Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T10:10:33.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Negotiating with the nation: petitions and the language of appeal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Get access

Summary

To the Honble The Principal Officers, and Commissioners of His Majesty's Navy

The humble Petition of Rachel Sershall, Sheweth, That your petitioner is the Widow of Ralph Sershall, formerly Master Bricklayer of Plymouth Yard, and Mother of William Sershall, late Master Bricklayer of the same yard.

That she is become ancient and feeble, past struggling with the hardships of Life, and now by the loss of her Son her grey hairs are drooping with Sorrow to the Earth …

Therefore the Petitioner most humbly implores your Honours will be pleased to grant her a Servant in said Yard to support her against the extremities of Want.

Petition of Mrs Rachel Sershall, 13 August 1749

Petitioning was common practice in eighteenth-century Britain. Petitions ranged from appeals to parishes for poor relief, to applications to the King for pardon from execution. Naval and military petitions were an important subset. Army officers sent in their memorials for promotion, and similarly their naval brothers wrote to request a higher commission or a place on a larger ship. These men did so out of a sense of entitlement and in consideration of their service. For officers, however, it was often a case of who you knew, rather than what you knew. Men of the officer class drew heavily on their family and naval networks to advance their career, as we have seen, with varying degrees of frustration and success. Yet what about the vast majority who were not commissioned officers: common sailors and dockyard workers? The voices of these men and their families are seldom heard, lost to the historian by their lack of literacy and the scarcity of surviving correspondence. This group did not usually have the luxury of appealing to a relative, patron or family friend to advance their career or have their needs met. Instead, these men and women appealed or petitioned directly to the Admiralty Board or the Navy Board.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×