References

Kathrin S. Zippel

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489112.010

Abrahms, Kathryn. 1998. “The New Jurisprudence of Sexual Harassment.” Cornell Law Review 83: 1169.Google Scholar

Abramson, Joan. 1979. Old Boys, New Women: The Politics of Sex Discrimination. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar

Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

al Yafai, Faisal. 2004. “Royal Secretary Tells of Clique.” GuardianNovember 20 p. 15.Google Scholar

Alliance Against Sexual Coercion. 1981. Fighting Sexual Harassment: An Advocacy Handbook. Boston, MA: Alyson Publications.

Alter, Karen, and Vargas, Jeannette. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 452–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

AVFT (Association européenne contre Les Violences faites aux Femmes au Travail). 2004. “Le Droit Une Arme Pour les Violeurs.” Communiqué de Presse, December 7.

Bacchi, Carol L. 1999. Women, Policy, and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Bacchi, Carol L. and Jose, Jim. 1994. “Historicizing Sexual Harassment.” Women's History Review 3 (2): 263–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Backhouse, Constance and Cohen, Leah. 1981. Sexual Harassment on the Job: How to Avoid the Working Woman's Nightmare. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Baer, Susanne. 2004. “Dignity or Equality? Responses to Workplace Harassment in European, German, and U.S. Law.” Pp. 581–601 in Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Baer, Susanne 1996. “Pornography and Sexual Harassment in the EU.” Pp. 51–66 in Sexual Politics and the European Union: The New Feminist Challenge, edited by Elman, Amy R.. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Baer, Susanne 1995. Würde oder Gleichheit? Zur Angemessenen Grundrechtlichen Konzeption von Recht gegen Diskriminierung am Beispiel Sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den USA. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Baker, Carrie. 2001. “Sex, Power, and Politics: The Origins of Sexual Harassment Policy in the United States.” Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Women's Studies, Emory University.

Banaszak, Lee Ann, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht. 2003. “When Power Relocates: Interactive Changes in Women's Movements and States.” pp. 1–29 in Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, edited by Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baur, Christine. 2002. “Harassment in Professional Life.” Paper presented at the 3rd European Women's Lawyers Association (EWLA) Congress in Paris, September 20–1 http://www.ewla.org/wf_dl/baur.doc

Bergamaschi, Myriam. 2000. “The Gender Perspective in the Policies of European Trade Unions.” Pp. 159–75 in Gender Policies in the European Union, edited by Rossilli, Mariagrazia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Berghahn, Sabine. 1995. “Gender in the Legal Discourse in Post-Unification Germany: Old and New Lines of Conflict.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2: 37–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berkovitch, Nitza. 2002. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women's Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Anita. 1994. “Law, Culture, and Harassment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (4): 1227–311.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bertelsmann, Klaus. 1987. “Frauendiskriminierung. Sexuelle Beeinträchtigung im Betrieb.” Arbeitsrecht im Betrieb 6: 123–37.Google Scholar

Bevan, Stephen, 2004. “Sex Case Woman Wins Damages.” Nottingham Evening Post August 17 p. 12.Google Scholar

Bingham, Clara and Gansler, Laura Leedy. 2002. Class Action. The Story of Lois Jenson and the Landmark Case that Changed Sexual Harassment Law. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Bravo, Ellen and Cassedy, Ellen. 1992. The 9 to 5 Guide to Combating Sexual Harassment: Candid Advice from 9 to 5, the National Association of Working Women. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Brodsky, Carroll M. 1976. The Harassed Worker. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar

Brownmiller, Susan. 1999. In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution. New York, NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar

Brownmiller, Susan 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Brownmiller, Susan and Alexander, Dolores. 1992. “How We Got Here: From Carmita Wood to Anita Hill.” Ms. Magazine (January/February): 70–1.Google Scholar

Brush, Lisa D. 2003. Gender and Governance. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Brush, Lisa D. 2002. “Changing the Subject: Gender and Welfare Regime Studies.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 9 (2): 161–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Buechler, Steven M. 1990. Women's Movements in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Buhr, Kornelia and Sabine Klein-Schonnefeld. 1996. “Kommentierung des Beschäftigtenschutzgesetzes und ähnlicher Vorschriften in Landesgesetzen.” In Frauengleichstellungsgesetze des Bundes und der Länder, edited by Schiek, Dagmar. Köln: Bund-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). 2000. “Die Umsetzung des Bundesbeschäftigtenschutzgesetzes in Bundesministerien.” Unpublished.

Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ)1998. Frauen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn: BMFSFJ.

Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ)1994. Das Gleichberechtigungsgesetz des Bundes: Ein Gesetz für Frauen und Männer. Bonn: BMFSFJ.

Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ)1993. (K)ein Kavaliersdelikt? Sexuelle Belästigung im Arbeitsleben. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Frauen und Jugend.

