Abadie, A., and Imbens, G. [2005]. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74, 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. [1992]. National medical expenditure survey, calendar year 1987. Center for General Health Services Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, Rockville, MD.

Aiken, L., Smith, H., and Lake, E. [1994]. Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals known for good nursing care. Medical Care, 32, 771–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Althauser, R. P., and Rubin, D. B. [1970]. The computerized construction of a matched sample. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althauser, R. P., and Rubin, D. B. [1971]. Measurement error and regression to the mean in matched samples. Social Forces, 50, 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., and Weisberg, H. I. [1980]. Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies. Wiley, New York.

Anderson, T. W. [1958]. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistics. Wiley: New York.

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B. [1996]. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arai, Y., and Gorski, R. A. [1968]. Critical exposure time for androgenization of the developing hypothalamus in the female rat. Endocrinology, 82, 1010–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Armitage, S. G. [1952]. The effects of barbiturates on the behavior of rat offspring as measured in learning and reasoning situations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashikaga, T., and Chang, P. [1981]. Robustness of Fisher's linear discriminant function under two-component mixed normal models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 676–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, S. G., and Laird, N. M. [1988]. Regression analysis for categorical variables with outcome subject to nonignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, F. G. II, Chang, S. M., Gutin, P. H., Malec, M. K., McDermott, M. W., Prados, M. D., and Wilson, C. B. [1998]. Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurgery, 42, 709–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnard, J., Frangakis, C.Hill, J., and Rubin, D. B. [2003]. A principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of vouchers in New York City (with discussion and rejoinder). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barr, M. D., and Bertram, E. G. [1949]. A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female, and the behavior of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature, 163, 676–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartlett, D. J., Hurley, W. P., Brand, C. R., and Poole, E. W. [1968]. Chromosomes of male patients in a security prison. Nature, 219, 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basu, D. [1980]. Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher Randomization Test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baughman,, F. A., Jr., and Mann, J. D. [1972]. Ascertainment of seven YY males in a private neurology practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 222, 446–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaton, A. E., and Tukey, J. W. [1974]. The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on band-spectroscopic data. Technometrics, 16, 147–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belson, W. A. [1956]. A technique for studying the effects of a television broadcast. Applied Statistics, 5, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, D. J. [1999]. Does 401(k) eligibility increase net national savings?: Reducing bias in the eligibility effect estimate. A. B. Honors Thesis in Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Benson, H., and McCallie, D. [1979]. Angina pectoris and the placebo effect. New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 1424–1428.Google ScholarPubMed

Billewicz, W. Z. [1964]. Matched samples in medical investigations. British Journal of Preventative Social Medicine, 18, 167–173.Google ScholarPubMed

Billewicz, W. Z. [1965]. The efficiency of matched samples: An empirical investigation. Biometrics, 21, 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. [1975]. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Borgaonkar, D. S., and Shah, S. A. [1974]. The XYY chromosome male – or syndrome? In A. G. Steinberg and A. G. Bearn (eds.), Progress in Medical Genetics, 10. Grune & Stratton: New York. 135–222.

Boue, J., Boue, A., and Lazar, P. [1975]. Respective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology, 12, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brent, D. A., Crumrine, P. K., Varma, R., Brown, R. V., and Allan, M. J. [1990]. Phenobarbital treatment and major depressive disorder in children with epilepsy: A naturalistic follow-up. Pediatrics, 85, 1086–1091.Google ScholarPubMed

Breslow, N. E., and Day, N. E. [1980]. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol 1: The analysis of case-control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Bross, I. D. J. [1966]. Spurious effects from an extraneous variable. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 19, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bross, I. D. J. [1967]. Pertinency of an extraneous variable. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bunker, J. P., Forrest, W. H., Mosteller, F., and Vandam, L. D. (eds.). [1969]. The National Halothane Study. United States Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.

Camfield, C. S., Chaplin, S., Doyle, A., Shapiro, S. H., Cummings, C., and Camfield, P. R. [1979]. Side effects of phenobarbital in toddlers: Behavioral and cognitive aspects. Journal of Pediatrics, 95, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D. T., and Erlebacher, A. [1970]. How regression artifacts in quasi-experimental evaluations can mistakenly make compensatory education look harmful. In J. Hellmuth (ed.), The Disadvantaged Child (Vol. 3), Compensatory Education: A National Debate. Brunner/Mazel: New York.

Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. [1963]. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Rand McNally: Chicago.

Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. [1963]. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally: Chicago.

Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. [1966]. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

Card, D., and Kreuger, A. [1994]. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review, 84, 772–793.Google Scholar

Carpenter, R. G. [1977]. Matching when covariates are normally distributed. Biometrika, 64, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caspersson, T., Zech, L., and Johansson, C. [1970]. Analysis of human metaphase chromosome set by aid of DNA-binding fluorescent agents. Experimental Cell Research, 62, 490–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W S., Kleiner, B., and Tukey, P. A. [1983]. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.

Chapin, F. S. [1947]. Experimental Designs in Sociological Research. Harper and Brothers: New York.

Cochran, W. G. [1950]. The comparison of percentages in matched studies. Biometrika, 37, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1952]. An appraisal of the repeated population censuses in the eastern health district, Baltimore. In Research in Public Health. Milbank Memorial Fund: New York. 255–265.

Cochran, W. G. [1953a]. Matching in analytical studies. American Journal of Public Health, 43, 684–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cochran, W. G. [1953b]. Analysis of records with a view to their evaluation. The Family Health Maintenance Demonstration. Milbank Memorial Fund: New York. 228–236.

Cochran, W. G. [1955]. Research techniques in the study of human beings. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 33, 121–136.

Cochran, W. G. [1957]. Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics, 13, 261–281.

Cochran, W. G. [1963]. Sampling Techniques. Wiley: New York.

Cochran, W. G. [1965]. The planning of observational studies of human populations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 128, 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1967a]. Planning and analysis of non-experimental studies. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on the Design of Experiments in Army Research Development and Testing, ARO-D Report 67-2, 319–336.Google Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1967b]. Footnote by William G. Cochran. Science, 156, 1450–1462.Google Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1968a]. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 24, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cochran, W. G. [1968b]. Errors of measurement in statistics. Technometrics, 10, 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1969]. The use of covariance in observational studies. Applied Statistics, 18, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1970a]. Performance of a preliminary test of comparability in observational studies. ONR Technical Report No. 29. Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.

