Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:19:31.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2020

Christian Joppke
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Neoliberal Nationalism
Immigration and the Rise of the Populist Right
, pp. 284 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrajano, Marisa. 2014. “Will Immigration Spark a White Backlash in America?Issues in Governance Studies 67, 17.Google Scholar
Abrajano, Marisa and Hajnal, Zoltan L.. 2015. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Abts, Koen and Rummens, Stefan. 2007. “Populism versus Democracy,” Political Studies 55, 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Laban, Yasmeen and Gabriel, Christina. 2002. Selling Diversity: Immigration, Multiculturalism, Employment Equity, and Globalization. Peterborough (Ontario): Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Afonso, Alexandre and Rennwald, Line. 2018. “Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe,” in Manow, Philip, Palier, Bruno, and Schwander, Hanna, eds. Welfare Democracies and Party Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1995. Homo Sacer. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Muneer I. 2017. “Beyond Earned Citizenship,” Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review 52, 257304.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Tjitske. 2005. “Anti-immigrant Parties and the Defence of Liberal Values,” Journal of Political Ideologies 10(3), 337–54.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Tjitske. 2018. The Impact of Populist Radical-Right Parties on Immigration Policy Agendas: A Look at the Netherlands. Washington, DC.: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, Alexander. 1986. “Theories of Loss of Citizenship,” Michigan Law Review 84(7), 1471–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, James. 2015. “The Major Ideologies of Liberalism, Socialism, and Conservatism,” Political Studies 63(5), 980–94.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robin. 2017. Die Getriebenen: Merkel und die Flüchtlingspolitik. München: Siedler.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2018. “The Myth of the Liberal Order,” Foreign Affairs July/August, 124–33.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2013. Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2015. “’Heads I Win. Tails You Lose’: Migration and the Worker Citizen,” Current Legal Problems 68, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109(2), 287337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 2019. “Situationism À L’Envers?New Left Review 119, 4793.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1948. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcort Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Art, David. 2011. Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-immigrant Parties in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai. 2019. “‘Don’t Mention the War!’ How Populist Right-Wing Radicalism Became (Almost) Normal in Germany,” Journal of Common Market Studies 57, 90102.Google Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai and Berning, Carl. 2019. “How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Their Voters Veered to the Radical Right, 2013–2017,” Electoral Studies 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askola, Heli. 2020. “Copying Europe? Integration as a Citizenship Requirement in Australia,” International Migration Review. doi.org/10.1177/0197918320902042.Google Scholar
Atasoy, Ahmet, Atmaca, Delal, Choi, Sun-jo, et al. 2016. Impulspapier der Migrant*innenorganisationen zur Teilhabe in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Berlin.Google Scholar
Australian Government. 2017. Strengthening the Test for Australian Citizenship. Canberra.Google Scholar
Azoulai, Loïc. 2017. “Transfiguring European Citizenship: From Member State Territory to Union Territory,” in Kochenov, Dimitry, ed. EU Citizenship and Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Badenhoop, Elisabeth. 2017. “Calling for the Super Citizen: Citizenship Ceremonies in the UK and Germany as Techniques of Subject-Formation,” Migration Studies 5(3), 409–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, Alex. 2009. “Labour and Epistemic Communities: The Case of ‘Managed Migration’ in the UK,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11, 613–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Gregory and Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2015. “Migrants into Members: Social Rights, Civic Requirements, and Citizenship in Western Europe,” West European Studies 38(6), 1152–73.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2016. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2019. The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim. 2003. “Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarizing Party Systems,” West European Politics 26(3), 6790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, Tim. 2008. “Turning Round the Telescope: Centre-Right Parties and Immigration and Integration Policy in Europe,” Journal of European Public Policy 15(3), 315–30.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim. 2014a. “More and More Restrictive–But Not Always Populist: Explaining Variation in the British Conservative Party’s Stance on Immigration and Asylum,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 21(1), 2537.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim. 2014b. “Putting It Right? The Labour Party’s Big Shift on Immigration since 2010,” The Political Quarterly 85(3), 296303.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim, Hampshire, James and Partos, Rebecca. 2011. “Having One’s Cake and Eating It Too: Cameron’s Conservatives and Immigration,” The Political Quarterly 82(3), 398406.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith. 2014. “Transatlantic Convergence? The Archeology of Immigrant Integration in Canada and Europe,” International Journal 69(1), 6684.Google Scholar
Barbulescu, Roxana. 2014. “Global Mobility Corridors for the Ultra-Rich: The Neoliberal Transformation of Citizenship,” in Shachar, Ayelet and Bauböck, Rainer, eds. Should Citizenship Be for Sale? Florence: EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2014/01.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa. 2018. Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1992. “The Quest for Consistency: A Skeptical View,” in Barry, B. and Goodin, R., eds. Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano. 2018. The Political. Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 1994. Transnational Citizenship. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2014. “What Is Wrong with Selling Citizenship? It Corrupts Democracy,” in Shachar, Ayelet and Bauböck, Rainer, eds. Should Citizenship Be for Sale? Florence: EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2014/01.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer and Joppke, Christian, eds. 2010. How Liberal Are Citizenship Tests? Florence: EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2010/41.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, Waldrauch, Harald, Ersbøll, Eva, and Groenendijk, Kees, eds. 2006. Acquisition and Loss of Nationality. Volume 1: Comparative Analyses. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Bech, Emily Cochran, Borevi, Karin, and Mouritsen, Per. 2017. “A ‘Civic Turn’ in Scandinavian Family Migration Policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden,” Comparative Migration Studies 5:7 (DOI: 10.1186/s40878–016-0046-7), 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, Ulrich. 1983. “Jenseits von Stand und Klasse?” in Reinhard Kreckel, ed. “Soziale Ungleichheiten,” Soziale Welt (special issue no.2), 35–74.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Knut, Diermeier, Matthias, and Niehues, Judith. 2017. “Die AfD: Eine Partei der sich ausgeliefert fühlenden Durchschnittsverdiener?” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen no.1, 57–75.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Alexander and Collier, Paul. 2017. Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. 2011. “Governance and Governmentality after Neoliberalism,” Policy and Politics 39(4), 457–71.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1984. “Incentives and Disincentives: International Migration,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 120(4), 678701.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2004. In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1973. “Citizenship in the American Constitution,” Arizona Law Review 5, 369–87.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher and Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi. 2017. “Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20(2), 186206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birrell, Bob. 2017. The Coalition’s 457 Visa Reset: Tougher than You Think. The Australian Population Research Institute, Research Report, Monash University, Victoria, September.Google Scholar
Bither, Jessica and Ziebarth, Astrid. 2018. Creating Legal Pathways to Reduce Irregular Migration? What We Can Learn from Germany’s “Western Balkan Regulation.” German Marshall Fund, Migration Strategy Group.Google Scholar
Blauberger, Michael, Heindlmaier, Anita, Krame, Dionr et al. 2018. “ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers: Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence,” Journal of European Public Policy 25(10), 1422–41.Google Scholar
Block, Fred and Somers, Margaret R.. 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi’s Critique. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bloemraad, Irene, Kymlicka, Will, Lamont, Michèle, and Hing, Leanne Son. 2019. “Membership without Social Citizenship? Deservingness and Redistribution as Grounds for Equality,” Daedalus 148(3), 73104.Google Scholar
Block, Laura and Bonjour, Saskia. 2013. “Fortress Europe or Europe of Rights? The Europeanization of Family Migration Policies in France, Germany and the Netherlands,” European Journal of Migration and Law 15, 203–24.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Noberto. 1996. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Böhm, Veronika. 2017. “’Fördern und Fordern’ als Integrationskonzept,” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 37(5–6), 208–13.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. 1976. Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit. Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
Böcker, Anita and Strik, Tineke. 2011. “Language and Knowledge Tests for Permanent Residence Rights: Help or Hindrance for Integration?European Journal of Migration and Law 13, 157–84.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia. 2013. “Governing Diversity,” Citizenship Studies 17(6–7), 837–51.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia. 2014. “The Transfer of Pre-departure Integration Requirements for Family Migrants among Member States of the European Union,” Comparative Migration Studies 2(2), 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and Kraler, Albert. 2015. “Introduction: Family Migration as an Integration Issue?Journal of Family Issues 36(11), 1407–32.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia, Servent, Ariadna Ripoli and Thielemann, Eiko. 2018. “Beyond Venue Shopping and Liberal Constraint: A New Research Agenda for EU Migration Policies and Politics,” Journal of European Public Policy 25(3), 409–21.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and Block, Laura. 2016. “Ethnicizing Citizenship, Questioning Membership: Explaining the Decreasing Family Rights of Citizens in Europe,” Citizenship Studies 20(6–7), 779–94.Google Scholar
Bos, Ellen and Pállinger, Zoltán Tibor. 2018. Die Parlamentswahl in Ungarn 2018. MIDEM-Bericht 2018/2, Dresden.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 2017. “Status Non-Citizens,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boswell, Christina and Hampshire, James. 2017. “Ideas and Agency in Immigration Policy,” European Journal of Political Research 56, 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Anna and Gest, Justin. 2018. Crossroads: Comparative Immigration Regimes in a World of Demographic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.Google Scholar
