Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key Dates from Roman History
- To the Reader
- Introduction: Why Rome?
- 1 Anacyclosis: No Regime Is Exceptional and Democracy Is Not Inevitable
- 2 Mighty Republics Can Fall Because of Slow Corruption Rather Than Dramatic Revolutions
- 3 A Revered Tradition of Liberty Can Be Exploited by Authoritarians
- 4 Economic Inequality Drives Civil Strife
- 5 Political Violence Can Become Normalized
- 6 Strongmen Do Not Save Republics
- 7 The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship Need to Be Shared and Extended
- 8 Civic Virtue Is as Important as the Constitution and Laws
- 9 A Reckoning with the Oppressed Cannot Be Denied
- 10 Elections Only Work When Everyone Is Willing to Lose
- 11 Disregard for The Civil Liberties of Some Erodes the Legal Rights of All Citizens
- 12 Military Misadventures Abroad Lead to Instability at Home
- 13 Organized, Armed Gangs Tear Apart a Political System
- 14 Institutions May Not Be Able to Save the Republic
- 15 A Tyrant Backed into a Corner Is a Danger to the Republic
- 16 The Real Problem Is Not Simply a Tyrannical Leader
- 17 Free Speech Can Disappear
- 18 The Crisis Can Be Manufactured to Continue
- 19 The Revolution Can Be Advertised as a Restoration
- 20 Freedom Lost Cannot So Easily Be Regained
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliographic Note
- Index
1 - Anacyclosis: No Regime Is Exceptional and Democracy Is Not Inevitable
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key Dates from Roman History
- To the Reader
- Introduction: Why Rome?
- 1 Anacyclosis: No Regime Is Exceptional and Democracy Is Not Inevitable
- 2 Mighty Republics Can Fall Because of Slow Corruption Rather Than Dramatic Revolutions
- 3 A Revered Tradition of Liberty Can Be Exploited by Authoritarians
- 4 Economic Inequality Drives Civil Strife
- 5 Political Violence Can Become Normalized
- 6 Strongmen Do Not Save Republics
- 7 The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship Need to Be Shared and Extended
- 8 Civic Virtue Is as Important as the Constitution and Laws
- 9 A Reckoning with the Oppressed Cannot Be Denied
- 10 Elections Only Work When Everyone Is Willing to Lose
- 11 Disregard for The Civil Liberties of Some Erodes the Legal Rights of All Citizens
- 12 Military Misadventures Abroad Lead to Instability at Home
- 13 Organized, Armed Gangs Tear Apart a Political System
- 14 Institutions May Not Be Able to Save the Republic
- 15 A Tyrant Backed into a Corner Is a Danger to the Republic
- 16 The Real Problem Is Not Simply a Tyrannical Leader
- 17 Free Speech Can Disappear
- 18 The Crisis Can Be Manufactured to Continue
- 19 The Revolution Can Be Advertised as a Restoration
- 20 Freedom Lost Cannot So Easily Be Regained
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliographic Note
- Index
Summary
After centuries of general political stability, it is easy to imagine a sense of inevitability setting in; just as the seasons changed, so the Romans had their elections year after year, decade after decade, century after century. The Roman Republic with unusual regularity held elections, took votes, went to war, and passed laws. To be sure, there were disruptions occasionally—there were lawmakers and magistrates who overstayed their welcome; there was political strife, but as Tacitus writes, none of these lasted long and the Republic rolled on.
Until the Republic came to a sudden end and became an autocratic system ruled by one man, which modern historians refer to as the Roman Empire. Yet the Republic did not collapse all at once. There was a century of intermittent civil strife (roughly 133–31 BCE), which culminated in two decades of bloody civil war (49–31 BCE). At the end of the civil wars, Octavian, the adopted son of Julius Caesar, emerged victorious. He quickly assumed the name Augustus, The-August-One, and became Rome's first emperor.
Four hundred and sixty years are a pretty good run, and we may be just as inclined to ask why the Roman Republic lasted so long as to ask why it finally fell. Even in antiquity, Rome's success was a topic of reflection. The Greek historian and politician Polybius (202–120 BCE) wrote an entire history in an attempt to understand how Rome grew from a relatively powerful city in Italy to a Mediterranean-wide empire in such a short time—less than a hundred years. Polybius wrote at the height of the Republic and died just as it was seeing the first pangs of political tumult. He came to Rome as a high-profile political exile and became an astute observer of the Roman system. As a Greek, he brought an outsider's perceptivity and a knowledge of political theory.
In his search to understand Rome's success, Polybius found the answer in Rome's political institutions. Greek political theorists, beginning with Plato and Aristotle, had delineated the basic forms of political constitutions—monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy—and judged that the most durable and just constitution was one that mixed the best parts of each. In Rome, Polybius found in reality what had previously existed only in theory—a “mixed constitution.” He lays out how Rome combined elements from each constitution in its Republic.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- On the Fall of the Roman RepublicLessons for the American People, pp. 5 - 8Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2022