Cochran, W. G. [1970b]. Some effects of errors of measurement on linear regression. Proceedings of the 6th Berkeley Symposium, 1, 527–539.Google Scholar

Cochran, W. G. [1972]. Observational studies. In T. A. Bancroft (ed.), Statistical Papers in Honor of George W. Snedecor. Iowa State University Press: Ames.

Cochran, W. G. [1974]. The vital role of randomization in comparative experimentation. In J. Neyman (ed.), The Heritage of Copernicus. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 445–463.

Cochran, W. G. [1977]. Sampling Techniques. Wiley: New York.

Cochran, W. G. [1978]. Early development of techniques in comparative experimentation. In D. Owen (ed.), On the History of Statistics and Probability. Dekker: New York. 2–25.

Cochran, W. G. [1983]. Planning and Analysis of Observational Studies. Wiley: New York.

Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. [1957]. Experimental Designs. Wiley: New York.

Cochran, W. G., and Rubin, D. B. [1973]. Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhya, A, 35, 417–446.Google Scholar

Cohn, P. F., Harris, P., Barry, W., Rosati, R. A., Rosenbaum, P. R., and Waternaux, C. [1981]. Prognostic importance of anginal symptoms in angiographically defined coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 47, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfield, F. D., and York, R. L. [1966]. Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Office of Education: Washington, DC.

Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., and Kilgore, S. [1981]. Public and Private Schools. March 1981 Report to the National Center for Educational Statistics: Washington, DC.

Conaway, M. R. [1992]. The analysis of repeated categorical measurements subject to nonignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 817–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connors, A. F.., Speroff, T., Dawson, N. V., Thomas, C., Harrell, F. E.., Wagner, D., Desbiens, N., Goldman, L., Wu, A. W., Califf, R. M., Fulkerson, W. J.., Vidaillet, H., Broste, S., Bellamy, P., Lynn, J., and Knaus, W. A. [1996]. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 889–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, E. F., and Goldman, L. [1989a]. Asymmetric stratification: An outline for an efficient method for controlling confounding in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 626–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, E. F., and Goldman, L. [1989b]. Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. [1979]. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Rand McNally: Chicago.

Cornfield, J. [1951]. A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data, application to cancer of the lung, breast and cervix. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 11, 1269–1275.Google Scholar

Cornfield, J. [1956]. A statistical problem arising from retrospective studies. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium, 4, 135–148.Google Scholar

Cornfield, J., et al. [1959]. Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 173–200.Google Scholar

Cox, D. R. [1951]. Some systematic experimental designs. Biometrika, 38, 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D. R. [1957a]. Note on grouping. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D. R. [1957b]. The use of a concomitant variable in selecting an experimental design. Biometrika, 44, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D. R. [1958]. The Planning of Experiments. Wiley: New York.

Cox, D. R. [1970]. The Analysis of Binary Data. Methuen: London.

Cox, D. R. [1972]. The analysis of multivariate binary data. Applied Statistics, 21, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D. R. [1986]. Comment on “Statistics and causal inference” by Holland (with discussion and reply). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.Google Scholar

Cox, D. R., and Hinkley, D. V. [1974]. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hill: London.

Crandall, B. F., Carrel, R. E., and Sparkes, R. S. [1972]. Chromosome findings in 700 children referred to a psychiatric clinic. Journal of Pediatrics, 80, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curley, C., McEachern, J. E., and Speroff, T. [1998]. A firm trial of interdisciplinary rounds on the inpatient medical wards: An intervention designed using continuous quality improvement. Medical Care, 36, AS4–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Czajka, J. C., Hirabayashi, S. M., Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. [1992] Projecting from advance data using propensity modeling. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 10, 117–131.Google Scholar

D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. [1994]. Estimating propensity scores when covariates have either ignorable or nonignorable missing values. PhD Thesis. Department of Statistics, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.

D'Agostino, R. B.. [1998]. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a nonrandomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 225–228.Google Scholar

D'Agostino, R. B., and Rubin, D. B. [2000]. Estimation and use of propensity scores with incomplete data. Journal of the American Statistical Assocation, 95, 749–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daudin, J. J. [1986]. Selection of variables in mixed-variable discriminant analysis. Biometrics, 42, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawid, A. P. [1976]. Properties of diagnostic data distributions. Biometrics, 32, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dawid, A. P. [1979]. Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 41, 1–31.Google Scholar

DeBault, L. E., Johnston, E., and Loeffelholz, P. [1972]. Incidence of XYY and XXY individuals in a security hospital population. Diseases of the Nervous System, 33, 590–593.Google Scholar

Dehejia, R. H., and Wahba, S. [1999]. Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempster, A. P. [1969]. Elements of Continuous Multivariate Analysis. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

Dempster, A. P. [1971]. An overview of multivariate analysis. Journal of Mulivariate Analysis, 1, 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempster, A. P. [1973]. Aspects of multinomial logit model. In P. R. Krishnaiah (ed.), Multivariate Analysis III. Academic Press: New York. 129–142.

Dempster, A. P., Laird, N., and Rubin, D. B. [1977]. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion and reply). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 39, 1–38.Google Scholar

Diaconis, P., and Freedman, D. [1984]. Asymptotics of graphical projection pursuit. Annals of Statistics, 12, 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, A., and Sekon, J. S. [2005]. Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Poli-tical Methodology, The Society of Political Methodology <polmeth@ARTSCI.WUSTL.EDU>.

Dixon, W., Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., Frane, J. W., Hill, M. A., Jennrich, R. I., and Toporek, J. D. [1981]. BMD-81: Biomedical Computer Programs. University of California Press: Berkeley.

Dodson, W. E. [1989]. Deleterious effects of drugs on the developing nervous system. Neonatal Neurology, 16, 339–360.Google ScholarPubMed

Dorn, H. F. [1953]. Philosophy of inference from retrospective studies. American Journal of Public Health, 43, 692–699.Google Scholar

Drake, C. [1993]. Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect. Biometrics, 49, 1231–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, C., and Fisher, L. [1995]. Prognostic models and the propensity score. International Journal of Epidemiology, 24, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eastwood, E., and Fisher, G. [1988]. Skills acquisition among matched samples of institutionalized and community-based persons with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93, 75–83.Google ScholarPubMed

Efron, B. [1971]. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika, 583, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, B. [1975]. The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., and Harman, H. H. [1975]. Technical Report No. 8, Office of Naval Research contract N 00014-71-C-0117, HR 150 329.

Fang, K., Kotz, S., and Ng, K. [1990]. Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions. Chapman and Hall: London.

Farwell, J. R., Lee, Y. J., Hirtz, D. G., Sulzbacher, S. I., Ellenberg, J. H., and Nelson, K. B. [1990a]. Phenobarbital for febrile seizures: Effects on intelligence and on seizure recurrence. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 364–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farwell, J. R., Lee, Y. J., Hirtz, D. G., Sulzbacher, S. I., Ellenberg, J. H., and Nelson, K. B. [1990b]. Phenobarbital for febrile seizures. New England Journal of Medicine, 323, 485–486.Google Scholar

Feingold, C. [1994]. Correlates of cognitive development in low-birth-weight infants from low-income families. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 9, 91–97.Google ScholarPubMed

Feller, W. [1966]. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2. Wiley: New York.

Fiebach, N. H., Cook, E. F., Lee, T. H., Brand, D. A., Rouan, G. W., Weisberg, M., et al. [1990]. Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction who are initially admitted to stepdown units: Data from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study. American Journal of Medicine, 89, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finch, P. E. [1988]. Standardization. In S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson (eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (Vol. 8). Wiley: New York. 629–632.

Finley, W. H., McDanal, C. E.., Finley, S. C., and Rosecrans, C. J. [1973]. Prison survey for the XYY karyotype in tall inmates. Behavior Genetics, 3, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finney, D. J. [1957]. Stratification, balance, and covariance. Biometrics, 13, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. [1925]. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.

Fisher, R. A. [1935]. The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.

Fishman, R. H. B., and Yanai, J. [1983]. Long-lasting effects of early barbiturates on central nervous system and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 7, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Forssman, H. [1967]. Epilepsy in XYY man. Lancet, 1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frangakis, C. E., and Rubin, D. B. [2002]. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics, 58, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frangakis, C. E., Rubin, D. B., and Zhou, X. H.. [1998]. The clustered encouragement design. Proceedings of the Biometrics Section of the American Statistical Association, 71–79.

Friis, B., and Sardemann, H. [1977]. Neonatal hypocalcemia after intrauterine exposure to anticonvulsant drugs. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 52, 239–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gail, M. H., Wieand, S., and Piantadosi, S. [1984]. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments and nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika, 71, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaily, E., Kantola-Sorsa, E., and Granstrom, M. L. [1990]. Specific cognitive dysfunction in children with epileptic mothers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelfand, A. E., and Smith, A. F. M. [1990]. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 972–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

General Register Office. [1951]. Classification of Occupations 1950. His Majesty's Statistical Office: London. 3–13.

Gilbert, J. P., Light, R. J., and Mosteller, F. [1975]. Assessing social innovation: An empirical base for policy. In A. R. Lumsdaine and C. A. Bennett (eds.), Some Critical Issues in Assessing Social Programs. Academic Press: New York.

Glynn, R. J., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, F. B. [1993]. Multiple imputation in mixture models for nonignorable nonresponse with follow-ups. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 984–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberger, A. S. [1972a]. Some selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: Some formal illustrations. Discussion paper. University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty: Madison, WI.

Goldberger, A. S. [1972b]. Some selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: The case of interaction. Discussion paper. University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty: Madison, WI.

Goodman, L. A. [1968]. The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1091–1131.Google Scholar

Goodman, R. M., Smith, W. S., and Migeon, C. J. [1967]. Sex chromosome abnormalities. Nature, 216, 942–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gorski, R. A., and Arai, Y. [1968]. Protection against the organizing effect of exogenous androgen in the neonatal female rat. Endocrinology, 82, 1005–1009.Google Scholar

Graffar, M. [1960]. Social study of samples. Modern Problems in Pediatrics, 5, 30–42.Google Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. [1969]. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, B. G. [1953]. The use of covariance and balancing in analytical surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 43, 692–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenlees, J. S., Reece, W. S., and Zieschang, K. D. [1982]. Imputation of missing values when the probability of nonresponse depends upon the variable being imputed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, E. [1945]. Experimental Sociology: A Study in Method. Kings Crown Press: New York.

Gu, X. S., and Rosenbaum, P. R. [1993]. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: Structures, distances, and algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2, 405–420.Google Scholar

Haggstrom, G. [1976]. The pitfalls of manpower experimentation. In H. W. Sinaido and L. A. Broedling (eds.), Perspectives on Attitude Assessment: Surveys and Their Alternatives. Pendleton: Champaign, IL. 228–231.

Hahn, J. [1998]. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica, 66, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, M. A. [1979]. Choosing a parameter for 2 x 2 table or 2 x 2 x 2 table analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 362–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hansen, B. B. [2004]. Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 609–618.

Harrell, F. E.., Marcus, S. E., Layde, P. M., Broste, S. K., Cook, E. F., Wagner, D. P., et al. [1990]. Statistical methods in SUPPORT. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43 (Supplement), 89S–98S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, G. W. [1998] Expert report, April 27, 1998: “Health care expenditures attributable to smoking in Oklahoma.” The State of Oklahoma, ex rel., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., Defendants. Case no. CJ-96-1499-L. District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma.

Harter, H. L. [1960]. Expected values of normal order statistics. Aeronautical Research Laboratories Technical Report, 60–292.

Heckman, J. J. [1976]. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., and Hotz, V. J. [1989]. Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 862–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., and Todd, P. [1996]. Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: An interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13416–13420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hess, G. [1974]. WAIS Anvendt på 698 50-årige. Akademisk Forlag: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Hill, A. B., and Knowelden, J. [1950]. Inoculation and poliomyelitis: A statistical investigation in England and Wales in 1949. British Medical Journal, ⅱ: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, J., Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. [1999]. The design of the New York school choice scholarship program evaluation. In L. Bickman (ed.), Research Designs: Donald Campbell's Legacy. Sage: London. 155–180.

Hill, J. L., Reiter, J. P., and Zanutto, E. [2004]. A comparison of experimental and observational date analyses. In A. Gelman and X.L. Meng (eds.), Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives. Wiley: New York. 49–60.

Hill, T. D., Reddon, J. R., and Jackson, D. N. [1985]. The factor structure of the Wechsler scales: A brief review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirano, K., Imbens, G., and Ridder, G. [2003]. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71, 1161–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschhorn, K. [1965]. In D. B. Amos (ed.), Histocompatibility Testing. National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council: Washington, DC. 177–178.

Hirtz, D. G., Lee, Y. J., Ellenberg, J. H., and Nelson, K. B. [1986]. Survey on the management on febrile seizures. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 140, 909–914.Google ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. W. [1986a]. Which comes first, cause or effect? New York Statistician, 38, 1–6.

Holland, P. W. [1986b]. Statistics and causal inference (with discussion and reply). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. W. [1988]. Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. Sociological Methodology, 449–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. W., and Rubin, D. B. [1983]. On Lord's Paradox. In H. Wainer and S. Messick (eds.), Principles of Modern Psychological Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Holland, P. W., and Rubin, D. B. [1988]. Causal inference in retrospective studies. Evaluation Review, 12, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hook, E. B. [1973]. Behavioral implications of the human XYY genotype. Science, 179, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hook, E. B., and Kim, D. S. [1971]. Height and antisocial behavior in XY and XYY boys. Science, 172, 284–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horvitz, D. G., and Thompson, D. J. [1952]. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imbens, G. W. [2000]. The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87, 706–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imbens, G. W. [2004]. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. [2006a]. Rubin Causal Model. In S. Durlauff and L. Blume (eds.), Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan: London.

Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B. [2006b]. Causal Inference in Statistics and the Medical and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Infant Health and Development Program. [1990]. Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight infants from low-income families. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 3035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, P. A., Brunton, M., Melville, M. M., Brittain, R. P., and McClemont, W. F. [1965]. Aggressive behavior, mental, sub-normality and the XYY male. Nature, 208, 1351–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacobs, P. A., Price, W. H., Richmond, S., and Ratcliff, R. A. W. [1971]. Chromosome surveys in penal institutions and approved schools. Journal of Medical Genetics, 8, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jarvik, L. F., Klodin, V., and Matsuyama, S. S. [1973]. Human aggression and the extra Y chromosome: Fact or fantasy?American Psychologist, 28, 674–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jick, H., et al. [1973]. Coffee and myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 289, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. [1971a]. Continuous Univariate Distributions – 1. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. [1971b]. Continuous Univariate Distributions – 2. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

Jones, K. L., Johnson, K. A., and Chambers, C. C. [1992]. Pregnancy outcome in women treated with phenobarbital monotherapy. Teratology, 45, 452–510.Google Scholar

Kaltenbach, K., and Finnegan, L. P. [1986]. Neonatal abstinence syndrome, pharmacotherapy, and developmental outcomes. Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology, 8, 353–355.Google Scholar

Kalton, G. [1968]. Standardization: A technique to control for extraneous variables. Applied Statistics, 16, 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kane, R., Garrad, J., Buchanon, J., Rosenfeld, A., Skay, C., and McDermott, S. [1991]. Improving primary care in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 39, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P. [1958]. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, S., Almy, R., and Bernard, M. [1967]. Another XYY phenotype. Nature, 215, 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kempthorne, O. [1952]. The Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley: New York.

Kempthorne, O. [1976]. Discussion of “On rereading R. A. Fisher” by Leonard J. Savage. Annals of Statistics, 4, 495–497.Google Scholar

Kendall, M. G., and Buckland, W. R. [1971]. A Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Oliver and Boyd: London.

Kenney, D. A. [1975]. A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kihlberg, J. K., and Narragon, E. A. [1964]. A failure of the accident severity classification. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Report No. VJ-1823-R8, 62–70.Google Scholar

Kihlberg, J. K., and Robinson, S. J. [1968]. Seat belt use and injury patterns in automobile accidents. Cornell Aeronautical LaboratoryReport No. VJ-1823-R30.Google Scholar

Kilbey, M. M., and Asghar, K. (eds.). [1991]. Methodological Issues in Controlled Studies on Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Drug Abuse. Research report DHHS-NIDA 114 ADM 9-1837. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse: Rockville, MD.

Klipsten, F. A. [1964]. Subnormal serum folate and macrocytosis associated with anticonvulsant drug therapy. Blood, 23, 68–86.Google Scholar

Knuth, D. E. [1969]. Seminumerical Algorithms (Vol. 2). Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

Kruskal, W. [1980]. The significance of Fisher. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 1019–1030.Google Scholar

Krzanowski, W. J. [1975]. Discrimination and classification using both binary and continuous variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 782–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krzanowski, W. J. [1980]. Mixtures of continuous and categorical variables in discriminant analysis. Biometrics, 36, 486–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krzanowski, W. J. [1982]. Mixtures of continuous and categorical variables in discriminant analysis: A hypothesis testing approach. Biometrics, 38, 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lalonde, R. [1986]. Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. American Economic Review, 76, 604–620.Google Scholar

Lavori, P. W., and Keller, M. B. [1988]. Improving the aggregate performance of psychiatric diagnostic methods when not all subjects receive the standard test. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavori, P. W., Keller, M. B., and Endicott, J. [1988]. Improving the validity of FH-RDC diagnosis of major affective disorder in uninterviewed relatives in family studies: A model based approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 22, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lechner, M. [2002]. Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 165, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lederberg, J. [1973]. The genetics of human nature. Social Research, 43, 375–406.Google Scholar

Li, K. C. [1991]. Sliced inverse regression for dimension reduction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, E., Cohen, A., Lang, J. M., D'Agostino, R. B.., Datta, S., and Frigoletto, F. D.. [1996]. The association of epidural anesthesia with caesarian delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88, 993–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liewendahl, K., Majuri, H., and Helenius, T. [1978]. Thyroid function tests in patients on long-term treatment with various anticonvulsant drugs. Clinical Endocrinology, 8, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Light. J. R., Mosteller, F., and Winokur, H. S. [1971]. Using controlled field study to improve public policy. Federal Statistics (report of the President's Commission), 11, 367–402.Google Scholar

Lin, D. Y., Psaty, B. M., and Kronal, R. A. [1997]. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Technical Report No. 144. University of Washington School of Public Health: Seattle.

