Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:10:05.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - J. A. Hobson as a Welfare Economist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

By
Roger E. Backhouse
Edited by
Roger E. Backhouse  and
Tamotsu Nishizawa
Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Tamotsu Nishizawa
Affiliation:
Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

John Atkinson Hobson is renowned as an economic heretic. As a result of the remarks made by Keynes in his General Theory (1973 [1936]: 364–71) Hobson's heresy is generally associated with underconsumption. It can legitimately be argued that this permeates his work, from his first book, written with A. F. Mummery (1992 [1889]) to his writing on unemployment in the 1930s, taking in his analyses of industrial capitalism and imperialism along the way. Furthermore, in his autobiography, Confessions of an Economic Heretic (1938) Hobson presents underconsumption as the heresy that led to his systematic exclusion from academia. However, the Confessions also presents a different view. Underconsumption is ‘an early heresy’ – ‘the first open step in my heretical career’ (1938: 30). His ‘most destructive heresy’ (1938: 168), on the other hand, was that bargaining power was unequal between buyers and sellers, meaning that ‘whether under monopoly or so-called competitive conditions, markets are intrinsically unfair modes of distribution’.

Distribution by needs is not even approximately achieved by the ordinary higgling in a so-called competitive market. Everywhere, inequality of bargaining conditions, based on differences of needs, is represented in different amounts of gain.

(Hobson and Mummery 1992 [1889]: 191–2)

The reason why more attention had been paid to underconsumption than to this critique of markets was that the former was ‘a quarrel within the range of quantitative economic science’ (Hobson and Mummery 1992 [1889]: 164); the latter was ignored because it was too radical.

Type
Chapter
Information
No Wealth but Life
Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945
 , pp. 114 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhouse, R. E. 2006. Sidgwick, Marshall and the Cambridge School of Economics. History of Political Economy 38(1): 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2008. Faith, Morality and Welfare: The ‘English School of Welfare Economics’. History of Political Economy 40 (Annual Supplement): 212–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. 1972. Marshall on Pigou's Wealth and Welfare. Economica 39: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, P. J. 1992. Introduction. In Work and Wealth, by Hobson, J. A., v–xiv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Cain, P. J. 2002. Hobson and Imperialism: Radicalism, New Liberalism and Finance 1887–1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1914. Review of Work and Wealth by J. A. Hobson. Quarterly Journal of Economics 29(1): 177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. 1978. Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgell, S., and Tilman, R.. 1994. John Hobson: Admirer and Critic of Thorstein Veblen. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 211–24. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. H. 1915. Economic Theory and ‘Social Reform’. Journal of Political Economy 23(6): 562–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. H. 1919a. An Appraisal of Clay's Economics. Journal of Political Economy 27(4): 300–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. H. 1919b. The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory. American Economic Review 9: 309–18.Google Scholar
Handman, M. S. 1915. Review of Work and Wealth by J.A. Hobson. American Economic Review 5: 314–15.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1894. The Evolution of Modern Capitalism. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1898. John Ruskin: Social Reformer. London: James Nisbet. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1900. The Economics of Distribution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1901. The Social Problem. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1909. The Industrial System: An Inquiry into Earned and Unearned Income. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1914. Work and Wealth. London: Macmillan. Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1925. Neo-classical Economics in Britain. Political Science Quarterly 40(3): 337–83. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1926. Economic Art and Human Welfare. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1:467–80. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1929. Wealth and Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1938. Confessions of an Economic Heretic. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1992. Writings on Distribution and Welfare. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A., and Mummery, A. F. 1992 [1889]. The Physiology of Industry. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Homan, P. T. 1927. The Impasse in Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy 35(6): 776–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, P. T. 1928. Contemporary Economic Thought. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Kadish, A. 1990. Rewriting the Confessions: Hobson and the Extension Movement. In Reappraising J. A. Hobson: Humanism and Welfare, ed. Freeden, M., 137–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1973 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, volume VII. LondonMacmillan.Google Scholar
Levin, H. J. 1956. Standards of Welfare in Economic Thought. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 117–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macgreggor, D. H. 1914. Review of Work and Wealth by J. A. Hobson. Economic Journal 24: 560–63.Google Scholar
MacKillop, I. D. 1986. British Ethical Societies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1949. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1969. Utilitarianism. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill), volume 10, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. C. 1925. Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory. American Economic Review 15(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. C. 1969. Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism to Institutionalism. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
Neale, W. C., and Mayhew, A.. 1994. Hobson, Veblen and American Institutionalism. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 225–37. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, M. G. 1979. Pigou: An Extension of Sidgwickian Thought. History of Political Economy 11(4): 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1912. Wealth and Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan. Reprinted 1946.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall's Evolutionary Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. C. 1927. Mr. Hawtrey on the Scope of Economics. Economica 20: 172–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. C. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. C. 2001. Economic Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. 1994. J. A. Hobson and American Institutionalism: Under-Consumptionism and Technological Change. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 188–210. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. 2007. American Institutionalism and Its English Connections. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14(2): 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1883. Principles of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1901. Principles of Political Economy, 3rd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 1884. Outcast London. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. B. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 2009. Wealth and Life: Essays on the Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1848–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×