Burstein, Paul. 1999. “Social Movements and Public Policy.” Pp. 3–21 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by Guigni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar

Burstein, Paul 1998. Discrimination, Jobs and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Opportunity Employment in the United States Since the New Deal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Burstein, Paul 1991. “Legal Mobilization as Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 96 (5): 1201–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cahill, Mia. 2001. The Social Construction of Sexual Harassment Law: National and Organizational Effects. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Canning, Kathleen. 1996. Languages of Labor and Gender: Female Factory Work in Germany, 1850–1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Capell, Kerry. 2004. “Sex-Bias Suits: The Fight Gets Ugly.” Business Week. September 6: 24–6.Google Scholar

Carter, Victoria A. 1992. “Working on Dignity: EC Initiatives on Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 12: 431–53.Google Scholar

Chamallas, Martha. 2004. “Title VII's Midlife Crisis: The Case of Constructive Discharge.” Southern California Law Review 77: 307–95.Google Scholar

Cichowski, Rachel. 2002. “No Discrimination Whatsoever: Women's Transnational Activism and the Evolution of EU Sex Equality Policy.” Pp. 220–39 in Women's Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles and Transnational Politics, edited by Naples, Nancy A. and Desai, Manisha. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women's Groups and the Transformation of US Politics.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (4): 755–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clinton, Bill. 2004. My Life. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar

Cockburn, Cynthia. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, Evelyn. 1996. “European Union Sexual Harassment Policy.” Pp. 23–34 in Sexual Politics and the European Union: The New Feminist Challenge, edited by Elman, R. A.. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Connell, R. W. 1990. “The State, Gender, and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal?” Theory and Society 19: 507–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Connell, R. W. 2005. Masculinities. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Costain, Anne. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1988. “Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation, and Legitimation in Anti-Discrimination Law.” Harvard Law Review 101 (7): 1331–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Degen, Barbara. 2002. Selbstbewusste Frauen – Souveräne Männer. Recht, Geschlechterdialog und -mediation zur Prävention gegen sexualisierte Machtausübung in Betrieben und Unternehmen. Abschlussbericht zum oben genannten Projekt an der Universität/Gesamthochschule Essen. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.

Degen, Barbara 1999. “Neue Rechtsprechung zu sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz.” Der Personalrat 1: 8–13.Google Scholar

Degen, Barbara 1991. “Sexuelle Gewalt am Arbeitsplatz.” Streit 4: 139–46.Google Scholar

DeSacco, Dena. 1996. Sexual Harassment in the European Union: A Post-Maastricht Analysis. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press and College of Europe.Google Scholar

Gewerkschaftsbund, Deutscher. 1987. Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz: Frauen wehren sich. Bochum: Berg-Verlag.Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank. 1998. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 441–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank and Erin Kelly. 2005. “How to Stop Harassment: A Tale of Two Professions, a Tale of Two Sectors.” Unpublished paper. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dobbin/.

Dobbin, Frank and Erin Kelly. 2004. “Case Law and Corporate Politics: The Spread of Harassment Policies.” Unpublished paper. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dobbin/

Dobbin, Frank and Sutton, John R.. 1998. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resource Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 441–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Drucksache 12/5468. July 21, 1993. Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Durchsetzung der Gleichberechtigung von Frauen und Männern (Zweites Gleichberechtigungsgesetz - 2. GleiBG). Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung. 12. Wahlperiode.

Drucksache. Protokoll. November 11, 1993; 12. Wahlperiode. Stenographischer Bericht von der öffentlichen Anhörung. 57. und 58. Sitzung. Ausschuss für Frauen und Jugend, Deutscher Bundestag.

Drucksache 12/2096. February 14, 1992. Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz. Antrag der SPD.

Duggan, Lisa and Hunter, Nan D.. 1995. Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and Political Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 2004. “Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality.” Law and Society Review 38 (2): 181–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (6): 1401–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Fuller, Sally Riggs, and Mara-Drita, Iona. 2001. “Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1589–641.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Lande, John. 1993. “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil-Rights in the Workplace.” Law & Society Review 27 (3): 497–534.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. and Suchmann, Mark. 1999. “When the ‘Haves’ Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law.” Law & Society Review 33 (4): 941–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S.. 1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as a Rational Myth.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 406–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, Rosa. 1999. “Dignity and Discrimination: Toward a Pluralistic Understanding of Workplace Harassment.” Georgetown Law Journal 88: 1.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Hester. 1995. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Elman, R. Amy. 2000. “Sexual Harassment Policy: Sweden in European Context.” Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March 30–April 1.

Elman, R. Amy 1996. Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 1995. “Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex.” 29 Code of Federal Regulations 1604.11. http://www.eeoc.gov/

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)1990. “Guidelines on Sexual Favoritism.” Federal Regulations N-915.048. December 1. http://www.eeoc.gov/

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)1980. “Guidelines on Sexual Harassment.” Section 1604.11 of the Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex, 29 C. F. R. § 1604.11. http://www.eeoc.gov/

Equal Opportunity Commission (EOC). 2003. “Analysis of Tribunal Cases.” www.eoc.org.uk

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

European Commission. 1996. “Consultation of Management and Labour on the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Work.” Com (96) 373, 24.7.96.

European Commission. 1999. Sexual Harassment at the Workplace in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Evans-Pritchard, Ambrose. 2002. “Eu Sex Law Puts Firms in the Dock.” The Daily Telegraph April 19, p. 35.

Eyerman, Ron and Jamison, Andrew. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar

Farley, Lin. 1978. Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Kathy. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra M. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (2): 304–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra M. 1995a. “Making Equality: The Women's Affairs Offices in the Federal Republic of Germany.” Pp. 95–113 in Comparative State Feminism, edited by Stetson, Dorothy M. and AmyMazur, G.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra M.1995b. “Patriarchies and Feminisms: The Two Women's Movements of Post-Unification Germany.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, & Society 1 (2): 10–25.

Ferree, Myra M. 1987. “Equality and Autonomy: Feminist Politics in the United States and West Germany.” Pp. 172–95 in The Women's Movement of the United States and Western Europe, edited by Katzenstein, Mary and Mueller, Carol M.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra M., Gamson, William A., Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rucht, Dieter. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra Marx and Carol Mueller. 2004. “Feminism and the Women's Movement: A Global Perspective.” Pp. 576–607 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by DavidSnow, A., SarahSoule, A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ferree, Myra M. and Roth, Silke. 1998. “Gender, Class, and the Interaction Between Social Movements: A Strike of West Berlin Day Care Workers.” Gender & Society 12: 626–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Louise F. 2004. “Who Says? Legal and Psychological Constructions of Women's Resistance to Sexual Harassment.” Pp. 94–110 in Direction in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and RevaSiegel, B.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Franzway, Suzanne, Court, Dianne, and Connell, R. W.. 1989. Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Sydney, Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Friedman, Gabrielle and Whitman, James. 2003. “The European Transformation of Harassment Law: Discrimination Versus Dignity.” Columbia Journal of European Law 9: 241.Google Scholar

Gamson, William. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gardiner, Frances. 1997. “Introduction: Welfare and Sex Equality Policy Regimes.” Pp. 1–24 in Sex Equality Policy in Western Europe, edited by Gardiner, Frances. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gelb, Joyce. 1989. Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gelb, Joyce and Lief Palley, Marian. 1982. Women and Public Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gerhart, Ulrike, Heiliger, Anita, and Stehr, Annette, eds. 1992. Tatort Arbeitsplatz: Sexuelle Belästigung von Frauen. München: Frauenoffensive.

Gillespie, Dair and Leffler, Ann. 1987. “The Politics of Research Methodology in Claims-Making Activities.” Social Problems 34: 301–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary A., MichaelGordon, W., and Osakwe, Christopher. 1994. Comparative Legal Traditions. Text, Materials and Cases on the Civil and Common Law Traditions, with Special Reference to French, German, English, and European Law. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper. 2004. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Pp. 3–31 in Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, edited by Goodwin, Jeff and JamesJasper, M.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Gordon, Linda. 1981. “The Politics of Sexual Harassment.” Radical America 15 (4): 714.Google Scholar

Gottfried, Heidi and O'Reilly, Jacqueline. 2002. “Reregulating Breadwinner Models in Socially Conservative Welfare Systems: Comparing Germany and Japan.” Social Politics 9 (1): 29–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Government of Ireland. Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. 2004. Report on Sexual Harassment in the Workplace in EU Member States. The Irish Presidency of the European Union in association with FGS Consulting and Professor Aileen McGolgan. www.justice.ie

Goy, Alexandra. 1996. “The Victim-Plaintiff in Criminal Trials and Civil Law Responses to Sexual Violence.” Cardozo Women's Law Journal 3: 335.Google Scholar

Goy, Alexandra 1986. “Die Inszenierung des Freispruchs durch das Gericht.” Streit 4 (2): 48.Google Scholar

Gregory, Jeanne. 2000. “Sexual Harassment: The Impact of EU Law in the Member States.” Pp. 175–92 in Gender Policies in the European Union, edited by Rossilli, Mariagrazia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gregory, Jeanne 1995. “Making the Best Use of European Law.” European Journal of Women's Studies 2: 421–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, James E. and Morgan, Phoebe. 2005. In the Company of Men: Male Dominance and Sexual Harassment.Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Gutek, Barbara A. 1985. Sex and the Workplace: The Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men, and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Hagemann-White, Carol. 1998. “Violence Without End? Some Reflections on Achievements, Contradictions, and Perspectives of the Feminist Movement in Germany.” Pp. 176–94 in Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Family Violence, edited by Renate, C. A.Klein, . London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter and Soskice, David, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamacher, Gudrun. 1993. “Es passiert nicht jeder Frau jeden Tag, aber jeden Tag irgendwo. Warum zögern Gewerkschaftler, das Problem zu benennen?” Pp. 81–6 in Grenzverletzungen. Sexuelle Belästigung im Arbeitsalltag, edited by Sadrozinski, Renate. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar

Handler, Joel F. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Haney, Lynne. 1996. “Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Dominance.” American Sociological Review 61 (5): 759–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harsch, Donna. Forthcoming. The Revenge of the Domestic: Women and the Evolution of State Socialism in the German Democratic Republic, 1945–1971. Princeton University Press.

