Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:26:04.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Constraints on the acquisition of English modals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Marilyn Shatz
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Sharon A. Wilcox
Affiliation:
University of Missouri St. Louis
Get access

Summary

Introduction: Modals and language–thought issues

The ability to communicate through language is a benchmark of human competence. Speakers use language to communicate their knowledge and beliefs and to share their community's rules of social order and cultural norms. Modal expressions, because they encode the stances speakers take on propositions, are essential to these two language functions. Consider, for example, a proposition like John come. With the addition of a modal, such as can, may, must, or will, speakers can make a variety of statements about that proposition, from expressing their degree of certainty about the likelihood of the event it encodes to giving permission for the event to occur. If children are to become competent members of their language community, it is crucial that they master their language's modal system.

Because modal expressions encode notions of necessity, possibility, obligation, and permission, they are an important and revealing aspect of language to study with regard to language–thought issues. The use of modals in the epistemic sense (having to do with beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge states) seems to entail the ability to assess one's own knowledge state, to evaluate evidence, and to communicate those assessments to another whose state may be different from one's own. Such abilities, central though they are to a host of cognitive activities, have not regularly been accorded to children younger than 4. Yet children younger than 4 certainly produce modals in their spontaneous speech. Possibly children use these words solely for purposes of social regulation and description, that is, with deontic and dynamic meanings rather than epistemic ones (Palmer, 1979).

Type
Chapter
Information
Perspectives on Language and Thought
Interrelations in Development
, pp. 319 - 353
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×