Boyd, Monica. 2014. “Recruiting High Skill Labour in North America: Policies, Outcomes and Futures,” International Migration 52(3), 4053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brochmann, Grete. 2013. Country Report: Norway. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Bröckling, Ulrich. 2007. Das unternehmerische Selbst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1995. “Comments on ‘Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States’,” International Migration Review 29(4), 903–8.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1998. “Myths and Misconceptions in the Study of Nationalism,” in Hall, John,ed. The State of the Nation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2012. “Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(1), 18.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2017a. “Why Populism?Theory and Society 46(5), 357–85.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2017b. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(8), 1191–226.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2019. “Populism and Nationalism,” Nations and Nationalism (DOI: 10.1111/nana.12522), 1–23.Google Scholar
Brücker, Herbert. 2018. “Labour Market Integration of Refugees Gains Momentum,” IAB-Forum. Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeits- und Berufsforschung, October 17.Google Scholar
Bullough, Oliver. 2018. Money Land. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius, Rathgeb, Philip, and Sahn, Alexander. 2019. Authoritarian Values and the Welfare State: The Social Policy Preferences of Radical Right Voters. University of Konstanz (unpublished paper, in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Butterwegge, Christoph, Hentges, Gudrun, and Wiegel, Gerd. 2018. Rechtspopulisten im Parlament: Polemik, Agitation und Propaganda der AfD. Frankfurt am Main: Westend.Google Scholar
Buzdugan, Raluca and Halli, Shiva S.. 2009. “Labor Market Experiences of Canadian Immigrants with Focus on Foreign Education and Experience,” International Migration Review 43(2), 366–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Bridget. 2014. Making Citizens: Public Rituals and Personal Journeys to Citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cahill, Damien and Konings, Martijn. 2017. Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bradley and Manning, Jason. 2014. “Microaggression and Moral Cultures,” Comparative Sociology 13(6), 692726.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2018. American Discontent: The Rise of Donald Trump and Decline of the Golden Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy,” Political Studies 47, 216.Google Scholar
Caramani, Daniele. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government,” American Political Science Review 111(1), 5467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Careja, Roman, Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian, Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen, and Larsen, Erik Gahner 2016. “Direct and Indirect Welfare Chauvinism as Party Strategies: An Analysis of the Danish People’s Party,” Scandinavian Political Studies 39(4), 435–57.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Daniel and Jesse, Moritz. 2018. “The ‘Dano Evolution’: Assessing Legal Integration and Access to Social Benefits for EU Citizens,” European Papers 3(3), 1179–208.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A. and Cohen, Joseph N.. 2012. “The Arc of Neoliberalism,” Annual Review of Sociology 38, 317–40.Google Scholar
Cerna, Lucie. 2016a. Immigration Policies and the Global Competition for Talent. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cerna, Lucie. 2016b. “The Crisis as an Opportunity for Change? High-Skilled Immigration Policies Across Europe,” Journal for Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(10), 1610–30.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. 2008. “Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm,” The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 2(1), 146.Google Scholar
Chacón, Jennifer N. 2017. “Immigration and the Bully Pulpit,” Harvard Law Review Forum 130(7), 243–68.Google Scholar
Chacón, Jennifer N. 2018. “Citizenship Matters,” UC Davis Law Review 52(1), 180.Google Scholar
Charsley, Katherine and Bolognani, Marta, with Spencer, Sarah. 2017. “Marriage Migration and Integration,” Ethnicities 17(4), 469–90.Google Scholar
Chen, Xiaobei and Thorpe, Sherry Xiaohan. 2015. “Temporary Families? The Parent and Grandparent Sponsorship Program and the Neoliberal Regime of Immigration Governance in Canada,” Migration, Mobility, and Displacement 1(1), 8198.Google Scholar
Chishti, Muzaffar and Bolter, Jessica. 2018. “Family Separation and ‘Zero Tolerance’ Policies Rolled Out to Stem Unwanted Migrants, but May Face Challenges,” Migration Policy Institute (Washington, DC.), May 24.Google Scholar
Chishti, Muzaffar and Pierce, Sarah. 2016. “Republican and Democratic Party Platforms Reflect Parallel Universes on Immigration Policy,” Migration Policy Institute (Washington, DC.), July 28.Google Scholar
Chishti, Muzaffar, Pierce, Sarah, and Bolter, Jessica. 2018. “Even as Congress Remains on Sidelines, the Trump Administration Slows Legal Immigration,” Migration Policy Institute (Washington, DC.), March 22.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Goodwin, Matthew, and Whiteley, Paul. 2017. Brexit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2017. “Trump’s Travel Bans–Look Beyond the Text,” New York Review of Books, May 11.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2018. “The Supreme Court’s First Great Trump Test: The Muslim Ban,” New York Review of Books, April 23.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff and Keohane, Robert. 2017. “The Liberal Order is Rigged,” Foreign Affairs, May–June.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul. 2013. Exodus: How Migration Is Changing Our World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul. 2018. The Future of Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Consterdine, Erica. 2015. “Managed Migration under Labour: Organised Public, Party Ideology and Policy Change,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(9), 1433–52.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. 1816. The Liberty of Ancients Compared with That of Moderns (www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/constant1819.pdf).Google Scholar
Cook-Martin, David. 2019. “Temp Nations? A Research Agenda on Migration, Temporariness, and Membership,” American Behavioral Scientist 63(9), 1389–403.Google Scholar
Cooper, Melinda. 2017. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (EU). 2004. Immigrant Integration Policy in the European Union. Brussels, November 119, 14615/04, pp.1524.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crick Commission. 2003. The New and the Old. The Report of the “Life in the United Kingdom” Advisory Group. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Czaika, Mathias. 2018. “High-Skilled Migration: Introduction and Synopsis,” in Czaika, M., ed. High-Skilled Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Czaika, Mathias and Parsons, Christopher. 2018. “High-Skilled Migration in Times of Global Economic Crisis,” in Czaika, M., ed. High-Skilled Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahme, Heinz-Jürgen and Wohlfahrt, Norbert. 2003. “Aktivierungspolitik und der Umbau des Sozialstaates,” in Dahme, H. J., Otto, Hans-Uwe, Trube, Achim, and Wohlfahrt, Norbert, eds. Soziale Arbeit für den aktivierenden Staat. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela and Margalit, Yotam. 2019. “The Evolution of the Immigration Debate,” Comparative Political Studies (advance electronic publication), pp.1–41.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine. 2016. The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine and Marsden, Sarah. 2014. “Beyond Numbers versus Rights: Shifting the Parameters on Temporary Labour Migration,” International Migration and Integration 15, 525–45.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth. 2005. “‘Any Place I Hang My Hat?’ or: Residence Is the New Nationality,” European Law Journal 11(1), 4356.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth. 2018. “Has the Court Changed, or Have the Cases? The Deservingness of Litigants as an Element in Court of Justice Citizenship Adjudication,” Journal of European Public Policy 25(10), 1442–60.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F. 2009. Managed by the Market: How Finance Reshaped America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Benoist, Alain. 2017[1985]. Kulturrevolution von rechts. Dresden: Jungeuropa Verlag.Google Scholar
de Haas, Hein, Natter, Katharina, and Vezzoli, Simona. 2016. “Growing Restrictiveness or Changing Selection? The Nature and Evolution of Migration Policies,” International Migration Review 52(2), 324–67.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine and Hoffmann, Isabell. 2016. Fear Not Values: Public Opinion and the Populist Vote in Europe. Eupinions #2016/3, Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick. 2018. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dennison, James and Geddes, Andrew. 2018. “Brexit and the Perils of ‘Europeanised’ Migration,” Journal of European Public Policy 25(8), 1137–53.Google Scholar
Desiderio, Maria Vincenza and Hooper, Kate. 2016. The Canadian Expression of Interest System: A Model to Manage Skilled Migration to the European Union? Brussels: Migration Policy Institute (MPI) Europe.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, John. 2009. “The Myth of the Autocratic Revival: Why Liberal Democracy Will Prevail,” Foreign Affairs 88(1), pp.77ff.Google Scholar
di Fabio, Udo. 2016. Migrationskrise als föderales Verfassungsproblem: Gutachten im Auftrag des Freistaats Bayern. www.bayern.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Gutachten_Bay_DiFabio_formatiert.pdf.Google Scholar
Dietz, Martin and Walwei, Ulrich. 2008. “Hartz IV: Reform der Reform?” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte no.1–2, 31–8.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1984[1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duru, Deniz Neriman and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2017. “From Diversity to Conviviality: Intra-EU Mobility and International Migration to Denmark in Times of Economic Recession,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(4), 613–32.Google Scholar
Dustmann, Christian, Fitzenberger, Bernd, Schönberg, Uta, and Spitz-Oener, Alexandra. 2014. “From Sick Man of Europe to Economic Superstar,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1), 167–88.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. “Liberalism,” in Dworkin, R.. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
DWP (Department for Work and Pensions, UK). 2010. Universal Credit: Welfare That Works. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (Department of Work and Pensions). 2014. The Benefit Cap: A Review of the First Year. London: HMSO (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/386911/benefit-cap-review-of-the-first-year.pdf).Google Scholar
Dwyer, Peter and Wright, Sharon. 2014. “Universal Credit, Ubiquitous Conditionality and Its Implications for Social Citizenship,” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 22(1), 2735.Google Scholar
Eakin, Hugh. 2016. “Liberal, Harsh Denmark,” New York Review of Books, March 10.Google Scholar
EC (European Commission, Home Affairs). 2012. Immigration of International Students to the EU. Brussels.Google Scholar
Eger, Maureen A. and Valdez, Sarah. 2015. “Neo-Nationalism in Western Europe,” European Sociological Review 31(1), 115–30.Google Scholar
Eggleston, W. Neil and Elbogen, Amanda. 2018. “The Trump Administration and the Breakdown of Intra-Executive Legal Process,” The Yale Law Journal Forum, February 16, 825–47.Google Scholar
Ehsan, Rakib. 2017. “Inside the British Asian Brexit Vote,” The Conversation, February 16.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 2018. The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eichenhofer, Johannes. 2016. “Integrationsgesetzgebung,” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 36(8), 251–62.Google Scholar
Eiermann, Martin, Mounk, Yascha, and Gultchin, Limor. 2017. European Populism: Trends, Threats and Future Prospects. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (https://institute.global/insight/renewing-centre/european-populism-trends-threats-and-future-prospects).Google Scholar
Ekins, Richard, Hennessey, Patrick, Mahmood, Khalid, and Tugendhat, Tom. 2018. Aiding the Enemy: How and Why to Restore the Law of Treason. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Elias, Stella Burch. 2016. “Testing Citizenship,” Boston University Law Review 96, 2095–171.Google Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2007. States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2013. “When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration? Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany,” World Politics 65(3), 491538.Google Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2019a. “Human-Capital Citizenship and the Changing Logic of Immigrant Admissions,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561062), 1–18.Google Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2019b. “Discrimination in Migration and Citizenship,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561053).Google Scholar
Ellermann, Antje and Gorokhovskaia, Yana. 2019. “The Impermanence of Permanence: The Rise of Probationary Immigration in Canada,” International Migration (advance electronic publication), 1–16.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick and Careja, Romana. 2012. “From Dilemma to Dualization: Social and Migration Policies in the ‘Reluctant Countries of Immigration,’” in Emmenegger, P., Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Martin Seeleib-Kaiser, eds. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2018. “Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles,” Social Policy and Administration 52(1), 293314.Google Scholar
Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. 1994. “The Great Migration,” in H.M. Enzensberger. Civil Wars: From L.A. to Bosnia. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Ersbøll, Eva. 2015. Report on Citizenship Law: Denmark. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton Univesity Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016. Action Plan on the Integration of Third Country Nationals. Brussels: COM(2016) 377 final.Google Scholar
Evers, Adalbert. 2000. “Aktivierender Staat,” in Mezger, Erika and West, Klaus-W., eds. Aktivierender Sozialstaat und politisches Handeln. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Menon, Anand. 2017. Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. and Sewell, William H. Jr. 2013. “Neoliberalism: Policy Regimes, International Regimes, and Social Effects,” in Hall, Peter and Lamont, Michèle, eds. Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everson, Michelle. 1995. “The Legacy of the Market Citizen,” in Shaw, Jo and More, Gillian, eds. The New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, François. 1989. “Die Versicherungs-Gesellschaft,” Kritische Justiz, 385–93.Google Scholar
Farahat, Anuscheh. 2016. “Solidarität und Inklusion: Umstrittene Dimensionen der Unionsbürgerschaft,” Die öffentliche Verwaltung 69(2), 4555.Google Scholar
Fargues, Émilien. 2017. “The Revival of Citizenship Deprivation in France and the UK as an Instance of Citizenship Renationalisation,” Citizenship Studies 21(8), 984–8.Google Scholar
Fargues, Émilien. 2019a. Exclu.e.s de la naturalisation: Analyse des frontières de la ‘communauté nationale’ en France et au Royaume-Uni. Doctoral Dissertation, SciencesPo, Paris, December.Google Scholar
Fargues, Émilien. 2019b. “Simply a Matter of Compliance with the Rules? The Moralising and Responsibilising Function of Fraud-Based Citizenship Deprivation in France and the UK,” Citizenship Studies 23(4), 356–71.Google Scholar
Fassin, Eric. 2009. “‘Immigration subie: L’invention d’un problème,” Le Monde Diplomatique, November.Google Scholar
Favell, Adrian. 2015. Immigration, Integration and Mobility. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Favell, Adrian. 2016. “Just like the USA? Critical Notes on Alba and Foner’s Cross-Atlantic Research Agenda,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39(1), 2352–60.Google Scholar
Favell, Adrian. 2019. “Integration: Twelve Propositions after Schinkel,” Comparative Migration Studies 7:21 (doi.org/10.1186/s40878–019-0125-7).Google Scholar
Favell, Adrian and Barbulescu, Roxana. 2018. “Brexit, ‘Immigration’ and Anti-discrimination,” in Diamond, Patrick, Nedergaard, Peter, and Rosamond, Ben, eds. The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
FAZ-Wahlanalyse. 2017. “Merkel und die Koalition der Zufriedenen,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 25 (www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/f-a-z-wahlanalyse-merkel-und-die-koalition-der-zufriedenen-15206260.html).Google Scholar
Fenger, Menno. 2018. “The Social Policy Agendas of Populist Radical Right Parties in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 34(3), 188209.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1994. “Dai diritti del cittadino ai diritti della persona,” in Zolo, Danilo, ed. La cittadinanza. Rome and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Finchelstein, Gilles. 2017. “Post mortem: Raison et déraison du débat sur la déchéance de nationalité,” Pouvoirs 160, 99112.Google Scholar
Finotelli, Claudia and Kolb, Holger. 2015. “‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ Reconsidered: A Comparison of German, Canadian and Spanish Labour Migration Policies,” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis (DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095429), 1–15.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, David, Cook-Martin, David, Garcia, Angela, and Arar, Rawan. 2018. “Can You Become One of Us? A Historical Comparison of Legal Selection of ‘Assimilable’ Immigrants in Europe and the Americas,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(1), 2747.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George. 1987. “Law and Morality: A Kantian Perspective,” Columbia Law Review 87, 533–58.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George. 1993. Loyalty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 2008. Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FN (Front National). 2017. Marine 2017: 144 engagements présidentiels. (https://rassemblementnational.fr/pdf/144-engagements.pdf).Google Scholar
Forcier, Mathieu and Dufour, Frédérick Guillaume. 2016. “Immigration, Neoconservatism and Neoliberalism: The New Canadian Citizenship Regime in the Light of European Trajectories,” Cogent Social Sciences 2(1), 118.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert and Goodwin, Matthew. 2014. Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, Jennings, Will, and Somerville, Will. 2015. “Public Opinion, Responsiveness and Constraint: Britain’s Three Immigration Policy Regimes,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(9), 1391–411.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fourastié, Jean. 1979. Les Trente glorieuses ou La révolution invisible de 1946 à 1975. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah L.. 2002. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries,” American Journal of Sociology 103(3), 533–79.Google Scholar
FPÖ. 2017. Österreicher verdienen Fairness: Freiheitliches Wahlprogramm zur Nationalratswahl 2017. Vienna (www.fpoe.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Wahlprogramm_8_9_low.pdf).Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2017. Listen, Liberal. Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Ruth, ed. 1997. Displacing Whiteness. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2017. “The End of Progressive Neoliberalism,” Dissent Magazine, January 25.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1998. “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?Political Studies 46(4), 751–4.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2017. “After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology,” Journal of Political Ideologies 22(1), 111.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1994. “Britain, the Deviant Case,” in Cornelius, Wayne, Martin, Philip, and Hollified, James, eds. Controlling Immigration. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States,” International Migration Review 29(4), 881902.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B. 2006. “People Flows in Globalization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2), 145–70.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl Joachim. 1955. “The Political Thought of Neo-Liberalism,” American Political Science Review 49, 509–24.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History?” The National Interest, summer, 1–18.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gärditz, Klaus Ferdinand. 2013. “Der Bürgerstatus im Lichte von Migration und europäischer Integration,” Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer (VVDStRL) 72, 50156.Google Scholar
Gärditz, Klaus Ferdinand and Wallrabenstein, Astrid. 2019. “Staatsangehörigkeit in Geiselhaft,” Verfassungsblog (verfassungsblog.de/staatsangehoerigkeit-in-geiselhaft/).Google Scholar
Galston, William. 2018. “The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy,” Journal of Democracy 29(2), 519.Google Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 1988. The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 2006. “Two Faces of Neo-Liberalism,” in Robison, Richard, ed. The Neo-Liberal Revolution: Forging the Market State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2013. “Penalty and the Penal State,” Criminology 51(3), 475516.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2014. “The Welfare State: A Fundamental Dimension of Modern Government,” European Journal of Sociology 55(3), 327–64.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2018. “Liberalism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, revised version of January 22. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/Google Scholar
Geddes, Andrew. 2014. “The EU, UKIP and the Politics of Immigration in Britain,” The Political Quarterly 85(3), 289–95.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Genschel, Philipp and Seelkopf, Laura. 2015. “The Competition State: The Modern State in a Global Economy,” in Leibfried, Stephan, Huber, Evelyne, Lange, Matthew, Levy, Jonah, and Stephens, John, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
German Interior Ministry. 2018. Masterplan Migration: Massnahmen zur Ordnung, Steuerung und Begrenzung der Zuwanderung. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat.Google Scholar
Gibney, Matthew. 2013. “Should Citizenship Be Conditional? The Ethics of Denationalization,” The Journal of Politics 75(3), 646–58.Google Scholar
Gibney, Matthew. 2017. “Denationalization,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. Oxford Handbook on Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibney, Matthew. 2019. “Denationalisation and Discrimination,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561065.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1999. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gidron, Noam and Hall, Peter. 2017. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right,” British Journal of Sociology 68(S1), S57S84.Google Scholar
