Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 37
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      07 July 2022
      28 July 2022
      ISBN:
      9781009211659
      9781009211642
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.11kg, 70 Pages
    • Series:
      Elements in Research Methods for Developmental Science
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Series:
    Elements in Research Methods for Developmental Science

    Book description

    Parceling is pre-modeling strategy to create fewer and more reliable indicators of constructs for use with latent variable models. Parceling is particularly useful for developmental scientists because longitudinal models can become quite complex and even intractable when measurement models of items are fit. In this Element the authors provide a detailed account of the advantages of using parcels, their potential pitfalls, as well as the techniques for creating them for conducting latent variable structural equation modeling (SEM) in the context of the developmental sciences. They finish with a review of the recent use of parcels in developmental journals. Although they focus on developmental applications of parceling, parceling is also highly applicable to any discipline that uses latent variable SEM.

    References

    Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report form and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychaiatry, University of Vermont.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155173. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294170
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 4587. http://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
    Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78102. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0901_5
    Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Barrett, P. T., & Kline, P. (1981). The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. Personality Study and Group Behavior, 1(1), 2333.
    Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.
    Bodin, D., Pardini, D. A., Burns, T. G., & Stevens, A. B. (2009). Higher order factor structure of the WISC-IV in a clinical neuropsychological sample. Child Neuropsychology, 15(5), 417424. http://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802603661
    Bodner, T. E. (2006). Missing data: Prevalence and reporting practices. Psychological Reports, 99(3), 675680. http://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.3.675-680
    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
    Bollen, K. A., & Noble, M. D. (2011). Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1563915646. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010661108
    Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291294. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-r
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation modeling (pp. 136162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Byrne, B. M. (2005). Factor analytic models viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(1), 1732. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_02
    Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56(2), 81.
    Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 11501152. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x
    Castellanos-Ryan, N., & Conrod, P. (2011). Personality correlates of the common and unique variance across conduct disorder and substance misuse symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(4), 563576. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9481-3
    Castro, J., dePablo, J., Gomez, J., Arrindell, W. A., & Toro, J. (1997). Assessing rearing behaviour from the perspective of the parents: A new form of the EMBU. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32(4), 230235. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00788243
    Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N. et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 11791194. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
    Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2001). The effects of model parsimony and sampling error on the fit of structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 236264. http://doi.org/10.1177/109442810143004
    Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235259. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
    Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330351. http://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.6.4.330
    Comrey, A. L. (1961). Factored homogeneous item dimensions in personality research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 417431.
    Cortes Hidalgo, A. P., Neumann, A., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. et al. (2020). Prenatal maternal stress and child IQ. Child Development, 91(2), 347365. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13177
    Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179–198). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9
    Crede, M., & Harms, P. (2019). Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(1), 1830. http://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0272
    DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 11381151. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
    Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434449. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
    Eekhout, I., de Vet, H. C. W., de Boer, M. R., Twisk, J. W. R., & Heymans, M. W. (2018). Passive imputation and parcel summaries are both valid to handle missing items in studies with many multi-item scales. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(4), 11281140. http://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216654511
    Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(1), 128141. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_7
    Enders, C. K. (2008). A note on the use of missing auxiliary variables in full information maximum likelihood-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 434448. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802154307
    Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
    Enders, C. K. (2017). Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 418. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.008
    Field, A. (2016). An adventure in statistics: The reality enigma. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Galambos, J., & Kotz, S. (1978). Characterizations of probability distributions: A unified approach with an emphasis on exponential and related models. New York: Springer.
    Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 231258). Boston, MA: Springer.
    Gottschall, A. C., West, S. G., & Enders, C. K. (2012). A comparison of item-level and scale-level multiple imputation for questionnaire batteries. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(1), 125. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.640589
    Graham, J. W. (2003). Adding missing-data-relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 80100. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1001_4
    Graham, J. W., Tatterson, J. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2000). Creating parcels for multi-dimensional constructs in structural equation modeling. In annual meeting of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Saratoga Springs, NY.
    Gruner, K., Muris, P., & Merckelbach, H. (1999). The relationship between anxious rearing behaviours and anxiety disorders symptomatology in normal children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 30(1), 2735. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7916(99)00004-x
    Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233256. http://doi.org/10.1177/109442819923002
    Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 57, 327351. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x
    Herman, K. C., Hodgson, C. G., Eddy, C. L. et al. (2020). Does child likeability mediate the link between academic competence and depressive symptoms in early elementary school? Child Development, 91(2), e331e344. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13214
    Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Supplementary Educational Monographs
    Hopkins, J., Gouze, K. R., Lavigne, J. V., & Bryant, F. B. (2020). Multidomain risk factors in early childhood and depression symptoms in 6-year-olds: A longitudinal pathway model. Development and Psychopathology, 32(1), 5771. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001426
    Howard, W. J., Rhemtulla, M., & Little, T. D. (2015). Using principal components as auxiliary variables in missing data estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(3), 285299. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.999267
    Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
    Iliceto, P., & Fino, E. (2017). The Italian version of the Wong-Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS-I): A second-order factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 274280. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.006
    Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2020). Self-reported moral emotions and physical and relational aggression in early childhood: A social domain approach. Child Development, 91(1), e92e107. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13174
    Joo, H., Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2017). Not all nonnormal distributions are created equal: Improved theoretical and measurement precision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 10221053. http://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000214
    Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Taub, G. E., Reynolds, M. R., & Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Higher order, multisample, confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 35(1), 108127. ://WOS: 000202998000008.
    Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 757765.
    Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 186207. http://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
    Lang, K. M., & Little, T. D. (2018). Principled missing data treatments. Prevention Science, 19(3), 284294. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0644-5
    Lee, M. R., Bartholow, B. D., McCarthy, D. M., Pedersen, S. L., & Sher, K. J. (2015). Two alternative approaches to conventional person-mean imputation scoring of the Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol Scale (SRE). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(1), 231236. http://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000015
    Lei, P. W., & Shiverdecker, L. K. (2020). Performance of estimators for confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 584601. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1680292
    Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 3343. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
    Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936949. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
    Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 155.
    Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guildford Press.
    Little, T. D. (in press). Longitudinal structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
    Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151173. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
    Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 192211. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.2.192
    Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). The revised control, agency, and means-ends interview (CAMI): A multi-cultural validity assessment using mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses. Berlin: Max Planck Institute.
    Little, T. D., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). Planned missing data designs for developmental researchers. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 199204. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12043
    Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285300. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
    MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201226. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
    Madley-Dowd, P., Hughes, R., Tilling, K., & Heron, J. (2019). The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 110, 6373. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.016
    Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right – camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 257284. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
    Massé, R., Poulin, C., Dassa, C. et al. (1998). The structure of mental health: Higher-order confirmatory factor analyses of psychological distress and well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 45(1–3), 475504. http://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006992032387
    Mathieu, S. L., Conlon, E. G., Waters, A. M., & Farrell, L. J. (2020). Perceived parental rearing in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: Examining the factor structure of the EMBU child and parent versions and associations with OCD symptoms. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 51(6), 956968. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-00979-6
    Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260293. http://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802458935
    Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97110. http://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854
    Mazza, G. L., Enders, C. K., & Ruehlman, L. S. (2015). Addressing item-level missing data: A comparison of proration and full information maximum likelihood estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(5), 504519. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1068157
    McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Montigny, C., Castellanos-Ryan, N., Whelan, R. et al. (2013). A phenotypic structure and neural correlates of compulsive behaviors in adolescents. Plos One, 8(11), 13. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080151
    Motti-Stefanidi, F., Pavlopoulos, V., Mastrotheodoros, S., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2020). Longitudinal interplay between peer likeability and youth’s adaptation and psychological well-being: A study of immigrant and nonimmigrant adolescents in the school context. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 393403. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419894721
    Murray, J. S. (2018). Multiple imputation: A review of practical and theoretical findings. Statistical Science, 33(2), 142159. http://doi.org/10.1214/18-sts644
    Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 729757. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258228
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Orçan, F., & Yanyun, Y. (2016). A note on the use of item parceling in structural equation modeling with missing data. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 5972. http://doi.org/10.21031/epod.88204
    Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525556. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004525
    Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P. et al. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS (R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263283. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411667
    R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    Reddy, S. K. (1992). Effects of ignoring correlated measurement error in structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 549570. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052003005
    Rhemtulla, M. (2016). Population performance of SEM parceling srategies under measurement and structural model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 348368. http://doi.org/10.1037/met0000072
    Rhemtulla, M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Planned missing data designs in educational psychology research. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 305316. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1208094
    Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J.-M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Parceling cannot reduce factor indeterminacy in factor analysis: A research note. Psychometrika, 84, 772780. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09677-2
    Rioux, C., Lewin, A., Odejimi, O. A., & Little, T. D. (2020). Reflection on modern methods: Planned missing data designs for epidemiological research. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(5), 17021711. http://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa042
    Rioux, C., & Little, T. D. (2020). Underused methods in developmental science to inform policy and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 14(2), 97103. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12364
    Rioux, C., & Little, T. D. (2021). Missing data treatments in intervention studies: What was, what is, and what should be. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(1), 5158. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419880609
    Rioux, C., Stickley, Z., Odejimi, O. A., & Little, T. D. (2020). Item parcels as indicators: Why, when, and how to use them in small sample research. In Van De Schoot, R. & Miočević, M. (Eds.), Small sample size solutions: A guide for applied researchers and practitioners (pp. 203214). London: Routledge.
    Rodriguez, J. H., Gregus, S. J., Craig, J. T., Pastrana, F. A., & Cavell, T. A. (2020). Anxiety sensitivity and children’s risk for both internalizing problems and peer victimization experiences. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 51(2), 174186. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-019-00919-z
    Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 136. http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
    RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio.
    Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581590. http://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
    Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
    Rushton, J. P., Brainerd, C. J., & Pressley, M. (1983). Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 1838. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.18
    Sass, D. A., & Smith, P. L. (2006). The effects of parceling unidimensional scales on structural parameter estimates in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(4), 566586. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_4
    Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147177. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147
    Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 110. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
    Seaman, S., Galati, J., Jackson, D., & Carlin, J. (2013). What is meant by “missing at random”? Statistical Science, 28(2), 257268. http://doi.org/10.1214/13-sts415
    Stein, G. L., Mejia, Y., Gonzalez, L. M., Kiang, L., & Supple, A. J. (2020). Familism in action in an emerging immigrant community: An examination of indirect effects in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 56(8), 14751483. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000791
    Sterba, S. K. (2019). Problems with rationales for parceling that fail to consider parcel-allocation variability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(2), 264287. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1522497
    Sterba, S. K., & MacCallum, R. C. (2010). Variability in parameter estimates and model fit across repeated allocations of items to parcels. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(2), 322358. http://doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680302
    Sterba, S. K., & Rights, J. D. (2017). Effects of parceling on model selection: Parcel-allocation variability in model ranking. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 4768. http://doi.org/10.1037/met0000067
    Syed, M., Eriksson, P. L., Frisén, A., Hwang, C. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2020). Personality development from age 2 to 33: Stability and change in ego resiliency and ego control and associations with adult adaptation. Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 815832. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000895
    Takacs, L., Smolik, F., Kazmierczak, M., & Putnam, S. P. (2020). Early infant temperament shapes the nature of mother-infant bonding in the first postpartum year. Infant Behavior & Development, 58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101428
    Tarka, P. (2018). An over view of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313354. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8
    Thompson, B., & Melancon, J. (1996). Using item “testlets/parcels” in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using the PPDP-78. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED404349
    Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 3165. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239
    Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 110. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291170
    Van Buuren, S. (2018). Flexible imputation of missing data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., Lek, K., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2015). Editorial: Measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1064). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01064
    Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231251. http://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.3.2.231
    Violato, C., & Hecker, K. G. (2007). How to use structural equation modeling in medical education research: A brief guide. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19(4), 362371. http://doi.org/10.1080/10401330701542685
    Wei, J., Sze, I. N.-L., Ng, F. F.-Y., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2020). Parents’ responses to their children’s performance: A process examination in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 56(12), 23312344. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001125
    Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2022). On the use of balanced item parceling to counter acquiescence bias in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 170180
    Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 1018. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
    Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 1637. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.16
    Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233242. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002
    Yang, C. M., Nay, S., & Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Three approaches to using lengthy ordinal scales in structural equation models parceling, latent scoring, and shortening scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(2), 122142. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609338592
    Yoo, J. E. (2009). The effect of auxiliary variables and multiple imputation on parameter estimation in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 929947. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332225
    Yu, Y., & Kushnir, T. (2020). The ontogeny of cumulative culture: Individual toddlers vary in faithful imitation and goal emulation. Developmental Science, 23(1). http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12862
    Yuan, K.-H., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1997). On averaging variables in a confirmatory factor analysis model. Behaviormetrika, 24(1), 7183. http://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.24.71

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.