Lindley, D. V. [1947]. Regression lines and the linear functional relationship. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 9, 218–224.Google Scholar

Lindley, D. V., and Novick, M. R. [1981]. The role of exchangeability in inference. Annals of Statistics, 9, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsley, D. B. [1939]. A longitudinal study of the occipital alpha rhythm in normal children: Frequency and amplitude standards. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 55, 197–213.Google Scholar

Little, R. J. A. [1993]. Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 125–134.Google Scholar

Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. [1987]. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley: New York.

Little, R. J. A., and Schlucter, M. D. [1985]. Maximum likelihood estimation for mixed continuous and categorical data with missing values. Biometrika, 72, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, C., and Rubin, D. B. [1995]. ML estimation of the t distribution using EM and its extensions, ECM and ECME. Statistic Sinica, 5, 19–39.Google Scholar

Liu, C., and Rubin, D. B. [1998]. Ellipsoidally symmetric extensions of the general location model for mixed categorical and continuous data. Biometrika, 85, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, F. M. [1960]. Large-sample covariance analysis when the control variable is fallible. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, F. M. [1967]. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 304–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lucas, A., Morley, R., Cole, T. J., Lister, G., and Leeson-Paynee, C. [1992]. Breast milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born preterm. Lancet, 339, 261–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lytle, B. W., Blackstone, E. H., Loop, F. D., Hotalling, P. L., Arnold, J. H., McCarthy, P. M., and Cosgrove, D. M. [1999]. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 117, 855–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mahalanobis, P. C. [1927]. Analysis of race mixture in Bengal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 23, 301–333.Google Scholar

Martin, J. C. [1986]. Irreversible changes in mature and aging animals following intrauterine drug exposure. Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology, 8, 335–343.Google ScholarPubMed

Martin, J. C., Martin, D. C., Lamire, R., and Mackler, B. [1979]. Effects of maternal absorption of phenobarbital upon rat offspring development and function. Neurobehavioral Toxicology, 1, 49–55.Google ScholarPubMed

Matousek, M., and Petersen, I. [1973]. Frequency analysis of the EEG in normal children and adolescents. In P. Kellaway and I. Petersen (eds.), Automation of Clinical Electroencephalography. Raven Press: New York. 75–102.

Maxwell, S. E., and Jones, L. V. [1976]. Female and male admission to graduate school: An illustrative inquiry. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, M. W. [1999]. Instrumental variables and cancer screening trials: Estimating the effect of detecting cancer by screening. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2775–2794.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, M., and Rubin, D. B. [1999]. On estimating the causal effects of do not resuscitate orders. Medical Care, 37, 722–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKerracher, D. W. [1971]. Psychological aspects of a sex chromatin abnormality. Canadian Psychology, 12, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinlay, S. M. [1973]. An assessment of the relative effectiveness of several measures of association in removing bias from a comparison of qualitative variables. (unpublished).

McKinlay, S. M. [1974]. The expected number of matches and its variance for matched-pair designs. Applied Statistics, 23, 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinlay, S. M. [1975a]. The design and analysis of observational studies – A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 503–520.Google Scholar

McKinlay, S. M. [1975b]. The effect of bias on estimators of relative risk for pair-matched and stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 859–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinlay, S. M. [1977]. Pair matching: A reappraisal of a popular technique. Biometrics, 33, 725–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mednick, S. A., Mura, E., Schulsinger, F., and Mendick, B. [1971]. Prenatal conditions and infant development in children with schizophrenic parents. Social Biology, 18, 5103–5113.Google Scholar

Meier, P. [1978]. The biggest public health experiment ever: The 1954 trial of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine. In J. M. Tanur, et al. (eds.), Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown Holden Day: San Francisco, 3–14.

Meng, X.-L., and Rubin, D. B. [1993]. Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework. Biometrika, 80, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messick, S. [1980]. The Effectiveness of Coaching for SAT: Review and Reanalysis of Research from the Fifties to the FTC. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.

Middaugh, L. D. [1986]. Phenobarbital during pregnancy in mouse and man. Neurotoxicology, 7, 287–302.Google ScholarPubMed

Miettinen, O. [1976]. Stratification by a multivariate confounder score. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 609–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ming, K., and Rosenbaum, P. [2000]. Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls. Biometrics, 42, 109–142.Google Scholar

Moorhead, P. S., Nowell, P. C., Mellman, W. J., Battips, D. M., and Hungerford, D. A. [1960]. Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Experimental Cell Research, 20, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morales, W. J., and Koerten, J. [1986]. Prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants by maternally administered phenobarbital. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68, 295–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, C. [1979]. A finite selection model for experimental design of the health insurance study. Journal of Econometrics, 11, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortensen, E. L., Reinisch, J. M., and Teasdale, T. W. [1989]. Intelligence as measured by the WAIS and a military draft board group test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosteller, C. F., and Tukey, J. W. [1977]. Data Analysis and Regression. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

Murphy, M. L., Hultgren, H. N., Detre, K., Rhomsen, P. H. J., Takaro, T., and participants of the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. [1977]. Treatment of chronic stable angina. New England Journal of Medicine, 297, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Myers, W. O., Gersh, B. J., Fisher, L. D., Mock, M. B., Holmes, D. R., Schaff, H. V., et al. [1987]. Medical versus early surgical therapy in patients with triple-vessel disease and mild angina pectoris: A CASS registry study of survival. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 44, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakamura, Y., Moss, A. J., Brown, M. W., Kinoshita, M., and Kawai, C. [1999]. Long-term nitrate use may be deleterious in ischemic heart disease: A study using the databases from two large-scale postinfarction studies. Multicenter Myocardial Ischemia Research Group. American Heart Journal, 138, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neyman, J. [1990]. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles. Translated by D. M. Dabrowska and edited by T. P. Speed. Statistical Science, 5, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, J. [1971]. Prevalence and a 2 years incidence of chromosome abnormalities among all males in a forensic psychiatric clinic. British Journal of Psychiatry 119, 503–512.Google Scholar