Goodhart, David. 2013. The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-War Immigration. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Goodhart, David. 2017. The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1992. “If People Were Money…” in Barry, B. and Goodin, R., eds. Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. New York: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2012. “Fortifying Citizenship: Policy Strategies for Civic Integration in Western Europe,” World Politics 64(4), 659–98.Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2014. Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Matthew and Milazzo, Caitlin. 2017. “Taking Back Control? Investigating the Role of Immigration in the 2016 Vote for Brexit,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3), 459–64.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy. 1983. The Refugee in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, 2014. Deprivation of Citizenship Resulting in Statelessness and Its Implications in International Law: Opinion. Unpublished paper (in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2016. “Why Do Evangelists Vote for Trump?” The Immanent Frame, October 4 (https://tif.ssrc.org/2016/10/04/why-do-evangelicals-vote-for-trump/).Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2017. “Why Evangelists Voted for Trump: A Critical Cultural Sociology,” American Journal of Cultural Sociology (doi: 10.1057/s41290-017-0043-9).Google Scholar
Gosewinkel, Dieter. 2016. Schutz und Freiheit? Staatsbürgerschaft in Europa im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Green, Simon. 2013. “Germany: A Changing Country of Immigration,” German Politics 22(3), 333–51.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Kees. 2006. “Family Reunification as a Right under Community Law,” European Journal of Migration and Law 8, 215–30.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Kees. 2011. “Pre-departure Integration Strategies in the European Union: Integration or Immigration Policy?European Journal of Migration and Law 13, 130.Google Scholar
Gross, Thomas. 2007. “Das deutsche Integrationskonzept–vom Fördern zum Fordern? Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 27(9), 315–20.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1994. “Struggle for Recognition in the Democratic-Constitutional State,” in Gutmann, Amy, ed. Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2019. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States,” Politics and Society 38(2), 152204.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2016. “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism,” The American Prospect 12(1) (www.the-american-interest.com/2016/07/10/when-and-why-nationalism-beats-globalism/).Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay and Farahat, Anuscheh. 2015. Country Report on Citizenship Law: Germany. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay and Thym, Daniel. 2016. “Grenzenloses Asylrecht? Die Flüchtlingskrise als Problem europäischer Rechtsintegration,” Juristenzeitung 71(15/16), 753–63.Google Scholar
Halikiopoulou, Daphne, Mock, Steven, and Vasilopoulou, Sofia. 2013. “The Civic Zeitgeist: Nationalism and Liberal Values in the European Radical Right,” Nations and Nationalism 19(1), 107–27.Google Scholar
Hampshire, James. 2013. The Politics of Immigration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hampshire, James and Bale, Tim. 2015. “New Administration, New Immigration Regime: Do Parties Matter After All? A UK Case Study,” West European Politics 38(1), 145–66.Google Scholar
Hansen, Randall. 2010. “Citizenship Tests: An Unapologetic Defense,” in Bauböck and Joppke, eds. (2010).Google Scholar
Hansen, Randall. 2014. “Paradigm and Policy Shifts: British Immigration Policy, 1997–2011,” in Hollifield, James, Martin, Philip, and Orrenius, Pia, eds. Controlling Immigration (3rd ed.). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Randall. 2017. Constrained by Its Roots: How the Origins of the Global Asylum System Limit Contemporary Protection. Washington, DC.: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Harpaz, Yossi. 2019. Citizenship 2.0: Dual Nationality as a Global Asset. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Neville. 2016. “Demagnetisation of Social Security and Health Care for Migrants to the UK,” European Journal of Social Security 18(2), 130–63.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1982. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heindlmaier, Anita and Blauberger, Michael. 2017. “Enter at Your Own Risk: Free Movement of EU Citizens in Practice,” West European Politics 40(6), 1198–217.Google Scholar
Heinisch, Reinhard. 2003. “Success in Opposition–Failure in Government: Explaining the Performance of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Office,” West European Politics 26(3), 91130.Google Scholar
Heins, Volker and Çopur, Burak. 2013. “Willkommenskultur: Eine ethische Wende in der Zuwanderungspolitik?” in Bieber, Christoph, ed. Ethik und Politikmanagement. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Helbling, Marc and Kalkum, Dorina. 2018. “Migration Policy Trends in OECD Countries,” Journal of European Public Policy 25(12), 1779–97.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, Anton. 2013. Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henley and Partners. 2019. Henley Passport Index and Global Mobility Report. www.henleypassportindex.com/assets/2019/Q3/HPI%20Report%20190701.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hollifield, Jim, Héran, François, Martin, Philip, and Orrenius, Pia. 2019. Introduction: The Dilemmas of Immigration Control (typescript, in author’s possession). For a new edition of Controlling Immigration (Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press, to be published around 2021).Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2002. Secure Borders, Safe Haven. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2005. Controlling Our Borders. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2006. A Points-Based System: Making Migration Work for Britain. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2008a. The Path to Citizenship. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2008b. Earning the Right to Stay: A New Points Test for Citizenship. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (UK). 2018. The UK’s Future Skills-Based Immigration System. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadow of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Honohan, Iseult. 2009. “Reconsidering the Claim to Family Reunification for Migration,” Political Studies 57, 768–87.Google Scholar
Honohan, Iseult. 2017. “Liberal and Republican Concepts of Citizenship,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for all Seasons?Public Administration 69, 319.Google Scholar
Hopkin, Jonathan and Blyth, Mark. 2019. “The Global Economics of European Populism: Growth Regimes and Party System Change in Europe,” Government and Opposition 54(2), 193225.Google Scholar
Houdt, Friso van, Suvarierol, Semin, and Schinkel, Willem. 2011. “Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends towards ‘Earned Citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands,” International Sociology 26(3), 408–32.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John. 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?International Affairs 94(1), 723.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper RWP16–026, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Irving, Helen. 2019. “The Concept of Allegiance in Citizenship Law and Revocation: An Australian Study,” Citizenship Studies 23(4), 372–87.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth. 2008. “What Unites Right-Wing Populists in Western Europe?Comparative Political Studies 41(1), 323.Google Scholar
Jacobson, David. 1996. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobs, Günther. 2004. “Bürgerstrafrecht und Feindstrafrecht,” HRRS-Onlinezeitschrift für höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung zum Strafrecht, March, 88–95.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley. 2019. White Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jesse, Moritz. 2016. The Civic Citizens of Europe. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel Stedman. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. “Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration,” World Politics 50(2), 266–93Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2002. “European Immigration Policies at the Crossroads,” in Heywood, P., Jones, E. and Rhodes, M., eds. Developments in West European Politics 2. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2003. “Citizenship between De- and Re-ethnicization,” European Journal of Sociology 44(3), 429–58.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2004. “The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy,” British Journal of Sociology 55(2), 237–57.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2005a. Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2005b. “Exclusion in the Liberal State: The Case of Immigration and Citizenship Policy,” European Journal of Social Theory 8(1), 4361.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2007. “Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe,” West European Politics 30(1), 122.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2008. “Comparative Citizenship: A Restrictive Turn in Europe?Journal of Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2, 128–68.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2010a. Citizenship and Immigration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2010b. “The Inevitable Lightening of Citizenship,” European Journal of Sociology 51(1), 932.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2011. “European Immigration Policies: Still between Stemming and Soliciting,” in Heywood, Paul, Jones, Erik, Rhodes, Martin, and Sedelmeier, Ulrich, eds. Developments in European Politics 2. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2013. “Through the European Looking Glass: Citizenship Tests in the United States, Australia, and Canada,” Citizenship Studies 17(1), 115.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2014. “The Retreat Is Real–But what Is the Alternative? Multiculturalism, Muscular Liberalism, and Islam,” Constellations 21(2), 286–94.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2016. “Terror and the Loss of Citizenship,” Citizenship Studies 20(6–7), 728–48.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017a. “Citizenship in Immigration States,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017b. “Civic Integration in Western Europe: Three Debates.” West European Politics 40(6), 1153–76.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017c. Is Multiculturalism Dead? Crisis and Persistence in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017d. “Multiculturalism by Liberal Law: The Empowerment of Gays and Muslims,” European Journal of Sociology 58(1), 132.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017e. “Erst die Moral, dann das Fressen,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 8, p.6.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2018/19. “The Neonationalist Defense of Majority Culture: Themes, Actors, Policies,” Justice 62, 22–7.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2019. “The Instrumental Turn of Citizenship,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45(6), 858–78.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian and Torpey, John. 2013. Legal Integration of Islam: A Transatlantic Comparison. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Judis, John B. 2016. The Populist Explosion. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
