References
Akerlof, George A and Michaillat, Pascal (2018). “Persistence of false paradigms in low-power sciences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52), 13228–13233.
Alexander, Diane, Gorelkina, Olga, and Hengel, Erin (2021). “ Gender and the time cost of peer review.” Working Paper.
Alexander, Jason McKenzie, Himmelreich, Johannes, and Thompson, Christopher (2015). “Epistemic landscapes, optimal search, and the division of cognitive labor.” Philosophy of Science, 82(3), 424–453.
Allen, Christopher and Mehler, David MA (2019). “Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond.” Public Library of Science Biology, 17(5), e3000246.
Anderson, Katharine A (2016). “A model of collaboration network formation with heterogeneous skills.” Network Science, 4(2), 188–215.
Arvan, Marcus, Kofi Bright, Liam, and Heesen, Remco (2020). “Jury theorems for peer review.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/719117. Avin, Shahar (2015). “Funding science by lottery.” Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer, 111–126.
Avin, Shahar (2019). “Centralized funding and epistemic exploration.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(3), 629–656.
Azar, Ofer H (2005). “The review process in economics: Is it too fast?” Southern Economic Journal, 72(2), 482–491.
Baker, Monya (2016). “1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.” Nature News, 533(7604), 452.
Bala, Venkatesh and Goyal, Sanjeev (1998). “Learning from neighbours.” The Review of Economic Studies, 65(3), 595–621.
Balietti, Stefano, Mäs, Michael, and Helbing, Dirk (2015). “On disciplinary fragmentation and scientific progress.” Public Library of Science One, 10(3), e0118747.
Banerjee, Siddhartha, Goel, Ashish, and Kollagunta Krishnaswamy, Anilesh (2014). “Re-incentivizing discovery: Mechanisms for partial-progress sharing in research.” Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 149–166.
Barabâsi, Albert-Laszlo, Jeong, Hawoong, Néda, Zoltan, et al. (2002). “Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.
Barkoczi, Daniel and Galesic, Mirta (2016). “Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance.” Nature Communications, 7(1), 1–8.
Bauchner, Howard, Fontanarosa, Phil B, Flanagin, Annette, and Thornton, Joe (2018). “Scientific misconduct and medical journals.” Jama, 320(19), 1985–1987.
Bedessem, Baptiste (2019). “The division of cognitive labor: Two missing dimensions of the debate.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 1–16.
Begley, C Glenn and Ellis, Lee M (2012). “Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.” Nature, 483(7391), 531–533.
Bender, Max Ernst, Edwards, Suzanne, von Philipsborn, Peter, et al. (2015). “Using co-authorship networks to map and analyse global neglected tropical disease research with an affiliation to Germany.” Public Library of Science Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9(12), e0004182.
Benjamin, Daniel J, Berger, James O, Johannesson, Magnus, et al. (2018). “Redefine statistical significance.” Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10.
Bergstrom, Carl T, Foster, Jacob G, and Song, Yangbo (2016). “ Why scientists chase big problems: Individual strategy and social optimality.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1605.05822.
Bird, Alexander (2021). “Understanding the replication crisis as a base rate fallacy.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72(4), 965–993.
Boroomand, Amin and Smaldino, Paul E (2021). “Hard work, risk-taking, and diversity in a model of collective problem solving.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24(4) 10.
Boschini, Anne and Sjögren, Anna (2007). “Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns.” Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 325–365.
Botts, Tina Fernandes, Kofi Bright, Liam, Cherry, Myisha, Mallarangeng, Guntur, and Spencer, Quayshawn (2014). “What is the state of blacks in philosophy?” Critical Philosophy of Race, 2(2), 224–242.
Bourne, Philip E, Polka, Jessica K, Vale, Ronald D, and Kiley, Robert (2017). “Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission.” Public Library of Science Computational Biology, 13, e1005473.
Boyer, Thomas (2014). “Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results.” Synthese, 191(1), 17–35.
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas and Imbert, Cyrille (2015). “Scientific collaboration: Do two heads need to be more than twice better than one?” Philosophy of Science, 82(4), 667–688.
Bright, Liam K (2017a). “Decision theoretic model of the productivity gap.” Erkenntnis, 82(2), 421–442.
Bright, Liam K (2017b). “On fraud.” Philosophical Studies, 174(2), 291–310.
Bright, Liam K (2021). “Why do scientists lie?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 89, 117–129.
Bright, Liam K, Dang, Haixin, and Heesen, Remco (2018). “A role for judgment aggregation in coauthoring scientific papers.” Erkenntnis, 83(2), 231–252.
Bruner, Justin and O’Connor, Cailin (2017). “Power, bargaining, and collaboration.” In Boyer-Kassem, T., Mayo-Wilson, C., and Weisberg, M. (eds.), Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 135–160.
Bruner, Justin P (2013). “Policing epistemic communities.” Episteme, 10(4), 403–416.
Bruner, Justin P (2019). “Minority (dis) advantage in population games.” Synthese, 196(1), 413–427.
Bruner, Justin P and Holman, Bennett (2019). “Self-correction in science: Meta-analysis, bias and social structure.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 78, 93–97.
Camerer, Colin F, Dreber, Anna, Holzmeister, Felix, et al. (2018). “Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.” Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644.
Campbell, Donald T (1965). “Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution.” Social Change in Developing Area.
Casadevall, Arturo and Fang, Ferric C (2012). “Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms.” Infection and Immunity, 80, 891–896.
Chambers, Christopher D (2013). “Registered reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex.” Cortex, 49(3), 609–610.
Collins, Harry M (1974). “The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks.” Science Studies, 4(2), 165–185.
Cotton, Christopher (2013). “Submission fees and response times in academic publishing.” American Economic Review, 103(1), 501–509.
Currie, Adrian (2019). “Existential risk, creativity & well-adapted science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 76, 39–48.
Dahlberg, Brett (2018). “Cornell food researcher’s downfall raises larger questions for science.” NPR.
Dasgupta, Partha and David, Paul A (1994). “Toward a new economics of science.” Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521.
Dasgupta, Partha and Maskin, Eric (1987). “The simple economics of research portfolios.” The Economic Journal, 97(387), 581–595.
Langhe, De, Rogier, (2014). “A unified model of the division of cognitive labor.” Philosophy of Science, 81(3), 444–459.
de Melo-Martín, , Inmaculadade, and Intemann, Kristen (2018). The fight against doubt: How to bridge the gap between scientists and the public. Oxford University Press.
Carmen, Del, Alejandro, and Bing, Robert L (2000). “Academic productivity of African Americans in criminology and criminal justice.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 11(2), 237–249.
Derex, Maxime, Perreault, Charles, and Boyd, Robert (2018). “Divide and conquer: Intermediate levels of population fragmentation maximize cultural accumulation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1743), 20170062.
Devezer, Berna, Nardin, Luis G, Baumgaertner, Bert, and Ozge Buzbas, Erkan (2019). “Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity.” Public Library of Science One, 14(5), e0216125.
Devezer, Berna, Navarro, Danielle J, Vandekerckhove, Joachim, and Ozge Buzbas, Erkan (2021). “The case for formal methodology in scientific reform.” Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805.
Dion, Michelle L, Lawrence Sumner, Jane, and McLaughlin Mitchell, Sara (2018). “Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields.” Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327.
Dotson, Kristie (2011). “Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing.” Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257.
Du Bois, WEB (1898). “The study of the Negro problems.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 11(1), 1–23.
Eklund, Anders, Nichols, Thomas E, and Knutsson, Hans (2016). “Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7900–7905.
Etzkowitz, Henry, Fuchs, Stephan, Gupta, Namrata, Kemelgor, Carol, and Ranga, Marina (2008). “The coming gender revolution in science.” In Hackett, Edward J., Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael, and Wajcman, Judy (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 403–428.
Fanelli, Daniele (2009). “How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.” Public Library of Science One, 4(5), e5738.
Fanelli, Daniele (2012). “Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries.” Scientometrics, 90(3), 891–904.
Fang, Christina, Lee, Jeho, and Schilling, Melissa A (2010). “Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning.” Organization Science, 21(3), 625–642.
Fazelpour, Sina and Rubin, Hannah (2022). “Diversity and homophily in social networks.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Fazelpour, Sina and Steel, Daniel (2022). “Diversity, trust and conformity: A simulation study.” Philosophy of Science, 89(2), 209–231.
Feldon, David F, Peugh, James, Maher, Michelle A, Roksa, Josipa, and Tofel-Grehl, Colby (2017). “Time-to-credit gender inequities of first-year PhD students in the biological sciences.” CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(1), 1–9.
Ferber, Marianne A and Brün, Michael (2011). “The gender gap in citations: Does it persist?” Feminist Economics, 17(1), 151–158.
Ferber, Marianne A and Teiman, Michelle (1980). “Are women economists at a disadvantage in publishing journal articles?” Eastern Economic Journal, 6(3/4), 189–193.
Frey, Daniel and Šešelja, Dunja (2018). “What is the epistemic function of highly idealized agent-based models of scientific inquiry?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48(4), 407–433.
Frey, Daniel and Šešelja, Dunja (2020). “Robustness and idealizations in agent-based models of scientific interaction.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1411-1437.
Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, Nathan and O’Connor, Cailin (2023). “Can confirmation bias improve group learning? Working Paper.
Gadbury, Gary L and Allison, David B (2012). “Inappropriate fiddling with statistical analyses to obtain a desirable p-value: Tests to detect its presence in published literature.” Plos One, 7(1), e46363.
Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric (2013). “The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no ‘expedition’ or ‘-hacking’ and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time.” Department of Statistics, Columbia University, 348, 1–17.
Glänzel, Wolfgang and Schubert, András (2004). “Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship.” In Moed, H., Glanzel, W., Smoch, U. (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, 257–276.
Goldman, Alvin I (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin I and Shaked, Moshe (1991). “An economic model of scientific activity and truth acquisition.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 63(1), 31–55.
Golub, Benjamin and Jackson, Matthew O (2010). “Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 112–149.
Golub, Benjamin and Jackson, Matthew O (2012). “How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1287–1338.
Goodman, Steven and Greenland, Sander (2007). “Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis.” Public Library of Science Medicine, 4(4), e168.
Gopalakrishna, Gowri, Ter Riet, Gerben, Vink, Gerko, et al. (2022). “Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in the Netherlands.” Public Library of Science One, 17(2), e0263023.
Gorman, Dennis M, Elkins, Amber D, and Lawley, Mark (2019). “A systems approach to understanding and improving research integrity.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(1), 211–229.
Grim, Patrick, Singer, Daniel J, Bramson, Aaron, et al. (2019). “Diversity, ability, and expertise in epistemic communities.” Philosophy of Science, 86(1), 98–123.
Grim, Patrick, Singer, Daniel J, Fisher, Steven, et al. (2013). “Scientific networks on data landscapes: Question difficulty, epistemic success, and convergence.” Episteme, 10(4), 441–464.
Grim, Patrick, Singer, Daniel J, Reade, Christopher, and Fisher, Steven (2015). “Germs, genes, and memes: Function and fitness dynamics on information networks.” Philosophy of Science, 82(2), 219–243.
Gross, Kevin and Bergstrom, Carl T (2019). “Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions.” Public Library of Science Biology, 17(1), e3000065.
Gross, Kevin and Bergstrom, Carl T (2021). “Why ex post peer review encourages high-risk research while ex ante review discourages it.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(51), e2111615118.
Harnagel, Audrey (2019). “A mid-level approach to modeling scientific communities.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 76, 49–59.
Head, Megan L, Holman, Luke, Lanfear, Rob, Kahn, Andrew T, and Jennions, Michael D (2015). “The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.” Public Library of Science Biology, 13(3), e1002106.
Heesen, Remco (2017a). “Academic superstars: Competent or lucky?” Synthese, 194(11), 4499–4518.
