Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T02:32:11.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - State responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Yoram Dinstein
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

The ILC Draft Articles

With its toxic atmosphere of defiance of law and order, a NIAC provides fertile soil for international disputes between the local State (Ruritania) and a foreign State (Arcadia). Such disputes flare up in consequence of damage caused within the territory of Ruritania, during a NIAC, to (i) Arcadian agents or installations, primarily embassies and consulates; (ii) Arcadian nationals who have entered Ruritania as tourists, businessmen, labourers, students, etc.; or (iii) the property of Arcadian nationals or corporations.

There is no general binding treaty regulating the international law of State responsibility. The subject was studied for decades by the ILC, and, in 2001, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for International Wrongful Acts (cited supra 217) were finally presented to the General Assembly. Although the ILC Draft Articles were not (nor were they intended to be) transformed into a treaty – and therefore have no binding force – it is noteworthy that the ICJ has relied on them periodically, even before their formal adoption (see, e.g., infra 361). Of particular interest is Article 10 of the Draft Articles (supra 217), which deals with insurrectional movements. ‘The wording of the article can be considered as a concise and distinct expression of international customary law’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cahin, G., ‘Attribution of Conduct to the State: Insurrectional Movements’, The Law of International Responsibility, supra note 279, at 247, 249
Yeager (US) v. Iran (Iran–US Claims Tribunal, 1987), 82 ILR179, 193
Youmans case (General Claims Commission, Mexico–USA, 1926), IV RIAA 110, 111, 116
Velásquez Rodríguez case (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 1988), 28 ILM294, 325
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’, 35 Ger.YIL9, 25–8 (1992)Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M., ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago's Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’, 10 EJIL371, 379 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnidge, R.P., ‘The Due Diligence Principle under International Law’, 8 ICLR81, 112 (2006)Google Scholar
Freeman, A.V., ‘Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces’, 88 RCADI267, 278–9 (1955)Google Scholar
Denza, E., Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 139 (2nd edn, 1998)
Lillich, R.B. and Paxman, J.M., ‘State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens Occasioned by Terrorist Activities’, 26 AULR217, 289 (1976–7)Google Scholar
Feller, A.H., The Mexican Claims Commissions 1923–1934: A Study in the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals 151–2 (1935)
West (USA) v. Mexico (1928), IV RIAA 270, 271
Noyes case (General Claims Commission, Panama–USA, 1933), VI RIAA 308
Sarropoulos c. Etat Bulgare (Tribunal Arbitral Mixte Gréco-Bulgare, 1927), VII Recueil des Décisions des Tribunaux Arbitraux Mixtes Institués par les Traités de Paix 47
Whiteman, M.M., II Damages in International Law 1424 (1937)
Brownlie, I., System of the Law of Nations: State Responsibility Part I 172 (1983)
Borchard, E.M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or the Law of International Claims 233 (1915)
Akehurst, M., ‘State Responsibility for the Wrongful Acts of Rebels – An Aspect of the Southern Rhodesian Problem’, 43 BYBIL49, 51 (1968–9)Google Scholar
Sambiaggio case (Mixed Claims Commission Italy–Venezuela, 1903), X RIAA 499
Santa Clara Estates Company case (Mixed Claims Commission Great Britain–Venezuela, 1903), IX RIAA 455
Iloilo Claims (Arbitral Tribunal Great Britain–United States, 1925), VI RIAA 158
Silvanie, H., Responsibility of States for Acts of Unsuccessful Insurgent Governments 135 (1939)
Home Frontier and Foreign Missionary Society of the United Brethren in Christ (United States) v. Great Britain (1920)
Réclamations Britanniques dans la Zone Espagnole du Maroc (UK v. Spain, 1924), II RIAA 617
Jiménez de Aréchaga, E., ‘International Responsibility’, Manual of Public International Law 531, 563 (Sørensen, M. ed., 1968)Google Scholar
Paddeu, F.I., ‘A Genealogy of Force Majeure in International Law’, 82 BYBIL381, 493 (2011)Google Scholar
Cheng, B., General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals 228 (1987)
Eagleton, C., The Responsibility of States in International Law 156 (1928)
Crawford, J. and Olleson, S., ‘The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility’, International Law 441, 455 (3rd edn, Evans, M.D. ed., 2010)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J., ‘Rebellion and State Responsibility: Wrongdoing by Democratically Elected Insurgents’, 58 ICLQ427–42 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinson (France) v. Mexico (1928), V RIAA 327
Jiménez de Aréchaga, E., ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, 159 RCADI 1, 285 (1978)Google Scholar
Sassòli, M., ‘State Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, 846 IRRC401, 410 (2002)Google Scholar
Umpire Plumley in the Bolívar Railway Company case (Mixed Claims Commission Great Britain–Venezuela, 1903), IX RIAA 445, 453
Short (US) v. Iran (Iran–US Claims Tribunal, 1987), 82 ILR149, 161
Puerto Cabello and Valencia Company case (Mixed Claims Commission Great Britain–Venezuela, 1903)
Zemanek, K., ‘The Legal Foundations of the International System’, 266 RCADI9, 261 (1997)Google Scholar
Kohen, M.G., ‘Succession of States in the Field of International Responsibility: The Case for Codification’, Perspectives of International Law in the 21st Century: Liber Amicorum Professor Christian Dominicé 161, 172 (2012)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., State Succession to International Responsibility 246 (2007)CrossRef
Digest of International Law 825 (Whiteman, M.M. ed., 1967)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • State responsibility
  • Yoram Dinstein, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279391.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • State responsibility
  • Yoram Dinstein, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279391.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • State responsibility
  • Yoram Dinstein, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279391.008
Available formats
×