Kälin, Christian. 2015. Citizenship by Investment and Economic Contribution to the State. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Zürich (typescript, in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 2011. Political Theology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics 1(1), 528.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 2009. “The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement,” Perspectives on Politics 7(4), 753–66.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1966. “Review of The Politics of Bureaucracy by Gordon Tullock,” Administrative Science Quarterly 11(3), 488–90.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric. 2018. Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration and the Future of White Majorities. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1949. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kevins, Anthony and van Kersbergen, Kees. 2019. “The Effects of Welfare State Universalism on Migrant Integration,” Policy and Politics 47(1), 115–31.Google Scholar
Keyes, Elizabeth. 2013. “Defining American: The DREAM Act, Immigration Reform and Citizenship,” Nevada Law Journal 14, 101–55.Google Scholar
King, Stephen D. 2017. Grave New World: The End of Globalization and Return of History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca. 2005. “The Unmaking of Citizens: Banishment and the Modern Citizenship Regime in France,” Citizenship Studies 9(1), 2340.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1957. “The Waning of Opposition in Parliamentary Regimes,” Social Research 24(2), 127–56.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and McGann, Anthony J.. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen, Landais, Camille, Saez, Emmanuel, and Schultz, Esben Anton. 2014. “Migration and Wage Effects of Taxing Top Earners: Evidence from the Foreigners’ Tax Scheme in Denmark,” The Quarterly Journal for Economics 129(1), 333–78.Google Scholar
Klos, Christian. 2013. “Aufenthaltsrecht vor dem Infarkt,” in Jochum, Georg, Fritzemeyer, Wolfgang, and Kau, Marcel, eds. Grenzüberschreitendes Recht–Crossing Frontiers. Festschrift für Kay Hailbronner. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry. 2014. “Citizenship for Real,” in Shachar, and Bauböck, (2014).Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, ed. 2017. EU Citizenship and Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry. 2019. Citizenship. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, Eleonore. 2004. “Family-Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30(2), 243–62.Google Scholar
Kofman, Eleonore, Rogoz, Madalina, and Lévey, Florence. 2010. Family Migration Policies in Europe. Unpublished manuscript, in author’s possession.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1939. “The Nature of Nationalism,” American Political Science Review 33(6), 1001–21.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kolb, Holger. 2014. “When Extremes Converge: German and Canadian Labor Migration Policy Compared,” Comparative Migration Studies 2(1), 5775.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2010. “Trade-Offs between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(1), 126.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2017. Assimilation oder Multikulturalismus? Berlin and Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2018. Cultural Rights and Native Majorities Between Universalism and Minority Rights. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB): Discussion Paper SP VI, 2018–106.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, Michalowski, Ines, and Waibel, Stine. 2012. “Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008,” American Journal of Sociology 117(4), 1202–45.Google Scholar
Koppetsch, Cornelia. 2019. Die Gesellschaft des Zorns: Rechtspopulismus im globalen Zeitalter. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Korean Immigration Service. 2017. The Medium and Long Term Immigration Policy of the Republic of Korea. Korean Ministry of the Interior, typescript (in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Koschorke, Albrecht. 2017. Populisten und Liberale. Presentation at the Conference, Wettbewerb der Narrative. Zur globalen Krise liberaler Erzählungen, Goethe Institut, Berlin, March (transcript, in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Koschorke, Albrecht. 2018. “Auf der anderen Seite des Grabens,” ZfL Blog (Leibniz-Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung, Berlin), August 30.Google Scholar
Koslowski, Rey. 2014. “Selective Migration Policy Models and Changing Realities of Implementation,” International Migration 52(3), 2639.Google Scholar
Koslowski, Rey. 2018. “Shifts in Selective Migration Policy Models: A Comparison of Australia, Canada, and the US,” in Czaika, Mathias, ed. High-Skilled Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraler, Albert. 2010. Civic Stratification, Gender and Family Migration in Europe. Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).Google Scholar
Kramer, Dion. 2016. “Earning Social Citizenship in the European Union: Free Movement and Access to Social Assistance Benefits Reconstructed,” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 18, 270301.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan. 2017. After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan and Holmes, Stephen. 2019. The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Krippner, Greta. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuptsch, Christiane and Martin, Philip. 2011. “Low-Skilled Labour Migration,” in Betts, Alexander, ed. Global Migration Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2007. Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2013. “Neoliberal Multiculturalism?” in Evans, Peter and Lamont, Michèle, eds. Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2015. “Solidarity in Diverse Societies: Beyond Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Welfare Chauvinism,” Comparative Migration Studies 3(4), 1533.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne. 1994. “The Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,” Ethics 104(2), 352–81.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” in Panizza, Francisco, ed. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Langenfeld, Christine. 2018. “Die ‘singuläre’ deutsche Flüchtlingspolitik: eine Chronik,” in Lehner, Roman and Wapler, Friederike, eds. Die herausgeforderte Rechtsordnung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lapp, Kevin. 2012. “Reforming the Good Moral Character Requirement for U.S. Citizenship,” Indiana Law Journal 87(4), 1571–637.Google Scholar
Lash, Christopher. 1995. The Revolt of the Elites. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Laubenthal, Barbara. 2019. “Refugees Welcome? Reforms of German Asylum Policies Between 2013 and 2017 and Germany’s Transformation into an Immigration Country,” German Politics (DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2018.1561872).Google Scholar
Lavi, Shai. 2011. “Citizenship Revocation as Punishment,” University of Toronto Law Journal 61(4), 783810.Google Scholar
Layton-Henry, Zig. 1994. “Britain: The Would-Be Zero Immigration Country,” in Cornelius, Wayne, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James, eds. Controlling Immigration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehner, Roman and Kolb, Holger. 2017. “Vorschlag zu einem Einwanderungsgesetz: Viel Lärm um wenig,” Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, no.2, 34–7.Google Scholar
Lehner, Roman and Kolb, Holger. 2018a. “Aus der Zeit gefallen: Warum ein Punktesystem kaum mehr Platz im deutschen Erwerbsmigrationsrecht hat,” Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ), no.16, 1181–7.Google Scholar
Lehner, Roman and Kolb, Holger. 2018b. “Zum Glück kein grosser Wurf,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Einspruch Magazin), 28 November (https://einspruch.faz.net/einspruch-magazin/2018-11-28/zum-glueck-kein-grosser-wurf/173809.html).Google Scholar
Lemke, Thomas. 2001. “‘The Birth of Bio-Politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality,” Economy and Society 30(2), 190207.Google Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara. 2014. “The ‘Rights’ of Temporary Labour Migrants in Asian States,” Asian Ethnicity 15(2), 157–73.Google Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara. 2016. “Democracies and the Power to Revoke Citizenship,” Ethics and International Affairs 30(1), 7391.Google Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara. 2017. “Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization,” American Political Science Review 112(1), 99111.Google Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara. 2018. “Wither the Canadian Model? Evaluating the New Canadian Nationalism (2006–2015),” in Fossum, John Erik, Kastoryano, Riva, and Siim, Birte,eds. Diversity and Contestations over Nationalism in Europe and Canada. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Lengfeld, Holger. 2017. “Die ‘Alternative für Deutschland’: eine Partei für Modernisierungsverlierer?Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 69(2), 209–32.Google Scholar
Lessenich, Stephan. 2008. Die Neuerfindung des Sozialen: Der Sozialstaat im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Ley, David. 2010. Millionaire Migrants. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark. 2017. The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lind, Michael. 2016. “This Is What the Future of American Politics Looks Like,” Politico, May 22.Google Scholar
Lori, Noora. 2019. Offshore Citizens: Permanent Temporary Status in the Gulf. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luce, Edward. 2017. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas.1986. Ökologische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Lutz, Philipp. 2019. “Variation in Policy Success: Radical Right Populism and Migration Policy,” West European Politics 42(3), 517–44.Google Scholar
MAC (Migration Advisory Council, UK). 2018. European Economic Area Migration in the UK: Final Report. London, September 18.Google Scholar
MAC. 2020. A Points-Based System and Salary Thresholds for Immigration. London, January 28.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey. 2014a. “Citizenship Revocation, the Privilege to Have Rights and the Production of Aliens,” Queen’s Law Journal 40(1), 153.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey. 2014b. The Return of Banishment: Do the New Denationalisation Policies Weaken Citizenship? Florence: EUDO Observatory on Citizenship.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey. 2017. “From Settler Society to Warrior Nation and Back Again,” in Mann, Jatinder, ed. Citizenship in Transnational Perspective: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey. 2018. “Is It Time to Retire Nottebohm?AJIL Unbound 111, 492–7.Google Scholar
Macnicol, John. 2010. New Labour’s Anti-poverty Strategy, 1997–2019. Paris: SciencesPo and CERI/CNRS (www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/sites/sciencespo.fr.ceri/files/art_jm_0.pdf).Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl M. 2018. “The Constitution and the Trump Travel Ban,” Lewis and Clark Law Review 22(2), 391412.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2013. The Sources of Social Power, vol. 4: Globalizations, 1945–2011. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manow, Philip. 2018. Die Politische Ökonomie des Populismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2015. Contingent Citizenship: The Law and Practice of Citizenship Deprivation in International, European and National Perspectives. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Mantu, Sandra. 2018. “‘Terrorist’ Citizens and the Human Right to Nationality,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26(1), 2841.Google Scholar
Mares, Peter. 2016. Not Quite Australian: How Temporary Migration Is Changing the Nation. Melbourne: Text Publishing.Google Scholar
Margulies, Peter. 2017. “Ninth Circuit argument turns on whether the ban clashes with the Immigration Act,” Lawfare (Dec.7) (www.lawfareblog.com/ninth-circuit-argument turns-whether-ban-clashes-immigration-act).Google Scholar
Margulies, Peter. 2018. “Bans, Borders, and Sovereignty: Judicial Review of Immigration Law in the Trump Administration,” Michigan State Law Review 1, 180.Google Scholar
