Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T02:36:03.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Inflections and word-formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

Similarity between fields: formatives.

Why the distinction? Division of dictionary and grammar; but why is that justified? Word-formation as change of part of speech: criterion not satisfactory. Inflections as syntactically determined (Italian -o/-a in Nouns vs Adjectives); criterion natural but not sufficient (Number of Nouns, Comparatives, English -ion). Test whether complex word can be replaced by simple. Criterion of regularity: gaps in word-formation; regularity and irregularity of meaning. No single criterion adequate in all cases.

Change and indeterminacy. Changes in the status of formatives (Latin/Italian -sc-); hence synchronic blurring (Participles and Participial Adjectives). Likewise for derived and simple lexemes: effect of learned borrowing (French Adjectives in -al).

In the last chapter we underlined the technical distinction between relations within paradigms (inflectional morphology) and relations among lexemes (lexical morphology). In the case of compounding its justification is sufficiently obvious. Forms like what and ever or salmon and fall represent distinct lexemes (what, ever, salmon, fall), and forms which combine them, if not syntactic, must also be lexemes (whatever, salmon-fall). In the history of languages compounds of this type do not usually develop into inflectional formations, and there is little or no indeterminacy. But the distinction between inflections and wordformation is more difficult. In the form generation the ending -ion is not a word, just as -s is not a word in generations. On the face of it, both are simply formative elements or, as we will call them, formatives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Morphology , pp. 42 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×