Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T07:10:22.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2018

Kevin Morris
Kevin Morris
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Physicalism Deconstructed
Levels of Reality and the Mind–Body Problem
 , pp. 249 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, S. 1920. Space, Time, and Deity. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1968. A Materialist Theory of Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Árnadóttir, S. and Crane, T. 2013. There is No Exclusion Problem. In Gibb, S. C., Lowe, E. J., and Ingthorsson, R. D. (eds.), Mental Causation and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, P. 2012a. A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding. In Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, P. 2012b. Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation. The Journal of Philosophy 109: 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, P. 2012c. Properties, Powers, and the Subset Account of Realization. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84: 654–74.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946 (1952). Language, Truth, and Logic, Second edition. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Basile, P. 1999. Experience and Relations: An Examination of F. H. Bradley's Conception of Reality. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. 2009. Interventionist Causal Exclusion and Non-Reductive Physicalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 161–78.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. 2010. Interventionism and Epiphenomenalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40: 359–83.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 2003. Why the Exclusion Problem Seems Intractable and How, Just Maybe, to Tract It. Noûs 37: 471–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. 2008. Exclusion Again. In Hohwy, J. and Kallestrup, J. (eds.), Being Reduced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 2011a. By Our Bootstraps. Philosophical Perspectives 25: 27–41.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 2011b. Construction Area (No Hard Hat Required). Philosophical Studies 154: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. 2017. Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. and McLaughlin, B. 2014. Supervenience. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. 1710 (1982). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Winkler, K. (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Berker, S. Forthcoming. The Unity of Grounding. Mind.Google Scholar
Blanshard, B. 1984. Bradley on Relations. In Manser, A. and Stock, G. (eds.), The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. 1980. Introduction: What is Functionalism? In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. 1990. Can the Mind Change the World? In Boolos, G. (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. 2015. The Canberra Plan Neglects Ground. In Horgan, T., Sabatés, M., and Sosa, D. (eds.), Qualia and Mental Causation in a Physical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. and Stalnaker, R. 1999. Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap. The Philosophical Review 108: 1–46.Google Scholar
Bontly, T. 2005a. Exclusion, Overdetermination, and the Nature of Causation. Journal of Philosophical Research 30: 261–82.Google Scholar
Bontly, T. 2005b. Proportionality, Causation, and Exclusion. Philosophia 32: 331–48.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. 1980. Materialism Without Reductionism: What Physicalism Does Not Entail. In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. 1988. How to be a Moral Realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. 1897 (1969). Appearance and Reality, Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. 1935. Relations. In Collected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. and Kim, J. 1967. The Logic of the Identity Theory. The Journal of Philosophy 64: 515–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bunzl, M. 1979. Causal Overdetermination. The Journal of Philosophy 76: 134–50.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. 1999. Cosmic Hermeneutics. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 347–83.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. 2008. Truthmakers and Ontological Commitment: or How to Deal with Complex Objects and Mathematical Ontology Without Getting Into Trouble. Philosophical Studies 140: 1–18.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. 2016. Do We Need Grounding? Inquiry 59: 382–97.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. and Barnes, E. 2007. A Critical Study of John Heil's From an Ontological Point of View. SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review 6: 22–30.Google Scholar
Candlish, S. 2007. The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, B. 2011. Overdetermination and the Exclusion Problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 251–62.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1934. The Unity of Science. Black, M. (trans.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1936. Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science 3: 419–71 and 4: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. 1938 (1955). Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science. In Neurath, O. et al. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 2012. Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. and Jackson, F. 2001. Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation. The Philosophical Review 110: 315–60.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1981. Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clapp, L. 2001. Disjunctive Properties: Multiple Realizations. The Journal of Philosophy 98: 111–36.Google Scholar
Correia, F. and Schneider, B. 2012. Grounding: An Opinionated Introduction. In Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, T. and Mellor, D. H. 1990. There is No Question of Physicalism. Mind 99: 185–206.Google Scholar
Creath, R. 2014. Logical Empiricism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/logical-empiricismGoogle Scholar
Daly, C. 1998. What are Physical Properties? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 196–217.Google Scholar
Daly, C. 2012. Scepticism about Grounding. In Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. 2015. The Possibility of Physicalism. The Journal of Philosophy 111: 557–92.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1970. Mental Events. In Foster, L. and Swanson, J. W. (eds.), Experience and Theory London: Duckworth. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1993. Thinking Causes. In Heil, J. and Mele, A. (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2001. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1981. True Believers. In Heath, A. F. (ed.), Scientific Explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991. Real Patterns. The Journal of Philosophy 88: 27–51.Google Scholar
deRosset, L. 2013. Grounding Explanations. Philosopher's Imprint 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1643 (1991). Correspondence with Elisabeth. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. III. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenney, A. (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowe, P. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowell, J. 2006. The Physical: Empirical, not Metaphysical. Philosophical Studies 131: 25–60.Google Scholar
Dreier, J. 2006. Was Moore a Moorean? In Horgan, T. and Timmons, M. (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. 2008. Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Endicott, R. 2011. Flat Versus Dimensioned: The What and How of Functional Realization. Journal of Philosophical Research 36: 191–208.Google Scholar
Endicott, R. 2012. Resolving Arguments by Different Conceptual Traditions of Realization. Philosophical Studies 159: 41–59.Google Scholar
Endicott, R. 2016. Developing the Explanatory Dimensions of Part-Whole Realization. Philosophical Studies 173: 3347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esfeld, M. 2007. Mental Causation and the Metaphysics of Causation. Erkenntnis 67: 207–20.Google Scholar
Esfeld, M. 2010. Causal Overdetermination for Humeans? Metaphysica 11: 99–104.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. 1958. The “Mental” and the “Physical”. In Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 1994. Essence and Modality. Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. 2001. The Question of Realism. Philosophers Imprint 1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 2012. Guide to Ground. In Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1974. Special Sciences (Or: the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis). Synthese 28: 97–115.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1989. Making Mind Matter More. Philosophical Topics 17: 59–79.Google Scholar
Funkhouser, E. 2002. Three Varieties of Causal Overdetermination. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83: 335–51.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. 1963. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23: 121–3.Google Scholar
Gibb, S. 2014. The Entailment Problem and the Subset Account of Property Realization. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92: 551–66.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2002. The Dimensions of Realization. Analysis 62: 316–23.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2007a. The Metaphysics of Mechanisms and the Challenge of the New Reductionism. In de Joong, H. and Schouten, M. (eds.), The Matter of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2007b. Understanding the New Reductionism: The Metaphysics of Science and Compositional Reduction. The Journal of Philosophy 104: 193–216.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2010. Moving Beyond the Subset Model of Realization. Synthese 177: 165–92.Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2016. Reduction and Emergence in Science and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goff, P. 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1967. A Causal Theory of Knowing. The Journal of Philosophy 64: 357–72.Google Scholar
Hall, N. 2004. Two Concepts of Causation. In Collins, J., Hall, N., and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heil, J. 2012. The Universe as We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1950 (1959). Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. In Ayer, A. (ed.), Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1969. Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets. In Morgenbesser, S., Feigl, H., and White, M. (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. and Oppenheim, P. 1948. Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15: 135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, P. 1942. The Status of Emergence. The Journal of Philosophy 39: 486–93.Google Scholar
Hill, C. 2009. Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1982. Supervenience and Microphysics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63: 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. 1993. From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind 102: 555–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. 2006. Materialism: Matters of Definition, Defense, and Deconstruction. Philosophical Studies 131: 157–83.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. and Potrč, M. 2008. Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Horst, S. 2007. Beyond Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, R. 2009. Emergentism and Supervenience Physicalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 83–98.Google Scholar
Howell, R. 2013. Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1748 (1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kallestrup, J. 2006. The Causal Exclusion Argument. Philosophical Studies 131: 459–85.Google Scholar
Keaton, D. and Polger, T. 2014. Exclusion, Still not Tracted. Philosophical Studies 171: 135–48.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. and Oppenheim, P. 1956. On Reduction. Philosophical Studies 7: 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1966. On the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 227–35.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1968. Reduction, Correspondence, and Identity. The Monist 52: 424–38.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1972. Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws, and the Identity Theory. The Monist 56: 178–92.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1973. Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 217–36.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1976. Events as Property Exemplifications. In Brand, M. and Walton, D. (eds.), Action Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1978. Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables. American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 149–56.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984. Concepts of Supervenience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45: 153–76.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1987. “Strong” and “Global” Supervenience Revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48: 315–26.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989a. The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63: 31–47.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989b. Mechanism, Purpose, and Explanatory Exclusion. Philosophical Perspectives 3: 77–108.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1990. Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept. Metaphilosophy 21: 1–27.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1992. Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993. Can Supervenience and “Non-Strict Laws” Save Anomalous Monism? In Heil, J. and Mele, A. (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1999. Making Sense of Emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 13–36.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2002a. Responses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 671–80.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2002b. The Layered Model: Metaphysical Considerations. Philosophical Explorations 5: 2–20.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2005a. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2005b. Philosophy of Mind, Second edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2007. Causation and Mental Causation. In McLaughlin, B. and Cohen, J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2008. Reduction and Reductive Explanation: Is One Possible Without the Other? In Hohwy, J. and Kallestrup, J. (eds.), Being Reduced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2010. Thoughts on Sydney Shoemaker's Physical Realization. Philosophical Studies 148: 101–12.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2011. From Naturalism to Physicalism: Supervenience Redux. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 85: 109–34.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. 2013. The Conceptual Link from Physical to Mental. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and Its Place in Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1972 (1980). Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. 1865 (1950). The History of Materialism. Thomas, E. (trans). New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Leuenberger, S. 2014. From Grounding to Supervenience? Erkenntnis 79: 227–40.Google Scholar
Levine, J. 2001. Purple Haze. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. and Trogdon, K. 2009. The Modal Status of Materialism. Philosophical Studies 145: 351–62.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1966. An Argument for the Identity Theory. The Journal of Philosophy 63: 17–25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1969. Review of Art, Mind, and Religion. The Journal of Philosophy 66: 22–7.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1970. How to Define Theoretical Terms. The Journal of Philosophy 67: 427–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1972. Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–58.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1973. Causation. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–67.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1983. New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1994. Reduction of Mind. In Guttenplan, S. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
List, C. and Menzies, P. 2009. Nonreductive Physicalism and the Limits of the Exclusion Principle. The Journal of Philosophy 106: 475–502.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. 2002. Comments on Jaegwon Kim's Mind in a Physical World. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 655–62.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. 2007. Mental Causation, or Something Near Enough. In McLaughlin, B. and Cohen, J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. 2015. Mental Causation: The Free Lunch. In Horgan, T., Sabatés, M., and Sosa, D. (eds.), Qualia and Mental Causation in a Physical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Glasgow, J. 2003. The Impossibility of Superdupervenience. Philosophical Studies 113: 201–23.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mander, W. J. 1994. An Introduction to Bradley's Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, E. 2001. Mental Causation: Unnaturalized but Not Unnatural. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 57–83.Google Scholar
Marras, A. 2005. Consciousness and Reduction. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 56: 335–61.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1992. The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism. In Beckerman, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1993. On Davidson's Response to the Charge of Epiphenomenalism. In Heil, J. and Mele, A. (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1995. Varieties of Supervenience. In Savellos, E. and Yalçin, Ü. (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 2006. Is Role-Functionalism Committed to Epiphenomenalism? Journal of Consciousness Studies 13: 39–66.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 2007. Mental Causation and Shoemaker-Realization. Erkenntnis 67: 149–72.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. 2003. A Physicalist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. 2006. Realization and the Formulation of Physicalism. Philosophical Studies 131: 127–55.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. 2008. Can Physicalism Be Non-Reductive? Philosophy Compass 3: 1281–96.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. 2016. Grounding and the Formulation of Physicalism. In Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C. (eds.), Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2001. Objects and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Montero, B. 2010. A Russellian Response to the Structural Argument Against Physicalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17: 70–83.Google Scholar
Moore, D. 2012. Causal Exclusion and Dependent Overdetermination. Erkenntnis 76: 319–35.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. 1923. Emergent Evolution. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2009. Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 647–57.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2010. Guidelines for Theorizing About Realization. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 48: 393–416.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2011a. Subset Realization and Physical Identification. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41: 317–35.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2011b. Subset Realization, Parthood, and Causal Overdetermination. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92: 363–79.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2013. On Two Arguments for Subset Inheritance. Philosophical Studies 163: 197–211.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2014a. Causal Closure, Causal Exclusion, and Supervenience Physicalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95: 72–86.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2014b. Supervenience Physicalism, Emergentism, and the Polluted Supervenience Base. Erkenntnis 79: 351–65.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2015. Against Disanalogy-Style Responses to the Exclusion Problem. Philosophia 43: 435–53.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2016. Physicalism, Truthmaking, and Levels of Reality: Problems and Prospects. Topoi. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9379-y.Google Scholar
Morris, K. 2018. What's Wrong with Brute Supervenience? A Defense of Horgan on Physicalism and Superdupervenience. Analytic Philosophy 59: 256–80.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1949. The Meaning of Reduction in the Natural Sciences. In Stouffer, R. (ed.), Science and Civilization. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1970. Issues in the Logic of Reductive Explanations. In Kiefer, H. and Munitz, M. (eds.), Mind, Science, and History. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. Panpsychism. In Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1931. Physicalism: The Philosophy of the Vienna Circle. The Monist 41: 618–23.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1932 (1959). Protocol Sentences. In Ayer, A. (ed.), Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1938 (1955). Unified Science as Encyclopedic Integration. In Neurath, O. et al. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ney, A. 2007. Can the Appeal to Constitution Solve the Exclusion Problem? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88: 486–506.Google Scholar
Ney, A. 2009. Physical Causation and Difference-Making. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 737–64.Google Scholar
Ney, A. 2012. The Causal Contribution of Mental Events. In Hill, C. and Gozzano, S. (eds.), New Perspectives on Type Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ney, A. 2016. Grounding in the Philosophy of Mind: A Defense. In Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C. (eds.), Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P. and Putnam, H. 1958. The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. In Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2001. The Rise of Physicalism. In Gillett, C. and Loewer, B. (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2006. The Causal Closure of the Physical and Naturalism. In McLaughlin, B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. 1961. Philosophical Reasoning. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Pepper, S. 1926. Emergence. The Journal of Philosophy 23: 241–5.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. 2002. Robust Nonreductive Materialism. The Journal of Philosophy 99: 499–531.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. 2011. Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piccinini, G. Unpublished Manuscript. Neurocognitive Mechanisms.Google Scholar
Pineda, D. and Vincente, A. 2017. Shoemaker's Analysis of Realization: A Review. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94: 97–120.Google Scholar
Place, U. T. 1956. Is Consciousness a Brain Process? British Journal of Psychology 47: 44–50.Google Scholar
Poland, J. 1994. Physicalism: The Philosophical Foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polger, T. 2004. Natural Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polger, T. 2007. Realization and the Metaphysics of Mind. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 233–59.Google Scholar
Polger, T. 2010. Mechanisms and Explanatory Realization Relations. Synthese 177: 193–212.Google Scholar
Polger, T. 2013. Physicalism and Moorean Supervenience. Analytic Philosophy 54: 72–92.Google Scholar
Polger, T. and Shapiro, L. 2008. Understanding the Dimensions of Realization. The Journal of Philosophy 105: 213–22.Google Scholar
Polger, T. and Shapiro, L. 2016. The Multiple Realization Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1960 (1975). Minds and Machines. In Hook, S. (ed.), Dimensions of Mind. New York: New York University Press. Reprinted in Putnam 1975.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1962. The Analytic and the Synthetic. In Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1963 (1975). Brains and Behavior. In Butler, R. J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Reprinted in Putnam 1975.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1967 (1975). Psychological Predicates. In Capitan, W. and Merrill, D. (eds.), Art, Mind and Religion. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in Putnam 1975 as “The Nature of Mental States.”Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1969a. On Properties. In Rescher, N. (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1969b (1975). Logical Positivism and the Philosophy of Mind. In Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (eds.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. Reprinted in Putnam 1975.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1973 (1975). Philosophy and our Mental Life. In Putnam, H., Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.Google Scholar
Rabin, G. 2011. Review of Physicalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 562–6.Google Scholar
Railton, P. 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1931. Theories. In Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raven, M. 2012. In Defense of Ground. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 687–701.Google Scholar
Rosen, G. 2010. Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction. In Hale, R. and Hoffman, A. (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1903 (1964). The Principles of Mathematics. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1914 (2009). Our Knowledge of the External World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1918 (2010). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Pears, D. (ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2003. Overdetermining Causes. Philosophical Studies 114: 23–45.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2009. On What Grounds What. In Chalmers, D. et al. (eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2016. Ground Rules: Lessons from Wilson. In Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C. (eds.), Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schulte, P. 2014. Can Truthmaker Theorists Claim Ontological Free Lunches? European Journal of Philosophy 22: 249–68.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1962. Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man. In Colody, R. (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. 2012. Mental Manipulations and the Problem of Causal Exclusion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 507–24.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. and Polger, T. 2012. Identity, Variability, and Multiple Realization in the Special Sciences. In Hill, C. and Gozzano, S. (eds.), New Perspectives on Type Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, K. 2015. Causal Overdetermination and Modal Compatibilism. Philosophia 43: 1111–31.Google Scholar
Sharpe, K. Unpublished Manuscript. Psychophysical Reduction Without Property Identity.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1980 (2003). Causality and Properties. In Van Inwagen, P. (ed.), Time and Cause. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Reprinted in Shoemaker 2003.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1981 (2003). Some Varieties of Functionalism. Philosophical Topics 12: 83–118. Reprinted in Shoemaker 2003.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2001 (2003). Realization and Mental Causation. In Gillett, C. and Loewer, B. (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Shoemaker 2003.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2003. Identity, Cause, and Mind, Expanded Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2007. Physical Realization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2003. What's So Bad About Overdetermination? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 719–26.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1959. Sensations and Brain Processes. The Philosophical Review 68: 141–56.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1963. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Stace, W. 1939. Novelty, Indeterminism, and Emergence. The Philosophical Review 48: 296–310.Google Scholar
Stoljar, D. 2001. Two Conceptions of the Physical. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 253–81.Google Scholar
Stoljar, D. 2008. Distinctions in Distinction. In Hohwy, J. and Kallestrup, J. (eds.), Being Reduced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stoljar, D. 2010. Physicalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stout, G. F. 1901–2. Alleged Contradictions in the Concept of Relation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2: 1–24.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. 2006. Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13: 3–31.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. 1986. The Physical World. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87: 263–77.Google Scholar
Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, J. 1990. Emergence vs. Panpsychism: Magic or Mind Dust? Philosophical Perspectives 4: 215–26.Google Scholar
Van Gulick, R. 1993. Who's in Charge Here? And Who's Doing All the Work? In Heil, J. and Mele, A. (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vision, G. 2011. Re-Emergence: Locating Conscious Properties in a Material World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 1999. How Superduper Does a Physicalist Supervenience Need To Be? The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 33–52.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2002. Causal Powers, Forces and Superdupervenience. Grazer Philosophische Studien 63: 53–77.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2005. Supervenience-Based Formulations of Physicalism. Noûs 39: 426–59.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2006. On Characterizing the Physical. Philosophical Studies 131: 61–99.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2010. What is Hume's Dictum, and Why Believe It? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80: 595–637.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2011. Non-reductive Realization and the Powers-based Subset Strategy. The Monist 94: 121–54.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2014. No Work for a Theory of Grounding. Inquiry 57: 535–79.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2016. Grounding-Based Formulations of Physicalism. Topoi. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9435-7.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Forthcoming. Metaphysical Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. 1959. F. H. Bradley. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Won, C. 2014. Overdetermination, Counterfactuals, and Mental Causation. The Philosophical Review 123: 205–29.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2008. Mental Causation and Neural Mechanisms. In Hohwy, J. and Kallestrup, J. (eds.) Being Reduced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2014. A Functional Account of Causation; or, A Defense of Causal Thinking by Reference to the Only Standard That Matters – Usefulness (as Opposed to Metaphysics or Agreement with Intuitive Judgment). Philosophy of Science 81: 691–713.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2015a. Interventionism and Causal Exclusion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91: 303–47.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2015b. Methodology, Ontology, and Interventionism. Synthese 192: 3577–99.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, F. Varieties of Early Modern Materialism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24: 797–813.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. 1992. Mental Causation. The Philosophical Review 101: 245–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Kevin Morris, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: Physicalism Deconstructed
  • Online publication: 30 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108662178.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Kevin Morris, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: Physicalism Deconstructed
  • Online publication: 30 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108662178.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Kevin Morris, Tulane University, Louisiana
  • Book: Physicalism Deconstructed
  • Online publication: 30 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108662178.010
Available formats
×