Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T21:25:57.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Common uses of multivariable models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Mitchell H. Katz
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

What are the most common uses of multivariable models in clinical research?

The four most common uses of multivariable models are:

  1. A observational studies of etiology

  2. B intervention studies (randomized and nonrandomized)

  3. C studies of diagnosis

  4. D studies of prognosis

These different uses are discussed in the Sections 2.2–2.5.

How is multivariable analysis used in observational studies of etiology?

The goal of etiologic studies is to identify causes of an outcome, usually with the goal of removing a harmful substance (e.g., tobacco) or promoting a healthful activity (e.g., exercise).

Although observational studies cannot prove causality, multivariable analysis may strengthen the argument for causality by excluding confounding, an alternative explanation of an association. Look back at the example of fitness and mortality in Chapter 1. If the association between fitness and longevity is causal, encouraging people to exercise more will extend their life. If the association between fitness is confounded by smoking (i.e., smoking is the real cause of the decreased lifespan, and because smokers exercise less it appears that fitness is associated with longevity) increasing fitness will not change longevity. The data in Table 1.2 indicate that the effect of fitness on longevity is not confounded by smoking or other factors (at least not the ones the authors adjusted for) and therefore fitness programs are a promising intervention for extending survival.

Type
Chapter
Information
Multivariable Analysis
A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers
, pp. 14 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gardner, C.D., Fortmann, S.P., and Krauss, R.M. “Association of small low-density lipoprotein particles with the incidence of coronary artery disease in men and women.” JAMA 276 (1996): 875–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, D., Wilson, P.W.F., Anderson, K.M., et al. “Stratifying the patient at risk from coronary disease: New insights from the Framingham heart study.” Am. Heart. J. 119 (1990): 712–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, F.A., Allegrone, J., Goldberg, R.J., et al. “Association of statin therapy with outcomes of acute coronary syndromes: The Grace study.” Ann. Intern. Med. 140 (2004): 857–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittelman, M.S., Ferris, S.H., Shulman, E., et al. “A family intervention to delay nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease.” JAMA 276 (1996): 1725–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, S.M., Jeong, J., Geyer, C.E., et al. “Longer therapy, iatrogenic amenorrhea, and survival in early breast cancer.” N. Engl. J. Med. 362 (2010): 2053–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozen, M.W., D'Agostino, R.B., Selker, H.P., et al. “A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease: A prospective multicenter clinical trial.” N. Engl. J. Med. 310 (1984): 1273–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corey, G.A. and Merenstein, J.H.Applying the acute ischemic heart disease predictive instrument.” J. Fam. Pract. 25 (1987): 127–33Google ScholarPubMed
Pearson, S.D., Goldman, L., Garcia, T.B., et al. “Physician response to a prediction rule for the triage of emergency department patients with chest pain.” J. Gen. Intern. Med. 9 (1994): 241–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasson, J.H. and Sox, H.C.Clinical prediction rules: Have they come of age?JAMA 275 (1996): 641–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehlbach, S.H.Commentary.” J. Fam. Pract. 25 (1987): 132–3Google Scholar
Elliott, W.J. and Powell, L.H. “Diagonal earlobe creases and prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.” Am. J. Med. 100 (1996): 205–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuchter, L., Schultz, D.J., Synnestvedt, M., et al. “A prognostic model for predicting a 10-year survival in patients with primary melanoma.” Ann. Intern. Med. 125 (1996): 369–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braitman, L.E. and Davidoff, F.Predicting clinical states in individual patients.” Ann. Intern. Med. 125 (1996): 406–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×