References

L. David Ritchie

doi:10.1017/9781316717172.014

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 September 2017

L. David Ritchie

Show author details

L. David Ritchie: Affiliation:
Portland State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Metaphorical Stories in Discourse , pp. 254 - 255

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adams, D. (1979). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. Basingstoke, UK: Pan Books.Google Scholar

Amsterdam, A. G., & Bruner, J. S. (2002). Minding the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. (2010). Diversity on the Supreme Court (cartoon). Houston Chronicle, May 11.Google Scholar

Axton, M., Crudup, A., Durden, T., & Presley, E. (1956). Heartbreak Hotel. Los Angeles, CA: Unichappell Music Inc.Google Scholar

Bagley, P. (2007). Mission accomplished (cartoon). Salt Lake City Tribune, May 3.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2007). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.Google Scholar

Beeler, N. (2014). Lady Justice and Lady Liberty embracing (cartoon). Columbus Dispatch. Available at www.dispatch.com/content/cartoons/2013/06/beeler0627.html.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. (2011). Coffin nails (cartoon). Chattanooga Times Free Press, February 10.Google Scholar

Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humor. London: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2005). A fight we have to win. A speech to Labour’s Spring Conference, Sage Center, Gateshead, England.Google Scholar

Blake, W. (1966). Complete writings. Ed. Keynes, G.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar

Brunvand, J. H. (1981). The vanishing hitchhiker: American urban legends and their meanings. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Bryant, G. (1984). The working woman report: Succeeding in business in the 1980s. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Bulow, P. H. (2004). Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling. Discourse & Society, 15, 33–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bunyan, J. (1678/1969). Pilgrim’s progress. New York: Collier (Harvard Classics series).Google Scholar

Cameron, L. J. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. J. (Principal Investigator). (2006). Procedure for metaphor analysis. The Metaphor Analysis Project. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. J. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18, 197–222.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. J., & Deignan, A. (2003). Using large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 149–160.Google Scholar

Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Low, G. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 116–146). London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Quellenangabe: Linguistics Vanguard. ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015, January.Google Scholar

Causley, C. (1975). Collected poems, 1951–1975. Boston: Godine.Google Scholar

Chiappe, D. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (2001). Literal bases for metaphor and simile. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 249–276.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, I. et al. (2006). Open Kyoto to debate. An open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Available at www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605.Google Scholar

Clement, J. (1968). Flushed from the bathroom of your heart. From Johnny Cash at Folsom Prison. New York: Sony Music Entertainment Inc.Google Scholar

Cole, J. (2014). Warning signs … (cartoon). Scranton Times-Tribune. January 19.Google Scholar

Cole, J. (2016). The dog that caught the bus. Scranton Times-Tribune, June 30.Google Scholar

Congreve, W. (1693). The old bachelor. Edinburgh: Printed by and for Martin & Wotherspoon 1768.Google Scholar

Conrad, J. (1958). Lord Jim. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Crisp, P. (1996). Imagism’s metaphors: A test case. Language and Literature, 5, 79–92.Google Scholar

Crisp, P. (2001). Allegory: Conceptual metaphor in history. Language and Literature, 10(1), 5–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crisp, P. (2005a). Allegory and symbol – a fundamental opposition? Language and Literature, 14, 323–338.Google Scholar

Crisp, P. (2005b). Allegory, blending and possible worlds. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 115–131.Google Scholar

Crisp, P. (2008). Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature, 17, 291.Google Scholar

Dante, A. (1320). The Divine Comedy. Translated by Robert and Jean Hollander. Doubleday: Inferno, 2000; Purgatorio, 2003; Paradiso, 2007. Available at http://etcweb.princeton.edu.Google Scholar

Darkow, J. (2014). Racism in America (cartoon). Daily Tribune, April 30.Google Scholar

Deignan, A., & Semino, E. (2010). Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In Cameron, L & Maslen, R. (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 161–179). London: Equinox.Google Scholar

De Mendoza Ibanez, R., & Masegosa, A. G. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3, 1–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Disney, W. (1934). The ant and the grasshopper. From Silly Symphonies. Beverly Hills, CA: United Artists.Google Scholar

Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. G. (2012). Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In MacArthur, F., Oncins-Martinez, J. L., Sanchez-Garcia, M., & Piquer-Piriz, A. M. (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (2014). Human Evolution. New York: Pelican BooksGoogle Scholar

DuVernay, A. (2014). Selma. Cloud Eight Films.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2009a). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2009b). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8, 181–205.Google Scholar

El Roto, . (2003). La gran droga (cartoon). El País, June 6.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. (1995). Solid investments: Making full use of the nation’s human capital. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar

Feirstein, B., & Trippett, L. (1982). Real men don’t eat quiche. London: New English Library.Google Scholar

Fine, G. A., & DeSoucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 1–21.Google Scholar

Fitzsimmons, D. (2014). Mission Accomplished. Arizona Daily Star.Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2009a). The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 383–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2009b). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 3–17). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Frenkiel, Nora. (March 1984). The up-and-comers; Bryant takes aim at the settlers-in. Adweek (Magazine World). Special Report.Google Scholar

