Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- PART I Engineering issues specific to entry probes, landers or penetrators
- PART II Previous atmosphere/surface vehicles and their payloads
- PART III Case studies
- 21 Surveyor landers
- 22 Galileo probe
- 23 Huygens
- 24 Mars Pathfinder and Sojourner
- 25 Deep Space 2 Mars Microprobes
- 26 Rosetta lander Philae
- 27 Mars Exploration Rovers: Spirit and Opportunity
- Appendix Some key parameters for bodies in the Solar System
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
25 - Deep Space 2 Mars Microprobes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- PART I Engineering issues specific to entry probes, landers or penetrators
- PART II Previous atmosphere/surface vehicles and their payloads
- PART III Case studies
- 21 Surveyor landers
- 22 Galileo probe
- 23 Huygens
- 24 Mars Pathfinder and Sojourner
- 25 Deep Space 2 Mars Microprobes
- 26 Rosetta lander Philae
- 27 Mars Exploration Rovers: Spirit and Opportunity
- Appendix Some key parameters for bodies in the Solar System
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
Summary
The DS-2 mission was the second ‘Deep Space’ mission in NASA's New Millennium technology validation programme (Smrekar et al., 1999). It was to demonstrate miniaturized penetrators to enable subsurface and network science. The spacecraft that flew were radically smaller – by two orders of magnitude – than anything NASA had previously flown to the planets. The project cost a remarkably modest $29.6 million.
The original concept anticipated deployment at low latitude on Mars, and a payload including a microseismometer. As the mission evolved, and the delivery opportunity as a ‘piggyback’ payload on the Mars Polar Lander emerged, the mission concept had to change. In particular, the low-temperature environment at high latitudes on Mars reduced the expected energy capacity of the batteries (and thus the penetrators' lifetime) to the point where it was no longer likely that worthwhile seismic data would be acquired.
The new payload therefore centred on measuring the volatile content of the high-latitude soil. The same thermal environment that eroded the energy capability of the mission also made it likely that water might be trapped as ice in the soil.
Entry performance was driven by the entry conditions (at 6.9 km s−1 with a flight path angle of −13.1°, as for MPL) and the allowed flight parameters (velocity, angle of incidence) at impact (Braun et al. 1999b).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Planetary Landers and Entry Probes , pp. 289 - 298Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007