Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T14:27:38.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Induction and Augmentation of Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2017

By
Aaron Goldberg
Edited by
Martin Olsen
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Care , pp. 23 - 31
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Osterman, MJK, Martin, JA. Recent Declines in Induction of Labor by Gestational Age. NCHS Data Brief, No. 155. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2014.Google Scholar
Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries – Committee Opinion No. 561. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. April 2013.Google Scholar
Induction of labor – Practice Bulletin, No. 107. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. August 2009.Google Scholar
Hatfield, AS, Sanchez-Ramos, L, Kaunitz, AM. Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: A systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:186–92.Google Scholar
Plaut, MM, Schwartz, ML, Lubarsky, SL. Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999 ;180:1535.Google Scholar
Owen, J, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:991.Google Scholar
Wing, DA, et al. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995a; 172:1804.Google Scholar
Wing, DA, et al. Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995b;172:1804.Google Scholar
Wing, DA, Park, MR, Paul, RH. A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:905.Google Scholar
Cheng, SY, Ming, H, Lee, JC. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:119–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Austin, SC, Sanchez-Ramos, L, Adair, CD. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:624.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, DJ, et al. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with extraamniotic catheter balloon: Clinical experience and review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996; 51:621–7.Google Scholar
Jozwiak, M, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labor (review). The Cochrane Library 2012;(3).Google Scholar
Mei-Dan, E, et al. Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: A prospective quasi-randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:723–7.Google Scholar
Karjane, NW, Brock, EL, Walsh, SW. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amnionic saline infusion. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:234–9.Google Scholar
Lin, MG, et al. Transcervical foley catheter with and without extra-amnionic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:558–65.Google Scholar
Chen, W, et al. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;129:193–8.Google Scholar
Jozwiak, M, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2012;(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulvain, M, Stan, C, Irion, O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Jan 25;(1).Google Scholar
Vaisanen-Tommiska, M, et al. Nitric oxide metabolites in cervical fluid during pregnancy: Further evidence for the role of cervical nitric oxide in cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:779.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T, et al. Outpatient cervical ripening by nitric oxide donors for prolonged pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:1089–97.Google Scholar
Kelly, AJ, Munson, C, Minden, L. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 Jun 15;(6).Google Scholar
Kavanagh, J, Kelly, AJ and Thomas, J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, BM, et al. Early versus late amniotomy for labor induction: A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1321–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bricker, L, Luckas, M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, Issue 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howarth, GR, Botha, DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 ;(3).Google Scholar
Smyth, RM, Allred, SK and Markham, C. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Oct 17; (4).Google Scholar
Luthy, DA, Malmgren, JA, Zingheim, RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:1511–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrouenraets, FP, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vahratain, A, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively inducted nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:698–704.Google Scholar
Saccone, G, Berghella, V. Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 11:629–36.Google Scholar
Caughey, A, Sundaram, V, Kaimal, A, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:252–63.Google Scholar
Wood, S, Cooper, S, Ross, S. Does induction of labor increase the risk of cesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG 2014; 121:674–85.Google Scholar
Darney, BG, Snowden, JM, Cheng, YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:761–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishanina, E, Rogozinksa, E, Thatthi, T, et al. use of labor induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2014; 186:665–73.Google Scholar
Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean – Practice Bulletin No. 115. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. 2010.Google Scholar
Tolcher, MC, et al. Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 1059–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, DA, Paul, RH. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179:94–9.Google Scholar
Lin, MG, et al. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:593–601.Google Scholar
Bakker, JJ, et al. Internal versus external tocodynamometry during increased or augmented labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12.Google Scholar
Harper, LM, et al. The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:38.e1–6.Google Scholar
Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. March 2014.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×