Frost, R. (1969). The road not taken. In The poetry of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garland, N. (2004). Playing with matches (cartoon). Daily Telegraph, November 2Google Scholar

Garner, J. (1994). Politically correct bedtime stories. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223–247.Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 347–358.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2011). The allegorical impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 121–130.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Boers, E. (2005). Metaphoric processing of allegorical poetry. In Maalej, Z. (Ed.), Metaphor and culture. Tunis, Tunisia: University of Manouba Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., Gould, J., & Andric, M. (2005–2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 25, 221–238.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gladwell, M. (2006). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558.Google Scholar

Grande, A. (2013). Honeymoon Avenue. On Yours truly. Island Records.Google Scholar

Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.Google Scholar

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In Martin, J. R. & Veel, R. (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185–237). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassel.Google Scholar

Hansen, J. (1988). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee (June 23).Google Scholar

Hansen, J. (2008). Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (June 23).Google Scholar

Hansen, J. (2012). Why I must speak out about climate change. TED Talks.Google Scholar

Harris, R. A., & Tolmie, S. (2011). Cognitive allegory: An introduction. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 109–120.Google Scholar

Hemingway, E. (1987). The complete short stories of Ernest Hemingway. New York: Charles Scriveners’ & Sons.Google Scholar

Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Carter, G. L. (2005). Working women in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2003). The mind and its stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, S., Pollack, H. N., & Shen, P. Y. (2008). A late quaternary climate reconstruction based on borehole heat flux data, borehole temperature data, and the instrumental record. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, July 4.Google Scholar

Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, R. B. Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. Wall Street Journal, March.Google Scholar

Ijzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.Google Scholar

Inhofe, J. (2006). Speech before the U.S. Senate (September 25).Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jamiol, P. (2014). SCOTUS / Animal Farm (cartoon). Available at www.juancole.com/2014/04/supreme-editorial-cartoon.html.Google Scholar

Juckes, M. N., Allen, M. R., Briffa, K. R., Esper, J., Hegerl, G. C., Moberg, A., Osborn, T. J., & Weber, S. L. (2007). Millennial temperature reconstruction intercomparison and evaluation. Climate of the Past, 3(4), 591.Google Scholar

Junger, S. (1997). The perfect storm. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, (pp. 201–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D., Schneider, D. P., McKay, N. P., Ammann, C. M., Bradley, R. S., Briffa, K. R., Miller, G. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Overpeck, J. T., & Vinther, Bo M., Arctic Lakes 2k Project Members (2009). Recent warming reverses long-term arctic cooling. Science, 325(5945), 1236–1239.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (2008). How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 129–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kosinski, J. (1970). Being there. Toronto: Bantam.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2013). The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In Helm, J. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, December 16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.Google Scholar

Lee, T. C. K., Zwiers, F. W., & Tsao, M. (2008). Evaluation of proxy-based millennial reconstruction methods. Climate Dynamics, 31(2–3), 263–281.Google Scholar

Lin, T. Y, & Chiang, W. (2015). Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on US beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 137–161.Google Scholar

Lister, T. (2016). Brexit: An often rocky marriage ends in sudden divorce. CNN, June 25, 2016. Available at www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/europe/uk-european-union-divorce/.Google Scholar

Lithwick, D. (2011). Her honor. New York Magazine, November 27.Google Scholar

Lithwick, D. (2016). Narrative and metaphor in media depictions of crime. Presented at the Stanford Symposium on Narrative and Metaphor in the Law. Stanford, CA, January 30.Google Scholar

Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S., & Hughes, M. K. (1999). Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 759.Google Scholar

Mao, F. (2010). On cognition and function of grammatical metaphor. A dissertation presented for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173.Google Scholar

Mattingly, C. (2011). The machine-body as contested metaphor in clinical care. Genre, 44, 380.Google Scholar

McIntyre, S., & McKitrick, R. (2003). Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998): Proxy data base and northern hemispheric average temperature series. Energy & Environment, 14(6).Google Scholar

McKee, R. (2013). Digging your own grave (cartoon). Augusta Chronicle, September 18.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In Suls, J. and Wills, T. A. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Mooney, Chris. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mooney, Chris. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science and reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse: Son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 23–38.Google Scholar

Nash, J. M. (2000). The new science of Alzheimer’s. TIME, July 17.Google Scholar

Nicholson, P. (2008). The class ceiling (cartoon). The Australian, July 20.Google Scholar

Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. ANNALS, AAPSS, 658, 36–66.Google Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Norrick, N. R., & Spitz, A. (2010). The interplay of humor and conflict in conversation and scripted humorous performance. Humor, 23, 83–111.Google Scholar

Oakley, T., & Crisp, P. (2011). Honeymoons and pilgrimages: Conceptual integration and allegory in old and new media. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 152–159.Google Scholar

Obama, B. (2008). A more perfect union. Constitution Center, Philadelphia, PA, March 18.Google Scholar

Obama, B. (2013). Remarks by the President on climate change at Georgetown University. Available at www.whitehouse.gov.Google Scholar