Markovits, Daniel. 2019. The Meritocracy Trap. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, David A. 1988, ed. The New Asylum Seekers. Nijhoff: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip L. 2006. “The Economics of Migration,” Harvard International Review, July 17.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip L. 2017. “Election of Donald Trump and Migration,” Migration Letters 14(1), 161–71.Google Scholar
Marzouki, Nadia, McDonnell, Duncan, and Roy, Olivier, eds. 2016. Saving the People: How Populists Hijack Religion. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas, Arango, Joaquin, Hugo, Graeme, et al. 1993. “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal,” Population and Development Review 19(3), 431–66.Google Scholar
Mau, Steffen. 2015. Inequality, Marketization and the Majority Class: Why Did the European Middle Classes Accept Neo-Liberalism? Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mau, Steffen. 2017. Das metrische Wir: Über die Quantifizierung des Sozialen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mau, Steffen, Brabandt, Heike, and Laube, Lena. 2012. Liberal States and the Freedom of Movement: Selective Borders, Unequal Mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McDonald, Marci. 2014. “True Blue,” The Walrus, May (https://thewalrus.ca/true-blue/).Google Scholar
McDonnell, Duncan. 2016. “The Lega Nord: The New Saviour of Northern Italy,” in Marzouki, Nadia, McDonnell, Duncan, and Roy, Olivier, eds. Saving the People: How Populists Hijack Religion. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, Michael. 2017. “The Revolt of the Rust Belt: Place and Politics in the Age of Anger,” British Journal of Sociology 68(S1), S120S152.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence, ed. 1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Agustin. 2014. “Which Citizenship? Whose Europe?German Law Journal 15(5), 907–33.Google Scholar
Mény, Yves and Surel, Yves. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism,” in Meny, Y. and Surel, Y., eds. Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Menz, Georg. 2011. “Employer Preferences for Labour Migration: Exploring ‘Varieties of Capitalism’-Based Contextual Conditionality in Germany and the United Kingdom,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13, 534–50.Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2017. “Kosmopolitismus versus Kommunitarismus: Ein neuer Konflikt in der Demokratie,” in Harfst, Philipp, Kubbe, Ina, and Poguntke, Thomas, eds. Parties, Governments and Elites. Springer VS (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-17446-0_2).Google Scholar
Messina, Anthony. 1989. Race and Party Competition in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Messina, Anthony. 2007. The Logics and Politics of Post-WW II Migration to Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Ines. 2010. “Citizenship Tests and Traditions of Interference with Cultural Diversity,” in Bauböck and Joppke (2010).Google Scholar
Michalowski, Ines. 2011. “Required to Assimilate? The Content of Citizenship Tests in Five Countries,” Citizenship Studies 15(6–7), 749–68.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. 2012. Global Income Inequality by the Numbers. Policy Research Working Paper 6259, The World Bank, Washington, DC., December.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. 2019. Capitalism, Alone. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2008. “Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship,” Journal of Political Philosophy 16(4), 371–90.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Bobbie. 2016. A ‘Privilege, not a Right’: Contemporary Debates on Citizenship Deprivation in Britain and France. Working Paper No. 130, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2011. “The Radical Right in Europe Today: Trends and Patterns in East and West,” in Langenbacher, Nora and Schellenberg, Britta, eds. Is Europe on the “Right” Path? Right-Wing Extremism and Right-Wing Populism in Europe. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2018. The Radical Right in Eastern Europe: Democracy under Siege? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Modood, Tariq. 2007. Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin and Torney, Simon. 2014. “Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style,” Political Studies 62, 381–97.Google Scholar
Möllers, Christoph. 2008. “Pluralität der Kulturen als Herausforderung an das Verfassungsrecht?” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie no.113, 223–44.Google Scholar
Monat, Shannon and Brown, David. 2017. “More than a Rural Revolt: Landscapes of Despair and the 2016 Presidential Election,” Journal of Rural Studies 55, 227–36.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Lydia. 2007. “New Labour’s Community of Rights: Welfare, Immigration and Asylum,” Journal of Social Policy 36(1), 3957.Google Scholar
Morris, Lydia. 2016. “Squaring the Circle: Domestic Welfare, Migrants Rights, and Human Rights,” Citizenship Studies 20(6–7), 693709.Google Scholar
Morris, Lydia. 2018. “‘Moralising Welfare’ and Migration in Austerity Britain: A Backdrop to Brexit,” European Societies (DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1448107).Google Scholar
Motomura, Hiroshi. 2014. Immigration Outside the Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2018a. “Populists are on the rise but this can be a moment for progressives too,” The Guardian, September 10.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2018b. For a Left Populism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2017. The Age of Responsibility: Luck, Choice and the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People v. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha and Foa, Roberto Stefan. 2018. “The End of the Democratic Century: Autocracy’s Global Ascendance,” Foreign Affairs, May/June, 29–36.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Per. 2006. “The Particular Universalism of a Nordic Civic Nation,” in Modood, Tariq, Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, eds. Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Per and Olsen, Tore Vincents. 2013. “Denmark between Liberalism and Nationalism,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(4), 691710.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, Per et al. 2019. “Leitkultur Debates as Civic Integration in North-Western Europe,” Ethnicities (DOI: 10.1177/1468796819843538), 1–22.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist,” Government and Opposition 39(4), 541–63.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2013. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?European Journal of Political Research 52, 119.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie Lee. 2008. “What Is Neo-Liberalism?Socio-Economic Review 6, 703–31.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2019. Furcht und Freiheit: Für einen anderen Liberalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard. 1995. “Elemente einer Theorie der Integration moderner Gesellschaften,” Berliner Zeitschrift für Soziologie 5, 524.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard. 2012. Inclusion and Exclusion in the Liberal Competition State: The Cult of the Individual. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard. 2014. Academic Capitalism: Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Münch, Ursula. 2014. “Asylpolitik in Deutschland–Akteure, Interessen, Strategien,” in Luft, Stefan and Schimany, Peter, eds. 20 Jahre Asylkompromiss: Bilanz und Perspektiven. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Muffels, Ruud and Wilthagen, Ton. 2013. “Flexicurity: A New Paradigm of the Analysis of Labor Markets and Policies Challenging the Trade-Off between Flexibility and Security,” Sociology Compass 7(2), 111–22.Google Scholar
Nachtwey, Oliver. 2016. Die Abstiegsgesellschaft: Über das Aufbegehren in der regressiven Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Nedergaard, Peter. 2018. Back to Its Roots: Why Do the Danish Social Democrats Want a More Restrictive Immigration Policy? Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Charlotte. 2016. “Civis Capitalist Sum: Class as the New Guiding Principle of EU Free Movement Rights,” Common Market Law Review 53, 937–78.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Charlotte. 2017. “The ECJ Sacrifices EU Citizenship in Vain: Commission v. United Kingdom,” Common Market Law Review 54, 209–44.Google Scholar
O’Shea, Edwina. 2009. Missing the Point(s): The Declining Fortunes of Canada’s Economic Immigration Program. Washington, DC.: Transatlantic Academy Paper Series.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ocak, Özden. 2016. “Immigration and French National Identity under Neoliberalism: Sarkozy’s Selective Immigration Politics as a Performance of Sovereignty,” Patterns of Prejudice 50(1), 8295.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1985. “New Social Movements,” Social Research 52(4), 817–68.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1996. “Die Aufgabe von staatlichen Aufgaben: ‘Thatcherismus’ und die populistische Kritik der Staatsfähigkeit,” in Grimm, Dieter, ed. Staatsaufgaben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 2001. “Wessen Wohl ist das Gemeinwohl?” in Günther, Klaus and Wingert, Lutz, eds. Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 2019a. “Wille und Unwille des Volkes. Notizen zur politischen ‘Theorie’ des Populismus,” in Liberale Demokratie und soziale Macht: Ausgewählte Schriften von Claus Offe, vol. 4. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 2019b. The ‘Liberal Democracy Cube’ under the Onslaught of Populist Parties. Unpublished manuscript (in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav. 2010. “Illiberal Liberalism: Cultural Restrictions on Migration and Access to Citizenship in Europe,” American Journal of Comparative Law 58, 53106.Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav. 2013. The Loyalty Dilemma: To Pledge or Not to Pledge. Typescript (in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav. 2015. The Cultural Defense of Nations: A Liberal Theory of Majority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav. 2017. “Naturalization,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Blauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav. 2019. “The Citizenship-Makers: Ethical Dilemmas in Immigrant Education,” European Law Journal 25, 524–43Google Scholar
Pappas, Takis. 2019. Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paquet, Mireille. 2012. “Beyond Appearances: Citizenship Tests in Canada and the UK,” International Migration and Integration 13, 243–60.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paskalev, Vesco. 2014. The Return of Banishment: It’s Not about Their Citizenship, It’s about Ours. Florence: EUDO Observatory on Citizenship.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1979. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pélaby, Janie and Sénac, Réjane. 2019. “Citizenship Revocation: A Stress Test for Liberal Democracy,” Citizenship Studies 23(4), 388405.Google Scholar
Perching, Bernhard. 2012. The National Policy Frames for the Integration of Newcomers: Comparative Report. PROSINT Project Report, Vienna (typescript).Google Scholar
Permoser, Julia Mouráo. 2012. “Civic Integration as Symbolic Politics: Insights from Austria,” European Journal of Migration and Law 14, 173–98.Google Scholar
Peters, Margaret E. 2017. Trading Barriers: Immigration and the Remaking of Globalization. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pevnick, Ryan. 2008. “An Exchange: The Morality of Immigration,” Ethics and International Affairs, 22(3), 241–59.Google Scholar
Pevnick, Ryan. 2011. Immigration and the Constraints of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, Sarah, Bolter, Jessica and Selee, Andrew. 2018. U.S. Immigration Policies under Trump: Deep Changes and Lasting Impacts. Washington, DC.: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2017. “American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy,” British Journal of Sociology 68(S1), S106S119.Google Scholar
