Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T13:22:01.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Resource dependence and construction, and macro- and micro-politics in transnational enterprises and alliances: the case of jet engine manufacturers in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Arndt Sorge
Affiliation:
WZB, Germany
Katja Rothe
Affiliation:
Social Science Research Center Berlin
Christoph Dörrenbächer
Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law
Mike Geppert
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introductory overview

We are concerned with the relative importance of different factors for the internationalization strategy and localization patterns in a highly globalized industry, with non-routine value creation and vertical integration or strong vertical alliances. To take a prime example for this situation, we investigated the evolution of two different multinational corporations (MNCs) developing and manufacturing jet engines in Germany. This study is embedded in an analysis of the jet engine industry and its worldwide development. Germany afforded a unique chance to study a combination of continuity and radical change in a high-technology industry. The business model of the industry is generally not known or appreciated, and it deviates remarkably from what is usually claimed for high-technology industries and for Anglo-American business systems. Furthermore, whilst the product and its supply are truly global, local influences are strong on the resource side, and a combined balance of resources affects localization decisions within the wider strategy of an enterprise. The strength of globalization, together with the interdependency between sites across borders, leverages the importance of local resource endowments, including socio-economic institutions (see also chapter of Maclean and Hollinshead in this volume).

This situation is poorly considered in the international business literature. Also, resource endowments mainly work differently from what the varieties of capitalism and business systems literature suggest. Such approaches seem to misunderstand high-technology industries to an extent which remains to be researched in greater detail, in view of what we know from the literature on national business systems.

Type
Chapter
Information
Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation
The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities
, pp. 41 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, Y. 1966. The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of ResearchGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. 1986. “Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies 17: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2007. “Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view,” Journal of International Business Studies 38: 802–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astley, W. G. and P. S. Sachdeva 1984. “Structural sources of intraorganizational power. a theoretical synthesis,” Academy of Management Review 9: 104–13Google Scholar
Barkema, H. G. and F. Vermeulen 1998. “International expansion through start-up or acquisition: a learning perspective,” Academy of Management Journal 41: 7–26Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. London: Century BusinessGoogle Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A. and Giuri, P. 2001. “Network structure and industrial dynamics. The long-term evolution of the aircraft-engine industry,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12: 201–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March 1992. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. 2007. “The challenges for foreign-owned subsidiaries in FDI-led modernization strategies: the case of Hungary,” Competition and Change 11: 179–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2005. “Micropolitical aspects of mandate development and learning in local subsidiaries of multinational corporations.” Discussion Paper SP III 2005–202, Social Science Research Center Berlin
Dunning, J. 1988. “The eclectic paradigm of international production: a re-statement and some possible extensions,” http://aib.msu.edu/awards/19_1_88_1.pdf (last accessed 29 October, 2009)
Ergas, H. 1984. “Why do some countries innovate more than others?,” http://ssrn.com/abstract=1430184 (last accessed 29 October, 2009)
Forsgren, M., Holm, U. and Johanson, J. 2005. Managing the Embedded Multinational: A Business Network View. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galland, A. 1993. Die Ersten und die Letzten. Deutsche Jagdflieger im 2. Weltkrieg. Munich: Schneekluth
Gersdorff, K., Grasmann, K. and Schubert, H. (with Prestel, Karl) 1995. Flugmotoren und Strahltriebwerke. Entwicklungsgeschichte der deutschen Luftfahrtantriebe von den Anfängen bis zu den internationalen Gemeinschaftsentwicklungen. Bonn: Bernard & Graefe
Gottschling, D. 2006. “Triebwerke der Region. Die Wachstumsbranche der Luft- und Raumfahrt in der Hauptstadtregion Berlin-Brandenburg kann sich sehen lassen: Millionen-Umsätze, tausende Arbeitskräfte, internationale Anerkennung – und kein Ende,” FORUM – Das Brandenburger Wirtschaftsmagazin 6: 4–5Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.) 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University PressCrossRef
Hayward, K. 1986. International Collaboration in Civil Aerospace. London: Frances PinterGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J.-F. and Reddy, S. 1997. “The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: does national origin affect ownership decisions?,” Journal of International Business Studies 29: 515–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. E. 1977. “The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment,” Journal of International Business Studies 8: 23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, P. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lammers, C. J. 1978. “The comparative sociology of organizations,” Annual Review of Sociology 4: 485–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. 1996. “The social constitution of trust: supplier relations in Britain and Germany,” Organization Studies 17: 365–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, K. S. G. 2006. “Deutsche Biotech-Unternehmen und ihre Innovationsfähigkeit im internationalen Vergleich – eine institutionentheoretische Analyse.” Doctoral thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Lundvall, B. A. (ed.) 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Frances Pinter
Marr, A. 2007. A History of Modern Britain. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Saka, A. 2007. “Unravelling learning within multinational enterprises,” British Journal of Management 18: 294–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, S. and Schurig, A. 2003. “The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network,” International Business Review 12: 755–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorge, A. 2006. “Organizing socially constructed internal and external resources,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 162: 172–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist, The 2009. “Rolls-Royce. Making things in a post-industrial society,” 8 January
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. 1992. European Business Systems. Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. 2006. “Understanding differences: searching for the social processes that construct and reproduce variety in science and economic organization,” Organization Studies 27: 1153–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia: Frank Whittle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Whittle (last accessed October 29, 2009)
Wikipedia: Jet engine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet engine (last accessed October 29, 2009)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×