Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:32:50.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure

from Part IV - Abdomen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Ashok Rajimwale
Affiliation:
Southampton University Hospitals, UK
Padraig S. J. Malone
Affiliation:
Southampton University Hospitals, UK
Mark D. Stringer
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Keith T. Oldham
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Pierre D. E. Mouriquand
Affiliation:
Debrousse Hospital, Lyon
Get access

Summary

Intractable constipation and fecal incontinence are socially embarrassing and are commonly associated with spinal cord anomalies, anorectal malformations, Hirschsprung's disease and sacral agenesis. Initial conservative management of chronic constipation and fecal incontinence involves daily enemas, diet modification, stool softeners, suppositories, laxatives, and biofeedback. However, these programs are more unpleasant and difficult to manage as children get older. In the pre-MACE era when conservative management failed, children either faced the future wearing pads for fecal soiling or were doomed to permanent diverting colostomy as a last resort. The MACE procedure has allowed patients to become continent and independent with improved self-esteem.

Approximately 50% of patients with a neuropathic bladder secondary to myelomeningocele, who require bladder reconstructive surgery to establish continence or create a safe bladder, will also suffer from a neuropathic bowel with resultant chronic constipation and/or fecal incontinence, that does not respond to conservative measures. Conversely, up to 50% of patients born with an anorectal malformation will have long-term fecal incontinence, and as many as 50% of these will also have a neuropathic bladder, many of whom will require bladder reconstructive surgery. It is logical that these coexisting lower urinary tract and bowel problems should be managed simultaneously and not in isolation; in the majority of cases definitive bowel management usually rests with the reconstructive urologist. It is within this setting of holistic care that the MACE procedure was conceived and developed.

Principles of the MACE procedure

The MACE procedure simply combines three well-established surgical principles:

  1. (a) the Mitrofanoff principle of a continent catheterizable abdominal stoma and conduit

