Book contents
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Guidelines and Standards
- 1 Introduction to Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 2 Pharmacology Principles in Sedation
- 3 Pain Assessment and Management Considerations
- 4 Patient Evaluation and Procedure Selection
- 5 Patient Monitoring, Equipment, and Intravenous Fluids
- 6 Credentialing, Competency, and Education
- 7 Quality, Legal, and Risk Management Considerations: Ensuring Program Excellence
- 8 Nursing Considerations for Sedation
- 9 Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners
- 10 High-risk Patients: Sedation Considerations in Coexisting Disease
- 11 Respiratory Compromise in Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 12 Management of Complications of Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 13 Recovery and Discharge after Procedural Sedation
- 14 Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends
- 15 Simulation Training for Sedation
- 16 Sedation in the Radiology Suite
- 17 Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
- 18 Sedation in the Interventional Cardiology Suite
- 19 Sedation in the Emergency Department
- 20 Sedation in the Intensive Care Setting
- 21 Pediatric Sedation: Practical Considerations
- 22 Pediatric Sedation: Safety and Outcomes
- 23 Sedation in the Office and Other Outpatient Settings
- 24 Sedation in Dentistry
- 25 Sedation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- 26 Interventional Pain Management Procedures
- 27 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Adults
- 28 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Infants and Children
- Index
- References
3 - Pain Assessment and Management Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2017
Book contents
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Guidelines and Standards
- 1 Introduction to Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 2 Pharmacology Principles in Sedation
- 3 Pain Assessment and Management Considerations
- 4 Patient Evaluation and Procedure Selection
- 5 Patient Monitoring, Equipment, and Intravenous Fluids
- 6 Credentialing, Competency, and Education
- 7 Quality, Legal, and Risk Management Considerations: Ensuring Program Excellence
- 8 Nursing Considerations for Sedation
- 9 Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners
- 10 High-risk Patients: Sedation Considerations in Coexisting Disease
- 11 Respiratory Compromise in Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 12 Management of Complications of Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 13 Recovery and Discharge after Procedural Sedation
- 14 Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends
- 15 Simulation Training for Sedation
- 16 Sedation in the Radiology Suite
- 17 Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
- 18 Sedation in the Interventional Cardiology Suite
- 19 Sedation in the Emergency Department
- 20 Sedation in the Intensive Care Setting
- 21 Pediatric Sedation: Practical Considerations
- 22 Pediatric Sedation: Safety and Outcomes
- 23 Sedation in the Office and Other Outpatient Settings
- 24 Sedation in Dentistry
- 25 Sedation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- 26 Interventional Pain Management Procedures
- 27 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Adults
- 28 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Infants and Children
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice , pp. 36 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1004–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, PH, Covington, E, Dahl, J, Katz, J, Miaskowski, C. Pain: Current Understanding of Assessment, Management and Treatments. Reston, VA: National Pharmaceutical Council and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2006.Google Scholar
Gagliese, L, Weizblit, N, Ellis, W, Chan, VW. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 2005; 117: 412–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herr, KA, Spratt, K, Mobily, PR, Richardson, G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 207–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bieri, D, Reeve, RA, Champion, GD, Addicoat, L, Ziegler, JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain 1990; 41: 139–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, LJ, Harris, J, Epps, CD, Herr, K. Psychometric evaluation of selected pain intensity scales for use with cognitively impaired and cognitively intact older adults. Rehabil Nurs 2005; 30: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuppy, DJ. The Faces Pain Scale: reliability and validity with mature adults. Appl Nurs Res 1998; 11: 84–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D. Ethnic differences in affect intensity, emotion judgments, display rule attitudes, and self-reported emotional expression in an American sample. Motiv Emotion 1993; 17: 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, CL, von Baeyer, CL, Spafford, PA, van Korlaar, I, Goodenough, B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001; 93: 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallard, P, Williams, L, Lenton, S, Velleman, R. Pain in cognitively impaired, non-communicating children. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85: 460–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkel, SI, Voepel-Lewis, T, Shayevitz, JR, Malviya, S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs 1997; 23: 293–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, J, Fraser, GL, Coursin, DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 119–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauder, P, Andreoletti, M, Cambonie, G, et al. Sedation and analgesia in intensive care (with the exception of new-born babies). French Society of Anesthesia and Resuscitation. French-speaking Resuscitation Society. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008; 27: 541–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Chanques, G, Viel, E, Constantin, JM, et al. The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain 2010; 151: 711–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payen, JF, Bru, O, Bosson, JL, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2258–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aissaoui, Y, Zeggwagh, AA, Zekraoui, A, Abidi, K, Abouqal, R. Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1470–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Ahlers, SJ, van Gulik, L, van der Veen, AM, et al. Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU. Crit Care 2008; 12: R15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, GP. Pain management after ambulatory surgery. Ambulatory Surgery 1999; 7: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASPAN pain and comfort clinical guideline. www.aspan.org/Portals/6/docs/ClinicalPractice/Guidelines/ASPAN_ClinicalGuideline_PainComfort.pdf (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
Buss, HE, Melderis, K. PACU pain management algorithm. J Perianesth Nurs 2002; 17: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Further Reading
Prabhakar, A, Mancuso, KF, Owen, CP, Lissauer, J, Urman, RD, Kaye, AD. Perioperative analgesia outcomes and strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;28(2):105–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadivelu, N, Mitra, S, Kaye, AD, Urman, RD. Perioperative analgesia and challenges in the drug-addicted and drug-dependent patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Mar;28(1):91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar