Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:33:21.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Ancillary techniques useful in the evaluation and diagnosis of bone and soft tissue neoplasms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Lester J. Layfield
Affiliation:
University of Missouri School of Medicine
Carlos W. Bedrossian
Affiliation:
Rush University Medical College, Chicago
Julia R. Crim
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Lucio Palombini
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II'
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Ancillary studies including immunohistochemistry, molecular diagnostics, and cytogenetics play important roles in the diagnosis, subtyping, and prognostication of hematopoietic, epithelial, and mesenchymal neoplasms. The advent of clinically useful techniques for the detection of mutations, translocations, and copy number alterations has greatly expanded the utility of molecular diagnostics in the work-up of malignant neoplasms. Ancillary studies appear to be particularly helpful in the investigation of musculoskeletal lesions including lymphomas. Chromosomal translocations and mutations appear to be of greater diagnostic aid in bone and soft tissue lesions than in neoplasms of epithelial tissues. A subset of sarcomas bears chromosomal anomalies including reciprocal translocations, deletions, mutations, and amplifications which appear to be specific for certain histopathologic types. Mutations such as those occurring in the KIT and platelet derived growth factor alpha genes are important for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors as well as the prediction of response to directed therapy (Gleevec). Similarly, the SYT-SSX fusion transcript resulting from the t(X;18)(p11;q11) appears to be specific for synovial sarcoma. Of equal interest, both diagnostically and pathogenetically, are the translocations and fusion genes involving the EWS gene (22q12) which appear to define a Ewing family of sarcomas comprising the entities intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round tumor, myxoid chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor. These findings have facilitated the development of a molecular approach to soft tissue sarcomas. On this basis, soft tissue sarcomas currently can be divided into two groups. One group has specific chromosomal abnormalities (gene mutations and translocations) while the other shows complex often non-specific karyotypic abnormalities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alawi, F, Stratton, D, Freedman, PD. Solitary fibrous tumor of the oral soft tissues: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 16 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Jul;25(7):900–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambros, IM, Ambros, PF, Strehl, S, et al. MIC2 is a specific marker for Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Evidence for a common histogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors from MIC2 expression and specific chromosome aberration. Cancer. 1991 Apr;67(7):1886–1893.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin, KM, Litzky, LA, Smythe, WR, et al. Wilms’ tumor 1 susceptibility (WT1) gene products are selectively expressed in malignant mesothelioma. Am J Pathol. 1995 Feb;146(2):344–356.Google ScholarPubMed
Antonescu, CR, Tschernyavsky, SJ, Decuseara, R, et al. Prognostic impact of P53 status, TLS-CHOP fusion transcript structure, and histological grade in myxoid liposarcoma: a molecular and clinicopathologic study of 82 cases. Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Dec;7(12):3977–3987.Google ScholarPubMed
Appleton, MA, Attanoos, RL, Jasani, B. Thrombomodulin as a marker of vascular and lymphatic tumours. Histopathology. 1996 Aug;29(2):153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvand, A, Denny, CT. Biology of EWS/ETS fusions in Ewing’s family tumors. Oncogene. 2001 Sep;20(40):5747–5754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, FG, Qualman, SJ, Macris, MH, et al. Genetic heterogeneity in the alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma subset without typical gene fusions. Cancer Res. 2002 Aug;62(16):4704–4710.Google ScholarPubMed
Binh, MB, Sastre-Garau, X, Guillou, L, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Oct;29(10):1340–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calonje, E, Fletcher, CDM. Vascular tumors. In: Fletcher, CDM (ed) Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2007: 66.Google Scholar
Cessna, MH, Zhou, H, Perkins, SL, et al. Are myogenin and myoD1 expression specific for rhabdomyosarcoma? A study of 150 cases, with emphasis on spindle cell mimics. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Sep;25(9):1150–1157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cessna, MH, Zhou, H, Sanger, WG, et al. Expression of ALK1 and p80 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and its mesenchymal mimics: a study of 135 cases. Mod Pathol. 2002 Sep;15(9):931–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, JK, Tsang, WY, Pau, MY, et al. Lymphangiomyomatosis and angiomyolipoma: closely related entities characterized by hamartomatous proliferation of HMB-45-positive smooth muscle. Histopathology. 1993 May;22(5):445–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Alava, E, Kawai, A, Healey, JH, et al. EWS-FLI1 fusion transcript structure is an independent determinant of prognosis in Ewing’s sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Apr;16(4):1248–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debiec-Rychter, M, Sciot, R, Le Cesne, A, et al. KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(8):1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehner, LP. On trial: a malignant small cell tumor in a child: four wrongs do not make a right. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jun;109(6):662–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dei Tos, AP, Wadden, C, Calonje, E, et al. Immunohistochemical demonstration of glycoprotein p30/32 MIC2 (CD99) in synovial sarcoma: a potential cause of diagnostic confusion. Appl Immunohistochem. 1995; 3:168–172.Google Scholar
DeYoung, BR, Wick, MR, Fitzgibbon, JF, et al. CD31: an immunospecific marker for endothelial differentiation in human neoplasms. Appl Immunohistochem. 1993; 1:97–100.Google Scholar
Deyrup, AT, Haydon, RC, Huo, D, et al. Myoid differentiation and prognosis in adult pleomorphic sarcomas of the extremity: an analysis of 92 cases. Cancer. 2003 Aug;98(4):805–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doussis, IA, Gatter, KC, Mason, DY. CD68 reactivity of non-macrophage derived tumours in cytological specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1993 Apr;46(4):334–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanburg, JC, Rosenberg, AE, Weaver, DL, et al. Osteocalcin and osteonectin immunoreactivity in the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Oct;108(4):464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, CD, Fletcher, JA, Cin, PD, Ladanyi, M, Woodruff, JM. Diagnostic gold standard for soft tissue tumours: morphology or molecular genetics? Histopathology. 2001 Jul;39(1):100–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, CD, Gustafson, P, Rydholm, A, Willén, H, Akerman, M. Clinicopathologic re-evaluation of 100 malignant fibrous histiocytomas: prognostic relevance of subclassification. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun;19(12):3045–3050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folpe, AL, Gown, AM. Immunohistochemistry for analysis of soft tissue tumors. In: Weiss, SW, Goldblum, JR (eds) Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc.; 2001: 200.Google Scholar
Folpe, AL, Weiss, SW, Fletcher, CD, Gown, AM. Tenosynovial giant cell tumors: evidence for a desmin-positive dendritic cell subpopulation. Mod Pathol. 1998 Oct;11(10):939–944.Google ScholarPubMed
Folpe, AL, Hill, CE, Parham, DM, O’Shea, PA, Weiss, SW. Immunohistochemical detection of FLI-1 protein expression: a study of 132 round cell tumors with emphasis on CD99-positive mimics of Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Dec;24(12):1657–1662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fos, SN, Bosch, AL. Immunohistochemistry of soft tissue sarcomas. Pathology Case Reviews. 2008; 13:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franquemont, DW, Frierson, HF, Mills, SE. An immunohistochemical study of normal endometrial stroma and endometrial stromal neoplasms: evidence for smooth muscle differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991 Sep;15(9):861–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritsch, MK, Bridge, JA, Schuster, AE, Perlman, EJ, Argani, P. Performance characteristics of a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of tumor-specific fusion transcripts from archival tissue. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003 Jan–Feb;6(1):43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlong, MA, Mentzel, T, Fanburg-Smith, JC. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: a clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers. Mod Pathol. 2001 Jun;14(6):595–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gloghini, A, Rizzo, A, Zanette, I, et al. KP1/CD68 expression in malignant neoplasms including lymphomas, sarcomas, and carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Apr;103(4):425–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granter, SR, Renshaw, AA, Fletcher, CD, Bhan, AK, Rosenberg, AE. CD99 reactivity in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Hum Pathol. 1996 Dec;27(12):1273–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillou, L. Contribution of molecular biology and markers to the prognosis and management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Path Case Reviews. 2008; 13:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillou, L, Wadden, C, Kraus, MD, Dei Tos, AP, Fletcher, CDM. S-100 protein reactivity in synovial sarcomas: a potentially frequent diagnostic pitfall. Appl Immunohistochem. 1996; 4:167–175.Google Scholar
Guillou, L, Coindre, J, Gallagher, G, et al. Detection of the synovial sarcoma translocation t(X;18) (SYT;SSX) in paraffin-embedded tissues using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a reliable and powerful diagnostic tool for pathologists: A molecular analysis of 221 mesenchymal tumors fixed in different fixatives. Hum Pathol. 2001 Jan;32(1):105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvell, JD, Kilpatrick, SE, White, WL. Histogenetic relations between giant cell fibroblastoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. CD34 staining showing the spectrum and a simulator. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998 Aug;20(4):339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, T, Matsuno, Y, Shimoda, T, et al. Extrathoracic solitary fibrous tumors: their histological variability and potentially aggressive behavior. Hum Pathol. 1999 Dec;30(12):1464–1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helman, LJ, Meltzer, P. Mechanisms of sarcoma development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Sep;3(9):685–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, DA, Pfeifer, JD, Marley, EF, et al. WT1 staining reliably differentiates desmoplastic small round cell tumor from Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: An immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic study. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Sep;114(3):345–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirota, S, Isozaki, K, Moriyama, Y, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998 Jan;279(5350):577–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holden, JA, Willmore-Payne, C, Coppola, D, Garrett, CR, Layfield, LJ. High-resolution melting amplicon analysis as a method to detect c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007 Aug;128(2):230–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holthöfer, H, Virtanen, I, Kariniemi, AL, et al. Ulex europaeus I lectin as a marker for vascular endothelium in human tissues. Lab Invest. 1982 Jul;47(1):60–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Hurlimann, J. Desmin and neural marker expression in mesothelial cells and mesotheliomas. Hum Pathol. 1994 Aug;25(8):753–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judkins, AR, Montone, KT, LiVolsi, VA, van de Rijn, M. Sensitivity and specificity of antibodies on necrotic tumor tissue. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Nov;110(5):641–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawai, A, Woodruff, J, Healey, JH, et al. SYT-SSX gene fusion as a determinant of morphology and prognosis in synovial sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan;338(3):153–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury, JD. Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005 Jul;12(4):212–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, SE, Bergman, S, Pettenati, MJ, Gulley, ML. The usefulness of cytogenetic analysis in fine needle aspirates for the histologic subtyping of sarcomas. Mod Pathol. 2006 Jun;19(6):815–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladanyi, M, Bridge, JA. Contribution of molecular genetic data to the classification of sarcomas. Hum Pathol. 2000 May;31(5):532–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladanyi, M, Woodruff, JM, Scheithauer, BW, et al. Letter to the Editor. Modern Pathol. 2000; 13:1336–1346.Google Scholar
Ladanyi, M, Antonescu, CR, Leung, DH, et al. Impact of SYT-SSX fusion type on the clinical behavior of synovial sarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 243 patients. Cancer Res. 2002 Jan;62(1):135–140.Google ScholarPubMed
Layfield, LJ, Emerson, LL, Crim, JR, Randall, L. Squamous differentiation and cytokeratin expression in an osteosarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Clinical Medicine: Pathology. 2008 Mar;18(1):55–59.Google Scholar
Leader, M, Collins, M, Patel, J, Henry, K. Staining for factor VIII related antigen and Ulex europaeus agglutinin I (UEA-I) in 230 tumours: an assessment of their specificity for angiosarcoma and Kaposi’s sarcoma. Histopathology. 1986 Nov;10(11):1153–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, XQ, Hisaoka, M, Shi, DR, Zhu, XZ, Hashimoto, H. Expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in soft tissue tumors: an immunohistochemical and molecular study of 249 cases. Hum Pathol. 2004 Jun;35(6):711–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makhlouf, HR, Remotti, HE, Ishak, KG. Expression of KIT (CD117) in angiomyolipoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002 Apr;26(4):493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massi, D, Beltrami, G, Capanna, R, Franchi, A. Histopathological re-classification of extremity pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma has clinical relevance. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec;30(10):1131–1136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menssen, HD, Renkl, HJ, Rodeck, U, et al. Presence of Wilms’ tumor gene (wt1) transcripts and the WT1 nuclear protein in the majority of human acute leukemias. Leukemia. 1995 Jun;9(6):1060–1067.Google ScholarPubMed
Metzelaar, MJ, Korteweg, J, Sixma, JJ, Nieuwenhuis, HK. Biochemical characterization of PECAM-1 (CD31 antigen) on human platelets. Thromb Haemost. 1991 Dec;66(6):700–707.Google ScholarPubMed
Miettinen, M, Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Oct;130(10):1466–1478.Google ScholarPubMed
Miettinen, M, Rapola, J. Immunohistochemical spectrum of rhabdomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma-like tumors: expression of cytokeratin and the 68-kD neurofilament protein. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989 Feb;13(2):120–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miettinen, M, Lindenmayer, AE, Chaubal, A. Endothelial cell markers CD31, CD34, and BNH9 antibody to H- and Y-antigens: evaluation of their specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of vascular tumors and comparison with von Willebrand factor. Mod Pathol. 1994 Jan;7(1):82–90.Google Scholar
Moll, R, Franke, WW, Schiller, DL, Geiger, B, Krepler, R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):11–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, G, Skytting, B, Xie, Y, et al. The SYT-SSX1 variant of synovial sarcoma is associated with a high rate of tumor cell proliferation and poor clinical outcome. Cancer Res. 1999 Jul;59(13):3180–3184.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Sullivan, MJ, Kyriakos, M, Zhu, X, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with t(X;18): a pathologic and molecular genetic study. Mod Pathol. 2000 Dec;13(12):1336–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, K, Hasegawa, T, Yokoyama, R, Beppu, Y, Itoi, E. Osteosarcoma with cytokeratin expression: a clinicopathological study of six cases with an emphasis on differential diagnosis from metastatic cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2003 Oct;56(10):742–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordóñez, NG. Value of thrombomodulin immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Histopathology. 1997 Jul;31(1):25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, NG. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor: II: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study with emphasis on new immunohistochemical markers. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Nov;22(11):1314–1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parham, DM, Ellison, DA. Rhabdomyosarcomas in adults and children: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Oct;130(10):1454–1465.Google ScholarPubMed
Parham, DM, Dias, P, Kelly, DR, Rutledge, JC, Houghton, P. Desmin positivity in primitive neuroectodermal tumors of childhood. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992 May;16(5):483–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramani, P, Bradley, NJ, Fletcher, CD. QBEND/10, a new monoclonal antibody to endothelium: assessment of its diagnostic utility in paraffin sections. Histopathology. 1990 Sep;17(3):237–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, BP, Singer, S, Tsao, C, et al. KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001 Nov;61(22):8118–8121.Google ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, AA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: liposarcoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004 Nov;155(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, AA, Bridge, JA. Updates on cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2000 Nov;123(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigel, JE, Smith, TA, Reith, JD, Goldblum, JR. Immunohistochemical analysis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase expression in deep soft tissue calcifying fibrous pseudotumor: evidence of a late sclerosing stage of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001 Feb;5(1):10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silberstein, GB, Van Horn, K, Strickland, P, Roberts, CT, Daniel, CW. Altered expression of the WT1 Wilms tumor suppressor gene in human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul;94(15):8132–8137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, S, Socci, ND, Ambrosini, G, et al. Gene expression profiling of liposarcoma identifies distinct biological types/subtypes and potential therapeutic targets in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Cancer Res. 2007 Jul;67(14):6626–6636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirgi, KE, Wick, MR, Swanson, PE. B72.3 and CD34 immunoreactivity in malignant epithelioid soft tissue tumors: adjuncts in the recognition of endothelial neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Feb;17(2):179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirvent, N, Coindre, JM, Maire, G, et al. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Oct;31(10):1476–1489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, AJ, Chatten, J, Bertoni, F, et al. CD99 (p30/32MIC2) neuroectodermal/Ewing’s sarcoma antigen as an immunohistochemical marker: review of more than 600 tumors and the literature experience. Appl Immunohistochem. 1994 ;2:231–237.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, T, Mine, H, Horii, Y, et al. Neuroblastoma cell lines showing smooth muscle cell phenotypes. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2000 Dec;9(4):221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takada, J, Ishii, S, Ohta, T, et al. Usefulness of a novel monoclonal antibody against human osteocalcin in immunohistochemical diagnosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1992;420(6):507–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeton, SF, Solomon, AR. Spindle cell lipoma is strongly CD34 positive: an immunohistochemical study. J Cutan Pathol. 1996 Dec;23(6):546–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traweek, ST, Kandalaft, PL, Mehta, P, Battifora, H. The human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen (CD34) in vascular neoplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jul;96(1):25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Rijn, M, Barr, FG, Xiong, QB, Hedges, M, Shipley, J, Fisher, C. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma: an analysis of clinical, pathologic, and molecular genetic features. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Jan;23(1):106–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, SW, Langloss, JM, Enzinger, FM. Value of S-100 protein in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors with particular reference to benign and malignant Schwann cell tumors. Lab Invest. 1983 Sep;49(3):299–308.Google Scholar
Wick, MR, Manivel, JC. Epithelioid sarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: an immunocytochemical and lectin-histochemical comparison. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1987; 410(4):309–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmore-Payne, C, Holden, JA, Tripp, S, Layfield, LJ. Human malignant melanoma: detection of BRAF- and c-kit-activating mutations by high-resolution amplicon melting analysis. Hum Pathol. 2005 May;36(5):486–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmore-Payne, C, Layfield, LJ, Holden, JA. c-KIT mutation analysis for diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in fine needle aspiration specimens. Cancer. 2005 Jun;105(3):165–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmore-Payne, C, Holden, JA, Chadwick, BE, Layfield, LJ. Detection of c-kit exons 11- and 17-activating mutations in testicular seminomas by high-resolution melting amplicon analysis. Mod Pathol. 2006 Sep;19(9):1164–1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmore-Payne, C, Holden, J, Turner, KC, Proia, A, Layfield, LJ. Translocations and amplifications of chromosome 12 in liposarcoma demonstrated by the LSI CHOP breakapart rearrangement probe. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jun;132(6):952–957.Google ScholarPubMed
Yantiss, RK, Spiro, IJ, Compton, CC, Rosenberg, AE. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor versus intra-abdominal fibromatosis of the bowel wall: a clinically important differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Jul;24(7):947–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×