Pillai, Sangeetha and Williams, George. 2017. “The Utility of Citizenship Stripping Laws in the UK, Canada and Australia,” Melbourne University Law Review 41(2), 145.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2020. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA.:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John. 1973. “Two Types of Nationalism,” in Kamenka, Eugene, ed. Nationalism: The Nature and Evolution of an Idea. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Plant, Raymond. 2010. The Neo-Liberal State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric. 2017. Can it Happen Here? Donald Trump and the Paradox of Populist Government. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 605, University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar
Price, Matthew. 2009. Rethinking Asylum. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3), 223–51.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2017. Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten: Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2019. Das Ende der Illusionen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Regeringen, (Denmark). 2018. Ét Danmark uden parallelsamfund: Ingen ghettoer i 2030. Copenhagen, March.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert. 1992. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL.: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans: Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. 2011. The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrick, Dani. 2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization,” Journal of International Business Policy 1(1–2), 1233.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Cristina. 2009. “The Citizenship Clause, Original Meaning, and the Egalitarian Unity of the Fourteenth Amendment,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11, 1363–71.Google Scholar
Roos, Christof. 2018. “The (De-)Politicization of EU Freedom of Movement: Political Parties, Opportunities, and the Framing of Reform in Germany and the UK,” Comparative European Politics (https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295–018-0118-1).Google Scholar
Root, Jesse, Gates-Gasse, Erika, Shields, John, and Bauder, Harald. 2014. Discounting Immigrant Families: Neoliberalism and the Framing of Canadian Immigration Policy Change. Toronto: Ryerson University, RCIS Working Paper No. 2014/7.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2000. The New Social Question. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2013. The Society of Equals. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc. 2011. US Immigration Policy since 9/11: Understanding the Stalemate over Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Washington, DC.: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc, Capps, Randy, and Lin, Serena Yi-Ying. 2011. Earned Legalization. Washington, DC.: Migration Policy Institute Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Roy, Olivier. 2016. “Beyond Populism: The Conservative Right, the Courts, the Churches and the Concept of a Christian Europe,” in Nadia Marzouki, , McDonnell, Duncan, and Roy, Olivier, eds. 2016. Saving the People: How Populists Hijack Religion. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marin, Ruth. 2000. Immigration as a Democratic Challenge: Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruffer, Galya Benarieh. 2011. “Pushed beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the European Union,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(6), 935–51.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36(2), 379415.Google Scholar
Ruhs, Martin. 2013. The Price of Rights: Regulating International Labor Migration. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. 2004. “Explaining the Emergence of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties: The Case of Denmark,” West European Politics 27(3), 474502.Google Scholar
Rytter, Mikkel. 2010. “‘The Family of Denmark’ and ‘the Aliens’: Kinship Images in Danish Integration Policies,” Ethnos 75(3), 301–22.Google Scholar
Sagang, Kim. 2016. “Migration Policies of Korea,” Korea Forum Spezial (Berlin: EPRIE), 22–6.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. 1901. “Citizenship and Allegiance,” The Law Quarterly Review 67, 270–82.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2013. “Solidarity in the European Union,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33(2), 213–41.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2007. “Immigration and the Significance of Culture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35(2), 93125.Google Scholar
Schiek, Dagmar. 2017. “Perspectives on Social Citizenship in the EU: From Status Positivus to Status Socialis Activus via Two Forms of Transnational Solidarity,” in Kochenov (2017).Google Scholar
Schinkel, Willem. 2018. “Against ‘Immigrant Integration’: For an End to Neocolonial Knowledge Production,” Comparative Migration Studies 6:31 (doi.org/10.1186/s40878–018-0095-1).Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur. 1992. The Disuniting of America. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Garbi. 2011. “Law and Identity: Transnational Arranged Marriages and the Boundaries of Danishness,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(2), 257–75.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Semisch, Henning. 2000. “Selber schuld: Skizzen versicherungsmathematischer Gerechtigkeit,” in Bröckling, Ulrich, Krasmann, Susanne, and Lemke, Thomas, eds. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1923. Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter. 1989. “Membership in the Liberal Polity: The Devaluation of American Citizenship,” in Brubaker, Rogers, ed. Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in North America and Europe. Lanham, MD.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter and Smith, Rogers. 1985. Citizenship by Consent. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Caroline and Kolb, Holger. 2015. “Managing Cultural Diversity in Federal Germany: Bavaria and Berlin as Classic Antagonists,” Fédéralisme Régionalisme 15 (https://popups.uliege.be/1374-3864/index.php?id=1557).Google Scholar
Schutter, Helder de and Ypi, Lea. 2015. “Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants,” British Journal of Political Science 45, 235–51.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1952. The Organizational Weapon. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Semuels, Alana. 2016. “The end of welfare as we know it,” The Atlantic, April 1, 2016. Available at: www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/04/the-end-of-welfare-as-we-know-it/476322.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2006. “The Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes,” New York University Law Review 81, 148206.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2009. The Birthright Lottery. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2011. “Earned Citizenship: Property Lessons for Immigration Reform,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 23(1), 110158.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2016. “Selecting by Merit: The Brave New World of Stratified Mobility,” in Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea, eds. Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2017. “Citizenship for Sale?” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds.The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet and Bauböck, Rainer, eds. 2014. Should Citizenship Be for Sale? Florence: EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2014/01.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet and Hirschl, Ran. 2014. “On Citizenship, States, and Markets,” Journal of Political Philosophy 22(2), 231–57.Google Scholar
Shaxson, Nicholas. 2018. The Finance Curse: How Global Finance Is Making Us All Poorer. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Shuibhne, Niamh Nic. 2015. “Limits Rising, Duties Ascending: The Changing Legal Shape of Union Citizenship,” Common Market Law Review 52, 889938.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1891. The Elements of Politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. 2014. Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. “The International Diffusion of Liberalism,” International Organization 60, 781810.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Julie. 2008. “Toward Consensus? Centre-Right Parties and Immigration Policy in UK and Ireland,” Journal of European Public Policy 15(3), 415–31.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen. 2019. The Scramble for Europe: Young Africa on Its Way to the Old Continent. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Soennecken, Dagmar. 2014. “Shifting Up and Back: The European Turn in Canadian Refugee Policy,” Comparative Migration Studies 2(1), 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, Alexander. 2007. Solidarity Decomposed: Being and Time in European Citizenship. University of Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07–13.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret. 2008. Genealogies of Citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Somerville, Will and Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2010. “The Role of Networks in the Development of UK Migration Policy,” Political Studies 58, 951–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 2012a. “Citizenship, Immigration, and the European Social Project: Rights and Obligations of Individuality,” British Journal of Sociology 63(1), 121.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 2012b. “Individuality, Sociological Institutionalism, and Continuing Inequalities: A Response to Commentators,” British Journal of Sociology 63(1), 4753.Google Scholar
Spaventa, Eleanor. 2017. “Earned Citizenship: Understanding Union Citizenship Through Its Scope,” in Dimitry, Kochenov, ed. EU Citizenship and Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SPD Parliamentary Group. 2016. Entwurf eines Einwanderungsgesetzes. Berlin (November 7).Google Scholar
Speck, Ulrich 2016. “The Crisis of Liberal Order,” The American Interest, September 12.Google Scholar
Spektorowski, Alberto. 2003. “The New Right: Ethno-Regionalism, Ethno-Pluralism and the Emergence of a Neo-Fascist ‘Third Way,’Journal of Political Ideologies 8(1), 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Sarah. 2007. “Immigration,” in Seldon, Anthony, ed. Blair’s Britain, 1997–2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2008. Beyond Citizenship. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2011. “A New International Law of Citizenship,” American Journal of International Law 105, 694746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2014a. “Cash-for-Passports and the End of Citizenship,” in Shachar, Ayelet and Bauböck, Rainer, eds. Should Citizenship Be for Sale? Florence: EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2014/01.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2014b. “Expatriating Terrorists,” Fordham Law Review 82, 2169–87.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2019a. “Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2302,” The American Journal of International Law 113(1), 109–16.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter. 2019b. Nottebohm and “Genuine Link”: Anatomy of a Jurisprudential Illusion. Geneva: Investment Migration Working Papers, IMC-RP2019/1.Google Scholar
Sredanovic, Djordje. 2016. “Political Parties and Citizenship Legislation Change in EU28 Countries, 1992–2013,” International Political Science Review 37(4), 438–52.Google Scholar
Stadlmaier, Jeremias. 2018. “Earning Citizenship: Economic Criteria for Naturalization in Nine EU Countries,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26(1), 4263.Google Scholar
