Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:52:49.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Physics and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Get access

Summary

Introduction

All scientists reading this would agree that scientific research in general, and Physics in particular, deserves to be pursued if only for the sake of understanding and enjoying the world in which we live. They share Albert Einstein’s opinion: “Why do we devise theories at all? The answer is simply: because we enjoy ‘comprehending’ . . . There exists a passion for comprehending, just as there exists a passion for music” [1]. At the same time, all scientists also believe that new basic knowledge will continue to bring concrete benefits to Society.

However, this intimate conviction, well-founded on past experience, is no longer sufficient. For about twenty years, politicians and the public have increasingly been asking scientists, and in particular physicists, to

  1. better describe what they do and what they learn;

  2. explain what advantages Society has gained and can expect to receive in the future from the funds allocated to fundamental research; and

  3. organize the production and dissemination of fundamental research in such a way as to maximize its benefits to Society.

It is my opinion that in such an enterprise other scientists perform better than physicists, possibly (but not only) because the subject of their research helps them: advances in medicine and, more recently, in molecular biology are naturally close to human life and are thus easily perceived as “useful.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Physics
For the Twenty-First Century
, pp. 505 - 531
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaldi, U. and Larsson, B. (eds.), Hadrontherapy in Oncology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1994.
Autio, E., Bianchi-Streit, M., and Hameri, A. P., Technology Transfer and Technological Learning through CERN’s Procurement Activity, CERN Yellow Report, Geneva, CERN, 2003.
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
Casimir, H., Haphazard Reality – Half a Century of Science, New York, Harper and Row, 1983.
Cavalli Sforza, L. L., Genes, Peoples, and Languages, New York, North Point Press, 2000.
Feuer, L. S., Einstein and the Generations of Science, New Brunswick, Transaction Inc., 1982.
Feynman, R., Six Easy Pieces, New York, Basic Books, 1994.
Garwin, R. L. and Charpak, G., Megawatts and Megatons: Turning Point for the Nuclear Age?, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Heisenberg, W., Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, New York, Harper and Row, 1958.
Laughlin, R. B., A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down, New York, Basic Books, 2005.
Ong, N-P. and Bhatt, R. (eds.), More is Different: Fifty Years of Condensed Matter Physics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001.
Rees, M., Our Cosmic Habitat, London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 2001.
Smith, C. S., A Search for Structure, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1981.
Stewart, J. and LaVaque-Manty, D., Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2003.
Tobias, C. and Tobias, I., People and Particles, San Francisco, San Francisco Press, 1997.
Weinberg, S., Facing-up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2001.
Jackson, J., The question, Fermi News 25 (2002) 7.Google Scholar
Kaiserin, J., House bill signals the end of NIH’s double-digit growth, Science 300 (2003) 2019.Google Scholar
A call from downtown to shed staff, authority. . .., Science 300 (2003) 877.
Philanthropy rising tide lifts science, Science 286 (1999) 214.CrossRef
Seife, C., At Canada Perimeter Institute, “Waterloo” means “Shangri-La,”Science 302 (2003) 1650.Google Scholar
Stanford to host the institute for particle astrophysics and cosmology, CERN Courier, March 2003, 33.
Press release of March 18, 2004,
