Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T17:00:50.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Moving Boundaries? – Comments on the Relationship Between Philosophy and Cosmology

from Part I - Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

Claus Beisbart
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Khalil Chamcham
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A popular account of the development of science, in particular of cosmology, and of the relation between science and philosophy goes like this: Science is inherently progressive and ever extends our knowledge. Step by step, phenomena at smaller and larger scales become known to us. Philosophy, by contrast, is concerned with those questions that we cannot (yet) answer in a scientific way due to a lack of empirical evidence. Accordingly, as science progresses, the boundary between the sciences and philosophy shifts. As a result, philosophy continuously loses ground, thus becoming more and more marginal – or so the view is. The aim of this comment is to discuss this account of science and philosophy with a special emphasis on cosmology.

A Popular Story About the Development of Science and Philosophy

Let us first unfold the popular story in more detail. There is quite a lot to support it. Early attempts to account for the natural world and to explain the observed phenomena, e.g. in ancient Greece, were fraught with speculation. There was simply no alternative, since, in modern terms, background knowledge was small and data sparse. Accordingly, to the extent that there was natural science, it was speculative and in this sense philosophical. Philosophy and the natural sciences were not, and could not be, properly distinguished, as is evident e.g. from the fact that a renowned philosopher, viz. Plato, wrote a dialogue concerned with what we now call cosmology.

Given the lack of knowledge and data, it is no surprise that there were rival views on how the world is composed and how far it extends. As to the small scales, there was controversy as to whether the natural world is built out of tiny, indivisible bodies, as the atomists claimed. There were competing views about the largest scales too: Whereas the atomists favoured an infinite world, the school that gained predominance for quite some time claimed that the Universe was finite and consisted largely of what is now considered to be the solar system (consult Kragh (2007) for a history of cosmology).

After the so-called Scientific Revolution, and particularly during the twentieth century, our knowledge of the natural world has rapidly increased.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beisbart, C. (2009) Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology? Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 40, 175–205.Google Scholar
Dawid, R. (2013) String Theory and the Scientific Method.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2014) On the Philosophy of Cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 46, 5–23.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (2013) Bohmian Mechanics. In E. N., Zalta, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/qm-bohm/.
Hawking, S. (1992) A Brief History of Time.. London: Transworld Publishers Ltd.
Hawking, S. and Mlodinow, L. (2010) The Grand Design. New Answers to the Ultimate Questions of Life.. London:Transworld Publishers.
Kanitscheider, B. (1991) Kosmologie. 2nd edn. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun.
Kant, I. (1781) Kritik der reinen Vernunft.. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch (2nd edn 1787), English translation: Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, translated by P., Guyer and A. W., Wood; Cambridge Edition of the Works of Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University (page numbers refer to the 1781 and 1787 editions, abbreviated as A and B, respectively).
Kragh, H. (2007) Conceptions of Cosmos. From Myths to the Accelerating Universe: A History of Cosmology.. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Manchak, J. B. (2009) Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 40, 53–6.Google Scholar
Mason, S. F. (1962) A History of the Sciences.. New York: Macmillan.
Ney, A. and Albert, D. Z. (eds.) (2013) The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics.. New York: Oxford University Press.
North, J. D. (1965) The Measure of the Universe. A History of Modern Cosmology.. Oxford:Clarendon Press.
Peacock, J. A. (1999) Cosmological Physics.. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951) Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review. 60, 20–43.
Vaidman, L. (2015) Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In E. N., Zalta, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2015 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/qm-manyworlds/.
van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×