Book contents
- Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law
- Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Biographies
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Cross-Cutting Issues
- Part I Individual Commission
- Part II Joint Commission
- 5 Co-Perpetration Based on Joint Control over the Crime
- 6 Joint Criminal Enterprise
- Part III Participation
- Part IV Participating in Group Activities
- Part V Inchoate and Preparatory Acts
- Part VI Other Forms of Responsibility
- Part VII Concluding Observations
- Index
- References
5 - Co-Perpetration Based on Joint Control over the Crime
from Part II - Joint Commission
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2019
Book contents
- Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law
- Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Biographies
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Cross-Cutting Issues
- Part I Individual Commission
- Part II Joint Commission
- 5 Co-Perpetration Based on Joint Control over the Crime
- 6 Joint Criminal Enterprise
- Part III Participation
- Part IV Participating in Group Activities
- Part V Inchoate and Preparatory Acts
- Part VI Other Forms of Responsibility
- Part VII Concluding Observations
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines the concept of co-perpetration, as defined and developed in the jurisprudence of the ICC. To this end, the research contained herein is divided into two separate, yet interrelated, parts that focus on the two distinct forms of co-perpetration, which the Court has recognized in its case law: ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ co-perpetration.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law , pp. 85 - 120Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Select Bibliography
Ambos, K., Treatise on International Criminal Law – Volume I: Foundations and General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ambos, K., ‘Article 25: Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Triffterer, O. and Ambos, K. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (3rd edn, Munich: C.H. Beck, 2016).Google Scholar
Cryer, R. et al., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G., Rethinking Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil Gil, A. and Maculan, E., ‘Current Trends in the Definition of “Perpetrator” by the International Criminal Court: From the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges in the Lubanga Case to the Katanga Judgment’, 28 Leiden Journal of International Law (2015), 349.Google Scholar
Jain, N., Perpetrators and Accessories in International Criminal Law: Individual Modes of Responsibility for Collective Crimes (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Ohlin, J., ‘Co-Perpetration: German Dogmatik or German Invasion’, in Stahn, C. (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 517.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J., van Sliedregt, E. and Weigend, T., ‘Assessing the Control-Theory’, 26 Leiden Journal of International Law (2013), 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olásolo, H., The Criminal Responsibility of Senior Political and Military Leaders as Principals to International Crimes (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Olásolo, H. and Cepeda, A., ‘The Notion of Control of the Crime and Its Application by the ICTY in the Stakić Case’, 4 International Criminal Law Review (2004), 475.Google Scholar
Roxin, C., Täterschaft und Tatherrschaft (1st edn, Hamburg: Cram, De Gruyter & Co., 1963).Google Scholar
Sadat, L. and Jolly, J., ‘Seven Canons of ICC Treaty Interpretation: Making Sense of Article 25’s Rorschach Blot’, 27 Leiden Journal of International Law (2014), 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, W., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E., Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Weigend, T., ‘Perpetration through an Organization: The Unexpected Career of a German Legal Concept’, 9 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2011), 91.Google Scholar
Weigend, T., ‘Problems of Attribution in International Criminal Law: A German Perspective’, 12 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2014), 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, G. and Burghardt, B., ‘Claus Roxin on Crimes as Part of Organized Power Structures: Introductory Note’, 9 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2011), 191Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by