Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T17:11:48.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Social science in India: colonial import, indigenous product or universal truth? (1982c)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Get access

Summary

In this chapter I return to a topic discussed in Chapters 6 and 7, the colonial system that prevailed throughout much of the world until the middle of the twentieth century. This time, however, I look not at relations of power or perceptions of the past but at perceptions of social science. I had worked briefly in India before being invited to contribute to an international symposium on the differences in the praxis of anthropology between Western and non-Western countries. Its long history of intellectual endeavour made India well suited for an attempt to place social science in a context of imperial conquest and retreat. In the paper I endeavour to show that the view practitioners and onlookers take of the social science enterprise is conditioned by their political stance as well as, in some cases, by the writings of philosophers of science.

Introduction

In the past, almost all the empirical studies carried out under the banner of social anthropology were conducted by men and women who were citizens of industrial nations and whose focus of inquiry was the social life of communities with techniques simpler than their own. Even today, most anthropological fieldwork is of this kind. The phenomenon of indigenous anthropology in non-Western countries, and particularly in countries of the Third World, therefore poses two obvious questions. First, how, if at all, is the process of inquiry altered when anthropologists and other social scientists study people who are more like themselves or who at least belong to the same nation as themselves? And second, does the process change which therefore provides the financial, logistic and professional infrastructure for his inquiry, is poor and newly independent rather than affluent and with a long history of political and intellectual autonomy?

Type
Chapter
Information
Models and Interpretations
Selected Essays
, pp. 196 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×