Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 14
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      26 January 2024
      04 April 2024
      ISBN:
      9781009429979
      9781009475662
      9781009429993
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.25kg, 68 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.14kg, 68 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    This Element traces the evolution of peer assessment in writing instruction and illustrates how peer assessment can be used to promote the teaching and learning of writing in various sociocultural and educational contexts. Specifically, this Element aims to present a critical discussion of the major themes and research findings in the existing studies on peer assessment regarding the three assessment paradigms (assessment of, for, and as learning), and to identify whether and how peer assessment has served the purposes of assessment of, for, and as learning, respectively in writing instruction. This Element highlights the contextual factors that shape the effect of peer assessment in writing instruction and concludes with directions for future research and implications regarding how peer assessment can be successfully used to improve students' writing development.

    References

    Ahmed, R., & Abdu, A. K. (2021). Online and face-to-face peer review in academic writing: Frequency and preferences. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 169201. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911245.
    Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor, 10(1), 19–28.
    Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback. System, 56, 96106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002.
    Almahasneh, A. M. S., & Abdul-Hamid, S. (2019). The effect of using peer assessment training on writing performance among Arab EFL high school students in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 105115. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.10.
    Althauser, R., & Darnall, K. (2001). Enhancing critical reading and writing through peer reviews: An exploration of assisted performance. Teaching Sociology, 29(1), 2335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318780.
    Altstaedter, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of peer feedback in foreign language writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 137151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1115052.
    Amalia, N. R. (2021). The implementation of peer assessment in online writing class at senior high school in Bawean. Research on English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 9(1), 179186.
    Anson, I. G., & Anson, C. M. (2017). Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey. Assessing Writing, 33, 1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001.
    Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794.
    Barkaoui, K. (2021). Evaluating tests of second language development. Peter Lang.
    Bauer, C., Figl, K., Derntl, M., Beran, P. P., & Kabicher, S. (2009). The student view on online peer reviews. SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3), 2630. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562892.
    Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002.
    Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), 5870.
    Berggren, J. (2019). Writing, reviewing, and revising: Peer feedback in lower secondary EFL classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, Department of English, Stockholm University].
    Bhowmik, S. K., Hilman, B., & Roy, S. (2019). Peer collaborative writing in the EAP classroom: Insights from a Canadian postsecondary context. TESOL Journal, 10(2), e00393. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.393.
    Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 513533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.549204.
    Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 774. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
    Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
    Blain, S. (2001). Study of verbal peer feedback on the improvement of the quality of writing and the transfer of knowledge in francophone students in grade 4 living in a minority situation in Canada. Language Culture and Curriculum, 14(2), 156170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310108666619.
    Boon, S. I. (2016). Increasing the uptake of peer feedback in primary school writing: Findings from an action research enquiry. Education 3-13, 44(2), 212225.
    Bouziane, A., & Zyad, H. (2018). The impact of self and peer assessment on L2 writing: The case of Moodle workshops. In Ahmed, A. & Abouabdelkader, H. (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world (pp. 111–135). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64104-1_5.
    Jager, S., Bradley, , Meima, E. J., & Thouësny, S. (Eds.) (2014). CALL design: Principles and practice. In Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference (pp. 368373), Groningen, The Netherlands. Research-publishing.net.
    Bueno‐Alastuey, M. C., Vasseur, R., & Elola, I. (2022). Effects of collaborative writing and peer feedback on Spanish as a foreign language writing performance. Foreign Language Annals, 55, 517539. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12611.
    Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019). Metacognitive instruction for peer review interaction in L2 writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 357392. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05.
    Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 3952. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000.
    Cao, S. Y., Zhou, S. R., Luo, Y., et al. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803.
    Cao, Z. H., Yu, S. L., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001.
    Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing pre‐emptive formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478412.
    Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5.
    Chang, C. Y. H. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 81117. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03.
    Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008.
    Chen, M., & Cui, Y. Q. (2022). The effects of AWE and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence in continuation writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100915.
    Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.
    Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 7884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001.
    Chin, C. K., Gong, C., & Tay, B. P. (2015). The effects of wiki-based recursive process writing on Chinese narrative essays for Chinese as a Second Language (CSL) students in Singapore. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(1), 4559.
    Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.
    Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306289261.
    Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891.
    Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
    Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: Implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423.
    Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. M. (2023). From isolation to collaboration: Creating an intentional community of practice within the doctoral dissertation proposal writing process. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313
    Covill, A. E. (2010). Comparing peer review and self-review as ways to improve college students’ writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(2), 199226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862961003796207.
    Crinon, J. (2012). The dynamics of writing and peer review at primary school. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 121154.
    Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X. S., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.878147.
    Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and Practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.898128.
    Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481509.
    Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
    Egan, A., & Costello, L. (2016). Peer assessment of, for and as learning: A core component of an accredited professional development course for Higher Education teachers. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 293129313. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/293.
    Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M. (2013). Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 111131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002.
    Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775.
    Ferguson, T. (2009). The “write” skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734968.
    Franco Ponce, R. M., Córdova Reyes, W. M., & Maloney, D. (2021). Effectiveness of integrating ICTs in trained peer-review techniques: Improvement in ecuadorian secondary efl learners’ quality of writing [Doctoral dissertation, ESPOL. FCNM].
    Gao, X., Asmawi, A., & Samuel, M. (2017). Critical peer feedback for business English writing through Qzone blogs: A mechanism among Chinese undergraduates. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 3954. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1701-03.
    Geithner, C. A., & Pollastro, A. N. (2016). Doing peer review and receiving feedback: Impact on scientific literacy and writing skills. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 3846. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00071.2015.
    Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 3144.
    Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T., & Harnett, J. A. (2015). Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer-and self-assessment comments: Applying Hattie and Timperley’s feedback model. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 265281.
    Heift, T., & Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments: A case study in French. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 208214. www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.3.3.208.
    Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa.
    Huang, S. C. (2015). Setting writing revision goals after assessment for learning. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(4), 363385.
    Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 14331447. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854.
    Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.
    Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 3354.
    Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.
    Illana-Mahiques, E. (2021). Re-thinking peer reviewing in the virtual context: The roles of giving and receiving online feedback in L2 Spanish classrooms. Languages, 6(3), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030151.
    Jogan, M. K., Ana, H. H., & Gladys, A. M. (2001). Cross‐cultural e‐mail: Providing cultural input for the advanced foreign language student. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 341346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02066.x.
    Kim, H. (2012). Writing, peer feedback, and revision : A comparison of L1 and L2 college freshmen with longitudinal analyses [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/28468.
    Kinginger, C., & Belz, J. (2005). Socio-cultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic case studies from telecollaboration and residence abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 369421. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.369.
    Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2011). Examiners’ reports on theses: Feedback or assessment?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 211222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.06.001.
    Lam, R. (2013). The relationship between assessment types and text revision. ELT Journal, 67(4), 446458. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct034.
    Lam, R. (2016). Assessment as learning: Examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 19001917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999317.
    Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195206.
    Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?. Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003.
    Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English, 18(1), 99111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2011.543516.
    Lee, I. (2017). Classroom assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Singapore: Springer.
    Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 3450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003.
    Lee, I., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. (2019). Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 7281.
    Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003.
    Lee, M., & Evans, M. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 831847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598.
    Leung, K., Chan, M., Maxwell, G., & Poon, T. (2010). A qualitative analysis of sub-degree students commentary styles and patterns in the context of gender and peer e-feedback. In Hybrid Learning: Third International Conference, ICHL 2010, Beijing, China, August 16–18, 2010. Proceedings 3 (pp. 149159). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.
    Li, X., Xia, Q., Chu, S. K. W., & Yang, Y. (2022). Using gamification to facilitate students’ self-regulation in e-learning: A case study on students’ L2 English learning. Sustainability, 14(12), 7008.
    Lin, C.-J. (2019). An online peer assessment approach to supporting mind-mapping flipped learning activities for college English writing courses. Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 385415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00144-6.
    Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles. Journal of Computer assisted Learning, 17(4), 420432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.
    Lindgren, R. (2018). “The main thing with peer review, if we help each other out, that is a quicker way to get a better result”: Teachers’ experience of using peer review in the English classroom. Malmö University.
    Liu, J., & Hansen Edwards, , J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press.
    Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018.
    López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 12931310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2.
    Lu, Q., Zhu, X. H., & Cheong, C. M. (2021). Understanding the difference between self-feedback and peer feedback: A comparative study of their effects on undergraduate students’ writing improvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962.
    Ludemann, P. M., & McMakin, D. (2014). Perceived helpfulness of peer editing activities: First-year students’ views and writing performance outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 13(2), 129136. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.129.
    Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703.
    Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2022). Researching L2 student engagement with written feedback: Insights from sociocultural theory. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 788798.
    Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2023). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 00336882221150811.