Oliphant, P. (2011). Perils of Pauline / The electoral process (cartoon). Universal Press, June 29.Google Scholar

Ortony, A. (1993). The role of similarity in similes and metaphors. In Ortony, A., (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 342–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Orwell, G. (1946). Animal farm. Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion – classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.Google Scholar

Piper, W. (1930). The little engine that could. New York: Platt & Munk.Google Scholar

Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481.Google Scholar

Prudentius. (1723). Psychomachia; the war of the soul: Or, the battle of the virtues, and vices. Translated from Aur. Prudentius Clemens.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (2011). The philosophical stance of allegory in Stoicism and its reception in Platonism, Pagan and Christian: Origin in dialog with the Stoics and Plato. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 18, 335–371Google Scholar

Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reps, P. (1957). Zen flesh, Zen bones: A collection of Zen and pre-Zen writings. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (1991). Communication concepts 2: Information. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2003a). “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 125–146.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2003b). Categories and similarities: A note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 49–53.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2004). Lost in “conceptual space”: Metaphors of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 31–50.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2008). Gateshead revisited: The integrative function of ambiguous metaphors in a tricky political situation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 24–49.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2009a). Distributed cognition and play in the quest for the double helix. In Pishwa, H. (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 289–323). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2009b). Relevance and simulation in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 249–262.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2010). “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 123–143.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2011a). “Justice is blind”: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 70–89.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2011b). Why the block is the block: Reinforcing community through casual conversation. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 240–261.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2011c). “You’re lying to Jesus!” Humor and play in a discussion about homelessness. Humor, 24, 481–511.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2012). Metaphor and stories in discourse about personal and social change. In Wagoner, B., Jensen, E., & Oldmeadow, J. (Eds.), Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas. London: Information Age.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2014). “Born on third base”: Stories, simulations, and metaphor comprehension. Presented at the annual conference of Researching and Analyzing Metaphor, Cagliari, Italy.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Cameron, L. (2014). Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: Metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 204–223.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Dyhouse, V. (2008). FINE AS FROG’S HAIR: Three models for the development of meaning in figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 85–107.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Negrea-Busuioc, E. (2014). “Now everyone knows I’m a serial killer.” Spontaneous intentionality in conversational metaphor and story-telling. Metaphor and the Social World, 4, 171–195.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Schell, C. (2009). “The ivory tower” on an “unstable foundation”: Playful language, humor, and metaphor in the negotiation of scientists’ identities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 90–104.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Thomas, M. (2015). A “glowing marble”: “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away”? Obama’s use of contrasting metaphors and stories in framing climate change. Metaphor and the Social World, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 118–136.Google Scholar

Rockmore, E. B. (2015). How Texas teaches history. New York Times, October 21.Google Scholar

Rollins, D. (1964). The race is on. Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. H. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.Google Scholar

Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schank, R. C., & Berman, T. R. (2002). The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schön, D. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem solving in social policy. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schubert, T. W., Waldzus, S., & Seibt, B. (2008). The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 160–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Senzaki, N., & Reps, P. (1957). 101 Zen stories. In Reps, P., Zen flesh, Zen bones (pp. 3–82). Originally published by Rider and Company, London and David McKay Company, Philadelphia in 1939.Google Scholar

Snaevarr, S. (2010). Metaphors, narratives, emotions: Their interplay and impact. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Soon, W., & Baliunas, S. (2003). Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years. Climate Research, 23, 89–110.Google Scholar

Spenser, E. (1590). The Faerie Queene: Disposed into twelue books, fashioning XII. morall vertues. London: William Ponsonbie.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Steen, G. (2013). Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 179–197.Google Scholar

Steen, G. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013.Google Scholar

Steen, G. S., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2013). When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky. PLOS One. Available at www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0113536.Google Scholar

Terrion, J. L., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55, 55–88.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. (2011). The brain is wider than the sky: Analogy, emotion, and allegory. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 131–142.Google Scholar

Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness: A neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 811–834.Google Scholar

Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science, 35, 1–33.Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2).Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7).Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., Iyiewaure, P. O., & Boroditsky, L. (2016). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2).Google Scholar

Toles, T. (2012). Strip search (cartoon). Washington Post.Google Scholar

Toles, T. (2013). The canary in the coal mine (cartoon). Washington Post, February 25.Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. (1955). The return of the king. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., and Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 452–472.Google Scholar

Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315–343.Google Scholar

Turner, Mark (1996). The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today, 20(3), 397–418.Google Scholar

Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2003). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 469–487). Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Walters, K. (2011). Mission accomplished (cartoon). Blade.Google Scholar

Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Whitman, J. (1991). From the textual to the temporal: Early Christian “allegory” and early romantic “symbol.” New Literary History, 1, 161–176.Google Scholar

Whitman, J., ed. (2003). Interpretation and allegory: Antiquity to the modern period. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Wilkin, M., & Loudermilk, J. D. (1959). Waterloo. Universal Music.Google Scholar

Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language, 21, 404–433.Google Scholar

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wilson, N., and Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.Google Scholar

Winn, M. (1977). The plug-in drug: Television, children, and the family. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838–842.Google Scholar

Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–34.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (2015). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin Review.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive