Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-09T20:46:34.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting the Mfecane Controversy into Historiographical Context

from Part One - Historiography and Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2019

Norman Etherington
Affiliation:
Professor of History at the University of Western Australia and a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. His books include: Preachers, Peasants and Politics in Southeast Africa; Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital; Rider Haggard; The Annotated She, and Peace, Politics and Violence in the New South Africa.
Carolyn Hamilton
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access

Summary

Julian Cobbing presents not one, but three arguments in his challenge to accepted versions of the mfecane:

Troubled times in southern Africa were not a consequence of the rise of the Zulu kingdom;

A continuous series of writers seeking to justify white settlement blamed the Zulu for devastating and depopulating vast territories;

The root causes of commotions in the first few decades of the nineteenth century were labour raiding and slaving expeditions mounted to feed demand generated in the Cape colony and Portuguese Mozambique.

The first argument has been widely accepted. The other two have provoked spirited controversy. Essays in Part One of this book take up some of the issues raised by the second and third of Cobbing's propositions.

Settler History and the Mfecane

Cobbing regards the mfecane as the masterpiece of settler history, and in so doing aligns himself with a long-standing tendency of South African scholarship to emphasise the political uses of history. Afrikaner nationalists have at various times advertised their intention to find a past that serves their cause. English-speaking historians such as the influential amateurs George McCall Theal and George Cory made clear their own intentions to write the sort of history that would ‘heal’ divisions between Boer and Briton. In various ways ‘liberal’ historians of the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s consciously wrote history ‘against apartheid’. Those scholars were in turn attacked by radicals for deliberately concealing the functional relationship between segregation and capitalism.

Against this background, Cobbing's assumption of a linkage between what he regards as mfecane theorists and settler interests amounts to a normal reflex action for a South African historian. That does not mean, however, that it deserves to be accepted without examination. It is a proposition that can be tested according to normal canons of historical proof.

Christopher Saunders sets out to do precisely that, and finds no evidence that a continuous chain of settler apologists stretches from Theal to John Omer-Cooper. Without at all denying that historians write in an ideological context, he points to marked contrasts in interpretations of the mfecane. He draws a sharp contrast between Theal and Cory, who traced all violence to Shaka, and William Macmillan, who strongly suspected that the slave trade to Mozambique had much to do with disruptions in what became the Zululand region, the highveld and even the eastern Cape frontier.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mfecane Aftermath
Reconstructive Debates in Southern African History
, pp. 13 - 20
Publisher: Wits University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Putting the Mfecane Controversy into Historiographical Context
    • By Norman Etherington, Professor of History at the University of Western Australia and a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. His books include: Preachers, Peasants and Politics in Southeast Africa; Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital; Rider Haggard; The Annotated She, and Peace, Politics and Violence in the New South Africa.
  • Edited by Carolyn Hamilton, University of Cape Town
  • Book: Mfecane Aftermath
  • Online publication: 31 May 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Putting the Mfecane Controversy into Historiographical Context
    • By Norman Etherington, Professor of History at the University of Western Australia and a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. His books include: Preachers, Peasants and Politics in Southeast Africa; Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital; Rider Haggard; The Annotated She, and Peace, Politics and Violence in the New South Africa.
  • Edited by Carolyn Hamilton, University of Cape Town
  • Book: Mfecane Aftermath
  • Online publication: 31 May 2019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Putting the Mfecane Controversy into Historiographical Context
    • By Norman Etherington, Professor of History at the University of Western Australia and a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. His books include: Preachers, Peasants and Politics in Southeast Africa; Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital; Rider Haggard; The Annotated She, and Peace, Politics and Violence in the New South Africa.
  • Edited by Carolyn Hamilton, University of Cape Town
  • Book: Mfecane Aftermath
  • Online publication: 31 May 2019
Available formats
×