Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:04:32.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Towards a Physiological Aesthetic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

Matthew Rampley
Affiliation:
Surrey Institute of Art and Design
Get access

Summary

All art works tonically, increases strength, inflames desire (i.e. the feeling of strength) excites all the more subtle recollections of intoxication.

(WP §809)

Nietzsche's preoccupation with the question of time forms a central part of his critique of metaphysics and modernity, in which the modernist obsession with time and history is countered with the idea of Eternal Recurrence. The denial of time could be seen as standing at the origin of metaphysics, in Plato's valorisation of timeless Ideas, but Nietzsche's argument is that as in so many other respects, modernity constitutes both the climax of metaphysics and the moment of its unravelling. Hence the denial of temporality is joined by its dialectical negation, a morbid fascination with decay and decline, which is produced by the sense of time as a problem, and of temporality as a succession of mutually transcending ‘nows.’ The path to overcoming the temporal logic of modernity lies both in an aestheticisation of historical knowledge (though not at the expense of ‘objectivity’) and in the model offered by certain forms of artistic praxis, which embody a certain temporality both in terms of their external relation to the artistic tradition and in their internal semantic structure.

In his attention to the question of time and modernity, Nietzsche is undercutting the idea of transcendence sustaining metaphysics. The notion of transcendence, however, has both a temporal and a spatial dimension, and the concept consequently depends on extensive use of spatial and temporal metaphors for its exposition. It is apparent from the discourse of the sublime in which, as I have indicated before, Longinus's use of the metaphor of ‘transport’ becomes prominent in eighteenth-century writings on the sublime.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×