Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T15:51:55.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Naĭmark dilations and Naĭmark extensions in favour of moment problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

F.H. Szafraniec
Affiliation:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Seppo Hassi
Affiliation:
University of Vaasa, Finland
Hendrik S. V. de Snoo
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Franciszek Hugon Szafraniec
Affiliation:
Jagiellonian University, Krakow
Get access

Summary

Abstract Making use of Naĭmark extensions of a symmetric operator arising from an indeterminate Hamburger moment sequence we manufacture a machinery for providing representing measures with the following properties

  1. 1o the support of each of them is in arithmetic progression;

  2. 2o the supports of all the measures together partition ℝ;

  3. 3o none of them is N-extremal;

  4. 4o all of them are of infinite order.

All this is based on and, in fact, is a kind of guide to [Cichoń, Stochel and Szafraniec, 2010].

Moment problems and their close relatives, orthogonal polynomials were pretty often treated by the same means, mostly continuous fractions. Then, starting from [Stone, 1932, Chapter X] operator theory was used to handle the problem, look at [Landau, 1980] and [Fuglede, 1983, especially p. 51] for further references as well as for a fairly decent introduction to the subject, in a contemporary language.

Sustaining this idea in what refers to the single real variable case, sooner or later one has to deal with a symmetric operator which, as a matter of course, has deficiency indices (0, 0) or (1, 1). The latter is of interest here as it corresponds to an indeterminate moment problem and the routine procedure is to pass to extensions in the same Hilbert space as they always have to exist. The other way, which seems to be much less exploited with some exceptions, like [Kreĭn and Krasnoselskiĭ, 1947; Gil de Lamadrid, 1971; Langer, 1976; Simon, 1998] and references therein, is to go for extensions beyond the space.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhiezer, N. I. 1965. The Classical Moment Problem. Hafner, New York.
Akhiezer, N. I. and Glazman, I. M. 1981. Theory of linear operators in Hilbert space vol. I and II. Pitman, Boston-London-Melbourne.
Buchwalter, H. and Cassier, G. 1984. La paramétrisation de Nevanlinna dans le problème des moments de Hamburger. Expo. Math. 2, 155–178.Google Scholar
Cichoń, D., Stochel, J. and Szafraniec, F. H. 2010. Naimark extensions for indeterminacy in the moment problem. An example. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 59, 19471970.Google Scholar
Fuglede, B., 1983. The multidimensional moment problem. Expo. Math., 1, 47–65.Google Scholar
Gil de Lamadrid, J. 1971. Determinacy theory for the Livšic moments problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 34, 429–444.Google Scholar
Gorbachuk, M. L. and Gorbachuk, V. I. 1997. M. G. Krein's lectures on entire operators. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 97. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
Derkach, V.A., Hassi, S., Malamud, M.M. and de Snoo, H.S.V. 2009. Boundary relations and generalized resolvents of symmetric operators. Russ. J. Math. Phys., 16, 17–60.Google Scholar
Kreĭn, M. G. and Krasnoselskiĭ, M. A. 1947. Fundamental theorems on the extension of Hermitian operators and certain of their applications to the theory of orthogonal polynomials and the problem of moments. (Russian) Uspehi Matem. Nauk(N. S.) 2, no. 3(19), 60–106.Google Scholar
Landau, H. J. 1980. The classical moment problem: Hilbertian proofs. J. Funct. An., 38, 255–272.Google Scholar
Langer, R. W. 1976. More determinacy theory for the Livsic moments problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 56, 586–616.Google Scholar
Mlak, W. 1978. Dilations of Hilbert space operators (general theory). Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 153, 61 pp.Google Scholar
Naĭmark, M. A. 1940. Self-adjoint extensions of the second kind of a symmetric operator (in Russian), Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS. Ser. Math. [Izvestii Akad. Nauk SSSR] 4, 53–104.Google Scholar
Naĭmark, M. A. 1940. On the square of a closed symmetric operator. C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) 26, 866–870.Google Scholar
Naĭmark, M. A. 1943. On a representation of additive operator set functions. C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) 41, 359–361.Google Scholar
Okazaki, Y. 1986. Boundedness of closed linear operator T satisfying R(T) ⊂ D(T), Proc. Japan Acad., 62, 294–296.Google Scholar
Ôta, S. 1984. Closed linear operators with domain containing their range, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 27, 229–233.Google Scholar
Riesz, M. 1923. Sur le problème des moments. Troisième Note, Ark. för mat., astr. och fys. 17, (16).Google Scholar
Rudin, W. 1973. Functional analysis. McGraw-Hill Series in Higher Mathematics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-Düsseldorf-Johannesburg.
Shohat, J. A. and Tamarkin, J. D. 1943. The Problem of Moments, American Mathematical Society Mathematical Surveys, vol. II, American Mathematical Society, New York.
Simon, B. 1998. The classical moment problem as a self-adjoint finite difference operator. Advances Math. 137, 82–203.Google Scholar
Stochel, J. and Szafraniec, F. H. 1989. On normal extensions of unbounded operators. III. Spectral properties. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 25, 105–139.Google Scholar
Stochel, J. and Szafraniec, F. H. 1991. A few assorted questions about unbounded subnormal operators. Univ. Iagel. Acta Math., 28, 163–170; available at http://www2.im.uj.edu.pl/actamath/issues.php.Google Scholar
Stone, M. H. 1932. Linear transformations in Hilbert space and their applications to analysis. Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 15, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I.
Szafraniec, F. H. 1993. The Sz.-Nagy “théorème principal” extended. Application to subnormality. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 57, 249–262.Google Scholar
Szafraniec, F. H. 2010. Murphy's Positive definite kernels and Hilbert C*-modules reorganized. Pages 275–295 of Noncommutative harmonic analysis with applications to probability II, Banach Center Publ., vol. 89, Polish Acad. Sci. Inst. Math., Warsaw.
Sz.-Nagy, B. 1955. Prolongements des transformations de l'espace de Hilbert qui sortent de cet espace. Appendice au livre ”Leçons d'analyse fonctionnelle” par F. Riesz et B. Sz.-Nagy. (French)Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 36 pp.
Weidmann, J. 1980. Linear operators in Hilbert spaces. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×