Heesen, Remco (2017b). “Communism and the incentive to share in science.” Philosophy of Science, 84(4), 698–716.
Heesen, Remco (2018). “Why the reward structure of science makes reproducibility problems inevitable.” The Journal of Philosophy, 115(12), 661–674.
Heesen, Remco (2021). “Cumulative advantage and the incentive to commit fraud in science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. https://doi.org/10.1086/716235. Heesen, Remco and Kofi Bright, Liam (2020). “Is peer review a good idea?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72(3), 635–663.
Heesen, Remco, Kofi Bright, Liam, and Zucker, Andrew (2019). “Vindicating methodological triangulation.” Synthese, 196(8), 3067–3081.
Heesen, Remco and Romeijn, Jan-Willem (2019). “Epistemic diversity and editor decisions: A statistical Matthew effect.” Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(39), 1–20.
Hegselmann, Rainer, Krause, Ulrich (2002). “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3) 1–33.
Higginson, Andrew D and Munafò, Marcus R (2016). “Current incentives for scientists lead to underpowered studies with erroneous conclusions.” Public Library of Science Biology, 14(11), e2000995.
Hightower, Jane Marie (2011). Diagnosis: Mercury: Money, Politics, and Poison. Island Press.
Hitzig, Zoe and Stegenga, Jacob (2020). “The problem of new evidence: P-hacking and pre-analysis plans.” Diametros, 17(66), 1–24.
Hollenbeck, John R and Wright, Patrick M (2017). “Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data.” Journal of Management, 43, 5–18.
Holman, Bennett and Bruner, Justin (2017). “Experimentation by industrial selection.” Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1008–1019.
Holman, Bennett and Bruner, Justin P (2015). “The problem of intransigently biased agents.” Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 956–968.
Hong, Lu and Page, Scott E (2004). “Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(46), 16385–16389.
Huebner, Bryce and Kofi Bright, Liam (2020). “Collective responsibility and fraud in scientific communities.” In Bazargan-Forward, S. and Tollefsen, D. P. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility, 358–372.
Hull, David L (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press.
Ioannidis, John PA (2005). “Why most published research findings are false.” Public Library of Science Medicine, 2(8), e124.
Ioannidis, John PA (2008). “Why most discovered true associations are inflated.” Epidemiology, 19(5), 640–648.
Jackson, Matthew O and Wolinsky, Asher (2003). A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks. Springer.
John, Leslie K, Loewenstein, George, and Prelec, Drazen (2012). “Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.” Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.
Jönsson, Martin L, Hahn, Ulrike, and Erik, J Olsson, (2015). “The kind of group you want to belong to: Effects of group structure on group accuracy.” Cognition, 142, 191–204.
Kaplan, Robert M and Irvin, Veronica L (2015). “Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time.” Public Library of Science One, 10(8), e0132382.
Kauffman, Stuart and Levin, Simon (1987). “Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128(1), 11–45.
Kauffman, Stuart A and Weinberger, Edward D (1989). “The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response.” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 141(2), 211–245.
Kerr, Norbert L (1998). “HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217.
Kitcher, Philip (1990). “The division of cognitive labor.” The Journal of Philosophy, 87(1), 5–22.
Klein, Richard A, Ratliff, Kate A, Vianello, Michelangelo, et al. (2014). “Investigating variation in replicability: A ‘many labs’ replication project.” Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152.
Klein, Richard A, Vianello, Michelangelo, Hasselman, Fred, et al. (2018). “Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490.
Kleinberg, Jon and Oren, Sigal (2011). “Mechanisms for (mis) allocating scientific credit.” Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 529–538.
Korf, Rebecca (2023). Taking the Social Structure of Science Seriously When Debating Values in Science. Working Paper.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Princeton University Press.
Kummerfeld, Erich and Zollman, Kevin JS (2020). “Conservatism and the scientific state of nature.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(4) 1057–1076.
Kyburg Jr, Henry E and Man Teng, Choh (2013). “Choosing among interpretations of probability.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1301.6713.
LaCroix, Travis, Geil, Anders, and O’Connor, Cailin (2021). “The dynamics of retraction in epistemic networks.” Philosophy of Science, 88(3), 415–438.
Lakens, Daniel (2019). “The value of preregistration for psychological science: A conceptual analysis.” Japanese Psychological Review, 62(3), 221–230.
Landemore, Hélène (2012). Democratic Reason. Princeton University Press.
Larivière, Vincent, Chaoqun, Ni, Gingras, Yves, Cronin, Blaise, and Sugimoto, Cassidy R (2013). “Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science.” Nature, 504(7479), 211–213.
Latham, Gary P, Erez, Miriam, and Locke, Edwin A (1988). “Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 753–772.
Lazer, David and Friedman, Allan (2007). “The network structure of exploration and exploitation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 667–694.
Lee, Carole J (2016). “eds Michael Brownstein, and Saul.”, Jennifer Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, 265–282.
Leonard, Thomas C (2002). “Reflection on rules in science: An invisible-hand perspective.” Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(2), 141–168.
Leslie, Derek (2005). “Are delays in academic publishing necessary?” American Economic Review, 95(1), 407–413.
Lewandowsky, Stephan and Oberauer, Klaus (2020). “Low replicability can support robust and efficient science.” Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–12.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Pilditch, Toby D, Madsen, Jens K, Oreskes, Naomi, and Risbey, James S (2019). “Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.” Cognition, 188, 124–139.
Link, Albert N, Swann, Christopher A, and Bozeman, Barry (2008). “A time allocation study of university faculty.” Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363–374.
Luukkonen, Terttu (2012). “Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices.” Research Evaluation, 21(1), 48–60.
Magnus, PD (2013). “What scientists know is not a function of what scientists know.” Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 840–849.
March, James G (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Mason, Winter A, Jones, Andy, and Goldstone, Robert L (2008). “Propagation of innovations in networked groups.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 422–433.
Mayo, Deborah G (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Mayo, Deborah G (2018). “Statistical inference as severe testing.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Access provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven-KU Leuven on,.
Conor, Mayo-Wilson, Zollman, Kevin JS, and Danks, David (2011). “The independence thesis: When individual and social epistemology diverge.” Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 653–677.
McDowell, John M and Kiholm Smith, Janet (1992). “The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: Implications for academic promotion.” Economic Inquiry, 30(1), 68–82.
McElreath, Richard and Smaldino, Paul E (2015). “Replication, communication, and the population dynamics of scientific discovery.” Public Library of Science One, 10(8), e0136088.
McShane, Blakeley B, Gal, David, Gelman, Andrew, Robert, Christian, and Tackett, Jennifer L (2019). “Abandon statistical significance.” The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 235–245.
Merton, Robert K (1942). “A note on science and democracy.” Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126.
Merton, Robert K (1957). “Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science.” American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.
Merton, Robert K (1968). “The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
Merton, Robert K (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago press.
Mohseni, Aydin (2023a). “ HARKing: From misdiagnosis to mispescription.” Working Paper.
Mohseni, Aydin (2023b). “ Intervention and backfire in the replication crisis.” Working Paper.
Mohseni, Aydin and Randall Williams, Cole (2021). “Truth and conformity on networks.” Erkenntnis, 86, 1509–1530.
Muldoon, Ryan and Weisberg, Michael (2011). “Robustness and idealization in models of cognitive labor.” Synthese, 183(2), 161–174.
Munafò, Marcus R, Nosek, Brian A, Bishop, Dorothy VM, et al. (2017). “A manifesto for reproducible science.” Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9.
Murphy, Kevin R and Aguinis, Herman (2019). “HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results?” Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 1–17.
Newman, Mark EJ (2001). “Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results.” Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.
Newman, Mark EJ (2004). “Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205.
Nissen, Silas Boye, Magidson, Tali, Gross, Kevin, and Bergstrom, Carl T (2016). “Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.” Elife, 5, e21451.
Nosek, Brian A and Bar-Anan, Yoav (2012). “Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication.” Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243.
Nosek, Brian A, Ebersole, Charles R, DeHaven, Alexander C, and Mellor, David T (2018). “The preregistration revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606.
Nosek, Brian A and Lakens, Daniël (2014). “Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results.” Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141.
Nosek, Brian A, Spies, Jeffrey R, and Motyl, Matt (2012). “Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631.
Nuzzo, Regina (2015). “Fooling ourselves.” Nature, 526(7572), 182–185.
O’Connor, Cailin (2017). “The cultural red king effect.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 41(3), 155–171.
O’Connor, Cailin (2019a). “The natural selection of conservative science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 76, 24–29.
O’Connor, Cailin (2019b). The Origins of Unfairness: Social Categories and Cultural Evolution. Oxford University Press, USA.
O’Connor, Cailin and Bruner, Justin (2019). “Dynamics and diversity in epistemic communities.” Erkenntnis, 84(1), 101–119.
O’Connor, Cailin and Owen Weatherall, James (2018). “Scientific polarization.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3), 855–875.
O’Connor, Cailin and Owen Weatherall, James (2019). The Misinformation Age. Yale University Press.
Okasha, Samir (2006). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford University Press.
Olsson, E.J. (2013). A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation and Polarization. In: Zenker, F. (eds.), Bayesian Argumentation. Synthese Library, vol 362. Springer: Dordrecht, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_6. Open Science Collaboration, et al. (2015). “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science, 349(6251).
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.
Oster, Sharon (1980). “The optimal order for submitting manuscripts.” The American Economic Review, 70(3), 444–448.
Peirce, Charles S (1967). “Note on the theory of the economy of research.” Operations Research, 15(4), 643–648.
Pinto, Manuela Fernández and Fernández Pinto, Daniel (2018). “Epistemic landscapes reloaded: An examination of agent-based models in social epistemology.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 43(1 (163)), 48–71.
Polanyi, Michael, Ziman, John, and Fuller, Steve (2000). “The republic of science: Its political and economic theory Minerva, I (1)(1962), 54–73.” Minerva, 38(1), 1–32.
Popper, Karl R (1972). Objective Knowledge. Volume 360. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pöyhönen, Samuli (2017). “Value of cognitive diversity in science.” Synthese, 194(11), 4519–4540.
Protzko, John, Krosnick, Jon, Nelson, Leif D, et al. (2023). “ High replicability of newly-discovered social-behavioral findings is achievable.” Working Paper.
Radzvilas, Mantas, Peden, William, and De Pretis, Francesco (2021). “A battle in the statistics wars: A simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, Frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies.” Synthese, 199(5), 13689–13748.
Reijula, Samuli and Kuorikoski, Jaakko (2019). “Modeling epistemic communities.” In Miranda, Fricker, Graham, Peter J., Henderson, David, and Pedersen, Nikolaj JLL, (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge, 240–249.
Reijula, Samuli and Kuorikoski, Jaakko (2021). “The diversity-ability trade-off in scientific problem solving.” Philosophy of Science, 88(5), 894–905.
Rogers, Everett M (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Romero, Felipe (2016). “Can the behavioral sciences self-correct? A social epistemic study.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 60, 55–69.
Romero, Felipe (2017). “Novelty versus replicability: Virtues and vices in the reward system of science.” Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1031–1043.
Romero, Felipe (2018). “Who should do replication labor?” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 516–537.
Romero, Felipe (2020). “The Division of Replication Labor.” Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 1014–1025.
Romero, Felipe and Sprenger, Jan (2021). “Scientific self-correction: The Bayesian way.” Synthese, 198(23), 5803–5823.
Rosenstock, Sarita, Bruner, Justin, and O’Connor, Cailin (2017). “In epistemic networks, is less really more?” Philosophy of Science, 84(2), 234–252.
Rosenthal, Robert (1979). “The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.” Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
Rossiter, Margaret W (1993). “The Matthew Matilda effect in science.” Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341.
Rubin, Hannah (2022). “Structural causes of citation gaps.” Philosophical Studies, 179, 2323–2345.
Rubin, Hannah and O’Connor, Cailin (2018). “Discrimination and collaboration in science.” Philosophy of Science, 85(3), 380–402.
Rubin, Hannah and Schneider, Mike D (2021). “Priority and privilege in scientific discovery.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 89, 202–211.
Rubin, Mark (2017). “When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress.” Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 308–320.
Rubin, Mark (2020). “Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2010.10513.
Sampaio, Ricardo Barros, Marcus Vinicius, de Araújo Fonseca, Zicker, Fabio, et al. (2016). “Co-authorship network analysis in health research: Method and potential use.” Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 1–10.
Santana, Carlos (2021). “Let’s not agree to disagree: The role of strategic disagreement in science.” Synthese, 198(25), 6159–6177.
Sarsons, Heather (2017). “Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia.” American Economic Review, 107(5), 141–145.
Schneider, Mike D (2021). “Creativity in the social epistemology of science.” Philosophy of Science, 88(5), 882–893.
Schneider, Mike D, Rubin, Hannah, and O’Connor, Cailin (2022). “Promoting diverse collaborations.” In Ramsey, G. and de Block, A. (eds.), The Dynamics of Science: Computational Frontiers in History and Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schofield, Paul N, Bubela, Tania, Weaver, Thomas, et al. (2009). “Post-publication sharing of data and tools.” Nature, 461(7261), 171–173.
Selvin, Hanan C and Stuart, Alan (1966). “Data-dredging procedures in survey analysis.” The American Statistician, 20(3), 20–23.
Simmons, Joseph P, Nelson, Leif D, and Simonsohn, Uri (2016). “False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366
Singer, Daniel J (2019). “Diversity, not randomness, trumps ability.” Philosophy of Science, 86(1), 178–191.
Smaldino, Paul (2019a). “Better methods can’t make up for mediocre theory.” Nature, 575(7783), 9–10.
Smaldino, Paul E (2019b). “ Five models of science, illustrating how selection shapes methods.” Working paper.
Smaldino, Paul and O’Connor, Cailin (2022). “Interdisciplinarity can aid the spread of better methods between scientific communities.” Collective Intelligence, 1(2), 26339137221131816.
Smaldino, Paul E (2019b). “ Five models of science, illustrating how selection shapes methods.” Working Paper.
Smaldino, Paul E and McElreath, Richard (2016). “The natural selection of bad science.” Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384.
Smaldino, Paul E, Turner, Matthew A, and Contreras Kallens, Pablo A (2019). “Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science.” Royal Society Open Science, 6(7), 190194.
Smith, Adam (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. for A. Millar, Printed and Kincaid, A. and , J. Bell.
Smith, George Davey and Ebrahim, Shah. “Data dredging, bias, or confounding: They can all get you into the BMJ and the Friday papers.” British Medical Journal 325, 1437–1438.
Soderberg, Courtney K, Errington, Timothy M, Schiavone, Sarah R, et al. (2021). “Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model.” Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 990–997.
Solomon, Miriam (2006). “Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation and dissent.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(S1), 28–42.
Sommers, Samuel R (2006). “On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 597–612.
Sonnert, Gerhard and Holton, Gerald (1996). “Career patterns of women and men in the sciences.” American Scientist, 84(1), 63–71.
Stanford, P Kyle (2019). “Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: The impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science.” Synthese, 196(10), 3915–3932.
Stephan, Paula (1996). How Economics Shapes Science. Harvard University Press.
Stewart, Alexander J and Plotkin, Joshua B (2021). “The natural selection of good science.” Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1510–1518.
Strevens, Michael (2003). “The role of the priority rule in science.” The Journal of Philosophy, 100(2), 55–79.
Strevens, Michael (2006). “The role of the Matthew effect in science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(2), 159–170.
Strevens, Michael (2011). “Economic approaches to understanding scientific norms.” Episteme, 8(2), 184–200.
Strevens, Michael (2013). “Herding and the quest for credit.” Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(1), 19–34.
Strevens, Michael (2017). “Scientific sharing: Communism and the social contract.” In Boyer-Kassem, T., Mayo-Wilson, C., and Weisberg, M. (eds.), Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge, 3–33.
Szollosi, Aba, Kellen, David, Navarro, Danielle, et al. (2020). “Is preregistration worthwhile? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 94–95.
Tendeiro, Jorge N and Kiers, Henk AL (2019). “A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.” Psychological Methods, 24(6), 774–795.
Thagard, Paul (2006). “How to collaborate: Procedural knowledge in the cooperative development of science.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(S1), 177–196.
Thoma, Johanna (2015). “The epistemic division of labor revisited.” Philosophy of Science, 82(3), 454–472.
Thompson, Abigail (2014). “Does diversity trump ability?” Notices of the AMS, 61(9), 1024–1030.
Tiokhin, Leo, Lakens, Daniel, Smaldino, Paul E, and Panchanathan, Karthik (2021). “Shifting the level of selection in science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916231182568.
Tiokhin, Leonid and Derex, Maxime (2019). “Competition for novelty reduces information sampling in a research game-a registered report.” Royal Society Open Science, 6(5), 180934.
Tiokhin, Leonid, Panchanathan, Karthik, Lakens, Daniel, et al. (2021). “Honest signaling in academic publishing.” Public Library of Science One, 16(2), e0246675.
Leonid, Tiokhin, Yan, Minhua, and Morgan, Thomas JH (2021). “Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help.” Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 857–867.
Viola, Marco (2015). “Some remarks on the division of cognitive labor.” RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, 3.
Wagner, Elliott and Herington, Jonathan (2021). “Agent-based models of dual-use research restrictions.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72(2), 377–399.
Watts, Christopher and Gilbert, Nigel (2011). “Does cumulative advantage affect collective learning in science? An agent-based simulation.” Scientometrics, 89(1), 437–463.
Weatherall, James Owen and O’Connor, Cailin (2021a). “Conformity in scientific networks.” Synthese, 198(8), 7257–7278.
Weatherall, James Owen and O’Connor, Cailin (2021b). “Endogenous epistemic factionalization.” Synthese, 198(25), 6179–6200.
Weatherall, James Owen, O’Connor, Cailin, and Bruner, Justin P (2020). “How to beat science and influence people: Policymakers and propaganda in epistemic networks.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1157–1186.
Weisberg, Michael and Muldoon, Ryan (2009). “Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor.” Philosophy of Science, 76(2), 225–252.
West, Jevin D, Jacquet, Jennifer, King, Molly M, Correll, Shelley J, and Bergstrom, Carl T (2013). “The role of gender in scholarly authorship.” Public Library of Science One, 8(7), e66212.
Wright, Sewall (1932). “The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution.” Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, 356–366.
Jingyi, Wu (forthcoming). Better than Best. Philosophy of Science.
Jingyi, Wu (2023a). “ The communist norm and industrial science.” Withholding Knowledge. Working Paper.
Jingyi, Wu (2023b). “Epistemic advantage on the margin: A network standpoint epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 106(3), 755–777.
Jingyi, Wu and O’Connor, Cailin (2023). “How should we promote transient diversity in science? Synthese, 201(2), 37.
Jingyi, Wu, O’Connor, Cailin, and Smaldino, Paul E (forthcoming). “The cultural evolution of science.” In Tehrani, J., Kendal, R. and Kendal, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution. Oxford University Press.
Xie, Yu, Wang, Kai, and Kong, Yan (2021). “Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 1–28.
Yahosseini, Kyanoush Seyed and Moussaïd, Mehdi (2020). “Comparing groups of independent solvers and transmission chains as methods for collective problem-solving.” Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9.
Zollman, Kevin (2023). “ The scientific ponzi scheme.” Working Paper.
Zollman, Kevin JS (2007). “The communication structure of epistemic communities.” Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 574–587.
Zollman, Kevin JS (2009). “Optimal publishing strategies.” Episteme, 6(2), 185–199.
Zollman, Kevin JS (2010). “The epistemic benefit of transient diversity.” Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17–35.
Zollman, Kevin JS (2018). “The credit economy and the economic rationality of science.” The Journal of Philosophy, 115(1), 5–33.
