Abbell, M. (2004), Obtaining Evidence Abroad in Criminal Cases, New York.Google Scholar

Aiolfi, G. and Ledergerber, Z. (2005), ‘Glossary of International Anti-Corruption Standards with Examples of National Legal Practice’ (paper prepared for the 6th General Meeting Anti-Corruption Network for Transitional Economies in Instanbul, 30–31 May 2005, available at: http://www.anticorruptionnet.org).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Ch. (1974), International Extradition and World Public Order, Leiden.Google Scholar

Bertossa, B. L. (2004), ‘Mechanisms for Gathering Evidence Abroad’ in Asian Development Bank (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the 4th Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur, 3–5 December 2003, online edn available at: http://www.adb.org/>Publications>Controlling Corruption>Chapter7).

Blakesley, L. Ch. (1992), Terrorism, Drugs, International Law, and the Protection of Human Liberty: A Comparative Study of International Law, its Nature, Role, and Impact in Matters of Terrorism, Drug Trafficking, War, and Extradition, New York (Transnational Publishers).Google Scholar

Cockcroft, L. (1999), Implementation of the OECD Convention: The Conditions for Success (available at: http://www.transparency.org.uk>Papers by TI (UK) Members).Google Scholar

Dietrich, O. (1998), ‘OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials in International Business Transactions’, Austrian Review of International & European Law 3, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dommel, D. (1999), ‘Les défis de la corruption’ (working paper, available at: http://www.transparency.org/>Research and Publications>Country Papers).

Gilbert, G. (1991), Aspects of Extradition Law, Dordrecht, Boston, London.Google Scholar

Gilbert, G. (1998), Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law, Extradition and Other Mechanisms, The Hague, Boston, London.Google Scholar

Gilmore, W. C. (ed.) (1995), Mutual Assistance in Criminal and Business Regulatory Matters, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilmore, W. C. (2004), Dirty Money: The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, 3rd edn, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Hafiez, M. (2004), ‘Mutual Legal Assistance and Repatriation of Proceeds – Pakistan's Experience’ in Asian Development Bank, (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the 4th Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur, 3–5 December 2003, online edn available at: http://www.adb.org/>Publications>Controlling Corruption>Chapter7).Google Scholar

Henzelin, M. (2005), ‘ “Ne bis in idem”: un principe à géométrie variable’, Revue Pénale Suisse, Tome 123, 345.

Huet, A. and Koering-Joulin, R. (2005), Droit pénal international, 3rd edn, Paris.Google Scholar

McClean, D. (2002), International Co-operation in Civil and Criminal Matters, New York.Google Scholar

Moreillon, L. (ed.) (2004), Entraide internationale en matière pénale, Commentaire romand, Bâle, Genève, Munich.Google Scholar

Oehler, D. (1983), Internationales Strafrecht, 2nd edn, Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München.Google Scholar

Poncet, D. and P. Gully-Hart (1999), ‘Legal Framework of Extradition in Europe’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 277.Google Scholar

Popp, P. (2001), Grundzüge der internationalen Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen, Basel.Google Scholar

Prost, K. (1998), Breaking Down the Barriers: International Co-operation in Combating Transnational Crime (available at: http://www.oas.org/>Documents>Search by Title>MLA Resources).

Spinellis, D. D. (1999), ‘Securing Evidence Abroad: A European Perspective’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 359.Google Scholar

Swart, B. (1999), ‘The European Union and the Schengen Agreement’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 177.Google Scholar

Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (1989), ‘Double Criminality as a Requirement to Jurisdiction’ in Dugard, J., Wyngaert, Ch. (eds.) (1996), International Criminal Law and Procedure, Aldershot, Brookfield (USA), Singapore, Sydney, 131.Google Scholar

Wyngaert, Ch.Stessens, G. (1999), ‘The International Ne Bis In Idem Principle: Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vervaele, J. A. E. (2005), ‘The Transnational Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the EU: Mutual Recognition and Equivalent Protection of Human Rights’, Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 100–118 (online version available at: http://www.utrechtlawreview.org>Archive).Google Scholar

Wise, E. M. (1999), ‘Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Prosecute or Extradite’ in Bassiouni, M. Ch. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, New York, 15.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R. (2004), La coopération judiciaire internationale en matière pénale, 2nd edn, Berne.Google Scholar