References
Alexandrova, A. (2017) A Philosophy for the Science of Well Being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Anderson, E. (2004) ‘Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce’. Hypatia, 19(1), 1–24
Axtell, G. (2015) Objectivity. Cambridge: Polity Press
Badano, G., John, S., & Junghans, T. (2017) ‘NICE’s Cost-Effectiveness Threshold’ in McClimans, L. (ed) Measurement in Medicine: Philosophical Essays on Assessment and Evaluation. London: Rowman and Littlefield
Bertolaso, M., & Sterpetti, F. (2019) ‘Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research’. Synthese, 196(8), 3279–3317
Betz, G. (2013) ‘In defence of the value free ideal’. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(2), 207–220
Biddle, J. B., & Leuschner, A. (2015) ‘Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental?’ European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 261–278
Biddle, J. B., & Kukla, R. (2017) ‘The geography of epistemic risk’ in Elliott, K., ed. Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–238
Bird, A. (2019) ‘Systematicity, knowledge, and bias. How systematicity made clinical medicine a science’. Synthese, 196(3), 863–879
Bolinska, A. (2013) ‘Epistemic representation, informativeness and the aim of faithful representation’. Synthese, 190(2), 219–234
Borgerson, K. (2011) ‘Amending and defending critical contextual empiricism’. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(3), 435
Brown, M. J. (2019) ‘Is science really value free and objective?’ in McKain, K. and Kampouaris, K. (eds) What is Scientific Knowledge?: An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. London: Routledge
Churchman, C. (1948) ‘Statistics, Pragmatics, Induction’. Philosophy of Science, 15, 249–268
Culp, S. (1995). ‘Objectivity in experimental inquiry: breaking data-technique circles’. Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 438–458
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Douglas, H. (2000) ‘Inductive risk and values in science’. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579
Douglas, H. (2004) ‘The irreducible complexity of objectivity’. Synthese, 138(3), 453–473
Douglas, H. (2009) Science, Policy and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
Fine, A.I. (1984) ‘The Natural Ontological Attitude’, in Leplin, J., (ed.), Scientific Realism. University of California Press, pp. 261–277.
Fine, A. (1998) ‘The viewpoint of no-one in particular’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 72(2),7–20
Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gaukroger, S. (2012) Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds). (2002). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Goldman, A. I. (2001) ‘Experts: Which ones should you trust?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1), 85–110.
Goldman, A. I. (2002) ‘Knowledge and social norms. Review of the fate of knowledge, by H. Longino’. Science 296, 2148–2149
Hacking, I. (2015) ‘Let’s not talk about objectivity’ in Padovani, F., Eichardson, H & Tsou, Y. (eds) Objectivity in Science. Cham:Springer
Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Harding, S. (2015) Objectivity and diversity. University of Chicago Press
Hawley, K. (2014) ‘Trust, distrust and commitment’. Noûs, 48(1), 1–20.
Hicks, D. (2011) ‘Is Longino’s conception of objectivity feminist?’ Hypatia, 26(2), 333–351
Holman, B., & Geislar, S. (2018) ‘Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism: how to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias’. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 869–881
Intemann, K. (2011) ‘Diversity and dissent in science: Does democracy always serve feminist aims?’ in Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 111–132
Irzik, G., & Kurtulmus, F. (2019) ‘What is epistemic public trust in science?’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(4), 1145–1166
Janack, M. (2002) ‘Dilemmas of objectivity’. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 267–281.
Jeffrey, Richard (1956) ‘Valuation and acceptance of scientific hypotheses’. Philosophy of Science, 23(3), 237–246
John, S. (2015) ‘The example of the IPCC does not vindicate the Value Free Ideal: a reply to Gregor Betz’. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(1), 1–13
John, S. (2018) ‘Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: Against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty’. Social Epistemology, 32(2), 75–87
John, S. (2019) ‘Science, truth and dictatorship: Wishful thinking or wishful speaking?’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 78, 64–72.
Jukola, S. (2015) ‘Meta-analysis, ideals of objectivity, and the reliability of medical knowledge’. Science & Technology Studies
Kitcher, P. (1990) The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Koskinen, I. (2018) ‘Defending a risk account of scientific objectivity’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Kuhn, T. (1977) ‘Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice’ in Kuhn, T.S., (ed), The Essential Tension – Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kukla, R. (2012) ‘“Author TBD”: Radical collaboration in contemporary biomedical research’ Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 845–858
Lacey, H. (2005) Is Science Value-Free? London: Routledge
Levi, I. (1960) ‘Must the scientist make value judgments?’ Journal of Philosophy, 57, 345–357
Lewens, T. (2016) The Meaning of Science: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. London: Hachette UK
Lloyd, E.A. (1995) ‘Objectivity and the double standard for feminist epistemologies’. Synthese, 104(3), 351–381
Lloyd, E.A. (1998) The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Lloyd, E.A. (2005) The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Longino, H. (1996) ‘Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy’, in Nelson L.H. and Nelson J. (eds) Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–58
Longino, H (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Longino, H (2013) Studying Human Behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Ludwig, D. (2015) ‘Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal’. Erkenntnis, 81(6), 1–20.
Mackie, J.L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin Books
McMullin, E. (1982) ‘Values in science’. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 3–28
Megill, A. (1994) ‘Introduction: Four Senses of Objectivity’ in Megill, A. (ed) Rethinking Objectivity. Durham: Duke.
Menzies, P., & Price, H. (1993) ‘Causation as a secondary quality’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 187–203
Nagel, T. (1986) The View From Nowhere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Nozick, R. (2001) Invariances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Planck, M.K. (1950) Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. New York: Philosophical Library
Porter, T. (1994) Trust in Numbers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Proctor, R.N. (2001) ‘Commentary: Schairer and Schöniger’s forgotten tobacco epidemiology and the Nazi quest for racial purity’. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(1), 31–34
Railton, P. (1984, January) ‘Marx and the Objectivity of Science’. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 813–826
Rudner, R. (1953) ‘The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments’. Philosophy of Science, 20(1), 1–6
Schickore, J. (2008) ‘Doing science, writing science’. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 323–343
Schroeder, S.A. (2017) ‘Using democratic values in science: an objection and (partial) response’. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1044–1054
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Solomon, M. (1994) ‘Social empiricism’. Nous, 28(3), 325–343
Solomon, M. (2007) Social Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Steel, D. (2010) ‘Epistemic values and the argument from inductive risk’. Philosophy of Science, 77(1), 14–34
Stegenga, J. (2011) ‘Is meta-analysis the platinum standard?’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42(2011), 497–507
Steele, K. (2012) ‘The scientist qua policy advisor makes value judgments’. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 893–904
Wilholt, T. (2009) ‘Bias and values in scientific research’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40(1), 92–101
Wilholt, T. (2012) ‘Epistemic trust in science’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64, 233–253
Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana
Wright, J. (2018) ‘Rescuing objectivity: A Contextualist proposal’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48(4), 385–406
Wylie, A. (2003) ‘Why Standpoint Matters’, in Figueroa, R. and Harding, S. (eds), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. New York, NY and London: Routledge, pp. 26–48
Wynne, B. (1996) ‘May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide’ in Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: SAGE
Wray, K.B. (1999) ‘A defense of Longino’s social epistemology’. Philosophy of Science, 66, S538–S552.
Zammito, J. (2004) A nice derangement of epistemes Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press
