Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T11:30:54.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

15 - Transcendental phenomenology as the only true explanation of objectivity and all meaningful problems in previous philosophy

from IV - From monadological intersubjectivity to the historical a priori constitutive of all meaning

Burt Hopkins
Affiliation:
Seattle University
Get access

Summary

Scope and limits of Husserl's reactivation of the sedimented origins of the modern spirit

For Husserl, philosophy, as the universal science of what is, has but one goal: intuitive knowledge of what is. As we have seen, both what in the world the formalized meaning formations of mathematical physics refer to, and therefore make intuitable, and how in the world this reference and corresponding intuition is possible, are obscure on Husserl's view. He traces this obscurity to the fact that the formalized meaning in modern mathematics is made possible by the progressive “emptying of its meaning” (Crisis, 44/44) in relation to the “real” (Crisis, 35/37), that is, to the intuitive givenness of the things manifest to everyday sense experience in the surrounding world. Husserl's historical reflection on the beginnings of the development of modern, Galilean science reveals that it is first made possible by this progressive emptying of meaning. The meaning formations of the mathematics that make physics possible are themselves made possible by their “becoming liberated from all intuited actuality” (Crisis, 43/44), including the “magnitudes” (Crisis, 44/44) that “numbers are supposed to signify” and of course from the intuitively given shapes of actual things. More precisely, the ideal shapes of Euclidean geometry are substituted for the intuited shapes of things, while algebraic calculation with ““symbolic’ concepts” (Crisis, 48/48) that express numbers in general – as opposed to determinate numbers – excludes the “original thinking that genuinely gives meaning to this technical process and truth to the correct results” (Crisis, 46/46).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×