Bibliography

John Woods

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614002.012

Ackermann, W., “Beggrüdung einer strengere Implikation,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 21 (1956), 113–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Ainslie, G., “A Behavioral Economic Approach to the Defense Mechanism: Freud's Energy Theory Revisited,” Social Science Information, 21, 6 (1982), 735–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for Contraction and Revision.,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50 (1985), 510–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Alan Ross “Mathematics and the ‘Language Game’,” Review of Metaphysics, 11 (1958), 446–58Google Scholar

Anderson, Alan Ross, and Belnap, Nuel D. Jr., Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975

Anderson, Alan Ross and Belnap, Nuel D. Jr., “A Simple Treatment of Truth Functions,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24 (1959), 301–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, Alan Ross, and Belnap, Nuel D. Jr., Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 2, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995

Apostoli, Peter, and Brown, Bryson, “A Solution to the Completeness Problem for Weakly Aggregative Modal Logic,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 60–3 (1995), 832–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations and Prior Analytics, Rhetoric, On Interpretation, Posterior Analytics and Metaphysics, in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, Vols. 1 and 2., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984

Arrow, Kenneth J., Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: John Wiley, 1951

Avron, Arnon, “Whither Relevance Logic?,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21 (1992), 243–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1965

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, The revised Oxford translation Vol. 1 and 2., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984

Barth, E. M., The Logic of Articles in Traditional Philosophy, Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1974

Barth, E. M., and Krabbe, E. C. W. (eds.), Logic and Political Culture, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990

Barth, E. M., and Krabbe, E. C. W., From Axiom to Dialogue: A philosophical study of logic and argumentation., Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992

Bartlett, F. C., Remembering, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1932

Bartley, W. W., III (ed.), The Retreat to Commitment, revised and enlarged, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1984

Barwise, John (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977

Barwise, John, and Etchemendy, John, The Liar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984

Barwise, John, and Moss, Lawrence, Vicious Circles, Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications 1996

Batens, D., “Extensional Paraconsistent Logics,” Logique et Analyse, 90–91 (1980), 195–234Google Scholar

Becherand, W., and Essler, W. K. (eds.), Konzepte der Dialektik, Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann, 1981

Bell, John S., “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,” Physics, 1 (1964), 195CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, J. L., “Category Theory and the Foundation of Mathematics,” British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 32 (1981), 349–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel D., Jr., An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report, Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation, 1963

Belnap, Nuel D. Jr., “Gupta's Rule of Revision Theory of Truth,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11 (1982), 103–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel D., Jr., and Steel, Thomas B., The Logic of Questions and Answers, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1976

Benacerraf, Paul, “Mathematical Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, ⅬXX (1973), 661–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Benardete, José A., Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989

Beth, Evert W., “Towards An Up-to-date Philosophy of Natural Sciences,” Methods 1 (1949), 178–84Google Scholar

Birkhoff, G., “Lattices in Applied Mathematics,” American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 2 (1961), 155–84Google Scholar

Black, Max, “A Critical Review of [Quine's] Mathematical Logic,” Mind, 52 (1943), 264–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Bläu, Ulrich, Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache: Ihre Syntax, Semantik und Anwendung in der Sprachanalyse, Berlin: deGruyer, 1978

Bohm, David, Special Theory of Relativity, Amsterdam: W. A. Benjamins, 1965

Boolos, George S., “On Second Order Logic,” Journal of Philosophy, 72, 16 (1975), 509–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Boolos, George, “Saving Frege From Contradiction,” in Richard Jeffrey (ed.), Logic, Logic and Logic, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998, 171–82

Boolos, George, and Jeffrey, Richard, Computability and Logic, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989

Brady, R. T., “Depth Relevance of Some Paraconsistent Logics,” Studia Logica, 43 (1984), 63–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Brady, R. T., “The Non-triviality of Dialectical Set Theory,” in Priest, Routley, and Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent., Münich: Philosophia Verlag, 1989, 437–71

Brady, R. T., Universal Logic, unpublished

Bradley, F. H., The Principles of Logic, two volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1883; corrected impression 1922

Brown, Bryson, “Simple Natural Deduction for Weakly Aggregative Paraconsistent Logics,” in Dov Gabbay (ed.), Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic, London: Research Studies Press, 2001

Brown, Bryson, “Approximate Truth: A Paraconsistent Account,” in Joke Meheus (ed.), Inconsistency in Science, vol. 2 in the series Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic, 2002

Brown, Bryson, and Schotch, Peter, “Logic and Aggregation,” The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 28 (1999), 265–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Burali-Forti, “Una Questione Sui Numeri Transfiniti,” Rendiconti del Circolo Mathematico di Palermo, 11 (1897), translated as “A Question on Transfinite Numbers,” Jean van Heijenoort (trans.), in van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967, 104–12