Riordan, M., A tale of two cultures: building the Superconducting Super Collider, Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci. 32 (2001) 125.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S., Newtonianism, reductionism and the art of Congressional testimony, Nature 330 (1987) 433.Google Scholar
Sokal, A., Towards a hermeneutics of quantum gravity, Social Text 46/7 (1996) 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuer, L. S., Einstein and The Generations of Science, New Brunswick, Transaction Inc., 1982.
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
Rees, M., Our Cosmic Habitat, London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 2001.
Carr, B., Life, the cosmos and everything, Phys. World, October 2001, 23. This article can be found at .Google Scholar
Oberhummer, H., Report of the Conference ‘Anthropic Arguments in Cosmology and Fundamental Physics,’Nucl. Phys. News, 12 (2) (2002) 35.Google Scholar
Durrani, M., Physicist scoops religion prize, Phys. World, March 14, 2002.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. J. and LaVaque-Manty, D., Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2003.
Whitten, B., Foster, S., and Duncombe, M., What works for women in undergraduate physics?, Phys. Today, September 2003.Google Scholar
Fehrs, M. and Czujko, R., Gender disparity in physics, Phys. Today, August 1992, p. 33.Google Scholar
Pancheri, G., Women and their contribution to modern and contemporary physics: barriers and perspectives, Analysis, January–February 2002, 4.Google Scholar
Tobias, C. and Tobias, I., People and Particles, San Francisco, San Francisco Press, 1997.
Feynman, R., Six Easy Pieces, New York, Basic Books, 1994.
Maurellis, A. and Tennyson, J., The climate effects of water vapour, Phys. World, May 2003, 29.Google Scholar
Polyansky, O., Csaszar, A., Shirin, S.et al., High-accuracy ab initio rotation–vibration transitions for water, Science 299 (2003) 539.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S., Facing-up: Science and its Cultural Adversaries, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2001.
Anderson, P. W., Phys. Today, July 2002.
P. W. Anderson, in More is Different: Fifty Years of Condensed Matter Physics, Ong, N-P. and Bhatt, R., eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 1.
Reid, T. R., The Chip: How Two Americans Invented the Microchip and Launched a Revolution, New York, Random House, 2001. (The two Americans who in 1958–59 did the work were Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce.)
Alvarez, L., Catalysis of nuclear reactions by muons, Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, L., Evolution of Particle Physics, New York, Academic Press, 1970, pp. 1–49.
Leon, M. ed., Proceedings of the Workshop on Low Energy Muon Science – LEMS 93, Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1994.
Reports of the Railway Technical Research Institute:
See for instance .
Stanley Smith, C., A Search for Structure, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1981.
Olson, G. B., Designing a new material world, Science 288 (2000) 993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagamatsu, J., Nakagawa, N.et al., Nature, 410 (2001) 63.
Campbell, A. M., How could we miss it?, Science 292 (2001) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P., From insulator to superconductor, Nature 406 (2000) 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roukes, M., Nanoelectromechanical systems face the future, Phys. World, February 2001, 25.Google Scholar
Iijima, S., Nature 354 (1991) 56.CrossRef
Reed, M. and Tour, J. M., Computing with molecules, Scient. Am., June 2000.Google Scholar
Llang, W., Shores, M.et al., Kondo resonance in a single-molecule transistor, Nature 417 (2002) 725.Google Scholar
De, S.Franceschi and L. Kouwenhoven, Electronics and the single atom, Nature 417 (2002) 701.Google Scholar
Service, R. F., Can chemists assemble a future for molecular electronics?, Science 295 (2002) 2398.Google Scholar
Stelzer, E. H. K., Beyond the diffraction limit?, Nature 417 (2002) 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A., A marriage made for the nanoworld, Phys. World, December 2001, 25.Google Scholar
