Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- 10 Uterine Inversion
- 11 Shoulder Dystocia Following Forceps Delivery for Fetal Bradycardia
- 12 Umbilical Cord Prolapse
- 13 Minimising Decision to Delivery Interval (DDI) in a Category 1 Caesarean Section – Pre-Theatre Phase
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
13 - Minimising Decision to Delivery Interval (DDI) in a Category 1 Caesarean Section – Pre-Theatre Phase
from Scenario Section 1 - Obstetric
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2019
Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- 10 Uterine Inversion
- 11 Shoulder Dystocia Following Forceps Delivery for Fetal Bradycardia
- 12 Umbilical Cord Prolapse
- 13 Minimising Decision to Delivery Interval (DDI) in a Category 1 Caesarean Section – Pre-Theatre Phase
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation , pp. 79 - 86Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Brennand, J. E., Millins, P., Yentis, S. and Hinshaw, H. K. S., on behalf of the Joint Standing Committee of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2010). Good Practice No. 11: Classification of Urgency of Caesarean Section – A Continuum of Risk. London: The Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Chandraharan, E. and Arulkumaran, S. (2007). Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph(CTG) traces. Best Practice Research Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(4), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffey, F., Tsuchiya, K., Timmons, S., Baxendale, B., Adolphs, S. and Atkins, S. (2016). Simulated patients versus manikins in acute-care scenarios. Clinical Teacher, 13, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kither, H. and Monaghan, S. (2016). Intrauterine fetal resuscitation. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 17(7), 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
le Riche, H. and Hall, D. (2005). Non-elective caesarean section: how long do we take to deliver? Journal of Tropical Paediatrics, 51, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, D. N., Yentis, S. M., Kinsella, S. M., et al. (2000). Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification system. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93, 346–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, S. E., Ogrinc, G. and Steadman, W. (2007). Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nageotte, M. P. and Vander Wal, B. (2012). Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics – can it be done? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2011). Caesarean Section. NICE Clinical Guideline 132. Manchester: NICE.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2014). Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Clinical Guideline CG190. Manchester: NICE. Last updated: February 2017.Google Scholar
Ryding, E. L., Wijma, K. and Wijma, B. (2000). Emergency cesarean section: 25 women's experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siassakos, D., Hasafa, Z., Sibanda, T., et al. (2009a). Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siassakos, D., Clark, J., Sibanda, T., et al. (2009b). A simple tool to measure patient perception of operative birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 1755–1761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuffnell, D. J., Wilkinson, K. and Beresford, N. (2001). Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section – are current standards achievable? Observational case series. British Medical Journal, 322, 1330–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, M. H., Kamania, J. and Dennis, A. T. (2018). Immediate birth – an analysis of women and their babies undergoing time critical birth in a tertiary referral obstetric hospital. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 33, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar