Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T14:19:52.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 22 - Congenital absence of the pericardium

from Section 3 - Anatomic variants and congenital lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Tessa S. Cook
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Stefan L. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Elliot K. Fishman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Congenital absence of the pericardium is most easily diagnosed on axial CT or MR images. The heart appears rotated into the left hemithorax (Figure 22.1). Lung can be seen interposed between the aorta and the pulmonary artery, where normally there is fat covered by a layer of pericardium (Figure 22.2). In some cases, pericardium will be clearly visible along the right heart but not along the left heart (Figure 22.3). If the pericardial defect is small, focal herniation of a portion of the heart or great vessels may occur, increasing the risk for strangulation.

Importance

Distinguishing between complete and partial absence of the pericardium can be difficult when the normal, thin pericardium is generally difficult to visualize. Identifying absence of the pericardium is particularly important when the defect is partial, as this can result in herniation and strangulation of a portion of the heart or adjacent great vessels, which necessitates surgical correction.

Typical clinical scenario

Congenital absence of the pericardium occurs in approximately 0.002–0.004% of individuals. Partial absence of the left pericardium only (the most common form) results from atrophy of the left common cardinal vein, which interferes with development of the pericardium on that side.

It is most commonly incidentally detected during thoracic imaging ordered for unrelated reasons. Additionally, most cases are asymptomatic, although positional dyspnea and non-exertional chest pain have been reported, as has right bundle branch block. In 30% of patients, it is associated with congenital heart disease, such as tetralogy of Fallot, atrial septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve or patent ductus arteriosus.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis falls within two major categories: causes of levoposition of the heart or focal outpouchings from the heart. Volume loss in the left hemithorax due to atelectasis, prior lobectomy or left-sided bronchial atresia can also lead to levoposition of the heart in the setting of an intact pericardium. Enlargement of the right heart due to valvular disease or other causes can displace the heart into the left hemithorax.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging
Pseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 72 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Psychidis-Papakyritsis, P., de Roos, A., Kroft, L. J.. Functional MRI of congenital absence of the pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: W312–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Chassaing, S., Bensouda, C., Bar, O., Barbey, C., Blanchard, D.. A case of partial congenital absence of pericardium revealed by MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 632–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Scheuermann-Freestone, M., Orchard, E., Francis, J., et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Partial congenital absence of the pericardium. Circulation 2007; 116: e126–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Abbas, A. E., Appleton, C. P., Liu, P. T., Sweeney, J. P.. Congenital absence of the pericardium: case presentation and review of literature. Int J Cardiol 2005; 98: 21–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Verde, F., Johnson, P. T., Jha, S., Fishman, E. K., Zimmerman, S. L.. Congenital absence of the pericardium and its mimics. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013; 7: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×