[Anon.] Observations on the British Constitution, and on the Proposed Improvement of Our Parliamentary Representation (Edinburgh, 1831).Google Scholar

[Anon.] “Parliamentary Opposition,” ER, 101 (1855): 1–22.Google Scholar

[Anon.] “Independent Voting and Party Government,” SR, 3 (1857): 191–2.Google Scholar

[Anon.] The Franchise: What Shall We Do to It? (London, 1858).Google Scholar

[Anon.] Parliamentary Reform (London, 1867).Google Scholar

[Anon.] Student’s Handbook to the University and Colleges of Oxford (Oxford, 1913).Google Scholar

“A Moderate Liberal.” “Can Any Class Be Trusted?” NR, 2 (1884): 799–806.Google Scholar

A Moderate Liberal “A Reformer.” A View of Parliamentary Reform (Wallingford, 1867).Google Scholar

Acton, , Edward Dalberg, John Emerich, First Baron. The History of Freedom and Other Essays, ed. Neville Figgis, John and Vere Laurence, Reginald (London, 1907).Google Scholar

Alison, Archibald. “The Influence of the Press,” BM, 36 (1834): 373–91.Google Scholar

Alison, Archibald. Essays Political, Historical, and Miscellaneous, 3 vols. (Edinburgh, 1850).Google Scholar

Allin, C. D. “The Position of Parliament,” PSQ, 29 (1914): 214–43.Google Scholar

Andrae, Poul. Andrae and His Invention: The Proportional Representation Method, A Memorial Work, trans. Vaughn Meisling (Copenhagen, 1926).Google Scholar

Aris, Reinhold. “Proportional Representation in Germany,” Politica, 2 (1937): 433–45.Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. Irish Essays and Others (London, 1882).Google Scholar

Austin, John. A Plea for the Constitution, second edition (London, 1859).Google Scholar

Aytoun, William Edmonstoune. “Reform Measures of 1852,” BM, 71 (1852): 369–86.Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. Essays on Parliamentary Reform (London, 1883).Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. “Note of 18 Feb, 1859, to ‘Parliamentary Reform’,” The Works and Life of Walter Bagehot, ed. Mrs. Barrington, Russell (London, 1915), vol. 3: 164–76.Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, 15 vols., ed. John-Stevas, Norman St. (Cambridge, MA, 1965–86).Google Scholar

Bailey, Samuel. Questions in Political Economy, Politics, Morals, Metaphysics, Polite Literature, and Other Branches of Knowledge (London, 1828).Google Scholar

Bailey, Samuel. Essays on the Pursuit of Truth and the Progress of Knowledge, second edition (London, 1844).Google Scholar

Baily, Walter. A Scheme for Proportional Representation (London, 1869).Google Scholar

Baily, Walter. Proportional Representation in Large Constituencies (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Becker, Lydia. “Female Suffrage,” CR, 1 (1867): 307–16.Google Scholar

Becker, Lydia. “The Political Disabilities of Women,” in Before the Vote Was Won: Arguments for and against Women’s Suffrage 1864–1896, ed. Lewis, Jane (London, 1987): 118–40.Google Scholar

Beales, Edmond, Cremer, W. R., Holyoake, G. J., et al. Representative Reform: Report of the Committee Appointed by the Conference of Members of the Reform League, and Others, on Mr. Hare’s Scheme of Representation, held 28th February, & 7th & 21st March, 1868 (London, 1868).Google Scholar

Belloc, Hilaire and Chesterton, Cecil. The Party System (London, 1911).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Plan of Parliamentary Reform, in the Form of a Catechism (London, 1817).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Anarchical Fallacies, Being an Examination of the Declaration of Rights Issued during the French Revolution, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols., ed. Bowring, John (Edinburgh, 1838–43), vol. 2: 489–534.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Bentham’s Theory of Fictions, ed. Ogden, C. K. (New York, 1932).Google Scholar

Blanc, Louis. Questions d’aujourd’hui et de demain, 2 vols. (Paris, 1873).Google Scholar

Bodichon, Barbara. Reasons for and against the Enfranchisement of Women (London, 1869).Google Scholar

Bosanquet, Bernard. “The Reality of the General Will,” in The British Idealists, ed. Boucher, David (Cambridge, 1997): 130–41.Google Scholar

Bosanquet, S. R. Eirenicon: Toleration, Intolerance, Christianity, Christian Unity, the Church of England and Dissent (London, 1867).Google Scholar

Boundary Commission (England and Wales). Report of the Boundary Commissioners for England and Wales, 1885, 2 vols. (London, 1885).Google Scholar

Boutmy, Émile. Essai d’une Psychologie politique du Peuple anglais au XIX^e siècle (Paris, 1902).Google Scholar

Brodrick, George Charles. “The Utilitarian Argument against Reform, as Stated by Mr. Lowe,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 1–26.Google Scholar

Brodrick, George C. Political Studies (London, 1879).Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. Inaugural Discourse of Henry Brougham, Esq., MP: On Being Installed Lord Rector of the University of Glasgow (Glasgow, 1825).Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. “France,” The British and Foreign Review, 1 (1835): 492–512.Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. “French Parties and Politics,” ER, 61 (1835): 123–7.Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. Contributions to the Edinburgh Review by Henry Lord Brougham, 2 vols. (London, 1856).Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. The British Constitution: Its History, Structure, and Working (London and Glasgow, 1861).Google Scholar

Brougham, , Henry, Lord. Works of Henry Lord Brougham, 11 vols. (Edinburgh, 1873).Google Scholar

Brown, William Jethro. The New Democracy: A Political Study (London, 1899).Google Scholar

Bryce, James. The American Commonwealth, second edition, 2 vols. (London, 1889).Google Scholar

Buckalew, Charles. Proportional Representation: Or, the Representation of Successive Majorities in Federal, State, Municipal, Corporate, and Primary Elections, ed. Freeze, John (Philadelphia, 1872).Google Scholar

Buckle, Henry Thomas. “Mill on Liberty,” FM, 59 (1859): 509–42.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Select Works of Edmund Burke, 4 vols. (Indianapolis, 1990).Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Further Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Ritchie, Daniel (Indianapolis, 1992).Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Miscellaneous Writings, ed. Canavan, Francis (Indianapolis, 1999).Google Scholar

Calvert, Frederick. The Representation of Minorities (London, 1881).Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and The Heroic in History (London, 1841).Google Scholar

Cartwright, John. Legislative Rights of the Commonalty Vindicated; or, Take Your Choice!, second edition (London, 1777).Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Joseph. “A New Political Organization,” FR, 22 (1877): 126–34.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Joseph. “The Caucus,” FR, 24 (1878): 721–41.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Joseph. The Radical Programme, ed. Hamer, D. A. (Brighton, 1971).Google Scholar

Chapman, John. “Politics, Sociology, Voyages, and Travels,” WR, 41 (1872): 519–38.Google Scholar

Charles, I. His Majesties Answer to the XIX Propositions of Both Houses of Parliament (London, 1642).Google Scholar

Christophle, François-Marie-Jules. De la représentation proportionnelle (Paris, 1887).Google Scholar

Church, Richard William. “Mill on Liberty,” in Liberty: Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill, ed. Pyle, Andrew (South Bend, 1994): 210–54.Google Scholar

Clifford, W. K. The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, ed. Madigan, Timothy (Amherst, 1999).Google Scholar

Cole, Henry Warwick. The Middle Classes and the Borough Franchise (London, 1866).Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. On the Constitution of Church and State, According to the Idea of Each: with Aids toward a Right Judgment on the Late Catholic Bill (London, 1830).Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Political Thought of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. White, R. J. (London, 1938).Google Scholar

Collier, Robert. Representation of Minorities (London, 1868).Google Scholar

Congreve, Richard. Essays Political, Social, and Religious (London, 1874).Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. Political Writings, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar

Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Earl of Shaftesbury. Two Seasonable Discourses Concerning This Present Parliament (Oxford, 1675).Google Scholar

Cosgrove, Richard. The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian Jurist (London, 1980).Google Scholar

Courtney, Leonard. “Political Machinery and Political Life,” FR, 20 (1876): 74–92.Google Scholar

Courtney, Leonard. “The Representation of Minorities,” NC, 6 (1879): 141–56.Google Scholar

Courtney, Leonard. “The Seats Bill,” FR, 37 (1885): 26–36.Google Scholar

Cox, Homersham. The British Commonwealth: or a Commentary on the Institutions and Principles of British Government (London, 1854).Google Scholar

Cox, Homersham. The Institutions of English Government: Being an Account of the Constitution, Powers, and Procedure, of Its Legislative, Judicial, and Administrative Departments, with Copious References to Ancient and Modern Authorities (London, 1863).Google Scholar

Cracroft, Bernard. “The Analysis of the House of Commons, or Indirect Representation,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 155–90.Google Scholar

Cracroft, Bernard. Essays, Political and Miscellaneous, 2 vols. (London, 1868).Google Scholar

Creasy, Edward Shepherd. The Text-Book of the Constitution. Magna Charta, The Petition of Rights, and the Bill of Rights, with Historical Comments, and Remarks on the Present Political Emergencies (London, 1848).Google Scholar

Crosskey, Henry. “The Birmingham Liberal Association and Its Assailants,” MM, 39 (1878): 151–57.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “The Balance of Classes,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 67–84.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “Democracy in Switzerland,” ER, 171 (1890): 113–45.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “Ought the Referendum to Be Introduced into England,” CR, 57 (1890): 489–511.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “Alexis de Tocqueville,” NR, 21 (1893): 771–84.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “The Referendum [I],” NR, 23 (1894): 65–72.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “Unionists and the House of Lords,” NR, 24 (1895): 690–704.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “Will the Form of Parliamentary Government Be Permanent?” Harvard Law Review, 13 (1899): 67–79.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (London, 1905).Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “The Paralysis of the Constitution,” CR 88 (1905): 305–16.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “English Party Government,” QR, 210 (1909): 604–27.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. “The Political Situation: ‘On the Brink of an Abyss’,” NC, 67 (1910): 779–85.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, eighth edition (London, 1915).Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. General Characteristics of English Constitutionalism: Six Unpublished Lectures, ed. Raina, Peter (Bern, 2009).Google Scholar

Dobbs, Archibald. General Representation, On a Complete Readjustment and Modification of Mr. Hare’s Plan (London, 1871).Google Scholar

Dodgson, Charles Lutwidge [Lewis Carroll]. The Pamphlets of Lewis Carroll, Volume Three: The Political Pamphlets and Letters of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, ed. Abeles, Francine (New York, 2001).Google Scholar

Donisthorpe, Wordsworth. Individualism: A System of Politics (London, 1889).Google Scholar

Droop, Henry Richmond. On the Political and Social Effects of Different Methods of Electing Representatives (LSE Selected Pamphlets, 1869).Google Scholar

Droop, Henry Richmond. “On Methods of Electing Representatives,” Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 44 (1881): 141–202.Google Scholar

Dupont-White, Charles Brook. Le Rôle et la liberté de la presse (Paris, 1866).Google Scholar

Dupont-White, Charles Brook. “Introduction” to Mill, J. S., Le Gouvernement représentatif, trans. Dupont-White, third edition (Paris, 1877): v–xlviii.Google Scholar

Dupriez, Léon. L’organisation du suffrage universel en Belgique. Vote plural, vote obligatoire et représentation proportionnelle (Paris, 1901).Google Scholar

Dutcher, Salem. Minority or Proportional Representation: Its Nature, Aims, History, Processes, and Practical Operation (New York, 1872).Google Scholar

Duvergier de Hauranne, Prosper. “La démocratie et le droit de suffrage,” Revue des deux mondes, 74 (1868): 608–43, 785–821.Google Scholar

Eardley-Wilmot, John Eardley. Lord Brougham’s Acts and Bills, from 1811 to the Present Time … (London, 1857).Google Scholar

Eardley-Wilmot, John Eardley. A Safe and Constitutional Plan of Parliamentary Reform (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (London, 1881).Google Scholar

Escott, Thomas Hay Sweet. “The Future of the Radical Party,” FR, 34 (1883): 1–11.Google Scholar

Escott, T. H. S. “The Radical Programme: Machinery,” FR, 34 (1883): 290–7.Google Scholar

Fawcett, Henry. Mr. Hare’s Reform Bill Simplified and Explained (Westminster, 1860).Google Scholar

Fawcett, Henry. The Leading Clauses of a New Reform Bill (Cambridge, 1860).Google Scholar

Fawcett, Henry. “Mr. Mill’s Treatise on Representative Government,” MM, 4 (1861): 97–102.Google Scholar

Fawcett, Henry. “Proportional Representation, from the Last Speech of the Right Hon. Henry Fawcett, MP, Delivered to His Constituents at Hackney, October 13, 1884,” (Earl Grey Pamphlets Collection, 1884).Google Scholar

Fawcett, Millicent Garrett. “Proportional Representation,” MM, 22 (1870): 376–82.Google Scholar

Fawcett, Millicent Garrett. Home and Politics, third edition (London, 1894).Google Scholar

Fawcett, Millicent Garrett. “The Electoral Disabilities of Women,” in The Subjection of Women: Contemporary Responses to John Stuart Mill, ed. Pyle, Andrew (Bristol, 1995): 223–35.Google Scholar

Figgis, John Neville. “William Warburton,” in Typical English Churchmen from Parker to Maurice, ed. Collins, William (London, 1902): 215–56.Google Scholar

Finer, Herman. Fabian Tract No. 211: The Case against Proportional Representation (Westminster, 1924).Google Scholar

Fisher, J. Francis. The Degradation of Our Representative System and Its Reform (Philadelphia, 1863).Google Scholar

Flaugergues, Pierre-François. De la représentation nationale et principes sur la matière des élections (Paris, 1820).Google Scholar

Freeman, Edward. The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Frisby, Alfred. “The Next Reform Bill,” FR, 32 (1882): 241–54.Google Scholar

Froude, James Anthony. “Party Politics,” FM, 10 (1874): 1–18.Google Scholar

Gergonne, Joseph Diaz. “Arithmétique Politique. Sur les élections et le système représentatif,” Annales de Mathématiques, 10 (1820): 281–8.Google Scholar

Gibbons, Philip Arnold. Ideas of Political Representation in Parliament, 1660–1832 (Oxford, 1914).Google Scholar

Girardin, Émile de. Force ou Richesse: Questions de l’année 1864 (Paris, 1865).Google Scholar

Gladstone, William Ewart. “The Declining Efficiency of Parliament,” QR, 99 (1856): 521–70.Google Scholar

Gladstone, William Ewart. Speeches on Parliamentary Reform in 1866 (London, 1866).Google Scholar

Gladstone, William Ewart. “Electoral Facts,” NC, 4 (1878): 955–68.Google Scholar

Gleig, George Robert. “The Reform Bill,” BM, 99 (1866): 650–72.Google Scholar

Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, and Its Influence on General Virtue and Happiness, 2 vols. (London, 1793).Google Scholar

Graham, William. English Political Philosophy from Hobbes to Maine (London, 1907).Google Scholar

Granier de Cassagnac, Adolphe. L’empereur et la démocratie moderne (Paris, 1860).Google Scholar

Green, T. H. “Parliamentary Reform,” Speech of 25 February 1868, in The Collected Works of T. H. Green, ed. Nicholson, Peter, 5 vols. (Bristol, 1997), vol. 5: 232–6.Google Scholar

Greg, Percy. “Redistribution: Right and Wrong Directions,” NR, 2 (Feb. 1884): 807–23.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “Difficulties of Republican France,” ER, 92 (1850): 504–33.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “Representative Reform [1],” ER, 96 (1852): 452–508.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “The Expected Reform Bill,” ER, 95 (1852): 213–80.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “Parliamentary Purification,” ER, 98 (1853): 566–624.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “French Judgments of England,” ER, 103 (1856): 558–90.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “Representative Reform [2],” ER, 106 (1857): 254–86.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. “The Achievements and the Moral of 1867,” NBR, 47 (Sept. 1867): 205–56.Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. Enigmas of Life (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Greg, William Rathbone. Rocks Ahead: Or, The Warnings of Cassandra (London, 1874).Google Scholar

Grey, Albert, the Fourth Earl. Mr. Albert Grey, MP, and the Redistribution of Seats (Earl Grey Pamphlets, 1880).Google Scholar

Grey, Albert, “Proportional versus Majority Representation,” NC, 16 (1884): 935–64.Google Scholar

Grey, Henry George, the Third Earl. Parliamentary Government, Considered with Reference to Reform, second edition (London, 1864).Google Scholar

Guizot, François. Discours Académiques, suivis de divers essais de philosophie littéraire et politique (Paris, 1861).Google Scholar

Guizot, François. Histoire de la civilisation en Europe, suivie de Philosophie politique: de la souveraineté, ed. Rosanvallon, Pierre (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar

Guizot, François. The History of the Origins of Representative Government in Europe, trans. Andrew R. Scoble (Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar

Hall, Robert. An Apology for the Freedom of the Press, and for General Liberty, seventh edition (London, 1822).Google Scholar

Hallam, Henry. The Constitutional History of England, from the Accession of Henry VII to the Death of George II, sixth edition, 2 vols. (London, 1850).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. The Machinery of Representation, first edition (London, 1857).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. The Machinery of Representation, second edition (London, 1857).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. A Treatise on the Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal, first edition (London, 1859).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Representation in Theory and Practice,” FM, 61 (1860): 188–204.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Representation of Every Locality and Intelligence,” FM, 61 (1860): 527–43.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. A Treatise on the Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal, second edition (London, 1861).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Ideal of a Local Government for the Metropolis,” MM, 7 (1863): 441–7.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. The Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal: A Treatise, third edition (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Mr. Hare’s Electoral System: A Grouping of Parliamentary Electors that Combines a Just and Equal Distribution of Seats and the Free Expression both of Individual and Public Opinion with the Smallest Degree of Disturbance from Corrupt Influences,” in Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, Manchester Meeting, 1866, ed. Hastings, George (London, 1866): 202–8.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Minority Representation in Europe,” Journal of Social Science, 3 (1871): 185–91.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “On the Suggestions Afforded by the Application of the Cumulative Vote and by the Other Incidents of the School Board Elections,” Sessional Proceedings of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 4 (1871): 215–35.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. The Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal: A Treatise, fourth edition (London, 1873).Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “John Stuart Mill,” WR, 45 (1874): 122–59.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “A Note on Representative Government,” FR, 18 (1875): 102–7.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “The Reform Bill of the Future,” FR, 23 (1878): 75–84.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “The Coming Steps in Representation,” FR, 37 (1885): 216–22.Google Scholar

Hare, Thomas. “Individual Responsibility in Representative Government,” 4 (1886): 350–8.Google Scholar

Harris, George. The True Theory of Representation in a State: Considered More Especially in Relation to the Proposal of the Government for the Extension of the Suffrage (London, 1852).Google Scholar

Harris, George. The True Theory of Representation in a State: Or, the Leading Interests of the Nation, Not the Mere Predominance of Numbers, Proved to Be Its Basis (London, 1857).Google Scholar

Harris, George. The Autobiography of George Harris, LL.D., F.S.A. (London, 1888).Google Scholar

Harrison, Frederic. “The Religion of Inhumanity,” FR, 13 (1873): 677–99.Google Scholar

Harrison, Frederic. “The Revival of Authority,” FR, 13 (1873): 1–26.Google Scholar

Harrison, Frederic. Order and Progress (London, 1875).Google Scholar

Harrison, Frederic. Tennyson, Ruskin, Mill, and Other Literary Estimates (London, 1899).Google Scholar

Haynes, Edmund Sidney Pollock. The Decline of Liberty in England (London, 1916).Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William. Selected Writings, ed. Cook, Jon (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William. Fugitive Writings, ed. Waller, A. R. and Glover, Arnold (London, 1904).Google Scholar

Hearn, William Edward. The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development, second edition (London, 1866).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Political Writings, ed. Dickey, Laurence and Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar

Herbert, George. “Liberty and Socialism,” in Herbert Spencer and the Limits of the State, ed. Taylor, Michael (Bristol, 1996): 95–126.Google Scholar

Heywood, John. The Representation of Minorities: A Practical Plan (Bristol Selected Pamphlets, 1884).Google Scholar

Hoag, Clarence and Hallett, George. Proportional Representation (New York, 1926).Google Scholar

Hobart, Henry Vere. “Parliamentary Reform,” MM, 13 (1866): 259–72.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Elements of Law, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A. (Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar

Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny. Liberalism and Other Writings, ed. Meadowcroft, James (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George Jacob. The Workman and the Suffrage. Letters to the Right Honourable Lord John Russell, M.P., and the “Daily News” (London, 1859).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George Jacob. The Liberal Situation: Necessity for a Qualified Franchise. A Letter to Joseph Cowen, Jun. (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George Jacob. Working-Class Representation: Its Conditions and Consequences (Birmingham and London, 1868).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George Jacob. The Last Trial for Atheism in England: A Fragment of Autobiography, fourth edition (London, 1871).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George Jacob. The History of Co-Operation in England: Its Literature and Its Advocates, 2 vols. (London, 1875–79).Google Scholar

Holyoake, George. Hostile and Generous Toleration: A New Theory of Toleration (London, 1886).Google Scholar

Hoskins, James Thornton. A Modification of Mr. Hare’s Scheme for the Election of Representatives, second edition (London, 1860).Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. The Sphere and Duties of Government, trans. Joseph Coulthard (London, 1844).Google Scholar

Humphrey, Arthur Wilfrid. A History of Labour Representation (London, 1912).Google Scholar

Humphreys, John H. Proportional Representation: A Study in Methods of Election (London, 1911).Google Scholar

Hutton, Richard Holt. “The Political Character of the Working Classes,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 27–44.Google Scholar

Hutton, R. H. Criticisms on Contemporary Thought and Thinkers, 2 vols. (London, 1894).Google Scholar

Ilbert, Courtenay. Parliament: Its History, Constitution, and Practice (London, 1911).Google Scholar

Inglis, Robert. Parliamentary Reform. Substance of the Speech Delivered in the House of Commons, on Saturday, the 17th December, 1831 (London, 1832).Google Scholar

James, Edmund. “An Early Essay on Proportional Representation,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 34 (1895): 468–71.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Francis and Brougham, Henry, “Parliamentary Reform,” ER, 17 (1811): 253–90.Google Scholar

Jevons, William Stanley. The State in Relation to Labour (London, 1882).Google Scholar

Kebbel, T.E. “The Spirit of Party,” NC, 11 (1882): 378–88.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State (New Brunswick, 2006).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. The Essence and Value of Democracy, trans. Brian Graf (Lanham, 2013).Google Scholar

King, Joseph. Electoral Reform: An Inquiry into Our System of Parliamentary Representation (London, 1908).Google Scholar

Kinnear, John Boyd. Principles of Reform: Political and Legal (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Kinnear, John. “Practical Considerations on the Representation of Minorities,” FR, 4 (1866): 49–64.Google Scholar

Knatchbull-Hugessen, Edward Hugessen. “Redistribution of Political Power,” MM, 27 (1872): 67–76.Google Scholar

Kyllman, Max. “Mr. Hare’s System of Personal Representation,” reprinted from the ‘Examiner and Times,’ of October 2nd, 1866 (LSE Selected Pamphlets, 1866).Google Scholar

la Grasserie, Raoul de. De la représentation proportionnelle de la majorité et des minorités (Paris, 1889).Google Scholar

Laboulaye, Édouard René de. L’état et ses limites, suivi d’essais politiques sur Alexis de Tocqueville, l’instruction publique, les finances, le droit de pétition, etc., fifth edition (Paris, 1871).Google Scholar

Laski, Harold. Authority in the Modern State (New Haven, 1919).Google Scholar

Laski, Harold. The Foundations of Sovereignty and Other Essays (New York, 1921).Google Scholar

Lecky, W. E. H. The History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne, 2 vols. (London, 1876).Google Scholar

Lecky, W. E. H. Democracy and Liberty, 2 vols. (London, 1896).Google Scholar

Lecky, W. E. H. Introduction to Democracy and Liberty, Reprinted from the Cabinet Edition (London, 1899).Google Scholar

Lecky, W. E. H. The Map of Life: Conduct and Character (London, 1901).Google Scholar

Lewis, George Cornewall. “Marshall on the Representation of Minorities,” ER, 100 (1854): 226–35.Google Scholar

Lewis, George Cornewall. “History and Prospects of Parliamentary Reform,” ER, 109 (1859): 264–92.Google Scholar

Lewis, George Cornewall. Dialogue on the Best Form of Government (London, 1863).Google Scholar

Lewis, George Cornewall. An Essay on the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion, second edition (London, 1875).Google Scholar

Lindsay, , Alexander Dunlop, First Baron. The Essentials of Democracy (London, 1929).Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatise of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar

Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration, in A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings, ed. Goldie, Mark (Indianapolis, 2010): 1–68.Google Scholar

Lowenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights [1],” APSR, 31 (1937): 417–32.Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. Political Progress Not Necessarily Democratic: or Relative Equality the True Foundation of Liberty (Edinburgh, 1857).Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. “Mr. Mill on Representative Government,” NBR, 35 (1861): 534–63.Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. Constitutionalism of the Future, or Parliament the Mirror of the Nation (Edinburgh, 1865).Google Scholar

Low, Sidney. The Governance of England (London, 1904).Google Scholar

Lowe, Robert. “Reform Essays,” QR, 123 (1867): 244–77.Google Scholar

Lowe, Robert. Speeches and Letters on Reform, with a Preface by the Right Hon. R. Lowe, MP (London, 1867).Google Scholar

Lowell, A. Lawrence. The Government of England, 2 vols. (New York, 1908).Google Scholar

Lowes-Dickinson, Goldsworthy. The Development of Parliament during the Nineteenth Century (London, 1895).Google Scholar

Lubbock, John. “Proportional Representation,” NC, 15 (1884): 703–13.Google Scholar

Lubbock, John. Representation (London, 1885).Google Scholar

Lubbock, John. “Proportional Representation,” in The Pamphlets of Lewis Carroll, Volume Three: The Political Pamphlets and Letters of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, ed. Abeles, Francine (New York, 2001): 140–4Google Scholar

Lubbock, John, Courtney, Leonard, Grey, Albert, and Westlake, John. “Proportional Representation: Objections and Answers,” NC, 17 (1885): 312–20.Google Scholar

Ludlow, John Malcolm. “Mr. Hare’s Scheme of Parliamentary Representation,” CR, 9 (1868): 80–97.Google Scholar

Ludlow, John Malcolm, Maurice, Frederick Denison, and Kingsley, Charles. Politics for the People (London, 1848).Google Scholar

Lytton, Robert. “Report by Mr. Lytton, Her Majesty’s Secretary of Legation, on the Election of Representatives for the Rigsraad,” printed in Personal Representation, Speech of John Stuart Mill, Esq., MP, Delivered in the House of Commons May 29, 1867, with an Appendix Containing Notices of Reports, Discussions, and Publications on the System in France, Geneva, Germay, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, The Australian Colonies, and the United States., second edition (London, 1867): 17–42.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. Critical and Historical Essays, fifth edition, 2 vols. (London, 1848).Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. The Miscellaneous Writings of Lord Macaulay, 2 vols. (London, 1860).Google Scholar

MacCunn, John. Ethics of Citizenship (Glasgow, 1894).Google Scholar

MacCunn, John. Six Radical Thinkers: Bentham, J. S. Mill, Cobden, Carlyle, Mazzini, T. H. Green (London, 1907).Google Scholar

MacDonald, Ramsay. Socialism and Government, 2 vols. (London, 1909).Google Scholar

Mackinnon, W. A. On the Rise, Progress, and Present State of Public Opinion, in Great Britain and Other Parts of the World (London, 1828).Google Scholar

Mackintosh, James. “Universal Suffrage,” ER, 31 (1818): 165–203.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, James. “Parliamentary Reform,” ER, 34 (1820): 461–501.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry. Popular Government: Four Essays (London, 1885).Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic William. A Historical Sketch of Liberty and Equality: As Ideals of English Political Philosophy from the Time of Hobbes to the Time of Coleridge (Indianapolis, 2000).Google Scholar

Marshall, James Garth. Minorities and Majorities: Their Relative Rights (London, 1853).Google Scholar

Martin, Arthur Patchett. Life and Letters of the Right Honourable Robert Lowe, Viscount Sherbrooke, 2 vols. (London, 1893).Google Scholar

Marvell, Andrew. An Account of the Growth of Popery and Arbitrary Government in England (Amsterdam, 1675).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert (New York, 1978).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Selected Writings, ed. Simon, Lawrence (Indianapolis, 1994).Google Scholar

Maurice, Frederick Denison. “The Suffrage, Considered in Reference to the Working Class, and to the Professional Class,” MM, 2 (1860): 89–97.Google Scholar

Maurice, Frederick Denison. The Workman and the Franchise (London, 1866).Google Scholar

May, Erskine. Democracy in Europe: A History, 2 vols. (London, 1877).Google Scholar

Meredith, James Creed. Proportional Representation in Ireland (Dublin, 1918).Google Scholar

Mill, James. Political Writings, ed. Ball, Terence (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33 vols., ed. Robson, J. M. (Toronto, 1963–91).Google Scholar

Milnes, Richard Monckton, Houghton, Lord. “On the Admission of the Working Classes as Part of Our Social System; and Their Recognition for All Purposes as Part of the Nation,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 45–66.Google Scholar

Montalembert, Charles Forbes René de. L’avenir politique de l’Angleterre, fifth edition (Paris, 1857).Google Scholar

Morin, Antoine. De la question électorale dans le canton de Genève (Geneva, 1867).Google Scholar

Morley, John. Modern Characteristics (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Morley, John. Critical Miscellanies, 3 vols. (London, 1886).Google Scholar

Morley, John. Nineteenth-Century Essays, ed. Stansky, Peter (Chicago, 1970).Google Scholar

Morrison-Bell, Clive. “Proportional Representation – What Is It?,” NC, 73 (1913): 1122–30.Google Scholar

Naville, Ernest. La Patrie et les Partis (Geneva, 1865).Google Scholar

Naville, Ernest. On the Theory and Practice of Representative Elections (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Naville, Ernest. La pratique de la représentation proportionnelle (Earl Grey Pamphlets, 1882).Google Scholar

Newman, John Henry. A Letter Addressed to His Grace the Duke of Norfolk, on Occasion of Mr. Gladstone’s Recent Expostulation (London, 1875).Google Scholar

Ostrogorski, Moisei. “Introduction of the Caucus into England,” PSQ, 8 (1893): 287–316.Google Scholar

Ostrogorski, Moisei. “Les Origines des associations politiques et des organisations de parti en Angleterre,” Revue Historique, 52 (1893): 259–97.Google Scholar

Ostrogorski, Moisei. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, trans. Frederick Clarke, 2 vols. (London, 1902).Google Scholar

Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Le Mahieu, D. L. (Indianapolis, 2002)Google Scholar

Parker, Henry. Observations upon Some of His Majesties Late Answers and Expresses (London, 1642).Google Scholar

Peel, Robert. Speech of 3 March 1831, in The Emergence of British Parliamentary Democracy in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Conacher, J. B. (New York, 1971): 27–32.Google Scholar

Pelletan, Eugène. Les droits de l’homme (Paris, 1858).Google Scholar

Pitt, William, the Younger, The Speeches of the Right Honourable William Pitt in the House of Commons, 4 vols. (London, 1806).Google Scholar

Pochin, Henry Davis. A Plan of Parliamentary Reform (London, 1866).Google Scholar

“Political Euclid.” The Reform Problem: Its True Solution (London, 1866).Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick. “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” FM, 8 (1873): 86–97.Google Scholar

Prévost-Paradol, Lucien-Anatole. Nouveaux Essais de politique et de littérature (Paris, 1862).Google Scholar

Prévost-Paradol, Lucien-Anatole. La France Nouvelle, second edition (Paris, 1868)Google Scholar

Priestley, Joseph. Priestley’s Writings on Philosophy, Science, and Politics, ed. Passmore, John (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

Priestley, Joseph. Political Writings, ed. Miller, Peter (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar

Rae, W. Fraser. “Political Clubs and Party Organization,” NC, 3 (1878): 908–32.Google Scholar

Ritchie, David George. Principles of State Interference: Four Essays on the Political Philosophy of Mr. Herbert Spencer, J. S. Mill, and T. H. Green (London, 1891).Google Scholar

Ritchie, David. Natural Rights: A Criticism of Some Ethical and Political Conceptions (London, 1895).Google Scholar

Ritchie, David. “Social Evolution,” International Journal of Ethics, 6 (1896): 165–81.Google Scholar

Ritchie, David. “Evolution and Democracy,” in Ethical Democracy: Essays in Social Dynamics, ed. Coit, Stanton (London, 1900): 1–29.Google Scholar

Ritchie, David. “The Rights of Minorities,” in The British Idealists, ed. Boucher, David (Cambridge, 1997): 142–55.Google Scholar

Reeve, Henry. “Earl Grey on Parliamentary Government,” ER, 108 (1858): 271–97.Google Scholar

Reid, Andrew, ed. Why I Am a Liberal: Being Definitions and Personal Confessions of Faith by the Best Minds of the Liberal Party (London, 1885).Google Scholar

Renouvier, Charles Bernard. Science de la morale, 2 vols. (Paris, 1869).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar

Rose, J. Holland. The Rise of Democracy, second edition (London, 1904).Google Scholar

Russell, Lord John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time, first edition (London, 1821).Google Scholar

Russell, Lord John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time, second edition, “greatly enlarged” (London, 1823).Google Scholar

Russell, Lord John, Letter to the Electors of Stroud: On the Principles of the Reform Act, third edition (London, 1839).Google Scholar

Russell, Lord John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time, third edition (London, 1865).Google Scholar

Russell, Lord John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time, fourth edition (London, 1866).Google Scholar

Russell, Edward Richard. Minority Representation (London, 1883).Google Scholar

Russell, Edward. “The Electoral Future,” CR, 47 (1885): 250–65.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, Third Marquess. “The Theories of Parliamentary Reform,” in Oxford Essays, Contributed by Members of the University (London, 1858): 52–79.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, “The Value of Redistribution: A Note on Electoral Statistics,” NR, 4 (1884): 145–62.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, “Excerpt from an Address to a Deputation of Conservative Associations,” in English Party Politics (London, 1970), ed. Beattie, Alan, vol. 1: 182–3.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, Lord Salisbury on Politics, A Selection of His Articles in the Quarterly Review, 1860–1883, ed. Smith, Paul (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar

Saripolos, Nicolas. La Démocratie et l’élection proportionnelle: étude historique, juridique, et politique, 2 vols. (Paris, 1899).Google Scholar

Schnadhorst, Francis. “The Caucus and Its Critics,” NC, 12 (1882): 8–28.Google Scholar

Schloesser, Henry. Fabian Tract No. 153: The Twentieth Century Reform Bill (London, 1911).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy (Cambridge, MA, 1988).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer (Durham, 2008).Google Scholar

Senior, Nassau. “Lewis on Authority in Matters of Opinion,” ER, 91 (1850): 508–58.Google Scholar

Seymour, Edward Adolphus, Duke of Somerset. Christian Theology and Modern Skepticism (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Shaw-Lefevre, George. “The Representation of Minorities,” CR, 45 (1884): 714–33.Google Scholar

Shaw-Lefevre, George. “The Crusade for Proportional Representation,” FR, 37 (1885): 202–15.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. The Elements of Politics, second edition (London, 1897).Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. The Development of European Polity (London, 1903).Google Scholar

Sieyès, Emmanuel-Joseph, the Abbé. Political Writings, ed. Sonenscher, Michael (Indianapolis, 2003).Google Scholar

Sismondi, Jean Charles Léonard de. Examen de la constitution française (Paris, 1815).Google Scholar

Sismondi, Jean Charles Léonard de. Études sur les constitutions des peuples libres (Paris, 1836).Google Scholar

Smith, J. Parker. University Representation (London, 1883).Google Scholar

Smith, J. Parker. “Parliamentary Reform: Minority Representation,” WR, 121 (1884): 163–75.Google Scholar

Smith, J. Rigby. Personal Representation: A Simplification, Adaptation to the Ballot, and Defence of Mr. Hare’s Scheme of Electoral Reform (London, 1868).Google Scholar

Smith, Goldwin. Essays on Questions of the Day, Political and Social, second edition (London, 1897).Google Scholar

Snowden, Philip. Speech in “The Witness of Europe for PR” Representation, 6 (1913): 94–118.Google Scholar

Southey, Robert. Essays, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (London: John Murray, 1832).Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. “Parliamentary Reform: The Dangers, and the Safeguards,” WR, 17 (1860): 486–507.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Augustus. Suggestions for a Conservative and Popular Reform (London, 1850).Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. “Journalism,” CM, 6 (1862): 52–63Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. “Liberalism,” CM, 5 (1862): 70–83.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. “Parliamentary Government, in Two Papers” CR, 23 (1873): 1–19, 165–81.Google Scholar

Stephen, James Fitzjames. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, ed. Warner, Stuart (Indianapolis, 1993).Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “On the Choice of Representatives by Popular Constituencies,” in Essays on Reform (London, 1867): 85–126.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “Reform,” MM, 15 (1867): 529–36.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “Our Rulers – Public Opinion,” CM, 21 (1870): 288–98.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “Social Macadamisation,” FM, 6 (1872): 150–68.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. Essays on Freethinking and Plainspeaking (London, 1873).Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “Order and Progress,” FR, 17 (1875): 820–34.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. “The Value of Political Machinery,” FR, 18 (1875): 836–52.Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. Life of Henry Fawcett, third edition (New York, 1886).Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. Social Rights and Duties, 2 vols. (London, 1896).Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. The English Utilitarians, 3 vols. (London, 1900).Google Scholar

Stephen, Leslie. Studies of a Biographer, 4 vols. (London, 1902).Google Scholar

Sterne, Simon. On Representative Government and Personal Representation (Philadelphia, 1871).Google Scholar

Taine, Hippolyte. Du suffrage universel et de la manière de voter (Paris, 1872).Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Souvenirs (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer, 2 vols. (New York, 2004).Google Scholar

Trevelyan, George Otto. “A Few Remarks on Mr. Hare’s Scheme of Representation,” MM, 5 (1862): 480–6.Google Scholar

Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet de. Treatise on Tolerance and Other Writings, ed. Harvey, Simon (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar

Wallas, Graham. “The American Analogy,” Independent Review, 1 (1901): 505–16.Google Scholar

Wallas, Graham. Human Nature in Politics, ed. Kang, Sugwon (New Brunswick, 1981).Google Scholar

Ware, William Robert. The Machinery of Politics and Proportional Representation (London, 1872).Google Scholar

Watson, Robert Spence. The National Liberal Federation from Its Commencement to the General Election of 1906 (London, 1907).Google Scholar

Weber, Max. Political Writings, ed. Lassman, Peter and Speirs, Ronald (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar

Weber, Max. The Vocation Lectures, ed. Owen, David and Strong, Tracy, trans. Rodney Livingstone (Indianapolis, 2004).Google Scholar

Wells, H. G. In the Fourth Year: Anticipations of a World Peace (London, 1918).Google Scholar

West, Julius. Fabian Tract No. 168: John Stuart Mill (London, 1913).Google Scholar

Williams, J. Fischer. Proportional Representation and British Politics (London, 1914).Google Scholar

Williams, J. Fischer. The Reform of Political Representation (London, 1918).Google Scholar

Wilson, Edward. “The Caucus and Its Consequences,” NC, 4 (1878): 695–712.Google Scholar

Amy, Douglas. “The Forgotten History of the Single Transferable Vote in the United States,” Representation, 34 (1996): 13–20.Google Scholar

Arnstein, Walter. The Bradlaugh Case: A Study in Late Victorian Opinion and Politics (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Artz, Frederick. “The Electoral System in France during the Bourbon Restoration, 1815–30,” JMH, 1 (1929): 205–18.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David and Jeffrey, Banks. “Monotonicity in Electoral Systems,” APSR, 85 (1991): 531–7.Google Scholar

Baehr, Peter. Caesarism, Charisma, and Fate: Historical Sources and Modern Resonances in the Work of Max Weber (New Brunswick, 2008).Google Scholar

Baer, Marc. The Rise and Fall of Radical Westminster, 1780–1890 (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 2012).Google Scholar

Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA, 1967).Google Scholar

Bajpai, Rochana. Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar

Ball, Alan. British Political Parties: The Emergence of a Modern Party System, second edition (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 1987).Google Scholar

Ball, Terence. “Introduction” to Mill, James, Political Writings, ed. Ball, (Cambridge, 1992): xi–xxiii.Google Scholar

Barber, Kathleen. Proportional Representation and Electoral Reform in Ohio (Columbus, 1995).Google Scholar

Barber, Kathleen. A Right to Representation: Proportional Election Systems for the Twenty-First Century (Columbus, 2000).Google Scholar

Barker, Rodney and Howard-Johnston, Xenia, “The Politics and Political Ideas of Moisei Ostrogorski,” PS, 23 (1975): 415–29.Google Scholar

Barzun, Jacques. “Bagehot as Historian,” introduction to Bagehot, , CW, vol. 3: 23–40.Google Scholar

Bastid, Paul. L’avènement du suffrage universel (Paris, 1948).Google Scholar

Baum, Bruce. “Freedom, Power, and Public Opinion: J. S. Mill on the Public Sphere,” HPT, 22 (2001): 501–24.Google Scholar

Beales, Derek. The Political Parties of Nineteenth-Century Britain (London, 1971)Google Scholar

Beales, Derek. “The Electorate before and after 1832: The Right to Vote and the Opportunity,” PH, 11 (1992): 139–50.Google Scholar

Beattie, Alan. “1867–1906, Introduction,” in English Party Politics, ed. Beattie, , 2 vols. (London, 1970).Google Scholar

Beer, Samuel. “The Representation of Interests in British Government: Historical Background,” APSR, 51 (1957): 613–50.Google Scholar

Beer, Samuel. British Politics in the Collectivist Age (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald. What’s the Matter with Liberalism? (Berkeley, 1992).Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory (Princeton, 1989).Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “T. H. Green and the Morality of Victorian Liberalism,” in Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice, ed. Bellamy, (London, 1990): 131–51.Google Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth. “Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence,” Political Analysis, 8 (2000): 381–8.Google Scholar

Bergounioux, Alain and Manin, Bernard. Le régime social-démocrate (Paris, 1989).Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. Mid-Victorian Britain, 1851–1875 (London, 1971).Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. “Republicanism, Socialism, and Democracy in Britain: The Origins of the Radical Left,” Journal of Social History, 34 (2000): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biagini, Eugenio. Liberty, Retrenchment, and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880 (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar

Biagini, Eugenio. “Introduction: Citizenship, Liberty, and Community,” in Citizenship and Community: Liberals, Radicals, and Collective Identities in the British Isles, 1865–1931, ed. Biagini, (Cambridge, 1996): 1–17.Google Scholar

Biagini, Eugenio. “Liberalism and Direct Democracy: John Stuart Mill and the Model of Athens,” in Citizenship and Community: Liberals, Radicals, and Collective Identities in the British Isles, 1865–1931, ed. Biagini, (Cambridge, 1996): 21–44.Google Scholar

Biagini, Eugenio. British Democracy and Irish Nationalism, 1876–1906 (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar

Biagini, Eugenio and Reid, Alastair. “Currents of Radicalism, 1850–1914,” in Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organised Labour, and Party Politics in Britain, 1850–1914, ed. Biagini, and Reid, (Cambridge, 1991): 1–19.Google Scholar

Birch, A. H. Representative and Responsible Government: An Essay on the Constitution (London, 1964).Google Scholar

Birch, A. H. Representation (London, 1971).Google Scholar

Black, Anthony. Guild and State: European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present (New Brunswick, 2003).Google Scholar

Black, Duncan. “The Central Argument in Lewis Carroll’s ‘The Principles of Parliamentary Representation’,” Papers on Non-Market Decision Making, 3 (1967): 1–17.Google Scholar

Black, Duncan. A Mathematical Approach to Proportional Representation: Duncan Black on Lewis Carroll, ed. McLean, Iain, McMillan, Alistair, and Monroe, Burt (New York, 1996).Google Scholar

Blais, André. “Introduction,” to To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform, ed. Blais, (Oxford, 2008): 1–6.Google Scholar

Blais, André, with Dobrzynska, Agnieska and Indridi, Indridason. “To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice,” BJPS, 35 (2005): 182–90.Google Scholar

Blake, Robert. Disraeli (London, 1966).Google Scholar

Blewett, Neal. “The Franchise in the United Kingdom: 1885–1918,” Past & Present, 32 (1965): 27–56.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto. Liberalism and Democracy, trans. Martin Ryle and Kate Soper (New York, 2005).Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon. What Is Proportional Representation? (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon. “The Liberal Party and the Constitution,” Journal of Liberal History, 54 (2007): 46–52.Google Scholar

Bonham, James and Rehg, William. “Introduction,” to Deliberative Democracy: Essays in Reason and Politics, ed. Bonham, James and Rehg, William (Cambridge, MA, 1997): ix–xxx.Google Scholar

Boucher, David. “Introduction,” to The British Idealists, ed. Boucher, (Cambridge, 1997): viii–xxxiii.Google Scholar

Boucher, David. “David George Ritchie,” The Scottish Idealists, Selected Philosophical Writings, ed. Boucher, (Exeter, 2004): 159–61.Google Scholar

Boucher, David. “Introduction” to The Scottish Idealists, Selected Philosophical Writings, ed. Boucher, (Exeter, 2004): 1–22.Google Scholar

Bourke, Richard. Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke (Princeton, 2015).Google Scholar

Bragues, George. “Prediction Markets: The Practical and Normative Possibilities for the Social Production of Knowledge,” Episteme, 6 (2009): 91–106.Google Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan. “On Political Representation,” BJPS, 29 (1999): 101–27.Google Scholar

Brennan, Jason. Against Democracy (Princeton, 2016).Google Scholar

Briggs, Asa. “National Bearings,” ed. Briggs, (London, 1962): 288–303.Google Scholar

Briggs, Asa. “The Local Background of Chartism,” in Chartist Studies, ed. Briggs, (London, 1962): 1–28.Google Scholar

Briggs, Asa. The Age of Improvement, 1783–1867, second edition (London, 2000).Google Scholar

Brighouse, Harry and Fleurbaey, Marc. “Democracy and Proportionality,” JPP, 18 (2008): 1–19.Google Scholar

Brock, Michael. The Great Reform Act (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Bromund, Ted. “Uniting the Whole People: Proportional Representation in Great Britain, 1884–5, Reconsidered,” HR, 74 (2001): 77–94.Google Scholar

Brown, A. V. The Metaphysical Society: Victorian Minds in Crisis (New York, 1947).Google Scholar

Brown, Mark. “Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation,” JPP, 14 (2006): 203–25.Google Scholar

Brown, Philip. The French Revolution in English History (London, 1918).Google Scholar

Buchan, Alastair. The Spare Chancellor: The Life of Walter Bagehot (London, 1959).Google Scholar

Buel, Richard Jr. “Democracy and the American Revolution: A Frame of Reference,” William & Mary Quarterly, 21 (1964): 165–90.Google Scholar

Burn, W. L. “The Fancy Franchises,” PA, 8 (1954): 240–5Google Scholar

Burns, J. H. “J. S. Mill and Democracy [II],” PS, 5 (1957): 281–94.Google Scholar

Burrow, John. “Sense and Circumstances: Bagehot and the Nature of Political Understanding,” in Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, , That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge, 1983): 161–82.Google Scholar

Burrow, John. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar

Butler, David. “Electoral Reform,” PA, 57 (2004): 734–43.Google Scholar

Caine, Barbara. Victorian Feminists (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar

Canon, David. “Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24 (1999): 331–85.Google Scholar

Cannon, John. Parliamentary Reform, 1640–1832 (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar

Caramani, Daniele. Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies (New York, 2000).Google Scholar

Carey, John, and Reynolds, Andrew. “The Impact of Electoral Systems,” Journal of Democracy, 22 (2011): 36–47.Google Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe (London, 1980).Google Scholar

Casey, James. “Republican Courts in Ireland, 1919–1922,” Irish Jurist, 5 (1970): 321–42.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Mary. “The Role of Redistribution in the Making of the Third Reform Act,” HJ, 19 (1976): 665–83.Google Scholar

Chamberlin, John and Courant, Paul. “Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule,” APSR, 77 (1983): 718–33.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” PT, 37 (2009): 323–50.Google Scholar

Chase, Malcolm. Chartism: A New History (Manchester, 2007).Google Scholar

Christin, Olivier. Vox Populi: Une histoire du vote avant le suffrage universel (Paris, 2014).Google Scholar

Claeys, Gregory. “Justice, Independence, and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill’s Views on Socialism,” JP, 49 (1987): 122–47.Google Scholar

Claeys, Gregory. “General Introduction. The Chartist Movement: A Brief History,” in The Chartist Movement in Britain, 1838–1850, 6 vols., ed. Claeys, (London, 2001), vol. 1: xix–xxxviii.Google Scholar

Clark, J. C. D. English Society, 1688–1832 (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar

Clark, J. C. D. “Introduction,” to Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France: A Critical Edition (Stanford, 2001).Google Scholar

Clarke, P. F. “Electoral Sociology of Modern Britain,” History, 57 (1972): 31–55.Google Scholar

Clive, John. Macaulay: The Shaping of the Historian (Cambridge, MA, 1987).Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” Deliberative Democracy: Essays in Reason and Politics, ed. Bonham, James and Rehg, William (Cambridge, MA, 1997): 67–92.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays in Reason and Politics, ed. Bonham, James and Rehg, William (Cambridge, MA, 1997): 407–37.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, (Cambridge, 1998): 185–231.Google Scholar

Colaiaco, James. James Fitzjames Stephen and the Crisis of Victorian Thought (New York, 1983).Google Scholar

Cole, Alistair and Campbell, Peter, French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789 (Aldershott, 1989).Google Scholar

Cole, G. D. H. Chartist Portraits (London, 1965).Google Scholar

Cole, Matt. “Party Policy and Electoral Reform: A Survey of Developments, Motives, and Prospects,” British Elections & Parties Review, 9 (1999): 72–86.Google Scholar

Colomer, Joseph. “On the Origins of Electoral Systems and Political Parties: The Role of Elections in Multi-Member Districts,” Electoral Studies, 26 (2007): 262–73.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. “The Idea of ‘Character’ in Victorian Political Thought,” TRHS, 35 (1985): 29–50.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930 (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar

Conti, Gregory. “James Fitzjames Stephen, John Stuart Mill, and the Victorian Theory of Toleration,” HEI, 42 (2016): 364–98.Google Scholar

Conti, Gregory and Selinger, William, “Reappraising Walter Bagehot’s Liberalism: Discussion, Public Opinion, and the Meaning of Parliamentary Government,” HEI, 41 (2015): 264–91.Google Scholar

Conti, Gregory and Selinger, William “The Other Side of Representation: The History and Theory of Representative Government in Pierre Rosanvallon,” Constellations, 23 (2016): 548–62.Google Scholar

Cook, Chris. The Routledge Companion to Britain in the Nineteenth Century, 1815–1914 (London, 2005).Google Scholar

Coull, Gavin. “The Third Earl Grey, the Coming of Democracy, and Parliamentary Reform, 1865–67,” Durham University Journal, 87 (1995): 11–22, 185–94.Google Scholar

Cowling, Maurice. 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone, and Revolution (Cambridge, 1967).Google Scholar

Cox, Gary. “The Development of a Party-Orientated Legislature in England, 1832–1918,” BJPS, 16 (1986): 187–216.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary and Morgenstern, Scott, “The Increasing Advantage of Incumbency in the United States,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18 (1993): 495–514.Google Scholar

Craiutu, Aurelian. “Guizot’s Elitist Theory of Representative Government,” Critical Review, 15 (2003): 261–84.Google Scholar

Craiutu, Aurelian. Liberalism under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires (Lanham, 2003).Google Scholar

Crick, Bernard. Democracy: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2002).Google Scholar

Crossman, R. H. S. “Introduction,” to Bagehot, , The English Constitution, ed. Crossman, (London, 1963).Google Scholar

D’Alimonte, Roberto. “The New Italian Electoral System: Majority-Assuring but Minority-Friendly,” Contemporary Italian Politics, 7 (2015): 286–92.Google Scholar

Dawson, Christopher. “Democracy and the British Tradition,” Dublin Review, 212 (1943): 97–103.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H. T. “The Representation of the People in Eighteenth-Century Britain,” in Realities of Representation: State Building in Early Modern Europe and European America, ed. Jansson, Maija (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 2007): 19–44.Google Scholar

Dijn, Annelien de. “Aristocratic Liberalism in Post-Revolutionary France,” HJ, 48 (2005): 661–81.Google Scholar

Dovi, Suzanne. The Good Representative (Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York, 1957).Google Scholar

Drescher, Seymour. Tocqueville and England (Cambridge, MA, 1964).Google Scholar

Driver, C. H. “Walter Bagehot and the Social Psychologists,” in The Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Victorian Age, ed. Hearnshaw, F. J. C. (London, 1933): 194–221Google Scholar

Dryzek, John. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy,” PT, 29 (2001): 651–69.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John. “Difference Democracy: The Consciousness-Raising Group Against the Gentlemen’s Club,” in Democratizing Deliberation: A Political Theory Anthology, ed. Barker, Derek, McAfee, Noëlle, and McIvor, David (Dayton, 2012): 57–82Google Scholar

Dryzek, John and Niemeyer, Simon. “Representation,” in Dryzek, , Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance (Oxford, 2010): 42–65.Google Scholar

Dummet, Michael. Voting Procedures (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar

Dummet, Michael. Principles of Electoral Reform (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar

Duncan, Graeme. “John Stuart Mill and Democracy,” in John Stuart Mill’s Social and Political Thought, Critical Assessments, ed. Smith, G. W., 4 vols. (London, 1998), vol. 2: 69–87.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, trans. Barbara and Robert North (New York, 1963).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar

Easton, David. “Walter Bagehot and Liberal Realism,” APSR, 43 (1949): 17–37.Google Scholar

Edwards, David. “Toleration and Mill’s Liberty of Thought and Discussion,” in John Stuart Mill’s Social and Political Thought, Critical Assessments, ed. Smith, G. W., 4 vols., (London, 1998), vol. 3: 334–58.Google Scholar

Edwards, Ruth. The Pursuit of Reason: The Economist, 1843–1993 (London, 1993).Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “The Market and the Forum,” in The Foundations of Social Choice Theory, ed. Elster, Aanund Hylland, (Cambridge, 1986): 103–32.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Introduction,” to Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, (Cambridge, 1998): 1–18.Google Scholar

Emerson, P. J. The Politics of Consensus: For the Resolution of Conflict and the Reform of Majority Rule (Belfast, 1994).Google Scholar

Ensor, R. C. K. England 1870–1914 (Oxford, 1936).Google Scholar

Estlund, David. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (Princeton, 2008).Google Scholar

Evans, Eric. The Great Reform Act of 1832, second edition (London, 1994).Google Scholar

Evans, Eric. Parliamentary Reform in Britain, c. 1770–1918 (Abingdon, 2013).Google Scholar

Farrell, David. Comparing Electoral Systems (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 1997).Google Scholar

Fladeland, Betty. “Our Cause Being One and the Same,” in Slavery and British Society, 1776–1846, ed. Walvin, James (London, 1982): 69–99.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Ian Christopher. “‘This Zeal for Lawlessness’: A. V. Dicey, The Law of the Constitution, and the Challenge of Popular Politics,” PH, 16 (1997): 309–29.Google Scholar

Foote, Geoffrey. The Labour Party’s Political Thought: A History (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 1997).Google Scholar

Fontana, Biancamaria. Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society: The Edinburgh Review 1802–1832 (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. “The New Liberalism and Its Aftermath,” in Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice, ed. Bellamy, Richard (London, 1990): 175–92.Google Scholar

Furet, François. Revolutionary France, 1770–1880, trans. Antonia Nevill (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar

Gallagher, Michael. “Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes, and Majorities,” BJPS, 22 (1992): 469–96.Google Scholar

Garey, Alva Edward. Proportional Representation (MA Thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1920).Google Scholar

Gargarella, Roberto. “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality,” in Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon (Cambridge, 1998): 260–80Google Scholar

Garrard, John. “Democratization in Britain,” in European Democratization since 1800, ed. Garrard, Vera Tolz, and Ralph White, (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 2000): 27–49.Google Scholar

Garsten, Bryan. “Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty,” in Political Representation, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan, Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander (Cambridge, 2009): 90–110.Google Scholar

Gash, Norman. Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–1850 (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

Gash, Norman. Sir Robert Peel: The Life of Sir Robert Peel after 1830, second edition (London, 1988).Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. “La Droite et la gauche,” in Les Lieux de Mémoire, ed. Nora, Pierre, 3 vols. (Paris, 1984–92), vol. 3: 395–467.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. La condition politique (Paris, 2005).Google Scholar

Ghosh, Peter. “Gladstone and Peel,” in Politics and Culture in Victorian Britain: Essays in Memory of Colin Matthew, ed. Ghosh, Lawrence Goldman, (Oxford, 2006): 45–73.Google Scholar

Goldie, Mark. “Introduction” to Locke, John, A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings, ed. Goldie, (Indianapolis, 2010): ix–xxiv.Google Scholar

Goldman, Lawrence. “The Social Science Association, 1857–1886: A Context for Mid-Victorian Liberalism,” EHR, 101 (1986): 95–134.Google Scholar

Goldman, Lawrence (ed.) The Blind Victorian: Henry Fawcett and British Liberalism (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar

Goldman, Lawrence. Science, Reform, and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Social Science Association 1857–1886 (Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar

Greiff, Pablo de. “Deliberative Democracy and Group Representation,” Social Theory and Practice, 26 (2000): 397–415.Google Scholar

Griffin, Ben. “Women’s Suffrage,” in Languages of Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain, ed. Craig, David and Thompson, James (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 2013): 168–90.Google Scholar

Griffin, C. M. “L. T. Hobhouse and the Idea of Harmony,” JHI, 35 (1974): 647–61.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. Philips and Wollheim, Richard,“How Can One Person Represent Another?” Aristotelian Society, 34 (1960): 187–224.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. C. “Pressure Groups and Parties in Late-Victorian England,” Midland History, 3 (1976): 191–205.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. C. “The Caucus and the Liberal Party in 1886,” History, 61 (1976): 183–97.Google Scholar

Grofman, Bernard. “Should Representatives Be Typical of Their Constituents?” in Representation and Redistricting Issues, ed. Grofman, Arend Lijphart, and Robert McKay, (Lexington, 1982): 97–100.Google Scholar

Guerrero, Alexander. “Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42 (2014): 135–178.Google Scholar

Guillin, Vincent and Souafa, Djamel. “La réception de Stuart Mill en France,” La vie des idées (2010) [www.laviedesidees.fr/La-reception-de-Stuart-Mill-en.html].Google Scholar

Guinier, Lani. “The Representation of Minority Interests: The Question of Single-Member Districts,” Cardozo Law Review, 14 (1993): 1135–74.Google Scholar

Gunn, J. A. W. “Influence, Parties and the Constitution: Changing Attitudes, 1783–1832,” HJ, 17 (1974): 301–28.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton, 2004).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Popular Sovereignty as Procedure,” in Habermas, , Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Rehg (Cambridge, MA, 1996): 463–90.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction, trans. Barbara Fultner (Cambridge, MA, 2001).Google Scholar

Hain, Peter. Proportional Misrepresentation (Hants, 1986).Google Scholar

Halévy, Élie. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, trans. Mary Morris (Boston, 1955).Google Scholar

Halévy, Élie. Histoire du socialisme européen (Paris, 2006).Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. “James Mill on Universal Suffrage and the Middle Class,” JP, 24 (1962): 167–90.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. James Mill and the Art of Revolution (New Haven, 1963).Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. Macaulay and the Whig Tradition (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. “The Whig Conscience,” in The Conscience of the Victorian State, ed. Marsh, Peter (Syracuse, 1979): 19–38.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. “Individuality and Moral Reform: The Rhetoric of Liberty and the Reality of Restraint in Mill’s On Liberty,” in John Stuart Mill’s Social and Political Thought, Critical Assessments, ed. Smith, G.W., 4 vols., (London, 1998), vol. 2: 402–45.Google Scholar

Hamer, D. A. John Morley: Liberal Intellectual in Politics (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar

Hamer, D. A. “Introduction,” to The Radical Programme, ed. Hamer, (Brighton, 1971): vii–xliv.Google Scholar

Hanham, H. J. Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone (London, 1959).Google Scholar

Hanham, H. J. ed. The Nineteenth-Century Constitution, Documents and Commentary (Cambridge, 1969).Google Scholar

Harling, , “The State,” in A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Britain, ed. Chris, Williams (Oxford, 2004): 110–23.Google Scholar

Harris, Jose. Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar

Harrison, Brian and Hollis, Patricia, “Chartism, Liberalism, and the Life of Robert Lowery,” EHR, 82 (1967): 503–35.Google Scholar

Hart, Jenifer. Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System, 1820–1945 (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar

Harvie, Christopher. “Ideology and Home Rule: James Bryce, A. V. Dicey, and Ireland, 1880–1887,” EHR, 91 (1976): 298–314.Google Scholar

Harvie, Christopher. The Lights of Liberalism: The University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Harvie, Christopher and Matthew, H. C. G.. Nineteenth-Century Britain: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar

Hawkins, Angus. “‘Parliamentary Government’ and Victorian Political Parties, c. 1830–1880,” EHR, 104 (1989): 638–69.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Angus. British Party Politics, 1852–1886 (Houndmills, Basingstoke, 1998).Google Scholar

Hawkins, Angus. Victorian Political Culture, “Habits of Heart and Mind” (Oxford, 2015).Google Scholar