    Man, D., Xu, Y., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018). Understanding autonomous peer feedback practices among postgraduate students: A case study in a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 527536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310.
    McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 14951506.
    McDonough, K., Ammar, A., & Michaud, G. (2022). L2 peer interaction before and after writing: How does each one promote writing development? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 78(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0073.
    McDonough, K., Ammar, A., & Sellami, A. (2021). L2 French students’ conversations during interactive writing tasks and their interaction mindset. Foreign Language Annuals, 55(1), 222236. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12594.
    McIsaac, C. M., & Sepe, J. F. (1996). Improving the writing of accounting students: A cooperative venture. Journal of Accounting Education, 14(4), 515533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(96)00027-9.
    Meek, S. E., Blakemore, L., & Marks, L. (2017). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052.
    Meletiadou, E. (2021a). Exploring the impact of peer assessment on EFL students’ writing performance. IAFOR Journal of Education: Language Learning in Education, 9(3), 7895. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.3.05.
    Meletiadou, E. (2021b). Opening Pandora’s box: How does peer assessment affect EFL students’ writing quality? Languages, 6(115), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030115.
    Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.
    Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.
    Min, H. T. (2018). Trained peer written feedback and teacher written feedback: Similar or different? English Teaching & Learning, 42(2), 131153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0009-1.
    Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113131.
    Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x.
    Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). Modifying L2 criticisms: How learners do it?. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 768791.
    Nguyen, T. T. L. (2018). The effect of combined peer-teacher feedback on Thai students’ writing accuracy. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 117132.
    Nicolaidou, . (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers and Education, 68, 404415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004
    O’Donnell, M. E. (2014). Peer response with process-oriented, standards-based writing for beginning-level, second language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 97(3), 413429. www.jstor.org/stable/24368817.
    Ozkul, A. (2017). Peer response in L1 writing: Impact on revisons and student perceptions. [Master’s thesis, Iowa State University]. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15394.
    Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.
    Panadero, , E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 12531278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.
    Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124152. www.jowr.org/pkp/ojs/index.php/jowr/article/view/753.
    Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2011). Writing in the natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process. Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), 365393.
    Peterson, S. S., & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 8699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.003.
    Peterson, , S. S., & Portier, C. (2014). Grade one peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Education 3–13, 42(3), 237257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.670256.
    Pham, H. T. P. (2022). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 21122147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530.
    Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing and reflective thinking: Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554.
    Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 235246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120052396.
    Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019). The different impact of a structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates’ initial writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 653663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337.
    Rezai, A., Rahul, D. R., Asif, M., Omar, A., & Reshad Jamalyar, A. (2022). Contributions of E-portfolios assessment to developing EFL learners’ vocabulary, motivation, and attitudes. Education Research International, 2022, 111. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5713278.
    Roux-Rodriguez, R. (2003). Computer-mediated peer response and its impact on revision in the college Spanish classroom: A case study. University of South Florida.
    Ruecker, T. (2010). The potential of dual-language cross-cultural peer review. ELT Journal, 65(4), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq067.
    Ruegg, R. (2015). The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability. Linguistics and Education, 29, 7382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001.
    Ruegg, R. (2010). Aspects affecting confidence in writing. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 21, 123135.
    Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190.
    Sadeghi, K., & Rahmati, T. (2017). Integrating assessment as, for, and of learning in a large-scale exam preparation course. Assessing Writing, 34, 5061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.003.
    Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 131.
    Saeed, M. A., Ghazali, K., & Aljaberi, M. A. (2018). A review of previous studies on ESL/EFL learners’ interactional feedback exchanges in face-to-face and computer-assisted peer review of writing. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0084-8.
    Saeed, M. A., Ghazali, K., Sahuri, S. S., & Abdulrab, M. (2018). Engaging EFL learners in online peer feedback on writing: What does it tell us? Journal of Information Technology Education-Research, 17, 3961. https://doi.org/10.28945/3980.
    Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 3154. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133o.
    Sánchez‐Naranjo, J. (2019). Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing. Foreign Language Annuals, 52(3), 612643. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12414.
    Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., et al. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of assessment as learning (AAL), assessment for learning (AFL), and assessment of learning (AOL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094.
    Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15(4), 225230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553512.
    Schunn, C., Godley, A., & DeMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525.
    Serafini, F. (2001). Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384393.
    Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601.
    Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 110.
    Snyder, D. W., Nielson, R. P., & Kurzer, K. (2016). Foreign language writing fellows programs: A model for improving advanced writing skills. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 750771. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12231.
    Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
    Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. Calico Journal, 31(1), 118.
    Sun, H. Y., & Wang, M. C. (2022). Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221080507.
    Sun, P. P., & Jun Zhang, L. (2022). Effects of translanguaging in online peer feedback on Chinese University English-as-a-foreign-language students’ writing performance. RELC Journal, 53(2), 325341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221089051.
    Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 3140.
    Tai, H. C., Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the effects of peer review and teachers’ corrective feedback on EFL students’ online writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597490.
    Tan, S. X., Cho, Y. W., & Xu, W. S. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner’s writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2066137.
    Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.
    Tian, J. (2011). The effects of peer editing versus co-writing on writing in Chinese-as-a-foreign language [Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria].
    Tian, L. L., Liu, Q. S., & Zhang, X. X. (2022). Self-regulated writing strategy use when revising upon automated, peer, and teacher feedback in an online English as a foreign language writing course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873170.
    Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.
    Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 2027.
    Topping, K. J. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.31532/interdiscipeducpsychol.1.1.007.
    Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428.
    Tran, O. T. T., & Pham, V. P. H. (2023). The effects of online peer feedback on students’ writing skills during corona virus pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 881896. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16149a.
    Tsagari, D., & Meletiadou, E. (2015). Peer assessment of adolescent learners’ writing performance. Writing & Pedagogy, 7. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v7i2-3.26457.
    Tsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9.
    Tunagür, , M. (2021). The effect of peer assessment application on writing anxiety and writing motivation of 6th grade students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(1), 96105. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i1.4352.
    Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 281290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103816.
    Vorobel, O. (2013). A case study of peer review practices of four adolescent English language learners in face-to-face and online contexts. [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida].
    Vougan, A., & Li, S. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of peer feedback in second language writing: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 11151138.
    Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 10321047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.
    Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 4363. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/wareodowd/.
    Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070013.
    Wei, W., Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X. H., & Lu, Q. (2022). Comparing self-reflection and peer feedback practices in an academic writing task: A student self-efficacy perspective. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2042242.
    Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 165184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7.
    Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 283289.
    Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 279309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9285-y.
    Woodhouse, J., & Wood, P. (2022). Creating dialogic spaces: Developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment and review Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 643655. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779686.
    Wooley, R. S. (2007). The effects of web-based peer review on student writing [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University].
    Wu, L. (2009). Understanding SLA through peer interactions in a Chinese classroom: A sociocultural perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire].
    Wu, W. Y., Huang, J. Y., Han, C. W., & Zhang, J. (2022). Evaluating peer feedback as a reliable and valid complementary aid to teacher feedback in EFL writing classrooms: A feedback giver perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140.
    Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160.
    Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 186193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.
    Yang, Y. F. (2016). Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 683702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440.
    Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master’s students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40, 4252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004.
    Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 178192.
    Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47, 2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007.
    Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016a). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161.
    Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016b). Understanding the role of learners with low English language proficiency in peer feedback of second language writing. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 483494. www.jstor.org/stable/43893831.
    Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525.
    Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 5065. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879.
    Zaccaron, R., & Xhafaj, D. C. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: A comparative study on the effects of anonymous and conference peer feedback on the writing of learners of English as an additional language. System, 95(4), 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102367.
    Zhang, M., He, Q., Du, J., Liu, F., & Huang, B. (2022). Learners’ perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions toward online peer feedback in academic writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 973478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973478.
    Zhang, R. F., & Zou, D. (2022). A review of research on technology-enhanced peer feedback for second language writing based on the activity theory framework. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11469-8.
    Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209222.
    Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2020). What is the influence of peer feedback and author response on Chinese university students’ English writing performance? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 123146. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.259.
    Zhang, X. D., & Yu, S. L. (2022). Training student writers in conducting peer feedback in L2 writing: A meaning-making perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(4), 439460. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0045.
    Zhang, Z. (2017). Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study. ELT Journal, 71(3), 317328.
    Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90102.
    Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 1324.
    Zhao, H. (2018). Exploring tertiary English as a Foreign Language writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 11331145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434610.
    Zheng, L. Q., Cui, P. P., Li, X., & Huang, R. H. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533.
    Zhou, J., Zheng, Y., & Tai, J. H.-M. (2020). Grudges and gratitude: The social-affective impacts of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 345358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 130). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Zou, D., Xie, H. R., & Wang, F. L. (2022). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337.
    Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2018). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.