Google Scholar

Kainulainen, K., Tuominen, K., and Vaskonen, V. 2016. Self-interacting dark matter and cosmology of a light scalar mediator. Phys. Rev., D93(1), 015016. arXiv: 1507.04931[hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D95, no.7, 079901(2017)].Google Scholar

Kempf, A., Mangano, G., and Mann, R. B. 1995. Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev., D52, 1108–1118. arXiv: hep-th/9412167.Google Scholar

Klein, A. G., and Opat, G. I. 1976. Observation of 2π rotations by Fresnel diffraction of neutrons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 37, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kouwn, S., Lee, J., Lee, T. H., and Oh, P. 2013. Dark spinor model with torsion and cosmology. Mod. Phys. Lett., A28, 1350121. arXiv: 1211.2981[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Lee, C.Y. 2015. Self-interacting mass-dimension one fields for any spin. Int. J. Mod. Phys., A30, 1550048. arXiv: 1210.7916[hep-th].Google Scholar

Lee, C.Y. 2016a. A Lagrangian for mass dimension one fermionic dark matter. Phys. Lett., B760, 164–169. arXiv: 1404.5307[hep-th].Google Scholar

Lee, C.Y. 2016b. Symmetries and unitary interactions of mass dimension one fermionic dark matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys., A31(35), 1650187. arXiv: 1510.04983[hep-th].Google Scholar

Lee, C.Y., and Dias, M. 2016. Constraints on mass dimension one fermionic dark matter from the Yukawa interaction. Phys. Rev., D94(6), 065020. arXiv: 1511.01160[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Lee, T. D., and Wick, G. C. 1966. Space inversion, time Reversal, and other discrete symmetries in local field theories. Phys. Rev., 148(Aug), 1385–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, T. D., and Yang, C.N. 1956. Question of parity conservation in weak Interactions. Phys. Rev., 104, 254–258.Google Scholar

Lee, T. H. 2012. Some cosmological solutions of 5D Einstein equations with dark spinor condensate. Phys. Lett., B712, 6–9.Google Scholar

Liu, Y.X., Zhou, X.N., Yang, K., and Chen, F.W. 2012. Localization of 5D Elko spinors on Minkowski branes. Phys. Rev., D86, 064012. arXiv: 1107.2506[hep-th].Google Scholar

Lounesto, P. 2001. Clifford algebras and spinors. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser., 286, 1–338.Google Scholar

Lubański, J. K. 1942. Sur la theorie des particules elementaires de spin quelconque. I. Physica, 9. (in French).Google Scholar

Luo, J., Tu, L.C., Hu, Z.K., and Luan, E.J. 2003. New Experimental Limit on the Photon Rest Mass with a Rotating Torsion Balance. Phys. Rev. Lett., 90(Feb), 081801.Google Scholar

Majorana, E. 1937. Theory of the symmetry of electrons and positrons. Nuovo Cim., 14, 171–184.Google Scholar

McDermott, S. D. 2018 . Is self-interacting dark matter undergoing dark fusion? Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(22), 221806. arXiv: 1711.00857[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Michelson, A. A., and Morley, E. W. 1887. On the relative motion of the Earth and the luminiferous ether. Am. J. Sci., 34, 333–345.Google Scholar

Mishra, S. S. 2017. private communication.Google Scholar

Nakayama, Y. 2018a. Local field theory construction of Very Special Conformal Symmetry. arXiv: 1802.06489[hep-th].Google Scholar

Nakayama, Y. 2018b. Very special conformal field theories and their holographic duals. Phys. Rev., D97(6), 065003. arXiv: 1707.05423[hep-th].Google Scholar

Neto, J. A. Silva. 2017. f(R) gravity with torsion and Lorentz violation. PhD. thesis.Google Scholar

Padmanabhan, T. 2016. The atoms of space, gravity and the cosmological constant. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D25(07), 1630020. arXiv: 1603.08658[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Pakvasa, S. 2018. The Stern-Gerlach Experiment and the Electron Spin. arXiv: 1805.09412[physics.hist-ph].Google Scholar

Pauli, W. 1927. Zur quantenmechanik des magnetischen elektrons. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, 601–623.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1955. A generalized inverse for matrices. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 51(7), 406–413.Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., and Guimares, T. M. 2017. From inflation to recent cosmic acceleration: The fermionic Elko field driving the evolution of the universe. JCAP, 1709(09), 038. arXiv: 1702.07385[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., and Lima, R. C. 2017. Creation of mass dimension one fermionic particles in asymptotically expanding universe. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D26(12), 1730028. arXiv: 1612.02240[hep-th].Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., and S., A. Pinho, S. 2014. Elko applications in cosmology. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D23(14), 1444008.Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., Pinho, S. S., and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2014. Some remarks on the attractor behaviour in Elko cosmology. JCAP, 1408, 020. arXiv: 1402.6723[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., Holanda, R. F. L., Pinho, S. and Souza, A. 2017a. Evolution of the universe driven by a mass dimension one fermion field. EPL, 120(3), 31001. arXiv: 1703.07636[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Pereira, S. H., Pinho, S. S., A. Hoff da Silva, J. M., and Jesus, J. F. 2017b. Λ(t) cosmology induced by a slowly varying Elko field. JCAP, 1701(01), 055. arXiv: 1608.02777[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Podio, L., et al. 2013. Water vapor in the protoplanetary disk of DG Tau. Astrophys. J., 766, L5. arXiv: 1302.1410[astro-ph.SR].Google Scholar

Ramond, P. 1981. Field Theory: A Modern Primer. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, USA.Google Scholar

Rauch, H., Treimer, W., and Bonse, U. 1974. Test of a single crystal neutron interferometer. Physics Letters A, 47(5), 369 – 371.Google Scholar

Robertson, A. 2017. The Cosmological Implications of Self-Interacting Dark Matter. PhD. thesis, Durham U.Google Scholar

Rogerio, R. J. Bueno, , and Hoff da Silva, J. M. 2017. The local vicinity of spins sum for certain mass dimension one spinors. Europhys. Lett., 118(1), 10003. arXiv: 1602.05871[hep-th].Google Scholar

Ryder, L. H. 1986 and 1996. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. D. 2014a. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. D. 2014b. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwinger, J. 1951. The theory of quantized fields. I. Phys. Rev., 82, 914–927.Google Scholar

Shankaranarayanan, S. 2009. What-if inflaton is a spinor condensate? Int. J. Mod. Phys., D18, 2173–2179. arXiv: 0905.2573[astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Shankaranarayanan, S. 2010. Dark spinor driven inflation. Pages 1237–1240 of: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories. Proceedings, 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Paris, France, July 12-18, 2009. Vol. 1-3.Google Scholar

Shirokov, Y. M. 1960. Space and time reflections in relativistic theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 15, 1–12.Google Scholar

Silverman, M. P. 1980. The curious problem of spinor rotation. Eur. J. Phys., 1, 116–123.Google Scholar

Sperança, L. D. 2014. An identification of the Dirac operator with the parity operator. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D23, 1444003. arXiv: 1304.4794[math-ph].Google Scholar

Spergel, D. N., and Steinhardt, P. J. 2000. Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3760–3763. arXiv: astro-ph/9909386[astro-ph].Google Scholar

Srednicki, M. 2007. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

‘t Hooft, G. 1973. Dimensional regularization and the renormalization group. Nucl. Phys., B61, 455–468.Google Scholar

Tomonaga, S. 1946. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields. Prog. Theor. Phys., 1, 27–42. This is a translation of the original 1943 paper in Japanese.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. 2005. On eight kinds of spinors. Acta Phys. Polon., B36, 121–130.Google Scholar

Tulin, S., and Yu, H-B. 2018. Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure. Phys. Rept., 730, 1–57. arXiv: 1705.02358[hep-ph].Google Scholar

Tung, W. K. 1985. Group Theory in Physics. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific (1985) 344p.Google Scholar

Uhlenbeck, G. E., and Goudsmit, S. 1925. Die Intensität der Zeemankomponenten. Naturwissenschaften, 13, 90.Google Scholar

Uhlenbeck, G. E., and Goudsmit, S. 1926. Spinning electrons and the structure of spectra. Nature, 117, 264–265.Google Scholar

Vilela Mendes, R. 1994. Deformations, stable theories and fundamental constants. J. Phys., A27, 8091–8104.Google Scholar

Wei, H. 2011. Spinor dark energy and cosmological coincidence Problem. Phys. Lett., B695, 307–311. arXiv: 1002.4230[gr-qc].Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 1964a. Feynman rules for any spin. Phys. Rev., 133, B1318–B1332.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 1964b. Feynman rules for any spin. II . massless particles. Phys. Rev., 134, B882–B896.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 2005. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 2012. Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 1969. Feynman rules for any spin: III. Phys. Rev., 181, 1893–1899.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. 2013. The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werner, S. A., Colella, R., Overhauser, A. W., and Eagen, C. F. 1975. Observation of the phase shift of a neutron due to precession in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1053–1055.Google Scholar

Wigner, E. P. 1939. On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Annals Math., 40, 149–204. [Reprint: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 6, 9(1989)].Google Scholar

Wigner, E. P. 1964. Unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group including reflection. In: Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics: Lectures of the Istanbul Summer School of Theoretical Physics, 1962, edited by F. Gursey; (Gordon and Breach).Google Scholar

Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., and Hudson, R. P. 1957. Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay. Phys. Rev., 105, 1413–1414.Google Scholar

Yang, Chen-Ning, and Mills, R. L. 1954. Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. Phys. Rev., 96, 191–195.Google Scholar

Zhou, X.-N., Du, Y.-Z., Zhao, H.-Z., and Liu, Y.-X. 2018. Localization of five-dimensional Elko spinors with non-minimal coupling on thick branes. Eur. Phys. J., C78(6), 493. arXiv: 1710.02842[hep-th].Google Scholar