Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:29:57.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2018

Rutger Helmers
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in Historical Musicology at the University of Amsterdam and lectures in Literary and Cultural Studies at Radboud University Nijmegen
Get access

Summary

In an obituary for Balakirev written in 1910, the modernist critic Vyacheslav Karatïgin pointed out “denationalization” as one of the important new trends in Russian music. He singled out Aleksandr Skryabin (1872–1915), the most promising and path-breaking Russian composer of the day, as a contemporary who had left “the nationalistic passions of the New Russian School” far behind him. Karatïgin's representation of Russian music history—an epoch dominated by the Kuchka followed by a post-Kuchka phase led by Skryabin—was overly schematic, but the critic rightly perceived that interest in national distinctions among composers was waning. The number of new Russian operas on non-Russian subjects, which amounted to roughly one out of four works from Glinka's time to 1880, rose to about half of the output in the final decades before the revolution, and included works like Tchaikovsky's Iolanta (1892), Arensky's Raphael (1894), Taneyev's Oresteia (1895), César Cui's The Saracen (1899), Rimsky-Korsakov's Servilia (1902), and Rachmaninov's Francesca da Rimini (1906).

Opera had been losing its central importance for composers since the time of the Belyayev circle, when composers like Glazunov and Lyadov established themselves without producing any operas. In Russia as elsewhere, the repertoire was aging rapidly: the percentage of works by living composers on the imperial stages dropped dramatically—from 50 percent in 1890/91 to 15 percent by 1910/11. When young Sergey Prokofiev shared his first ideas for an opera on Dostoyevsky's The Gambler with Sergey Diaghilev in 1914, he was told that opera was a dying form; he should compose a ballet, instead.

Ironically, it was precisely at the time Karatïgin was writing that the fruits of the previous decades of national distinction were finally making their breakthrough in the West. Diaghilev was just beginning to present Russian works as exotic spectacles in France, introducing works of the Kuchka on Parisian stages and commissioning new ballets from Igor Stravinsky for that purpose.

The success of composers like Stravinsky and Prokofiev abroad marked a new age for Russian music, and the problems it produced in historiography were of a wholly different kind. Stravinsky's works have often been considered an integral part of Western music history that needed little reference to nineteenth-century Russian traditions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Not Russian Enough?
Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Opera
, pp. 153 - 160
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Rutger Helmers, Assistant Professor in Historical Musicology at the University of Amsterdam and lectures in Literary and Cultural Studies at Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Book: Not Russian Enough?
  • Online publication: 15 March 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Rutger Helmers, Assistant Professor in Historical Musicology at the University of Amsterdam and lectures in Literary and Cultural Studies at Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Book: Not Russian Enough?
  • Online publication: 15 March 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Rutger Helmers, Assistant Professor in Historical Musicology at the University of Amsterdam and lectures in Literary and Cultural Studies at Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Book: Not Russian Enough?
  • Online publication: 15 March 2018
Available formats
×