  2. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Pediatric Surgery and Urology
Long-Term Outcomes
, pp. 429 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stellman, G. R., Gilmore, M., & Bannister, C. M.A survey of the problems of bowel management experienced by families of spina bifida children. Zeitschrift fur Kinderchir. 1983; 38 (Suppl 2):96–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Malone, P. S., Wheeler, R. A., & Williams, J. E.Continence in patients with spina bifida: longterm results. Arch. Dis. Child. 1994; 70:107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rintala, R. J.Fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations, neuropathy, and miscellaneous conditions. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2002; 11:75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boemers, T. M.Urinary incontinence and vesicourethral dysfunction in pediatric surgical conditions. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2002; 11:91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, P. S. J.The management of bowel problems in children with urological disease. Br. J. Urol. 1995; 76:220–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, P. S., Ransley, P. G., & Kiely, E. M.Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 1990; 336:1217–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitrofanoff, P.Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculare dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir. Pediatr. 1980; 21:297–305.Google Scholar
Shandling, B. & Gilmour, R. F.The enema continence catheter in spina bifida: successful bowel management. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1987; 22:271–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radcliffe, A. G. & Dudley, H. A. F.Intraoperative antegrade irrigation of the large intestine. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1983; 156:721–723.Google ScholarPubMed
Squire, R., Kiely, E. M., Carr, B., Ransley, P. G., & Duffy, P. G.The clinical application of the Malone antegrade continence enema. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1993; 28:1012–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyle, M. A., Kaji, D. M., Duque, M., Wild, J., & Galansky, S. H.The Malone antegrade continence enema for neurogenic and structural fecal incontinence and constipation. J. Urol. 1995; 154:759–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, A. C., McCallion, W. A., Brown, S., & Boston, V. E.Antegrade Colonic Enemas. Br. J. Surg. 1996; 83:642–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellsworth, P. I., Webb, H. W., Crump, J. M.et al.The Malone antegrade colonic enema enhances the quality of life in children undergoing urological incontinence procedures. J. Urol. 1996; 155:1416–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schell, S. R., Toogood, G. J., & Dudley, N. E.Control of fecal incontinence: continued success with the Malone Procedure. Surgery 1997; 122:626–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goepel, M., Sperling, H., Stoher, M.et al.Management of neurogenic fecal incontinence in myelodysplastic children by a modified continent appendiceal stoma and antegrade colonic enema. Urology 1997; 49:758–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, C. A., Minevich, E., Wackson, J., & Lewis, A. G.Role of the antegrade continence enema in the management of the most debilitating childhood recto-urogenital anomalies. J. Urol. 1997; 158:1277–1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, J. L., Osborne, A., & Malone, P. S. J.The MACE Procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1999; 34:338–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, N. S., Hughes, S. F., & Stuchfield, B.Continent colonic conduit for rectal evacuation in severe constipation. Lancet 1994; 343:1321–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerharz, E. W., Vik, V., Webb, G.et al.The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1997; 185:544–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krogh, K. & Laurberg, S.Malone antegrade continence enema for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Br. J. Surg. 1998; 85:974–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. P., Moon, S., & Malone, P. S.Treatment of neuropathic urinary and faecal incontinence with synchronous bladder reconstruction and the antegrade continence enema procedure. Br. J. Urol. 1995; 75:386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mor, Y., Quinn, F. M. J., Carr, B.et al.Combined Mitrofanoff and antegrade continence enema procedures for urinary and fecal incontinence. J. Urol. 1997; 158:192–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedderburn, A., Lee, R. S., Denny, A.et al.Synchronous bladder reconstruction and antegrade continence enema. J. Urol. 2001; 165:2392–2393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kajbafzadeh, A. M. & Chubak, N.Simultaneous Malone antegrade continent enema and Mitrofanoff principle using the divided appendix: report of a new technique for prevention of stoma complications. J. Urol. 2001; 165: 2404–2409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankar, K. R., Losty, P. D., Kenny, S. E.et al.Functional results following the antegrade continence enema procedure. Br. J. Surg. 1998; 85:980–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bau, M. O., Younes, S., Aupy, A.et al.The Malone antegrade colonic enema isolated or associated with urological incontinence procedures: Evaluation from patient point of view. J. Urol. 2001; 165:2399–2403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksnes, G., Diseth, T. H., Helseth, A.et al.Appendicostomy for antegrade enema – effects on somatic and functioning in children with myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 2002; 109:484–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, P. S. The Malone procedure for antegrade continence enema. In Spitz, L. & Coran, A.Rob & Smith's Operative Surgery, Pediatric Surgery. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.Google Scholar
Gerharz, E. W., Vik, V., Webb, G., & Woodhouse, C. R. J.The in situ appendix in the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure for faecal incontinence. Br. J. Urol. 1997; 79:985–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, W. H.Yang needle tunnelling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms. J. Urol. 1993; 150:830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, P. R., Lara, R. C., Dutra, M. A.et al.New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997; 49:112–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, C. A., Minevich, E., & Wacksman, J.Modified technique of antegrade continence enema using a stapling device. J. Urol. 2000; 163:589–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, H. W., Barraza, M. A., & Crump, J. M.Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of fecal incontinence. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997; 32:457–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, D. M. & Malone, P. S.The Malone antegrade continence enema. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1995; 30:68–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouriquand, P., Mure, P. Y., Feyaerts, A.et al.The left Monti-Malone. BJU Int. 2000; 85(suppl):65.Google Scholar
Liloku, R. B., Mure, P. Y., Braga, L.et al.The left Monti-Malone procedure: Preliminary results in seven cases. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002; 37:228–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemelle, J. L., Olivier, P., David, N. et al. Analyse scintigraphique du lavement colique antegrade apres intervention de Malone. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the French Society of Paediatric Surgeons, Paris, Sept 1998.
Perez, M., Lemelle, J. L., Barhteleme, H.et al.Bowel management with anterograde colonic enema using a Malone or a Monti conduit. Clinical results. Eur J. Pediatr. Surg. 2001; 11:315–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAndrew, H. F. & Malone, P. S. J.Continent catheterisable conduits: which stoma, which conduit and which reservoir. BJU Int. 2002; 89:86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chait, P. G., Shandling, B., Richards, H. M., & Connolly, B. E.Fecal incontinence in children: treatment with percutaneous cecostomy tube placement – a prospective study. Radiology 1997; 203:621–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chait, P. G., Shandling, B., & Richards, H. M.The cecostomy button. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997; 32:849–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koyle, M. A. & Malone, P. S. J. The Malone antegrade continence enema. In Belman, A. B., King, L., & Kramer, S. A., eds. Clinical Pediatric Urology. 4th edn. Martin Dunitz Ltd, 2002: 529.Google Scholar
Graf, J. L., Strear, C., Bratton, B.et al.The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of literature. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1998; 33:1294–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, J. G., Khoury, A. E., Mc, Lorie, G. A.et al.Outcome analysis of Mitrofanoff principle applications using appendix and ureter to umbilicus and lower quadrant stomal sites. J. Urol. 1996; 156(5):1794–1797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, T., Pope, J. C., Adams, M. C.et al.Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedures in children. J. Urol. 2002; 168:1537–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dey, R., Kenny, S. E., Shankar, K. R.et al.After the honeymoon-medium-term outcome of antegrade continence enema procedure. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003; 38:65–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liard, A., Bocquet, I., Bachy, B., & Mitrofanoff, P.Survey on satisfaction of patients with Malone continent cecostomy. Prog. Urol. 2002; 12:1256–1260.Google ScholarPubMed
Curry, J. L., Osborne, A., & Malone, P. S.How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1998; 33:138–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, P. S. J., Curry, J. L., & Osborne, A.The antegrade continence enema procedure; why, when and how. World J. Urol. 1998; 16:274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, C. P., Barrow, C., Fishwick, J., et al.The Malone antegrade colonic enema procedure: outcome and lessons of 6 years' experience. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 1998; 13:370–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitt, M. A., Soffer, S. Z., & Pena, A.Continent appendicostomy in the bowel management of fecal incontinent children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997; 32:1630–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tackett, L. D., Minevich, E., Benedict, J. F., Wacksman, J., & Sheldon, C. A.Appendiceal versus ileal segment antegrade continence enema. J. Urol. 2002; 167:683–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×