Guest, J. R., Stiehvater, T. H., Gang Chen et al., Near-field coherent spectroscopy and microscopy of a quantum dot system, Science 293 (2001) 2224.Google Scholar
Hecht, J., Extreme laser shed light on nanoworld, New Scientist, 27 July 2002, 17.Google Scholar
Noyes, P., Physics with petawatt lasers, Phys. World, September 2002, 39.Google Scholar
Malka, V., A new and exciting optically induced electron source: extreme acceleration gradients beyond 1 TV/m, Europhys. News, March/April 2004, 43.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., How to create and destroy elements in a flash of light, New Scientist, August 23, 2003, 10.Google Scholar
Ledingham, K. W. D., McKenna, P., and Singhal, R. P., Applications for nuclear phenomena generated by ultra-intense lasers, Science 300 (2003) 1107.Google Scholar
Amaldi, U., The importance of particle accelerators, Europhys. News, 31 (6) (2000).Google Scholar
O’Shea, P. G. and Freund, H., Free-electron lasers: status and applications, Science 292 (2001) 1853.Google Scholar
Cho, A., The ultimate bright idea, Science 296 (2002) 1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plönjes, E., Feldhaus, J., and Möller, T., Taking free-electron lasers into the X-ray regime, Phys. World, July 2003, 33.Google Scholar
Service, R. F., Battle to become the next-generation X-ray sources, Science 298 (2002) 1356.Google Scholar
Patel, N., brighter, Shorter, better, Nature 415 (2002) 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartlidge, J. E., Nuclear alchemy, Phys. World, June 2003, 8.Google Scholar
Amaldi, U. and Larsson, B., eds., Hadrontherapy in Oncology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1994.
Gross, K. D. and Pavlovic, M., eds., Proposal for a Dedicated Ion Beam Facility for Cancer Therapy, Darmstadt, GSI, 1998.
U. Amaldi, ed., The path to the national center for ion therapy, Vercelli, Mercurio, 2005.
Cavalli Sforza, L. L., Genes, Peoples, and Languages, New York, North Point Press, 2000.
Morfill, G. and Bunk, W., New design on complex pattern, Europhys. News, May/June 2001, 77.Google Scholar
Kerner, B. S., The physics of traffic, Phys. World, August 1999, 25.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Will physics crack the market?New Scientist, 7 December 2002, 16. (The work quoted is due to D. Sornette and Wei-Xing Zhou.)Google Scholar
Schechter, B., Push me pull me, New Scientist, 24 August 2002, 41. (The work quoted was done by J. Sznajd, K. Sznajd-Weron, D. Stauffer, and collaborators.)Google Scholar
Strogatz, S., The physics of crowds, Nature 428 (2004) 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselmann, K., Schellnhuber, H. J., and Edenhofer, O., Climate change: complexity in action, Phys. World, June 2004, 31.Google Scholar
Gaines, A., Tim Berners-Lee and The Development of The World Wide Web, Hockessin, Mitchell Lane Publisher, 2002.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., The Semantic Web, Scient. Am., May 2001, 29.Google Scholar
Foster, I., The GRID: computing without bounds, Scient. Am., April 2003, 61.Google Scholar
Rodgers, P., US physicists dominate world top 100, Phys. World, June 2001, 7.Google Scholar
Jérome, D. and Raimond, J.-M., US threats to European journals, Phys. World, May 2004, 20.Google Scholar
Doyle, R., Filling the pipeline – The 2002 edition of “Science and Engineering indicators,”Scient. Am., July 2002, 15.Google Scholar
McCabe, H., Physicists unite to combat a crisis of falling numbers, Nature 401 (1999), 102.Google Scholar
Pure science courses fail to entice French students, Nature 417 (2002) 9.
Weinberg, S., The First Three Minutes, New York, Basic Books, 1977.
Hawking, S., A Brief History of Time, London, Bantam Press, 1988.
Enseigner les sciences à l’école, un outil pour la mise en oeuvre des programmes 2002, Paris, Centre National de Documentation Pédagogique, 2002.
L. M. Lederman, What is today’s most important unreported story?, to be found in
Lederman, L. M., Revolution in science: put physics first, Phys. Today, November 2002, 55.Google Scholar
Flocking to physics, Science 303 (2004) 166.
Wilson, C., Expanding the teacher network, Phys. World, November 2003, 56.Google Scholar
Schools at 1020 eV and beyond, Nature 429 (2004) 685.
Basic Science and Technology Transfer – Means and Methods in the CERN Environment, Bourgeois, F., ed., Geneva, CERN report CERN/BLIT/98–101, February 1998.
Brugt, Hendrick, Casimir, Gerhard, Phys. Today, September 2000, 80.
Casimir, Hendrik, Haphazard Reality – Half A Century of Science, New York,Harper and Row, 1983.
T. T. Nguyen, Casimir effect and vacuum fluctuations, Caltech lecture notes,
Quoted by Tyrrell, D. L., Casimir, H. G. B., Contribution to Symposium on Technology and World Trade, US Department of Commerce, November 16, 1966.Google Scholar
Richard, L. Garwin receives the National Medal of Science, IBM Research News, 2003.
Kostoff, R. N. and del Rio, J. A., The impact of physics research, Phys. World, June 2001, 47.Google Scholar
Schmied, H., A Study of Economic Utility Resulting from CERN Contracts, CERN Yellow Report, Geneva, CERN, 1975.
Bianchi-Streit, M., Blackburn, N., Schmied, H.et al., Economic Utility Resulting from CERN Contracts, CERN Yellow Report, Geneva, CERN, 1984.
Brendle, P.et al., Les effets “économiques” induits de l’ESA, ESA Contracts Report Vol. 3, 1980.
L. Bach et al., Study of the economic effects of European space expenditure, ESA Contract No. 7062/87/F/RD.
Autio, R. E, Bianchi-Streit, M., and Hameri, A. P., Technology Transfer and Technological Learning through CERN’s Procurement Activity, CERN Yellow Report, Geneva, CERN, 2003.
Haehnle, M., R&D Collaboration between CERN and Industrial Companies. Organisational and Spatial Aspects. Dissertation, September 1997, Vienna University of Economy and Business Administration.
Thomas, Sir J. M., Predictions, Notes Rec. R. Soc. London 55–1 (2001) 105.CrossRef
Sirtori, C., Bridge for the terahertz gap, Nature 417 (2002) 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, J., Forbidden zone, New Scientist, September 2002, 34.Google Scholar
Osborne, I., Revealing the invisible, Science 297 (2002) 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazdani, A. and Lieber, C. M., Up close and personal atoms, Nature 401 (1999) 227.Google Scholar
Drexler, K. E., Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, London, Fourth Estate, 1990.
Alivisatos, A. P., Less is more in medicine, Scient. Am., September 2001, 59.Google Scholar
Nanotech, The Science of The Small Gets Down to Business, Scient. Am. special issue, September 2001.
Small particles of gold and iron, attached to antibodies, have already been used by chemist C. Mirkin and collaborators to detect prostate-specific antigen: J-M. Nam, C. S. Thaxton, and C. A. Mirkin, Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins, Science 301 (2003) 1884.
Bacteria and viruses have already been detected with cantilevers a few micrometers long, see for instance B. Ilic, H. G. Craighead, S. Krylov et al., Attogram detection using nanoelectromechanical oscillators, J. Appl. Phys. 95 (2004) 3694.
de Rújula, A., Glashow, S. L., Wilson, R. R., and Charpak, G., Phys. Reports 99(6) (1983) 341.
Callan, C., Catalysis of Baryon Decay, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1983.
Kusenko, A. and Shaposhnikov, M., Baryogenesis and the baryon to dark matter ratio, Phys. Lett. B 418 (1998) 46.Google Scholar
King, J., Exciting times and challenges ahead, Phys. World, November 2002, 53.Google Scholar
Charpak, G. and Garwin, R. L., The DARI, a unit of measure suitable to the practical appreciation of the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation, Europhys. News, January/February 2002, 14.Google Scholar
Rotblat, J., The social conscience of scientists, Phys. World, December 1999, 65.Google Scholar
Goodstein, D., In the matter of J. Hendrick Schoen, Phys. World, November 2002, 17.Google Scholar
Trilling, G., Co-authors are responsible too, Phys. World, June 2003, 16.Google Scholar
Quoted in Trilling, G., Co-authors are responsible too, Phys. World, June 2003, 16.Google Scholar
Ducloy, M., The World Year of Physics, Europhys. News, January/February 2003, 26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×