Hart, Stephen. 1996. “The Cultural Dimension of Social Movements: A Theoretical Reassessment and Literature Review.” Sociology of Religion 57 (1): 87–100.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hauserman, Nancy R. 1999. “Comparing Conversations about Sexual Harassment in the United States and Sweden: Print Media Coverage of the Case Against Astra USA.” Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 14 (1): 45–68.Google Scholar

Hauserman, Nancy R. 2002. “Sexual Harassment as an Economic Concern: Swedish and American Coverage of Astra.” Pp. 88–99 in Sex and Money, Feminism and Political Economy in the Media, edited by Meehan, Eileen R. and Riordan, Ellen. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hawkesworth, Mary. 1997. “Challenging the Received Wisdom and the Status Quo: Creating and Implementing Sexual Harassment Policy.” NWSA Journal 9 (2): 94–102.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hearn, Jeff and Parkin, Wendy. 2001. Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Helfferich, Barbara and Felix Kolb. 2001. “Multilevel Action Coordination in European Contentious Politics: The Case of the European Women's Lobby.” Pp. 143–62 in Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity, edited by Imig, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

Hill, Anita. 1997. Speaking Truth to Power. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Hill, Anita F. and , Emma C. Jordan, , eds. 1995. Race, Gender and Power in America: The Legacy of the Hill-Thomas Hearing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hirshman, Linda and Larson, Jane. 1998. Hard Bargains: The Politics of Sex. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, Barbara, ed. 2003. Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodges, Jane A. 1996. “Sexual Harassment in Employment: Recent Judicial and Arbitral Trends.” International Labour Review 135 (5): 499–533.Google Scholar

Holzbecher, Monika, Anne Braszeit, Ursula Mueller, and Sibylle Plogstedt. 1990. Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Holzbecher, Monika and Bärbel Meschkutat. 1999. Mobbing am Arbeitsplatz. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.

Hooven, Martha and Klein, Freada. 1978. “Is Sexual Harassment Legal?” Aegis (September/October): 28–30.Google Scholar

Hoskyns, Catherine. 2000. “A Study of Four Action Programmes on Equal Opportunities.” Pp. 43–60 in Gender Policies in the European Union, edited by Rossilli, Mariagrazia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Hoskyns, Catherine 1996. Integrating Gender, Women, Law and Politics in the European Union. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Husbands, Robert. 1992. “Sexual Harassment Law in Employment: An International Perspective.” International Labour Review 131 (6): 535–59.Google Scholar

Imig, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. 2001. Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

International Labour Organisation (ILO). 1992. Combating Sexual Harassment at Work. Geneva: International Labour Office.

Jansen, Sarah. 1984. “Inside Out.” Pp. 135–40 in Übergriffe: Sexuelle Belästigung in Büros und Betrieben: Eine Dokumentation der Gruenen Frauen im Bundestag, edited by Plogstedt, Sibylle and Bode, Kathleen. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.

Jenson, Jane. 1987. “Changing Discourse, Changing Ideas: Political Rights and Reproductive Policies in France.” Pp. 64–88 in The Women's Movement of the United States and Western Europe, edited by Katzenstein, Mary F. and CarolMueller, M.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane and Sineau, Mariette. 1995. Mitterand et les Françaises: Un rendez-vous manqué. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar

Juliano, Ann and Schwab, Stewart. 2001. “The Sweep of Sexual Harassment Cases.” Cornell Law Review 86 (3): 548–602.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Gisela. 1992. Contemporary Western European Feminism. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Kathmann, Maria. 1993. “Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der gewerkschaftlichen Gegenstrategie.” Pro Familia Magazin 2: 5–6.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Mary F. 1998. Faithful and Fearless. Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and Military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Mary F. and Mueller, Carol M., eds. 1987. The Women's Movement of the United States and Western Europe. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, Erin and Dobbin, Frank. 1999. “Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies.” American Journal of Sociology 105:455–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, Erin and Dobbin, Frank. 1998. “How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management.” American Behavioral Scientist 41 (7): 960–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, Rita M. and Phoebe M. Stambaugh. 1992. “Sexual Harassment in the States.” Pp. 109–24 in Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State Level, edited by Guy, Mary E.. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Kenney, Sally. 1992. For Whose Protection? Reproductive Hazards and Exclusionary Policies in the United States and Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Kodre, Petra and Henrike Müller. 2003. “Shifting Policy Frames: EU Equal Treatment Norms and Domestic Discourses in Germany.” Pp. 83–116 in Gendering Europeanisation, edited by Liebert, Ulrike. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kolinsky, Eva and Hildegard Maria Nickel, eds. 2003. Reinventing Gender: Women in Eastern Germany since Unification. London, Portland: Frank Cass.

Koopmans, Ruud and Olzak, Susan. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (1): 198–230.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan W., and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, Ellen. 1996. Gegen die sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz.Juristische Praxis und Handlungsperspektiven.Pfaffenweiler.Google Scholar

Kuiper, Alie. 2002. Seksuele intimidatie op het werk aangepakt. Rotterdam: Ingeborg Luitwieler.Google Scholar

Lähner, Carola. 1993. Drucksache, Protokoll, November 11, p. 32, 12. Wahlperiode. Stenographischer Bericht von der Öffentlichen Anhörung. 57 und 58. Sitzung. Ausschuss Nr. 14, Frauen und Jugend, Deutscher Bundestag.