Nielsen, J., and Christensen, A. L. [1974]. Thirty-five males with double Y chromosomes. Psychological Medicine, 4, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noel, B., Dupont, J. P., Revil, D., Dussuyer, I., and Quack, B. [1974]. The XYY syndrome: Reality or myth?Clinical Genetics, 5, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ogawa, J. [1951]. Contributions to the theory of systematic statistics. Osaka Mathematical Journal, 4, 175–213.Google Scholar

Olkin, I., and Tate, R. F. [1961]. Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, D. R. [1972]. The XYY male: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 209–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Park, T., and Brown, M. B. [1994]. Models for categorical data with nonignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, P. L., and Bobrow, M. J. [1970]. Fluorescent staining of the Y chromosome in meiotic stages of the human male. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pereira De Vasconcelos, A., Colin, C., Desor, D., Divry, M., and Nehlig, A. [1990]. Influence of early neonatal phenobarbital exposure on cerebral energy metabolism and behavior. Experimental Neurology, 108, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Persson, T. [1967]. An XYY man and his relatives. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 11, 239–245.Google ScholarPubMed

Peters, C. C. [1941]. A method of matching groups for experiment with no loss of population. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, C. C., and Voorhis, W. R. [1940]. Statistical Procedures and Their Mathematical Bases. McGraw-Hill: New York.

Pfeiffer, S. I., and Aylward, G. P. [1990]. Outcome for preschoolers of very low birthweight: Sociocultural and environmental influences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1367–1378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Philip, J., Lundsteen, C., Owen, D., and Hirschhorn, K. [1976]. The frequency of chromosome aberrations in tall men with special reference to 47, XYY and 47, XXY. American Journal of Human Genetics, 28, 404–411.Google ScholarPubMed

Pitman, E. J. G. [1937]. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Biometrika, 29, 322–335.Google Scholar

Pocock, S. J., and Simon, R. [1975]. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics, 31, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pratt, J. W., and Schlaifer, R. [1988]. On the interpretation and observation of laws. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 23–52.

Price, W. H., and Whatmore, P. B. [1967]. Criminal behavior and the XYY male. Nature, 213, 815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raessler, S., and Rubin, D. B. [2005a]. The use of multiple imputation to create a nulldata set from nonrandomized job training data. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute.

Raessler, S., and Rubin, D. B. [2005b]. Complications when using nonrandomized job training data to draw causal inferences. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute.

Rao, C. R. [1973]. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. 2nd edition. Wiley: New York.

Rao, P. S. R. S., and Sedransk, J. (eds.) [1984]. W. G. Cochran's Impact on Statistics. Wiley: New York.

Rayburn, W., Donn, S., Compton, A., and Piehl, E. [1989]. Oral phenobarbital given antenatally to reduce neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage: A comparison between maternal and umbilical cord serum levels at delivery. Journal of Perinatology, 9, 268–270.Google ScholarPubMed

Rayburn, W., Donn, S., Piehl, E., and Compton, A. [1988]. Antenatal phenobarbital and bilirubin metabolism in the very low birth weight infant. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 159, 1491–1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raynor, W. J. [1983]. Caliper pair-matching on a continuous variable in case-control studies. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 12, 1499–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raynor, W. J., and Kupper, L. L. [1981]. Category-matching of continuous variables in case-control studies. Biometrics, 37, 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinisch, J. M., and Karow, W. G. [1977]. Prenatal exposure to synthetic progestins and estrogens: Effects on human development. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 257–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reinisch, J. M., Mortensen, E. L., and Sanders, S. A. [1993]. The Prenatal Development Project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 370 (Supplement), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reinisch, J. M., and Sanders, S. A. [1982]. Early barbiturate exposure: The brain, sexually dimorphic behavior, and learning. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 6, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinisch, J. M., Sanders, S. A., Lykke-Mortensen, E., and Rubin, D. B. [1995]. In utero exposure to phenobarbital and intelligence deficits in adult men. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1518–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rich, S. S. [1998]. Analytic options for asthma genetics. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 28, 108–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Richards, B. W., and Stewart, A. [1966]. The YY syndrome. Lancet, 984–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, J. M. [1989]. The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 679–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rodgers, B. [1978]. Feeding in infancy and later ability and attainment. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 20, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roseman, L. [1998]. Reducing bias in the estimate of the difference in survival in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1984a]. Conditional permutation tests and the propensity score in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1984b]. From association to causation in observational studies: The role of tests of strongly ignorable treatment assignment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1984c]. The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 147, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1986]. Dropping out of high-school in the United States: An observational study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1987]. Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1988]. Permutation tests for matched pairs with adjustments for covariates. Applied Statistics, 37, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1989]. Optimal matching for observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1991]. A characterization of optimal designs for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 53, 597–610.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R. [1995]. Observational Studies. Springer-Verlag: New York.

Rosenbaum, P. R. [2002]. Observational Studies, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag: New York.

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1983a]. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1983b]. Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 45, 212–218.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1984a]. Estimating the effects caused by treatments: Discussion of a paper by Pratt and Schlaiffer. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 26–28.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1984b]. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1985a]. Constructing a control group by multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33–38.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. [1985b]. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics, 41, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. [1982a]. A simple, general purpose display of the magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. [1982b]. Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 708–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1970]. The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment in Observational Studies. PhD thesis. Department of Statistics, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.

Rubin, D. B. [1972]. Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Experimental and Observational Studies. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.

Rubin, D. B. [1973a]. Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29, 159–183. Correction note [1974]: Biometrics, 30, 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1973b]. The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1974]. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1975]. Bayesian inference for causality: The importance of randomization. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 233–239.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1976a]. Inference and missing data (with discussion). Biometrika, 63, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1976b]. Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, I: Some examples. Biometrics, 32, 109–120. Printer's correction note, p. 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1976c]. Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, II: Maximums on bias reduction for fixed sample sizes. Biometrics, 32, 121–132. Printer's correction note, p. 955.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1977a]. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26. Printer's correction note, 3, p. 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1977b]. Formalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonrespondents in sample surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 538–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1978a]. Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1978b]. Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis Metric Matching, Research Bulletin 78–17. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.

Rubin, D. B. [1978c]. Multiple imputations in sample surveys: A phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. Proceedings of Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association. 20–28.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1979a]. Discussion of ‘Conditional independence in statistical theory,’ by A. P. Dawid. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series, B, 41, 27–28.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1979b]. Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 318–328.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1980a]. Discussion of “Randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test” by D. Basu. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591–593.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1980b]. Bias reduction using Mahalanobis metric matching. Biometrics, 36, 293–298. Printer's correction p. 296 ((5,10) = 75%).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1981]. Estimation in parallel randomized experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1983]. Comment: Probabilities of selection and their role for Bayesian modeling in sample surveys (discussion of Hansen, Madow, and Tepping). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 803–805.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1984a]. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Annals of Statistics, 12, 1151–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1984b]. Comment: Assessing the fit of logistic regressions using the implied discriminant analysis (discussion of “Graphical Methods for Assessing Logistic Regression Models” by Landwehr, Pregibon, and Shoemaker). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 79–80.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1984c]. William G. Cochran's contributions to the design, analysis, and evaluation of observational studies. In P. S. R. S. Rao and J. Sedransk (eds.), W. G. Cochran's Impact on Statistics. Wiley: New York. 37–69.

Rubin, D. B. [1986]. Which ifs have causal answers? Discussion of Holland's “Statistics and causal inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961–962.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1987]. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley: New York.

Rubin, D. B. [1990a]. Formal modes of statistical inference for causal effects. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 25, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1990b]. Neyman [1923] and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Statistical Science, 5, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1991a]. EM and beyond. Psychometrika, 56, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1991b]. Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects. Biometrics, 4, 1213–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [1997]. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubin, D. B. [2000a]. Statistical issues in the estimation of the causal effects of smoking due to the conduct of the tobacco industry. In J. Gastwirth (ed.), Statistical Science in the Classroom. Springer-Verlag: New York. 321–351.

Rubin, D. B. [2000b]. Statistical assumptions in the estimation of the causal effects of smoking due to the conduct of the tobacco industry. In J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, and P. Schmidt (eds.), Social Science Methodology in the New Millennium Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology. October 6, 2002. Cologne, Germany. 1–22.

Rubin, D. B. [2001a]. Estimating the causal effects of smoking. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 1395–1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubin, D. B. [2001b]. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [2002]. The ethics of consulting for the tobacco industry. Special Issue on ‘Ethics, Statistics and Statisticians’. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [2005]. Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. 2004 Fisher Lecture. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. [2006]. Statistical inference for causal effects, with emphasis on applications in psychometrics and education. In C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Psychometrics. Elsevier: North Holland, Amsterdam.

Rubin, D. B., Schafer, J. L., and Schenker, N. [1988]. Imputation strategies for missing values in post-enumeration surveys. Survey Methodology, 14, 209–221.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B., and Stuart, E. A. [2006]. Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of ellipsoidally symmetric distributions. To appear in the Annals of Statistics, 34.

Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. [1992a]. Affinely invariant matching methods with ellipsoidal distributions. Annals of Statistics, 20, 1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. [1992b]. Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions. Biometrika, 79, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. [1996]. Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 52, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. [2000]. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, M., Czarnecki, D. M., Cowan, R., McPherson, E., and Mudar, P. J. [1991]. Measures of maternal alcohol use as predictors of development in early childhood. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 15, 991–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sarhan, A. E., and Greenberg, B. G. [1962]. Contributions to Order Statistics. Wiley: New York.

Scarr, S. [1981]. Race, Social Class, and Individual Differences in I.Q. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.

Schafer, J. L. [1997]. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. CRC Press: New York.

Schaie, K. W., and Hertzog, C. [1983]. Fourteen-year cohort-sequential analyses of adult intellectual development. Developmental Psychology, 19, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesselman, J. J. [1978]. Assessing the effects of confounding variables. Americn Journal of Epidemiology, 108, 3–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Schraeder, B. D. [1986]. Developmental progress in very low birth weight infants during the first year of life. Nursing Research, 35, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seabright, M. [1971]. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet, 2, 971–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seltser, R., and Sartwell, P. E. [1965]. The influence of occupational exposure to radiation on the mortality of American radiologists and other medical specialists. American Journal of Epidemiology, 81, 2–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shah, S. A. [1970]. Report on the XYY Chromosomal Abnormality. Public Health Service Publication No. 2103.

Shah, S. A., and Borgaonkar, D. S. [1974]. American Psychologist, 29, 357.CrossRef

Shepardson, L. B., Youngner, S. J., Speroff, T., and Rosenthall, G. E. [1999]. Increased risk of death in patients with do not resuscitate orders. Medical Care, 37, 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, D. G., and Greenhouse, S. W. [1973]. Validity in estimating relative risk in case-control studies. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 26, 219–225.

Smith, I., Beasley, M. G., and Ades, A. E. [1991]. Effect on intelligence of relaxing the low phenylalanine diet in phenylketonuria. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 66, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, N. L., Reiber, G. E., Psaty, B. M., Heckbert, S. R., Siscovick, D. S., Ritchie, J. L., Every, N. R., and Koepsell, T. D. [1998]. Health outcomes associated with beta-blocker and diltiazem treatment of unstable angina. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32, 1305–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, J., and Todd, P. [2001]. Reconciling conflicting evidence on the performance of propensity score matching methods. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 91, 112–118.

Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. [1967]. Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press: Ames.

Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. [1974]. Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press: Ames.

Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. [1980]. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. Iowa State University Press: Ames.

Sobcyzuk, W., Dowzenko, A., and Krasicka, J. [1977]. Study of children of mothers treated with anticonvulsants during pregnancy. Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery, 11, 59–63.Google Scholar

Stone, R. A., Obrosky, D. S., Singer, D. E., Kapoor, W. N., and Fine, M. J. [1995]. Propensity score adjustment for pretreatment differences between hospitalized and ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators. Medical Care, 33 (Supplement), AS56–AS66.Google ScholarPubMed

Street, D. R. K., and Watson, R. A. [1969]. In D. J. West (ed.), Criminological Implications of Chromosome Abnormalities. Cropwood Round-Table Conference, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK. 61–67.

Streissguth, A. P., Barr, H. M., Sampson, P. D., et al. [1989]. IQ at age 4 in relation to maternal alcohol use and smoking during pregnancy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Student [1937]. Comparison between balanced and random arrangements of field plots. Biometrika, 29, 363–379.Google Scholar

Svalastoga, K. [1959]. Prestige, Class and Mobility. Gyldenhal: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Takizawa, T., Haga, M., Yagi, N., Terashima, M., Uehara, H., Yokoyama, A., and Kurita, Y. [1999]. Pulmonary function after segmentectomy for small peripheral carcinoma of the lung. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 118, 536–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tanner, M., and Wong, M. [1987]. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., and Owen, D. R. [1987]. National secular trends in intelligence and education: A twenty-year cross-sectional study. Nature, 325, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., Owen, D. R., and Sørensen, T. I. [1988]. Regional differences in intelligence and educational level in Denmark. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., Owen, D. R., and Sørensen, T. I. [1991]. Intelligence and educational levels in adult males at the extremes of stature. Human Biology, 63, 19–30.Google ScholarPubMed

Tukey, J. W. [1977]. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). [1994]. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: Patient survival in day-to-day medical practice and in randomized studies. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Report No. GAO-PEMD-95-9. U.S. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC.

U.S. Supreme Court Decision. [2002]. Zelman et al. v. Simmons-Harris, et al. Nos. 00-1751, 00-1777 and 00-1779.

U.S. Surgeon General's Committee. [1964]. Smoking and Health. United States Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.

Valaes, T., Kipouros, K., Petmezaki, S., Solman, M., and Doxiadis, S. A. [1980]. Effectiveness and safety of prenatal phenobarbital for the prevention of neonatal jaundice. Pediatric Research, 14, 947–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pol, M. C., Hadders-Algra, M., Huises, H. J., and Touwen, B. C. L. [1991]. Antiepileptic medication in pregnancy: Late effects on the children's central nervous system development. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 164, 121–128.Google ScholarPubMed

Vianna, A. M., Froto-Pessoa, O., Lion, M. F., and Decourt, L. [1972]. Searching for XYY males through electrocardiograms. Journal of Medical Genetics, 9, 165–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Villumsen, A. L. [1970]. Environmental Factors in Congenital Malformations: A Prospective Study of 9006 Human Pregnancies. F.A.D.L.S. Forlag: Copenhagen, Denmark. 124–125.

Vining, E. P. G., Mellitis, E. D., Dorsen, M. M., et al. [1987]. Psychologic and behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs in children: A double-blind comparison between phenobarbital and valproic acid. Pediatrics, 80, 165–174.Google ScholarPubMed

Volavka, J., Mednick, S. A., Sergeant, J., and Rasmussen, L. [1976]. EEGs of XYY and XXY men found in a large birth cohort. In S. A. Mednick and K. O. Christiansen (eds.), Biosocial Bases of Criminal Behavior. Gardner Press: New York.

Wallin, A., and Boreus, L. O. [1984]. Phenobarbital prophylaxis for hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants: A controlled study of bilirubin disappearance and infant behavior. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 73, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wechsler, D. [1955]. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The Psychological Corp.: New York.

Welch, B. L. [1937]. On the z-test in randomized block and Latin squares. Biometrika, 29, 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wesson, D. R., and Smith, D. E. [1977]. Barbiturates: Their Use, Misuse, and Abuse. Human Science Press: New York.

Wilks, S. S. [1932]. On the distribution of statistics in samples from a normal population of two variables with matched sampling of one variable. Metron, 9, 87–126.Google Scholar

Willoughby, A., Graubard, B. I., Hocker, A., Storr, C., Vietze, P., Thackaberry, J. M., et al. [1990]. Population-based study of the developmental outcome of children exposed to chloride-deficient infant formula. Pediatrics, 85, 485–490.Google ScholarPubMed

Wilson, J. T. [1971]. Caution with phenobarbital. Clinical Pediatrics, 10, 684–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Witkin, H. A., Mendick, S. A., Schulsinger, F., Bakkestrom, E., Christiansen, K. O., Goodenough, D. R., Hirschhorn, K., Lundsteen, C., Owen, D. R., Philip, J., Rubin, D. B., and Stocking, M. [1976]. Criminality in XYY and XXY men. Science, 193, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yaffe, S. J. [1980]. Drug and chemical risks to the fetus and newborn, summary: Pediatrician's view. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 36, 157–161.Google ScholarPubMed

Yaffe, S. J., and Dorn, L. D. [1990]. Effects of prenatal treatment with phenobarbital. Developmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 15, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yanai, J., and Bergman, A. [1981]. Neuronal deficits after neonatal exposure to phenobarbital. Experimental Neurology, 73, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yanai, J., Fares, F., Gavish, M., et al. [1989]. Neural and behavioral alterations after early exposure to phenobarbital. Neurotoxicology, 10, 543–554.Google ScholarPubMed

Yinger, J., Milton, I. K., and Laycock, F. [1967]. Treating matching as a variable in sociological experiment. American Sociological Review, 32, 801–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zachau-Christiansen, B., and Ross, E. M. [1975]. Babies: Human Development During the First Year. Wiley, New York.

Zeger, S. L., Wyant, T., Miller, L., and Samet, J. [2000]. Statistical testimony on damages in Minnesota v. Tobacco Industry. In J. Gastwirth (ed.), Statistical Science in the Classroom. Springer-Verlag: New York. 303–320.

Zemp, J. W., and Middaugh, L. D. [1975]. Some effects of prenatal exposure to D-amphetamine sulfate and phenobarbital on developmental neurochemistry and on behavior. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 2, 307–331.Google ScholarPubMed

Zeuthen, S., and Nielsen, J. [1973]. Prevalence of chromosome abnormalities among males examined for military service. Clinical Genetics, 4, 422–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhao, Z. [2004]. Using matching to estimate treatment effects: Data requirements, matching metrics, and monte carlo evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 91–107.