Statham, Paul and Geddes, Andrew. 2006. “Elites and the ‘Organised Public’: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in which Direction?West European Politics 29(2), 248–69.Google Scholar
Stern, Joachim and Valchars, Gerd. 2013. Country Report: Austria. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1997. Citizenship under Regime Competition: The Case of the “European Works Councils.” Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Working Paper 07/3, March (non-paginated).Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2013. Gekaufte Zeit: Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016a. How Will Capitalism End: Essays on a Failing System. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016b. Exploding Europe: Germany, the Refugees, and the British Vote to Leave. University of Sheffield, SPERI Paper No.31.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2017. “A New Regime: The Consolidation State,” in King, Desmond and Le Galès, Patrick, eds. Reconfiguring European States in Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strik, Tineke, Böcker, Anita, Luiten, Maaike, and van Oers, Ricky. 2010. The INTEC Project: Synthesis Report. Nijmegen (typescript).Google Scholar
Strik, Tineke, de Hart, Betty, and Nissen, Ellen. 2013. Family Reunification: A Barrier or Facilitator of Integration? Brussels: European Commission (DG Home Affairs).Google Scholar
Strumia, Francesca. 2016. Unravelling New Generation Skilled Migration Policies: Talent as Output and the Hunt for Lighter Citizens. Paper presented at conference ‘Investment Migration: Making Sense of the Trend’, Investment Migration Council, Geneva, June.Google Scholar
Süss, Jeanette and Schneider, Jan. 2017. Alternativen zum Asylantrag? Legale Migrationswege nach Deutschland für Drittstaatsangehörige ohne Schutzperspektive. Berlin: SVR Forschungsbereich.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Michael J. 2019. Earned Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Surak, Kristin. 2019. States, Markets, and Passports: The Rise of Citizenship by Investment. Typescript (in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Suvarierol, Semin. 2012. “Nation-Freezing: Images of the Nation and the Migrant in Citizenship Packages,” Nations and Nationalism 18(2), 210–29.Google Scholar
SVR. 2011. Migrationsland 2011. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR).Google Scholar
SVR. 2015. Unter Einwanderungsländern: Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR).Google Scholar
SVR. 2017. Chancen in der Krise: Zur Zukunft der Flüchtlingspolitik in Deutschland und Europa. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR).Google Scholar
SVR. 2018. Steuern, was zu steuern ist: Was können Einwanderungs- und Integrationsgesetze leisten? Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR).Google Scholar
SVR. 2019. Bewegte Zeiten: Rückblick auf die Integrations- und Migrationspolitik der letzten Jahre. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR).Google Scholar
Sykes, Patrick. 2016. “Denaturalisation and Conceptions of Citizenship in the ‘War on Terror’,” Citizenship Studies 20(6–7), 749–63.Google Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André. 1995. “Political Science Confronts Populism: From a Conceptual Mirage to a Real Problem,” Telos 103, 943.Google Scholar
Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tamir, Yael. 2019. Why Nationalism? Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2017. “Cosmopolitan Citizenship,” in Shachar, Ayelet, Bauböck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ther, Philipp. 2016. Die neue Ordnung auf dem alten Kontinent: Eine Geschichte des neoliberalen Europa. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Thränhardt, Dietrich. 2018. “Welcoming Citizens, Divided Government, Simplifying Media: Germany’s Refugee Crisis, 2015–2017,” in Dell’Orto, Giovanna and Wetzstein, Irmgard, eds. Refugee News, Refugee Politics. London: Routledge (quotations in text according to typescript).Google Scholar
Thwaites, Rayner. 2017. Report on Citizenship Law: Australia. Florence: RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-CR 2017/11, May.Google Scholar
Thwaites, Rayner. 2018. “The Life and Times of the Genuine Link,” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 49(4), 645–70.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2010. Migrationsverwaltungsrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2014. “Unionsbürgerfreiheit und Aufenthaltsrecht,” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 34(7), 220–7.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2015. “The Elusive Limits of Solidarity: Residence Rights of and Social Benefits for Economically Inactive Union Citizens,” Common Market Law Review 52, 1750.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2016. “Integration kraft Gesetzes? Grenzen und Inhalte des ‘Integrationsgesetzes’ des Bundes,” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 36(8), 241–51.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel 2017a. “Einwanderungsgesetzgebung: Chancen und Illusionen,” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 37(8), 297328.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2017b. “The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control,” verfassungsblog.de, October 20.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2018. “Vom ‘Fremdenrecht’ über die ‘Denizenship’ zur ‘Bürgerschaft,’Der Staat 57(1), 77117.Google Scholar
Tirman, John. 2015. Dream Chasers: Immigration and the American Backlash. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torpey, John. 2017. “The End of the World as We Know It?” American Exceptionalism in an Age of Disruption. Presidential Address, Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia, February 25 (typescript, in author’s possession).Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, Phil. 2011. “Illiberal Means to Liberal Ends? Understanding Recent Immigrant Integration Policies in Europe,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(6), 861–80.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 2016. “We Are All Denizens Now: On the Erosion of Citizenship,” Citizenship Studies 20(6–7), 679–92.Google Scholar
UNHCR. 2013. Interpreting the 1961 Statelessness Convention and Avoiding Statelessness Resulting from Loss and Deprivation of Nationality. Tunis (www.refworld.org/pdfid/533a754b4.pdf).Google Scholar
Van Horn, Rob. 2009. “Reinventing Monopoly and the Role of Corporations: The Roots of Chicago Law and Economics,” in Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Oers, Ricky, de Hart, Betty, and Groenendijk, Kees. 2013. Country Report: The Netherlands. EUDO Citizenship Observatory: European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, Wim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States,” Journal of European Social Policy 16(1), 2342.Google Scholar
Venugopal, Rajesh. 2015. “Neoliberalism as Concept,” Economy and Society 44(2), 165–87.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Herwig. 2015. “Preventing “Benefit Tourism” in the EU: A Narrow or Broad Interpretation of the Possibilities Offered by the ECJ in Dano?Common Market Law Review 52, 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vossen, Koen. 2011. “Classifying Wilders: The Ideological Development of Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom,” Politics 31(3), 179189.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2010. “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism,” Social Anthropology 20(1), 6679.Google Scholar
Wacqant, Loïc. 2012. “Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity,” Sociological Forum 25(2), 197220.Google Scholar
Wadhwa, Vivek. 2018. The Immigrant Exodus: Why America Is Losing the Global Race to Capture Entrepreneurial Talent. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Markus and Meyer, Thomas. 2017. “The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014,” Political Studies 65(1), 84107.Google Scholar
Waldinger, Roger. 2018. “Immigration and the Election of Donald Trump,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(8), 1411–26.Google Scholar
Walsh, James P. 2011. “Quantifying Citizens: Neoliberal Restructuring and Immigrant Selection in Canada and Australia,” Citizenship Studies 15(6–7), 861–79.Google Scholar
Walsh, James P. 2014. “From Nations of Immigrants to States of Transience: Temporary Migration in Canada and Australia,” International Sociology 29(6), 584606.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1984. “Liberalism and the Art of Separation,” Political Theory 12(3), 315330.Google Scholar
Watts, Beth, Fitzpatrick, Suzanne, Bramley, Glen, and Watkins, David. 2014. Welfare Sanctions and Conditionality in the UK. York (UK): Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1976[1922].Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr: Tübingen.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2011. “From Conditional to Secured and Sovereign: The New Strategic Link between the Citizen and the Nation-State in a Globalized World,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(3–4), 615–35.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2013. The Sovereign Citizen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1991. “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal 100, 2403–83.Google Scholar
Weiss, Volker. 2017. Die autoritäre Revolte: Die Neue Rechte und der Untergang des Abendlandes. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce and Wildeman, Christopher. 2009. “The Black Family and Mass Incarceration,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (AAPSS) no. 621, 221–42.Google Scholar
Winter, Elke. 2014. “(Im)possible Citizens: Canada’s ‘Citizenship Bonanza’ and Its Boundaries,” Citizenship Studies 18(1), 4662.Google Scholar
Winter, Elke. 2015. Report on Citizenship Law: Canada. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. “‘Normalisierung nach rechts’: Politischer Diskurs im Spannungsfeld von Neoliberalismus, Populismus und kritischer Öffentlichkeit,” Linguistik Online 73 (4–5), pp.2744.Google Scholar
Wöhst, Christian. 2018. Länderbericht Vereinigtes Königreich. Dresden: Mercator Forum Migration und Demokratie (MIDEM).Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven and Zaslove, Andrej. 2018. “The Impact of Populist Parties on Party Systems,” in Zaslove, A. and Wolinetz, S., eds. Absorbing the Blow: Populist Parties and Their Impact on Parties and Party Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Tom K. 2017. The Politics of Immigration: Partisanship, Demographic Change, and American National Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Chris F. 2012. “Policy Legacies, Visa Reform and the Resilience of Immigration Politics,” West European Politics 35(4), 726–55.Google Scholar
Wright, Chris F., Groutsis, Dimitria, and van den Broek, Diane. 2017. “Employer-Sponsored Temporary Labour Migration Schemes in Australia, Canada and Sweden,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(11), 1854–72.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. 1996. “The Myth of the Civic Nation,” Critical Review 10(2), 293311.Google Scholar
Young, Michael. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870–2033: An Essay on Education and Equality. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide. 2006. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Cambridge, MA.: Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian Joppke, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Neoliberal Nationalism
  • Online publication: 29 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696968.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian Joppke, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Neoliberal Nationalism
  • Online publication: 29 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696968.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Christian Joppke, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Neoliberal Nationalism
  • Online publication: 29 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108696968.006
Available formats
×