Lewis, Jane. 1997. “Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 4: 160–77.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane 1992. “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2 (3): 159–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Liebert, Ulrike. 2003. “Between Diversity and Equality: Analysing Europeanisation.” Pp. 11–46 in Gendering Europeanisation, edited by Liebert, Ulrike. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Liebert, Ulrike, ed. 2003. Gendering Europeanisation. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lootens, Tricia. 1986. “Sex Harasser under Fire.” Off Our Backs. 26 (11): 13.Google Scholar

Lorber, Judith. 2001. Gender Inequality. Feminist Theories and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Louis, Marie-Victoire. 1994. “Sexual Harassment at Work in France: What Stakes for Feminists?” Pp. 85–96 in Women and Violence, edited by Davies, Miranda. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2004. “Afterword.” Pp. 672–704 in Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2002. “The Logic of Experience: Reflections on the Development of Sexual Harassment Law.” Georgetown Law Journal 90: 813–33.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1983. “Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence.” Signs 8: 635–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B., eds. 2004. Directions in Sexual Harassment Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Maenz, Heike. 1994. “… und kaum eine traut sich, darüber zu sprechen”: Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz; eine Umfrage bei Thyssen-Stahl Hamborn/Beeckerwerth. Bochum: Beratungsgesellschaft für ISA-Consult GmbH, Innovation.Google Scholar

Mahon, Rianne. 2002. “Child Care: Toward What Kind of ‘Social Europe’?” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 9: 343–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marks, Gary and Doug McAdam. 1998. “Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union.” Pp. 95–120 in Governance in the European Union, edited by Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz, Schmitter, Phillip, and Streek, Wolfgang. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2001. “A Spectrum in Oppositional Consciousness: Sexual Harassment Plaintiffs and Their Lawyers.” Pp. 99–145 in Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, edited by Mansbridge, Jane and Morris, Aldon. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Patricia Y. 2003. “‘Said and Done’ Versus ‘Saying and Doing’ – Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work.” Gender and Society 17 (3): 342–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mazey, Sonia. 1998. “The European Union and Women's Rights: From the Europeanization of National Agendas to the Nationalization of a European Agenda?” Pp. 134–55 in Beyond the Market: The EU and National Social Policy, edited by Hine, David and Kassim, Hussein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G. 2003. “Drawing Comparative Lessons from France and Germany.” Review of Policy Research 20 (3): 493–523.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G. 1996. The Interplay: The Formation of Sexual Harassment Legislation in France and EU Policy Initiatives.” Pp. 35–49 in Sexual Politics and the European Union: The New Feminist Challenge, edited by Elman, R. A.. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G. 1994. “The Formation of Sexual Harassment Policies in France: Another Case of French Exceptionalism?” French Politics and Society 11 (2): 11–32.Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G., ed. 2001. State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mazur, Amy G. and Dorothy M. Stetson. 1995. “Conclusion: The Case for State Feminism.” Pp. 272–91 in Comparative State Feminism, edited by DorothyStetson, M. and Mazur, Amy G.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug and Rucht, Dieter. 1993. “The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528: 56–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, JL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Meehan, Elizabeth. 1985. Women's Rights at Work: Campaigns and Policy in Britain and the United States. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meschkutat, Bärbel, Holzbecher, Monika, and Richter, Gudrun. 1993. Strategien gegen sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz. Köln: Bund-Verlag.Google Scholar

Meschkutat, Bärbel, Stackelbeck, Martina and Langenhoff, Georg. 2002. Der Mobbing-Report. Eine Repräsentativstudie für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. Dortmund: Wirtschaftsverlag NW.Google Scholar

Milkman, Ruth, ed. 1985. Women, Work, and Protest: A Century of US Women's Labor History. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Mink, Gwendolyn. 2000. Hostile Environment: the Political Betrayal of Sexually Harassed Women. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Moeller, Robert G. 1993. Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Möller, Simon. 1999. Sexual Correctness: Die Modernisierung antifeministischer Debatten in den Medien. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly and Zippel, Kathrin. 2003. “Paid to Care: The Origins and Effects of Care Leave Policies in Western Europe.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, & Society, 10 (1): 49–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, Aldon. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Morrison, Toni, ed. 1992. Race-Ing Justice, En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Musall, Bettina and Andreas Ulrich. 1999. “Ganz ungeniert.” Der Spiegel, August, http://www.spiegel.de/

Mushaben, Joyce M. 2001. “Challenging the Maternalistic Presumption: The Gender Politics of Welfare Reform in Germany and the United States.” Pp. 193–215 in Women and Welfare: Theory and Practice in the United States and Europe, edited by NancyHirschmann, J. and Liebert, Ulrike. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Mushaben, Joyce M. 1989. “Feminism in Four Acts: The Changing Political Identity of Women in the Federal Republic of Germany.” Pp. 76–110 in The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty, edited by Merkl, Peter. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Naples, Nancy A. and Desai, Manisha, eds. 2002. Women's Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles and Transnational Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Norton, Eleanor Holmes. 1981. “Prepared Statement.” Pp. 92–8 in Oversight Hearings on Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Part 1. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the Committee on Education and Labor. House of Representatives. Ninety-Seventh Congress. First Session. Hearings held in Washington, D.C. on July 15, September 23, 24, and October 7, 1981.