Burge, Tyler, “Semantic Paradox,” Journal of Philosophy, 76 (1979), 169–98, reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and The Liar Paradox, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, 83–117

Burgess, John P., “Introduction to Part II,” in Richard Jeffrey (ed.), Logic, Logic and Logic, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998, 135–42

Cantor, George, “Beiträge zer Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre,” parts one and two, Mathematischen Annalen, 46 (1895), 481–512 and 49 (1897), 207–46; translated as Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, by P. E. B. Jourdain (trans.), Chicago: Open Court, 1915; reprinted New York: Dover, 1952, 85–201

Cantor, George, “Ueber eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre,” Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 1 (1890–91), 75–8, reprinted in Ernst Zermelo (ed.), Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts, Berlin: Springer, 1932, 278–81

Cargile, James, Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979

Carlsen, Laurie, Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983

Carlsen, Laurie, and ter Meulen, Alice, “Informational Independence in Intensional Contexts” in E. Saarinen et al. (eds.), Essays In Honor of Jaakko Hintikka, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 61–72

Carlson, Gregory N., and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995

Carnap, Rudolf, The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1937

Cartwright, N., How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983

Cartwright, Richard, “Implications and Entailments,” in Richard Cartwright, Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987, 237–58

Cartwright, Richard, Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987

Cartwright, Richard L., “Propositions,” R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, 1st Series, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962, 81–103

Cartwright, Richard L., “Propositions Again,” Nôus 2 (1968), 229–46Google Scholar

Castañeda, Hector-Neri, “Fiction and Reality: Their Fundamental Connections,” in John Woods and Thomas Pavel (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics 8 (1979), 31–62

Cézanne, Paul, in W. Hess (ed.), Über die Kunst: Gespräche mit Gasquet, Mittenwald: Mäander, 1980

Chellas, Brian F., Modal Logic: An Introduction., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980CrossRef

Cherniak, Christopher, Minimal Rationality, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986

Church, Alonzo, “The Weak Theory of Implication,” in Albert Menne, Alexander Wilhelmy, and Helmut Angstil (eds.), Untersuchungen zum Logikkalkül und zur Logik der Einzelwissenschaften, Freiburg: Kontrolliertes Denken, 1951, 22–37

Churchland, Paul M., “Eliminative Materialism,” Journal of Philosophy, 78 (1981), 67–90Google Scholar

Cohen, L. Jonathan, “On the Psychology of Prediction: Whose Is the Fallacy?,” Cognition 7 (1979), 385–407CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, L. Jonathan, “Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?,” The Behavior and Brain Sciences 4 (1981), 317–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, L. Jonathan, The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon, 1986

Cohen, L. Jonathan, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1989

Cohen, L. Jonathan, “Reply to Stein,” Synthese 99 (1994), 173–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, A., and Quillam, M., “Retrieval Time From Semantic Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8 (1969), 240–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Craig, William “On Axiomatizability Within a System,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1953), 1, 30–2CrossRef Google Scholar

Craig, William, “Three Uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen Theorem,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1957), 269–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Currie, Gregory, The Nature of Fiction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990

Curry, Haskell B., “The Paradox of Kleene and Rosser,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 50 (1941), 454–516CrossRef Google Scholar

Curry, Haskell B., “The Inconsistency of Certain Formal Logics,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 7 (1942), 115–117CrossRef Google Scholar

da Costa, Newton C. A., “On the Theory of Inconsistent Formal Systems,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, XV (1974), 497–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Dalla Chiara, M. L., “The Relevance of Quantum Logic,” Proceedings of the International Congress for Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, Salzburg: North-Holland, forthcoming

Davidson, Donald, “Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages,” in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965, 383–94

Davidson, Donald, “Truth and Meaning,” Synthese, 17 (1967), 304–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “Psychology as Philosophy,” in J. Glover (ed.), The Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976, 101–10

DeVidi, David, and Solomon, Graham, “On Confusions About Bivalence and Excluded Middle,” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, ⅹⅹⅹⅷ (1999), 785–99

Diaz, M. Richard, Topics in the Logic of Relevance, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1981

Doležel, Lubomír, “Extensional and Intentional Narrative Worlds,” John Woods and Thomas Pavel (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics, 8 (1979), 193–211

duBois-Reymond, Paul, “Eine neue Theorie der Convergenz und Divergenz von Reihen mit poitiven Gliedern,” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 76 (1873), 61–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Dummet, Michael, Frege: Philosophy of Language, London: Duckworth, 1973

Dunn, J. Michael, “Relevant Logic and Entailment,” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3: Alternatives to Classical Logic, Synthese Library, Vol. 166, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 986, 117–224

Dunn, J. Michael, “Intuitive Semantics for First Degree Entailments and ‘Coupled Trees,’” Philosophical Studies, 29 (1976), 149–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, The Illusions of Postmodernism, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996

Einstein, Albert “Ist die Traegheit eines Koerpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhaengig?,” Annalen der Physik 18 (1905), 639–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Elgin, Catherine Z., Considered Judgement, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996

Elster, Jon, Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985

Emerson, Ralph Waldo, “Self Reliance,” in Essays, London: Aldine Press, 1967

Feferman, Solomon, “Toward Useful Type-Free Theories, I,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49 (1984), 75–111, reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 237–87

Festinger, Leon, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957

Feyerabend, Paul, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: Verso, 1978

Fine, Kit, “Incompleteness for Quantified Relevance Logics,” in Jean Norman and Richard Sylvan (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989, 205–25

Flew, Anthony (ed.), Essays in Conceptual Analysis, London: Macmillan, 1960

Forrest, Peter, Quantum Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1988

Frege, Gottlob, 1893–1903 partial translation as The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System (Montgomery Furth, ed. and trans.), Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1964

Frege, Gottlob, Grundgeseze der Arithmetik, Jena: Pohle, 1903; partial translation as The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, Montgomery Furth (trans. and ed.), Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1964

Frege, Gottlob, Letter to Russell, in van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967, 127–8

Frege, Gottlob, Foundations of Arithmetic, J. L. Austin (trans.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1950

French, Simon, Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality, Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood, 1986

Friedman, Harvey, and Meyer Robert K., “Can We Implement Relevant Arithmetic?,” Technical Report TF-ARP-12/88, Automated Reasoning Project, Research School of Social Science, Australian National University, 1988

Frye, Northrop, The Great Code, Toronto: Academic Press, 1981

Fuhrmann, A., Relevant Logics, Modal Logics and Theory Change, Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, 1988

Gabbay, Dov M., “Dynamics of Practical Reasoning: A Position Paper,” in Advances in Modal Logic 2, K. Segerberg, M. Zkharayashev, M. de Rijke, and H. Wansing, (eds.), CSLI Publications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 179–224

Gabbay, Dov M., and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3, Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1984

Gabbay, Dov M., and Hunter, Anthony, “Making Inconsistency Respectable, Part I,” in P. Jorrand and J. Kelemen (eds.), Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence Research (FAIR '91), LNAI, Vol. 535, Springer-Verlag, 1991

Gabbay, Dov M., and Hunter, Anthony, “Making Inconsistency Respectable, Part II,” in M. Clarke, R. Kruse, and S. Seraffin (eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty: European Conference ECSQARU '93, Granada, Spain, LNCS, Vol. 747, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993

Gabbay, Dov M., and Woods, John, “Non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic: Getting Beyond the Goody Two-Shoes Model of Argument,” Synthese, forthcoming

Gabbay, Dov M., and Woods, John, “More on Non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, 9 (2001), 321–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Gabriel, Gottfried “Fiction: A Semantic Approach,” Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts, 8.2 (1979), 245–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Gaifman, Haim, “Operational Pointer Semantics: Solution to Self-referential Puzzlers I,” M. Vardi (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufman, 1988, 43–60

Gäredenfors, Peter, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987

Garey, Michael R., and Johnson, David S., Computers and Intractability, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1979

Peter, Geach, “Entailment,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. 32 (1958), 143–72; reprinted in Peter Geach, Logic Matters, Oxford: Blackwell, 1972, 174–86Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest, Words and Things, Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, 1968

Gibbins, Peter “A User-Friendly Quantum Logic,” Logique et Analyse, 112 (1985), 353–62Google Scholar

Gilles, Donald, Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993

Gilbert, Margaret, On Social Facts, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993

Gilmore, P. C., “The Consistency of Partial Set Theory Without Extensionality,” in Dana Scott (ed.), Symposium in Pure Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, 1967; Axiomatic Set Theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, XIII Pt. 2, American Mathematical Society, 1974

Girle, Roderic A., “Dialogue and Entrenchment,” Proceedings of the Sixth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, 1993, 105–89

Girle, Roderic A., “Knowledge: Organized and Disorganized,” Proceedings of the Seventh Florida Artificial Intellegence Research Symposium, Pensacola Beach, Fla., 1994, 198–203Google Scholar

Girle, Roderic A., “Commands in Dialogue Logic,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning, Bonn, 1996, 246–60

Girle, Roderic A., “Belief Sets and Commitment Stores,” in Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, and Athena V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric, St. Catharines, Ont.: OSSA, 1998

Glover, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976

Gochet, Paul, Ascent to Truth, Münich: Philosophia Verlag, 1986

Gödel, Kurt, “What Is Cantor's Continuum Problem?,” American Mathematical Monthly, 54 (1947), 515–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Goghossian, Dave “What the Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us,” Times Literary Supplement December 13 (1996), 14–15Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, 2nd ed., New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965

Grattan-Guiness, Ivor, “How Bertrand Russell Discovered His Paradox,” Historia Mathematica, 5 (1978), 127–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas, Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991

Gupta, Anil, “Truth and Paradox,” in Robert L. Martin (ed.) Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 175–236

Gupta, Anil, and Belnap, Nuel D., Jr., The Revision of Theory of Truth, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993

Haack, Susan, Deviant Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974

Hacking, Ian “What Is Logic?,” The Journal of Philosophy, ⅬXXVI (1979), 285–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983

Hahn, Lewis Edwin (ed.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, second rev. ed., LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1998

Hahn, Lewis Edwin, and Schilpp, Paul Arthur (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1986

Hallett, Michael, Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984

Hamblin, C. L., Fallacies, London: Methuen, 1970

Hansen, Hans V., and Pinto, Robert C. (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 1995

Harman, Gilbert “Is Modal Logic Logic?,” Philosophia 2 (1972), 75–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Harman, Gilbert, The Nature of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977

Harman, Gilbert, Change in View, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986

Harrah, David, Communication: A Logical Model, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1963

Hart, W. D., “Access and Inference,” in W. D. Hart (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, 52–62

Hausman, Daniel M., “Introduction” in Daniel M. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 1–50

Heintz, John, “Reference and Inference in Fiction,” John Woods and Thomas Pavel (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics 8 (1979), 85–99

Henkin, Leon“Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas,” in Infinite Models, New York: Pergamon, 1961, 167–83Google Scholar

Henson, C. Ward, “Reviews of Jensen, R. B. reply to Quine and Quine to Jenson,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 40 (1975), 241–2CrossRef Google Scholar

Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, and Kaulbach, Friedrich (eds.), Frege: Posthumous Writings, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979

Herzberger, Hans G., “Paradoxes of Grounding in Semantics,” Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970), 145–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Herzberger, Hans G., “Notes on Naive Semantics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982), 62–102, reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and The Liar Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 134–74

Hilbert, David, Grundlagen der Geometrie, Leipzig: Teubner; translated as The Foundations of Geometry, E. J. Townsend (trans.), Chicago: Open Court, 1902; 10th edition, with a supplement by Paul Bernays translated under the previous English title, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1971

Hinman, P., Kim, J., and Stich, S., “Logical Truth Revisited,” The Journal of Philosophy, ⅬXV (1968), 495–500CrossRef Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1962

Hintikka, Jaakko “A Counter-example to Tarski-type Truth definitions as Applied to Natural Languages,” Philosophia, 5 (1975), 207–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko, The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics [= Acta Philosophica Fernica 28 (1976)]

Hintikka, Jaakko “The Role of Logic in Argumentation,” The Monist, 72 (1989), 3–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko, “Information-Seeking Dialogues,” in W. Becherand and W. K. Essler (eds.), Konzepte der Dialektik, Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann, 1981, 212–31

Hintikka, Jaakko, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996

Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R., Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987

Hooker, C. A. (ed.), The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1: Historical Evolution, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979

Hookway, Christopher, Quine, Oxford: Polity Press, 1988

Howe, M., Introduction to Human Memory, New York: Harper & Row, 1970

Howell, Robert, “Fictional Objects: How They Are and How They Aren't,” in John Woods and Thomas Pavel (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics 8 (1979), 50–72

Howell, Robert, “Review of [Parsons's] ‘Non-existent Objects,’” Journal of Philosophy, 80 (1983), 163–73Google Scholar

Hughes, G. E., and Cresswell, M. J., An Introduction to Modal Logic, London: Methuen, 1968

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, Ernest C. Mossner (ed.), Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books, 1969

Hylton, Peter, Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990

Iseminger, Gary “Relatedness Logic and Entailment,” The Journal of Non-Classical Logic 3 (1986), 5–23Google Scholar

Jacquette, Dale, “Logical Dimensions of Question-Begging Argument,” American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1993), 317–27Google Scholar

Jáskowski, Leon, “Propositional Calculus for Contradictory Systems,” Studia Logica XXVI (1969), 143–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Jech, Thomas J., “About the Axiom of Choice,” in Jon Barwise (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977, 345–70

Johnson-Liard, P. H., and Byrne, R. M. J., Deduction, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1991

Johnson-Laird, P. N., and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977

Johnstone, Henry W., Jr., Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument, University Park, Penn.: The Dialogue Press of Man and World, 1978

Johnston, Davidand Jennings, R. E., “Paradox Tolerant Logics” Logique et Analyse 26 (1983), 291–308Google Scholar

Kalish, Donald, Montague, Richard, and Mar, Gary, Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning, 2nd ed., San Diego, Calif.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980

Kanigel, Robert, The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan, New York: Scribner, 1991

Kant, Imanuel, Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of Principles of Natural Theology and Morality, and Logic, Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1764/1800/1974

Kant, Imanuel, Hartman, Robert S., and Schwartz, Wolfgang (trans. with introduction) Logic, Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1974

Kaplan, David, “Bob and Carl and Ted and Alice,” in Jaakko Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Languages, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973, 490–518

Kaplan, David, and Montague, Richard, “A Paradox Regained,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1 (1960), 79–90; reprinted in Richard Montague, Formal Philosophy, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974, 271–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaufmann, W., “Uber die Konstitution des Elektrons,” Annalen der Physik, 19 (1906), 487

Keynes, John Maynard, “Letter to R. F. Harrod, 4 July 1938,” in Moggridge (ed.), Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 14, The General Theory and After: Part II: Defense and Development, London: Macmillan, 1973

A., Klatzley, Human Memory: Structures and Processes, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975

Kline, Morris, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, New York: Oxford University Press, 1980

Koryé, A., “The Liar,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 6 (1946), 344–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul, “Outline of a Theory of Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, 72 (1975), 690–716 reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), The Paradox of the Liar, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 134–74

Kripke, Saul A., Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980

Lakatos, Imre, Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980

Lambert, Karel, “Logic and Microphysics,” in Karel Lambert (ed.), The Logical Way of Doing Things, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1969, 93–117

Lester, R., “Shortcomings of Marginal Analysis for Wage-Employment Problems,” American Economic Review, 36 (1946), 63–82Google Scholar

Lester, R., “Marginalism, Minimum Wages. and Labour Markets,” American Economic Review, 37 (1947), 135–48Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I., “Implication and the Algebra of Logic,” Mind 21 (1912), 522–531. Collected Papers, pp. 351–359CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I., and Langford, C. H., Symbolic Logic, New York: Dover, 1932

Lewis, David, “Truth in Fiction,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 15 (1978), 37–46, reprinted with postscripts in David Lewis (ed.), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, 261–75Google Scholar

Lewis, David K., Convention, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969

Lieber, J., and Stoller, M., “Is that all there is?,” recorded on Capital Records by Peggy Lee in 1969Google Scholar

Lindsay, P., and Norman, D., Human Information Processing, New York: Academic Press, 1977

Lindstrom, Per“On Extensions of Elementary Logic,” Theoria, XXXV (1969), 1–11Google Scholar

Löb, M. H., “Solution of a Problem of Leon Henken,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20 (1955), 115–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Locke, John, Essay On Human Understanding, Peter H. Niddith (ed. with introduction), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975

Lorentz, Hendrik Antoon, The Theory of Electrons and Its Application to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat, 3rd ed., New York: Dover, 1952

Mackenzie, J. D., “Question-Begging in Non-Cumulative Systems,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8 (1979), 117–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackenzie, J. D., “Begging the Question in Dialogue,” Australian Journal of Philosophy, 62 (1984), 174–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, Donald, “Review of Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel,” Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), 113

Martin, Robert L. (ed.), Recent Essays On Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984

Martin, Robert, and Woodruff, Peter, “On Representing ‘True-in-L’ in L,” Philosophia 5 (1975), 213–17, reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), The Paradox of the Liar, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 47–51

McGee, Vann, Truth, Vagueness and Paradox, Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1990

McKinsey, J. C. C., Sugar, A. C., and Suppes, Patrick, “Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics,” Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2 (1953), 253–72Google Scholar

Menne, Albert, Wilhelmy, Alexander, and Angstil, Helmut (eds.), Untersuchungen zum Logikkalkül und zur Logik der Einzelwissenschaften, Freiburg: Kontrolliertes Denken, 1951

Mermin, N. B., “Quantum Mysteries for Everyone,” Journal of Philosophy, 78 (1981), 397–408CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer, R. K., “Entailment,” The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), 808–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer, Robert, and Routley, Richard, “Dialectical Logic and Consistency of the World,” Studies in Soviet Thought, 16 (1975), 1–25Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It,” in John Robson (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. IV, Essays on Economics and Society 1824–1845, Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1967, 309–39

Mill, John Stuart, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, in John Robson (ed.) Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. VIII Book II of Reasoning and Book III of Induction, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974, 157–640

Millikan, Ruth Garrett, Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984

Minsky, Marvin, The Society of the Mind, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987

Moore, G. E., “The Nature of Judgement,” Mind 7 (1898), 176–93Google Scholar

Moore, G. E., “Critical Notice on Russell's An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry,” Mind 8 (1899), 397–405Google Scholar

Moore, G. E., Principia Ethica, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1903

Moore, G. E., “The Refutation of Idealism,” Mind 12 (1903), 433–53; reprinted in G. E. Moore, Philosophical Studies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922, 1–30

Moore, G. E., Philosophical Studies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922

Moore, G. E., Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1959

Moore, G. E., “Russell's Theory of Descriptions,” in G. E. Moore, Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1959, 151–95

Mortensen, Chris, Inconsistent Mathematics, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer, 1995

Mortensen, Chris, “Paraconsistency and C1,” in Graham Priest, Richard Routely, and Jean Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, Münich: Philosophia Verlag, 1989, 289–305

Myrdal, Gunnar, Objectivity in Social Research, London: Duckworth, 1970

Nagel, Ernest, Suppes, Patrick, and Tarski, Alfred (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1962

Nekham, Alexander, De Naturis Rerum, T. Wright (ed.), London: Longman, 1863

Newell, Allen, and Simon, Herbert A., Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972

Nisbett, R., and Ross, L., Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1980

Norman, Jean, and Sylvan, Richard, Directions in Relevant Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989

Nozick, Robert, “Experience, Theory and Language,” in Lewis Edwin Hahn and Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1986, 339–63

Parsons, Charles, “The Liar Paradox,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 3 (1974), 381–412, reprinted in Robert L. Martin (ed.), Truth and The Liar Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, 9–45

Parsons, Terence, Non-existent Objects, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980

Parsons, Terence “True Contradictions,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20 (1990), 335–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Pavel, Thomas, Fictional Worlds, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986

Peacocke, Christopher“What Is a Logical Constant?”, The Journal of Philosophy, ⅬXXIII (1976), 221–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin, The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974

Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993

Plato, Meno, in E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.), Plato: The Collected Dialogues., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980, 353–84

Post, John F., “A Gödelian Theorem for Theories of Rationality,” in G. Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley, III (eds.), Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1987

Priest, Graham, “The Logic of Paradox,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8 (1979), 219–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Priest, Graham, In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1987

Priest, Graham, Beyond the Limits of Thought, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1995

Priest, Graham, and Routley, Richard, “Applications of Paraconsistent Logic,” in Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman (eds.) Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, München: Philosophia Verlag, 1989, 367–93

Priest, Graham, and Routley, Richard, “Systems of Paraconsistent Logic” in Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, Münich: Philosophia Verlag, 1989, 151–86

Priest, Graham, Routley, Richard, and Norman, Jean, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, Münich: Philosophia Verlag, 1989

Putnam, Hilary, “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics,” in Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 174–97Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “Truth by Convention,” in O. H. Lee (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, New York: Longmans, 1936, 90–124

Quine, W. V., “Notes on Existence and Necessity,” Journal of Philosophy, 40 (1943), 113–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12 (1947), 43–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “Review of Geach, Subject and Predicate,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 16 (1951), 138Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., Mathematical Logic, rev. ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951

Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953

Quine, W. V., “New Foundations for Mathematical Logic,” reprinted with additions in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953, 80–101Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1960

Quine, W. V., The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, rev. and enlarged ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976

Quine, W. V., Selected Logic Papers, New York: Random House, 1966; enlarged edition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995

Quine, W. V., Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press, 1969

Quine, W. V., Set Theory and Its Logic, rev. ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969

Quine, W. V., Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1970; second ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986

Quine, W. V., Roots of Reference: The Paul Carus Lectures, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court 1973

Quine, W. V., “Reply to Manley Thompson,” in Lewis Edwin Hahn and Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court 1986, 564–8

Quine, W. V., “Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World,” Erkenntnis 9 (1975), 313–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “Reply to Robert Nozick,” in Lewis Edwin Hahn and Paul Aurthur Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1986, 364–8

Quine, W. V., Theories and Things, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981

Quine, W. V., “Things and Their Place in Theories,” Theories and Things, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981, 1–23Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., “Ontology and Ideology Revisited,” Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983), 499–501CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., Quiddities, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987

Quine, W. V., The Pursuit of Truth, revised edition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990/1992

Quine, W. V., “Structure and Nature,” The Journal of Philosophy, ⅬXXIX (1992), 5–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V., From Stimulus to Science, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995

Quine, W. V., and Ullian, J. W., The Web of Belief, New York: Random House, 1970

Raiffa, Howard, Decision Analysis, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968

Ramsey, Frank P., The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1931

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971

Rawls, John “The Independence of Moral Theory,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48 (1974–5), 5–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Read, Stephen, Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference, Oxford: Blackwell, 1988

Rescher, N. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972

Rescher, Nicholas, and Brandon, Robert, The Logic of Inconsistency: A Study in Non-standard Possible-world Semantics and Ontology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980

Richard, Jules, “The Principles of Mathematics and the Problem of Sets,” in Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1967, 143–4

Rips, Lance J., The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994

Ross, W. D., Aristotle, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953

Rosser, Barkley “The Burali-Forti Paradox,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 7 (1942), 1–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Routley, Richard, “Some Things Do Not Exist,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, VII (1966), 251–76

Routley, Richard, “The Semantic Structure of Fictional Discourse,” in John Woods and Thomas Pavel (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics, 8 (1979), 3–30

Routley, Richard, and Routley, Val, “The Semantics of First Degree Entailment,” NoÛs, 6 (1972), 335–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, “On The Axioms of Geometry,” in Nicholas Griffin and Albert C. Lewis (eds.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell Volume II, Philosophical Papers 1896–99, London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1983, 390–415

Russell, Bertrand, A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900; republished London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937

Russell, Bertrand, The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed., London: Allen and Unwin, 1937

Russell, Bertrand “On Denoting,” Mind N.S. XIV (1905), 479–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry, New York: Dover, 1956

Russell, Bertrand, My Philosophical Development, London: Allen and Unwin, 1959

Russell, Bertrand, Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy, London: Allen and Unwin, 1961

Russell, Bertrand, “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types,” in Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967, 152–82

Ryle, Gilbert, “Are There Propositions?,” in Collected Papers 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968, London: Hutchinson and Co., 1971, 12–38. Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. ⅹⅹⅹ, 1930

Ryle, Gilbert, Philosophical Arguments, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1945

Ryle, Gilbert “Ordinary Language,” The Philosophical Review ⅬⅫ (1953), 167–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert, “Proofs in Philosophy,” in Gilbert Ryle (ed.) Collected Papers 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968, London: Hutchinson, 1972, 319–25

Ryle, Gilbert “Use, Usage and Meaning,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary vol. XXXV (1961), 223–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Sainsbury, R. M., Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988

Savage, Leonard J., The Foundations of Statistics, New York: John Wiley, 1954

Schotch, P. K., “Paraconsistent Logic: The View from the Right,” Philosophy of ScienceAssociation 2 (1993), 421–9Google Scholar

Schotch, P. K., and Jennings, R. E., “On Detonating,” in Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, Munich: Philosophia, 1989, 306–27

Sen, Amartya, “Social Choice Theory,” in Kenneth J. Arrow and M. D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. III, Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann, 1986, 1070–181

Sen, Amartya, On Ethics and Economics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1987

Sher, Gila, The Bounds of Logic, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991

Shoenfield, Joseph R., Mathematical Logic, Reading, Mass.: Allison-Wesley, 1967

Simmons, Keith, Universality of the Liar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993

Skolem, Th., “Untersuchungen über die Axiome des Klassenlalkuss,” in Th. Skolem (ed.), Selected Works in Logic, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1970, 67–101

Slater, B. H., “Paraconsistent Logics?,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24 (1995), 451–4CrossRef Google Scholar

Smiley, Timothy J., “Entailment and Deducibility,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. 32 (1958), 123–42Google Scholar

Soames, Scott, Understanding Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

Sorenson, Roy A., Blindspots, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988

Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre, Relevance, Oxford: Blackwell, 1986

Starmans, Richard, Logic, Argumentation and Common Sense, Tilburg: Tilburg University Print, 1996

Stein, Edward “Rationality and Reflective Equilibrium,” Synthese, 99 (1994), 137–72Google Scholar

Stich, Stephen, The Fragmentation of Reason, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990

Stich, Stephen, and Nisbett, Richard, “Justification and Psychology of Human Reasoning,” Philosophy of Science, 47 (1980), 188–202CrossRef Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick, Introduction to Logic, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1957

Suppes, Patrick, “Models of Data,” in Ernest Nagel, Patrick Suppes, and Alfred Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1962, 252–61

Suppes, Patrick, “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences,” Synthese 12 (1960), 287–301CrossRef Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick, “The Philosophical Relevance of Decision Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy, 58 (1960), 606–14Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick, “Logics Appropriate to Empirical Theories,” in C. A. Hooker (ed.), The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics Vol I: Historical Evaluation, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 329–40

Suppes, Patrick, Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, New York: Humanities Press, 1969

Tarski, Alfred, “On the Concept of Logical Consequence,” in Alfred Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathemathics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, J. H. Woodger (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2nd ed., John Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1983, 409–20

Tarski, Alfred, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, J. H. Woodger (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2nd ed., John Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1983

Tarski, Alfred, “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in Alfred Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, J. H. Woodger (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2nd ed., John Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1983, 152–278

Tennant, Neil, “Natural Deduction and Gentzen Sequent Systems for Intuitionistic Relevant Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52 (1987), 665–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Tennant, Neil, Autologic, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993

ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (ed.), Studies in Model Theoretic Semantics, Dordrecht: Foris, 1983

Turkle, Sherry, “Artificial Intelligence and Psychoanalysis,” in Graubard (ed.), The Artificial Intelligence Debate: False Starts, Real Foundations, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988, 260–1

Ullian, Joseph S., “Quine and the Field of Mathematical Logic,” Lewis E. Hahn and Paul A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1986, 569–89

Urmson, J. O., Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Two World Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956

Urquhart, Alasdair, “The Undecidability of Entailment and Relevant Implication,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1984), 1059–73CrossRef Google Scholar

van Benthem, Johan, “Five Easy Pieces,” in Johan van Benthem and Alice G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), Studies in Model Theoretic Semantics, Dordrecht: Foris, 1983, 1–17

Benthem, Johany, “What Is Dialectical Logic?,” Erkenntnis 14 (1979), 333–47CrossRef Google Scholar

van Benthem, Johan, and ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language, Dordrecht: Foris, 1985

van Eemeren Frans H., et al., Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996

van Eemeren, Frans H., and Grootendorst, Rob, Speech Acts in Argumentation Discussions, Dordrecht: Foris, 1984

Fraassen, Bas C., “Meaning Relations Among Predicates,” NoÛs 1 (1967), 161–79CrossRef Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas C., Formal Semantics and Logic, New York: Macmillan, 1971

van Fraassen, Bas C., “The Labyrinth of Quantum Logics,” in C. A. Hooker (ed.), The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics Vol. I: Historical Evolution, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975, 577–607

van Fraassen, Bas C., The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980

van Heijenoort, Jean (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book of Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967

Inwagen, Peter, “Creatures of Fiction,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 14 (1997), 299–308Google Scholar

Veyne, Paul, Le Pain et le Cirque, Paris: Seuil, 1976

von Mises, Ludwig, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1949

von Mises, Ludwig, Epistemological Problems of Economics, G. Riseman (trans.), New York: New York University Press, 1981

von Neumann, John, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1953

Wright, G. H., “The Concept of Entailment,” Logical Studies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957, 166–91Google Scholar

Walton, D. N., Logical Dialogue – Games and Fallacies, London: University Press of America, 1984

Walton, D. N., “Burden of Proof,” Argumentation, 2 (1988), 233–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Walton, D. N., and Krabbe, E. C. W., Commitment in Dialogue, Albany: State University of New York, 1995

Walton, Douglas, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995

Walton, Kendall, Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990

Wang, Hao, “Quine's Logical Ideas in Historical Perspective,” in Lewis E. Hahn and Paul A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1986, 623–43

Whately, Richard, Elements of Logic, 1st edition, Book 3, Section 13, New York: Harper and Row, 1826/1853

Wilson, N. L., “Substances Without Substrata,” Review of Metaphysics, 12 (1959), 521–39Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, 1958

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1964

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, in C. Diamond (ed.), Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939, Hassocks, U.K.: Harvester Press 1976

Woods, John, “The Contradiction-Exterminator,” Analysis, XXV (1965), 49–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, John “Fictionality and the Logic of Relations,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1969), 51–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, John, “Essentialism, Self-Identity, and Quantifying In,” in Milton K. Muntitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation, New York: New York University Press, 1971, 165–98

Woods, John, The Logic of Fiction: A Philosophical Sounding of Deviant Logic, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1974

Woods, John “Identity and Modality,” Philosophia V (1975), 69–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, John, “Critical Notice of Deviant Logic,” Canadian Journal of Philsophy VII (1977), 651–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, John, Engineered Death: Abortion, Suicide, Euthanasia, Senecide, Ottawa, Ont.: University of Ottawa Press, 1978

Woods, John, “Ideals of Rationality in Dialogic,” Argumentation, 2 (1988), 419–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, John, “The Relevance of Relevant Logic,” in J. Norman and R. Sylvan (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1989, 77–86

Woods, John, “And So Indeed Are Perfect Cheat,” Argumentation, 9 (1995), 654–68

Woods, John, “Semantic Intuitions” in Johan van Bentham, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1996, 179–208

Woods, John, “A Captious Nicety of Argument: The Philosophy of W. V. Quine,” in Lewis E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, Library of Living Philosophers, 2nd rev. ed., LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court Press, 1998, 687–725

Woods, John, Aristotle's Earlier Logic, Oxford: Hermes Science Publications, 2001

Woods, John, and Pavel, Thomas (eds.), Formal Semantics and Literary Theory, a special issue of Poetics 8 (1979)

Woods, John, and Peacock, Kent, “What Physics Does to Logic: The Current State of Quantum Logic Is Incompatible With,” forthcoming

Woods, John, and Walton, Douglas, “Arresting Circles in Formal Dialogues,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1978), 73–90; reprinted in John Woods and Douglas Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1982, Berlin: Foris/deGruyter, 1988, 143–159

Woods, John, and Walton, Douglas, “Question-Begging and Cumulativeness in Dialectical Games,” Nôus 16 (1982), 585–606; reprinted in John Woods and Douglas Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1982, Berlin: Foris/deGruyter 1988, 253–72

Woods, John, and Walton, Douglas, Argument: The Logic of Fallacies., Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1982

Woods, John, and Walton, Douglas, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1982, Berlin: Foris/de Gruyter, 1988

Wright, Crispin, Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1983

Zalta, Edward N., Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983

Zermelo, Ernst, “Beweis, das jede Menge wohlgeoronet werden kann,” Mathematischen Annalen 59 (1904), 514–16; translated as “Proof That Every Set Can Be Well-ordered,” S. Bauer-Mengelburge (trans.), in Jean van Heijenvoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967, 139–41

Zermelo, Ernst, “Uber Grenzzahlen und Megenbereiche: neue Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre,” Fundamentae Mathematicae, 16 (1930), 29–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Zucker, J., “The Adequacy Problem for Classical Logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 4 (1978), 517–35Google Scholar