O'Connor, Julia, Orloff, Ann, and Shaver, Sheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Connor, Karen. 1980. Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Oliver, Pamela and Johnston, Hank. 2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research,” Mobilization 5: 37–54.Google Scholar

Orloff, Ann S. 1996a. “Gender and the Welfare State.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 51–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Orloff, Ann S. 1996b. “Gender in the Liberal Welfare States: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States.” In State/Culture. State formation after the Cultural Turn, edited by Steinmetz, George. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Orloff, Ann S. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58 (3): 303–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ostner, Ilona. 1994. “Back to the Fifties: Gender and Welfare in Unified Germany.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 1 (1): 32–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ostner, Ilona 1993. “Slow Motion: Women, Work, and the Family in Germany.” Pp. 92–115 in Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family, and the State, edited by Lewis, Jane. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ostner, Ilona and Jane Lewis. 1995. “Gender and the Evolution of European Social Policies.” Pp. 159–93 in European Social Policies Between Fragmentation and Integration, edited by Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Outshoorn, Joyce, ed. 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pedriana, Nicholas and Stryker, Robin. 2004. “The Strength of a Weak Agency: Early Enforcement of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Transformation of State Capacity, 1965–71.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (3): 709–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pedriana, Nicholas and Stryker, Robin 1997. “Political Culture Wars 1960s Style: Equal Employment Opportunity-Affirmative Action Law and the Philadelphia Plan.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (3): 633–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pflüger, Almut and Susanne Baer. 2005. Beschäftigtenschutzgesetz in der Praxis. Bericht. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. www.bmfsfj.de

Pierce, Jennifer L. 1995. Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Plogstedt, Sibylle. 1987. “Belästigung: Sex als Crime.” Pp. 62–6 in Alltägliche Gewalt gegen Frauen, edited by Bendkowski, Halina and Rotalsky, Irene. Berlin: Elefanten Press.Google Scholar

Plogstedt, Sibylle and Bertelsmann, Klaus. 1987. Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz: Frauen wehren sich. Bochum: Berg-Verlag.Google Scholar

Plogstedt, Sibylle and Bode, Kathleen. 1984. Übergriffe: Sexuelle Belästigung in Büros und Betrieben: Eine Dokumentation der Gruenen Frauen im Bundestag. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Plogstedt, Sibylle and Degen, Barbara. 1992. Nein Heisst Nein! DGB-Ratgeber Gegen Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz. München: Piper.Google Scholar

Prieto, Maggie. 1983. “Women Coal Miners Fight Sexual Harassment.” Off Our Backs 13 (8): 17.Google Scholar

Pringle, Rosemary. 1988. Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Quadagno, Jill. 1992. “Social Movements and State Transformation: Labor Unions and Racial Conflict in the War on Poverty.” American Sociological Review 57 (5): 616–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 1994. Introduction to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, Raka. 1999. Fields of Protest: Women's Movements in India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Rees, Teresa L. 1998. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training and Labour Market Policies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reese, Laura A. and Lindenberg, Karen E.. 1999. Implementing Sexual Harassment Policy: Challenges for the Public Sector Workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rochon, Thomas R. 1998. Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism and Changing Values. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roggeband, Conny and Mieke Verloo. 1999. “Global Sisterhood and Political Change: The Unhappy ‘Marriage’ of Women's Movements and Nation States.” Pp. 177–94 in Expansion and Fragmentation: Internationalization, Political Change and the Transformation of the Nation State, edited by Kersbergen, Kees, Lieshout, Robert H, and Lock, Grahame. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, , Rachel, , Trappe, Heike and Gornick, Janet. 2004. “Gender and Work in Germany: Before and after Reunification.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 103–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rossilli, Mariagrazia, ed. 2000. Gender Policies in the European Union. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Roth, Silke. 2003. Building Movement Bridges: The Coalition of Labor Union Women. Contributions to Sociology Series. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, Michael. 1987. The Dignity of Women at Work: A Report on the Problem of Sexual Harassment in the Member States of the European Communities. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Ruggie, Mary. 1984. The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Runge, Annelie. 1984. “Obzöne Anrufe, viele Monate lang.” Pp. 131–5 in Übergriffe: Sexuelle Belästigung in Büros und Betrieben: Eine Dokumentation der Gruenen Frauen im Bundestag, edited by Plogstedt, Sibylle and Bode, Kathleen. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sadrozinski, Renate, ed. 1993. Grenzverletzungen: Sexuelle Belästigung im Arbeitsalltag. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar

Sadrozinski, Renate1991. “‘Wer muss sich den nun ändern …?’ Fortbildung zum Thema ‘Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz.’” Ein Bericht im Auftrag der Leitstelle Gleichstellung der Frau der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg. Hamburg: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg.

Saguy, Abigail. 2003. What is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Saguy, Abigail 2002. “International Crossways: Traffic in Sexual Harassment Policy.” European Journal of Women's Studies 9: 249–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane, ed. 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Samuels, Harriet. 2003. “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: a Feminist Analysis of Recent Developments in the UK.” Women's Studies International Forum 26 (5): 467–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar

Sawer, Marian 1995. “‘Femocrats in Glass Towers?’ The Office of the Status of Women in Australia.” Pp. 22–39 in Comparative State Feminism, edited by Stetson, Dorothy McBride and Mazur, Amy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Schenk, Herrad. 1981. Die Feministische Herausforderung. 150 Jahre Frauenbewegung in Deutschland. München: Beck.Google Scholar

Schiek, Dagmar. 1997. “Sexuelle Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz.” Arbeitsrecht im Betrieb (8): 441–51.Google Scholar

Schiek, Dagmar 1995. Zweites Gleichberechtigungsgesetz für die Privatwirtschaft: Textausgabe mit Kurzkommentierung. Köln: Bund-Verlag.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A. and Radaelli, Claudio. 2004. “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Policy Change in Europe.” West European Politics 27 (4): 1–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmitt, Sabine. 1995. Der Arbeiterinnenschutz im Deutschen Kaiserreich: Zur Konstruktion der schutzbedürftigen Arbeiterin. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneble, Andrea and Domsch, Michel. 1990. Sexuelle Belästigung von Frauen am Arbeitsplatz: Eine Bestandsaufnahme im Hamburger Öffentlichen Dienst. München: Hampp.Google Scholar

Schultz, Dagmar and Mueller, Angela. 1984. “Sexualität zwischen Lehrenden und Lernenden an der Hochschule – Sexuelle Belästigung oder Sexuelle Befreiung?” Pp. 561–76 in Wollen wir immer noch alles? Frauenpolitik zwischen Traum und Trauma, Dokumentation der 7. Sommeruniversität für Frauen, Berlin.Google Scholar

Schultz, Vicki. 2003. “The Sanitized Workplace.” Yale Law Journal 112 (8): 2061–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Scott, Joan. 1988. “Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Use of Poststructuralist Theory of Feminism.” Feminist Studies 14 (1) 33–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Segrave, Kerry. 1994. The Sexual Harassment of Women in the Workplace, 1600 to 1993. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar

Shaw, Jo. 2000. “Importing Gender: the Challenge of Feminism and the Analysis of the EU Legal Order.” Journal of European Public Policy 7: 406–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Skaine, Rosemarie. 1996. Power and Gender: Issues in Sexual Dominance and Harassment. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Thedaed. 1984. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Skretny, , David, John. 1998. “State Capacity, Policy Feedback and Affirmative Action for Blacks, Women and Latinos.” Research in Political Sociology 8: 270–310.Google Scholar

Smart, , Carol, . 1995. Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Smith, Jackie. 2004. “Transnational Processes and Movements.” Pp. 294–310 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David, A. Snow, , Sarah, A. Soule, , and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Snow, David A. 2004. “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields.” Pp. 380–412 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David, A. Snow, , Sarah, A. Soule, , and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 135–55 in Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, edited by Morris, Aldon and McClurg-Mueller, Carol. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Snow, , David, A., Burke, E. Rochford, Steven, K. Worden, and Robert, D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Soule, Sarah A. 2004. “Diffusion Processes Within and Across Movements.” Pp. 294–310 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David, A. Snow, , Sarah, A. Soule, , and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperling, , Liz, and Bretherton, Charlotte. 1996. “Women's Policy Networks and the European Union.” Women's Studies International Forum 19 (3): 303–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stein, , Laura, W. 1999. Sexual Harassment in America: A Documentary History. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Ronnie Ratner. 1980. “The Policy and the Problem: Overview over Seven Countries.” Pp. 1–25 in Equal Employment Policy for Women: Strategies for Implementation in the United States, Canada and Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Steinmetz, , George, . 2004. “Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and “Small N's” in Sociology.” Sociological Theory 22 (3): 371–400.CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinmetz, , George, 1993. Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stetson, , McBride, Dorothy, ed. 2001. Abortion Politics, Women's Movements and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stetson, Dorothy McBride. 1995. “The Oldest Women's Policy Agency: The Women's Bureau in the United States.” Pp. 245–71 in Comparative State Feminism, edited by Dorothy, M. Stetson, and Amy, G. Mazur, . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Stetson, , McBride, Dorothy and Amy, G. Mazur, eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Stone, , Deborah, A. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Stone, , Deborah, A 1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Stratigaki, Maria. 2004. The Cooptation of Gender Concepts in EU Policies: The Case of Reconciliation of Work and Family.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 11 (1): 30–56.CrossRef

Stratigaki, Maria 2000. “The European Union and the Equal Opportunities Process.” Pp. 27–48 in Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life, edited by Hantrais, Linda. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stryker, , Robin, . 1994. “Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order, and Change.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (4): 847–910.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stryker, , Robin, 1989. “Limits on the Technocratization of Law: The Elimination of the National Labor Relations Board's Division of Economic Research.” American Sociological Review 54 (3): 341–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Subhan, , Andrea, and Boujan, Nadine. 1994. Measures to Combat Sexual Harassment at the Workplace: Action Taken in the Member States of the EC. Luxembourg: European Parliament.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. and Judy M. Shih. 2004. “Damages in Sexual Harassment Cases.” Pp. 324–44 in Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by Catharine, A. MacKinnon, and Reva, B. Siegel, . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, , Sidney, . 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, , Sidney, 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, , Verta, . 1999. “Gender and Social Movements: Gender Processes in Women's Self-Help Movements.” Gender & Society 13 (1): 8–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tilly, , Charles, . 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Timmerman, , Greetje, and Bajema, Cristien. 1999. “Sexual Harassment in Northwest Europe.” European Journal of Women's Studies 6: 419–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trappe, , Heike, . 1996. “Work and Family in Women's Lives in the German Democratic Republic.” Work and Occupation 23 (4): 354–77.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trappe, , Heike, 1995. Emanzipation oder Zwang? Frauen in der DDR zwischen Beruf, Familie und Sozialpolitik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

UNICE. 2002. Position Paper. October 5, www.unice.org

US Merit Systems Protection Board. (U.S.M.S.P.B.) 1995. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government: Trends, Progress, Continuing Challenges. Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (U.S.M.S.P.B.)1988. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government: An Update. Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.

U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (U.S.M.S.P.B.)1981. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government: Is It a Problem? Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.

Valiente, Celia. 2000. “Left or Right: Does It Make Any Difference Regarding Gender Equality? The Case of Sexual Harassment Policies in Spain.” Paper presented at the 12th International Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March 30–April 2.

Valiente, Celia 1998. “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Equality Politics in Post-authoritarian Spain.” Pp. 169–79 in Politics of Sexuality: Identity, Gender and Citizenship, edited by Carver, Terrell and Mottier, Véronique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vogel-Polsky, Eliane. 2000. “Parity Democracy, Law and Europe.” Pp. 61–86 in Gender Policies in the European Union, edited by Rossilli, Mariagrazia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Wahl, , Angelika, . 1999. Gleichstellungsregime: Berufliche Gleichstellung von Frauen in den USA und in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walby, , Sylvia, . 2004. “The European Union and Gender Equality: Emergent Varieties of Gender Regime.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 11 (1): 4–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Watson, , Sophie, , ed. 1990. Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions. London, New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar

Weeks, , Elaine, L., Jacqueline, M. Boles, , Garbin, Albeno P., and Blount, John. 1986. “The Transformation of Sexual Harassment from a Private Trouble into a Public Issue.” Sociological Inquiry 56 (4): 432–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weldon, , Laurel, S.. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Welsh, , Sandy, . 1999. “Gender and Sexual Harassment.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 169–90.CrossRef Google Scholar

Whitman, James. 2003. “From Fascist ‘Honour’ to European ‘Dignity’.” Pp. 243–66 in The Darker Legacy of European Law: Perceptions of Europe and Perspectives on a European Order in Legal Scholarship During the Era of Fascism and National Socialism, edited by Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh. Cambridge: Hart.Google Scholar

Williams, , Christine, , Giuffre, Patti A., and Dellinger, Kirsten. 1999. “Sexuality in the Workplace: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment, and the Pursuit of Pleasure.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 73–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wise, , Sue, and Stanley, Liz. 1987. Georgie Porgie: Sexual Harassment in Everyday Life. London and New York: Pandora.Google Scholar

Women's Bureau. 1994. Sexual Harassment: Know Your Rights. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.

Wright, Ben. 2004. “Discrimination Cases May Do More Harm Than Good.” The Business September 5 p. 12.Google Scholar

Young, , Brigitte, . 1999. Triumph of the Fatherland: German Unification and the Marginalization of Women. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zippel, , Kathrin, . 2004. “Transnational Advocacy Networks and Policy Cycles in the European Union: The Case of Sexual Harassment.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, & Society 11 (1): 57–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zippel, , Kathrin, . 2003. “Practices of Implementation of Sexual Harassment Policies: Individual vs. Collective Strategies.” Review of Policy Research 20 (1): 175–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zippel, Kathrin.1999a. “Country Report for Austria.” Pp. 47–55 in Sexual Harassment at the Workplace in the European Union. European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Zippel, Kathrin.1999b. “Country Report for Germany.” Pp. 78–89 in Sexual Harassment at the Workplace in the European Union. European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Zippel, Kathrin. 1996. “Nichts mehr als sexuelle und politische Korrektheit? Sexuelle Belästigungsrichtlinien an amerikanischen Hochschulen.” In Peinlich Berührt: Sexuelle Belästigung an Hochschulen, edited by Bussmann, Hadumod and Lange, Katrin. Munich: Frauenoffensive.Google Scholar

Zippel, Kathrin 1994. “‘Die Realität sieht in den USA nicht viel besser aus, aber es ist wenigstens ein Thema!’ Sexuelle Belästigung an US-amerikanischen und bundesdeutschen Hochschulen im Vergleich.” Pp. 82–96 in Feministische Erbschaften-Feministische Erblasten, edited by Kahlert, Heike and Kleinau, Elke. Hamburg: IZHD – Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar